IP Library Granted Patent US 11,947,352
Granted Patent B2
US 11,947,352 · App. 17/558,170 · Granted Apr 2, 2024

Automated aircraft recovery system

Inventors: Cameron Robertson (San Mateo, CA); Joseph Roop (Sunnyvale, CA); Todd Reichert (Mountain View, CA); Damon Vander Lind (Alameda, CA)
Assignee: Kitty Hawk Corporation
G05D1/0061B64D17/54B64D17/62B64D17/80B64D45/00G05D1/042G05D1/0808B64D17/725B64D2045/0085B64U70/83
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 11,947,352
App. No.
17/558,170
Granted
Apr 2, 2024
Kind
B2
Abstract

Sensor data that includes or more of the following: (1) aircraft state information associated with an aircraft or (2) parachute canopy state information associated with a parachute canopy is received. The parachute canopy is coupled to the aircraft at a point aft of a center of mass of the aircraft. It is determined, based at least in part on the sensor data, whether to generate a control signal associated with maneuvering the aircraft into a nose-up position. A recovery action is performed, including by deploying the parachute canopy; wherein a load on the parachute canopy is reduced in the event the aircraft is in the nose-up position compared to the aircraft being in a nose-down position.

Claims (81)

1. A system, comprising:

an interface configured to receive sensor data from a sensor, wherein the sensor data includes or more of the following: (1) aircraft state information associated with an aircraft or (2) parachute canopy state information associated with a parachute canopy;

the parachute canopy, wherein the parachute canopy is coupled to the aircraft at a point aft of a center of mass of the aircraft; and

a processor configured to:

determine, based at least in part on the sensor data, whether to generate a control signal associated with maneuvering the aircraft into a nose-up position, and

perform a recovery action, including by deploying the parachute canopy, wherein a load on the parachute canopy is reduced in the event the aircraft is in the nose-up position compared to the aircraft being in a nose-down position.

2. The system of claim 1 , wherein:

the parachute canopy state information includes an indication associated with a failure of a first parachute canopy;

it is determined to generate the control signal associated with maneuvering the aircraft into the nose-up position in response to the indication associated with the failure of the first parachute canopy; and

the parachute canopy that is deployed as part of performing the recovery action is a second parachute canopy.

3. The system of claim 1 , wherein:

the parachute canopy state information includes an indication associated with a failure of a first parachute canopy;

the failure of the first parachute canopy includes one or more of the following: a rip in the first parachute canopy or a collapse of the first parachute canopy;

it is determined to generate the control signal associated with maneuvering the aircraft into the nose-up position in response to the indication associated with the failure of the first parachute canopy; and

the parachute canopy that is deployed as part of performing the recovery action is a second parachute canopy.

4. The system of claim 1 , wherein:

the parachute canopy state information includes an indication associated with a failure of a first parachute canopy;

it is determined to generate the control signal associated with maneuvering the aircraft into the nose-up position in response to the indication associated with the failure of the first parachute canopy;

the first parachute canopy includes a high-altitude and high-speed parachute canopy that is deployed in response to the aircraft state information exceeding both an altitude threshold and a speed threshold;

the parachute canopy that is deployed as part of performing the recovery action is a second parachute canopy.

5. The system of claim 1 , wherein:

the parachute canopy state information includes an indication associated with a failure of a first parachute canopy;

it is determined to generate the control signal associated with maneuvering the aircraft into the nose-up position in response to the indication associated with the failure of the first parachute canopy;

the parachute canopy that is deployed as part of performing the recovery action is a second parachute canopy; and

the second parachute canopy is deployed while the aircraft is maneuvered into the nose-up position.

6. The system of claim 1 , wherein performing the recovery action further includes changing a flight path of the aircraft to compensate for a limitation of the second parachute canopy.

7. The system of claim 1 , wherein performing the recovery action further includes changing a flight path of the aircraft to compensate for a limitation of the second parachute canopy, including by changing the flight path of the aircraft to avoid an object with a potential to snag a suspension line that is coupled to the second parachute canopy.

8. A method, comprising:

providing an interface configured to receive sensor data from a sensor, wherein the sensor data includes or more of the following: (1) aircraft state information associated with an aircraft or (2) parachute canopy state information associated with a parachute canopy;

providing the parachute canopy, wherein the parachute canopy is coupled to the aircraft at a point aft of a center of mass of the aircraft; and

providing a processor configured to:

determine, based at least in part on the sensor data, whether to generate a control signal associated with maneuvering the aircraft into a nose-up position, and

perform a recovery action, including by deploying the parachute canopy, wherein a load on the parachute canopy is reduced in the event the aircraft is in the nose-up position compared to the aircraft being in a nose-down position.

9. The method of claim 8 , wherein:

the parachute canopy state information includes an indication associated with a failure of a first parachute canopy;

it is determined to generate the control signal associated with maneuvering the aircraft is into the nose-up position in response to the indication associated with the failure of the first parachute canopy; and

the parachute canopy that is deployed as part of performing the recovery action is a second parachute canopy.

10. The method of claim 8 , wherein:

the parachute canopy state information includes an indication associated with a failure of a first parachute canopy;

the failure of the first parachute canopy includes one or more of the following: a rip in the first parachute canopy or a collapse of the first parachute canopy;

it is determined to generate the control signal associated with maneuvering the aircraft into the nose-up position in response to the indication associated with the failure of the first parachute canopy; and

the parachute canopy that is deployed as part of performing the recovery action is a second parachute canopy.

11. The method of claim 8 , wherein:

the parachute canopy state information includes an indication associated with a failure of a first parachute canopy;

it is determined to generate the control signal associated with maneuvering the aircraft into the nose-up position in response to the indication associated with the failure of the first parachute canopy;

the first parachute canopy includes a high-altitude and high-speed parachute canopy that is deployed in response to the aircraft state information exceeding both an altitude threshold and a speed threshold;

the parachute canopy that is deployed as part of performing the recovery action is a second parachute canopy.

12. The method of claim 8 , wherein:

the parachute canopy state information includes an indication associated with a failure of a first parachute canopy;

it is determined to generate the control signal associated with maneuvering the aircraft into the nose-up position in response to the indication associated with the failure of the first is parachute canopy;

the parachute canopy that is deployed as part of performing the recovery action is a second parachute canopy; and

the second parachute canopy is deployed while the aircraft is maneuvered into the nose-up position.

13. The method of claim 8 , wherein performing the recovery action further includes changing a flight path of the aircraft to compensate for a limitation of the second parachute canopy.

14. The method of claim 8 , wherein performing the recovery action further includes changing a flight path of the aircraft to compensate for a limitation of the second parachute canopy, including by changing the flight path of the aircraft to avoid an object with a potential to snag a suspension line that is coupled to the second parachute canopy.

15. An aircraft, comprising:

a sensor configured to generate sensor data, wherein the sensor data includes or more of the following: (1) aircraft state information associated with the aircraft or (2) parachute canopy state information associated with a parachute canopy;

the parachute canopy, wherein the parachute canopy is coupled to an airframe of the aircraft at a point aft of a center of mass of the aircraft;

the airframe; and

a processor configured to:

determine, based at least in part on the sensor data, whether to generate a control signal associated with maneuvering the aircraft into a nose-up position, and

perform a recovery action, including by deploying the parachute canopy, wherein a load on the parachute canopy is reduced in the event the aircraft is in the nose-up position compared to the aircraft being in a nose-down position.

16. The aircraft of claim 15 , wherein:

the parachute canopy state information includes an indication associated with a failure of a first parachute canopy;

it is determined to generate the control signal associated with maneuvering the aircraft into the nose-up position in response to the indication associated with the failure of the first parachute canopy; and

the parachute canopy that is deployed as part of performing the recovery action is a second parachute canopy.

17. The aircraft of claim 15 , wherein:

the parachute canopy state information includes an indication associated with a failure of a first parachute canopy;

the failure of the first parachute canopy includes one or more of the following: a rip in the first parachute canopy or a collapse of the first parachute canopy;

it is determined to generate the control signal associated with maneuvering the aircraft into the nose-up position in response to the indication associated with the failure of the first parachute canopy; and

the parachute canopy that is deployed as part of performing the recovery action is a second parachute canopy.

18. The aircraft of claim 15 , wherein:

the parachute canopy state information includes an indication associated with a failure of a first parachute canopy;

it is determined to generate the control signal associated with maneuvering the aircraft into the nose-up position in response to the indication associated with the failure of the first parachute canopy;

the first parachute canopy includes a high-altitude and high-speed parachute canopy that is deployed in response to the aircraft state information exceeding both an altitude threshold and a speed threshold;

the parachute canopy that is deployed as part of performing the recovery action is a second parachute canopy.

19. The aircraft of claim 15 , wherein:

the parachute canopy state information includes an indication associated with a failure of a first parachute canopy;

it is determined to generate the control signal associated with maneuvering the aircraft into the nose-up position in response to the indication associated with the failure of the first parachute canopy;

the parachute canopy that is deployed as part of performing the recovery action is a second parachute canopy; and

the second parachute canopy is deployed while the aircraft is maneuvered into the nose-up position.

20. The aircraft of claim 15 , wherein performing the recovery action further includes changing a flight path of the aircraft to compensate for a limitation of the second parachute canopy, including by changing the flight path of the aircraft to avoid an object with a potential to snag a suspension line that is coupled to the second parachute canopy.

Assignments (2)
RELEASE OF SECURITY INTEREST Recorded May 22, 2023
From: ONE AERO, LLC
To: KITTY HAWK CORPORATION
Reel/Frame 063713/0367 →
SECURITY INTEREST Recorded Mar 25, 2022
From: KITTY HAWK CORPORATION
To: ONE AERO, LLC
Reel/Frame 059503/0382 →
Continuity (2)
Continuation 15207359 · Jul 11, 2016
Related Publication 20220111970A1 · Apr 14, 2022