IP Library Granted Patent US 12,380,783
Granted Patent B2
US 12,380,783 · App. 17/561,066 · Granted Aug 5, 2025

Facility surveillance systems and methods

Inventors: Bernhard Metzler (Dornbirn, AT); Barbara Haupt (Walzenhausen, CH); Markus Kächele (Walzenhausen, CH); Bernd Reimann (Heerbrugg, CH); Stefan Martin Benjamin Gächter Toya (St. Gallen, CH); Alexandre Heili (Altstätten, CH)
Assignee: HEXAGON TECHNOLOGY CENTER GMBH
G08B13/19613G06F18/2431G06N3/02G06V20/35G06V20/52G08B13/1968G08B13/19682
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 12,380,783
App. No.
17/561,066
Granted
Aug 5, 2025
Kind
B2
Abstract

Systems and methods for surveillance of a facility including facility elements. The system includes a central computing unit providing a digital model of the facility providing topological or logical or functional relationships of the facility elements, surveillance sensors adapted for surveillance of a plurality of the facility elements and for generation of surveillance data, communication means for transmitting data from the surveillance sensors to the central computing unit, and state derivation means configured to analyse the surveillance data and derive a state of a respective facility element. The central computing unit is configured to record a state pattern by combining states of at least one facility element based on at least one relationship of the facility element provided by the facility model, provide a state pattern critical-noncritical classification model which considers relationships provided by the facility model, and perform a criticality-classification based on the relationship.

Claims (59)

1. A surveillance system for surveillance of a facility, the surveillance system comprising:

a mobile surveillance robot having a body, a drive system for moving of the body, and an action controller for controlling actions of the robot, the actions comprising the moving of the body or acquisition of surveillance data by the mobile surveillance robot,

the surveillance system further comprising:

at least a first surveillance sensor designed to acquire first surveillance data of at least one object of the facility,

a state detector configured to detect at least one state associated with the object based on the first surveillance data,

wherein the state detector is configured to:

notice a state ambiguity of the state which indicates an uncertainty of a state detection,

trigger an action of the mobile surveillance robot by the action controller in case a state ambiguity is noticed, the triggered action adapted to generate state verification information about the object, the state verification information being suitable to verify or falsify the detected state and therewith resolve the state ambiguity, and

resolve the state ambiguity considering the state verification information.

2. The surveillance system according to claim 1 , wherein the state detector is further configured to plan the action to be triggered such that the action is optimized with respect to the generation of verification information.

3. The surveillance system according to claim 2 , wherein the triggered action comprises acquisition of second surveillance data of the object by the surveillance robot.

4. The surveillance system according to claim 1 , wherein the triggered action comprises acquisition of second surveillance data of the object by the surveillance robot.

5. The surveillance system according to claim 4 , wherein the triggered action comprises change of acquisition position or direction such that the acquisition of the second surveillance data is performed with at least a second acquisition position or direction different to a first acquisition position or direction of acquisition of surveillance data.

6. The surveillance system according to claim 5 , wherein the state detector provides a correlation map correlating state ambiguity with acquisition position or direction, wherein:

the correlation map is based on a defined criterion representing the state or

the correlation map is established by machine learning or the

correlation map comprises best acquisition positions or directions for a plurality of detectable states.

7. The surveillance system according to claim 6 , wherein the surveillance system comprises at least a second surveillance sensor and:

the state detector is configured to determine with which surveillance sensor the second surveillance data is to be acquired such that the second surveillance is optimised with respect to generation of state verification information or

the first and the second surveillance sensors are sensors of different sort.

8. The surveillance system according to claim 4 , wherein the surveillance system comprises at least a second surveillance sensor and:

the state detector is configured to determine with which surveillance sensor the second surveillance data is to be acquired such that the second surveillance is optimised with respect to generation of state verification information or

the first and the second surveillance sensors are sensors of different sort.

9. The surveillance system according to claim 8 , wherein the triggered action comprises interaction of the surveillance robot with the object.

10. The surveillance system according to claim 1 , wherein the triggered action comprises interaction of the surveillance robot with the object.

11. The surveillance system according to claim 10 , wherein the interaction with the object comprises at least one of:

tactile contact,

application of material onto the object,

output of an acoustic or optic signal directed at the object.

12. The surveillance system according to claim 11 , wherein the state detector provides a correlation map correlating state ambiguity with interaction position or direction, wherein:

the correlation map is based on a defined criterion representing the state or

the correlation map is established by machine learning or the

correlation map comprises best interaction positions or directions for a plurality of detectable states.

13. The surveillance system according to claim 10 , wherein the state detector provides a correlation map correlating state ambiguity with interaction position or direction, wherein:

the correlation map is based on a defined criterion representing the state or

the correlation map is established by machine learning or the

correlation map comprises best interaction positions or directions for a plurality of detectable states.

14. The surveillance system according to claim 13 , wherein the interaction is based on a Markov model of states.

15. The surveillance system according to claim 10 , wherein the interaction is based on a Markov model of states.

16. The surveillance system according to claim 1 , wherein the triggered action is retrieval of data about the object, wherein the data is:

third surveillance data of a third surveillance sensor of the surveillance system, the third surveillance sensor not being part of the surveillance robot, or

stored in a database of the surveillance system.

17. The surveillance system according to claim 1 , wherein the surveillance robot is an unmanned ground vehicle (UGV).

18. The surveillance system according to claim 1 , wherein the first surveillance sensor comprises at least one of:

camera,

microphone,

RIM-camera,

laser scanner,

LIDAR,

RADAR,

motion detector, or

radiometer.

19. A surveillance method adapted for a facility surveillance system comprising at least a first surveillance sensor and a mobile surveillance robot, the method comprising the steps of:

acquiring of first survey data with the first surveillance sensor of an object of the facility,

detecting at least one state associated with the object based on the surveillance data,

noticing a state ambiguity of the state which indicates an uncertainty of a state detection,

triggering an action of the surveillance robot in case a state ambiguity is noticed, wherein the action comprises moving of the mobile surveillance robot or acquisition of surveillance data by the mobile surveillance robot and is adapted to generate state verification information about the object, the state verification information being suitable to verify or falsify the detected state and therewith resolve the state ambiguity, and

resolving the state ambiguity based on the state verification information.

20. A computer programme product comprising programme code which is stored on a non-transient machine-readable medium, comprising a programme code segment, and having computer-executable instructions for performing, when run on a central computing unit of a surveillance system, the steps of the method according to claim 19 .

Assignments (2)
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Dec 4, 2025
From: HEXAGON TECHNOLOGY CENTER GMBH
To: HEXAGON INNOVATION HUB GMBH
Reel/Frame 073833/0471 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Jan 4, 2022
From: METZLER, BERNHARD; HAUPT, BARBARA; KÄCHELE, MARKUS; REIMANN, BERND; GÄCHTER TOYA, STEFAN MARTIN BENJAMIN; HEILI, ALEXANDRE
To: HEXAGON TECHNOLOGY CENTER GMBH
Reel/Frame 058546/0934 →
Continuity (2)
Continuation 17289700
Related Publication 20220157136A1 · May 19, 2022
References Cited (91)
US 5861804A · Fansa et al. · 1999 [cited by applicant]
US 6308272B1 · Pearce · 2001 [cited by applicant]
US 8630741B1 · Matsuoka · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 9165455B1 · Hutz · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 9524648B1 · Gopalakrishnan et al. · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 9679455B2 · Jentoft et al. · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 9894327B1 · Jacob · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 10272570B2 · Storr · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 10867217B1 · Madden et al. · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 11148802B1 · Sun · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 11429807B2 · Pradeep · 2022 [cited by applicant]
US 11481571B2 · Kiemele et al. · 2022 [cited by applicant]
US 11636348B1 · Tang et al. · 2023 [cited by applicant]
US 20020135484A1 · Ciccolo · 2002 [cited by examiner]
US 20030164794A1 · Haynes et al. · 2003 [cited by applicant]
US 20050122914A1 · Durso et al. · 2005 [cited by applicant]
US 20090027196A1 · Schoettle · 2009 [cited by applicant]
US 20100017046A1 · Cheung et al. · 2010 [cited by applicant]
US 20100193626A1 · Goossen et al. · 2010 [cited by applicant]
US 20110299734A1 · Bodenmueller · 2011 [cited by applicant]
US 20120095619A1 · Pack et al. · 2012 [cited by applicant]
US 20120143808A1 · Karins et al. · 2012 [cited by applicant]
US 20120245844A1 · Lommel et al. · 2012 [cited by applicant]
US 20140055621A1 · Shirani et al. · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 20140300746A1 · Adachi · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 20140316616A1 · Kugelmass · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 20140320312A1 · Sager · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 20150091790A1 · Forutanpour · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 20150178383A1 · Corrado · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 20160185464A1 · Zheng · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 20160239723A1 · Ge · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 20160259333A1 · Ducharme · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 20160282864A1 · Lamm et al. · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 20160345832A1 · Pavagada Nagaraja et al. · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 20170092109A1 · Trundle · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 20170147007A1 · Ducharme · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 20170149883A1 · Joshi et al. · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 20170169313A1 · Choi · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 20170185872A1 · Chakraborty · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 20170301220A1 · Jarrell et al. · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 20180005134A1 · Kish et al. · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 20180089534A1 · Ye · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 20180130196A1 · Loveland et al. · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 20180141453A1 · High et al. · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 20180188714A1 · Cella et al. · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 20180211115A1 · Klein · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 20180314897A1 · Camilus et al. · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 20190121348A1 · Cella et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 20190212730A1 · Jones · 2019 [cited by examiner]
US 20190220697A1 · Kiemele et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 20190220698A1 · Pradeep · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 20200089967A1 · Velipasalar et al. · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 20200090477A1 · Monge Nunez et al. · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 20200108923A1 · Smith et al. · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 20200201292A1 · Cella et al. · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 20200300637A1 · Chiu et al. · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 20210235641A1 · Boudreau et al. · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 20210294172A1 · Rasmus-Vorrath et al. · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 20220157138A1 · Metzler · 2022 [cited by examiner]
US 20220157178A1 · Grace et al. · 2022 [cited by applicant]
CN 1854626A · 2006 [cited by applicant]
CN 103530995A · 2014 [cited by applicant]
CN 104919462A · 2015 [cited by applicant]
CN 105023022A · 2015 [cited by applicant]
CN 105516653 · 2016 [cited by applicant]
CN 105765516A · 2016 [cited by applicant]
CN 105979203 · 2016 [cited by applicant]
CN 105989683A · 2016 [cited by applicant]
CN 106774221A · 2017 [cited by applicant]
CN 106781458A · 2017 [cited by applicant]
CN 107196953A · 2017 [cited by applicant]
CN 107293093A · 2017 [cited by applicant]
EP 3156898 · 2017 [cited by applicant]
EP 3522003A1 · 2019 [cited by applicant]
GB 2546486 · 2017 [cited by applicant]
GB 201600845A · 2017 [cited by applicant]
KR 101125233 · 2012 [cited by applicant]
KR 101700395B1 · 2017 [cited by applicant]
WO 2017198696A2 · 2017 [cited by applicant]
“Human Detection Using Multimodal and Multi dimensional Features” of Spinello and Siegwart, ICRA 2008. [cited by applicant]
“People Detection in RGB-D Data” of Spinello and Arras, IROS 2011. [cited by applicant]
“Multi-modal Person Localization and Emergency Detection Using the Kinect” by Galatas et al. , IJARAI 2013. [cited by applicant]
“On the Use of a Low-Cost Thermal Sensor to Improve Kinect People Detection in a Mobile Robot” by Susperregi et al. , Sensors 2013. [cited by applicant]
Georis, B. et al., “Real-time control of video surveillance systems with program supervision techniques,” Machine Vision and Applications, Springer, vol. 18, Issue 3-4, pp. 189-205, (Jan. 24, 2007). [cited by applicant]
Wen, et al., “Real-Time Target Detection and Recognition with Deep Convolutional Networks for Intelligent Visual Surveillance,” 2016 IEEE/ACN 9th International Conference on Utility and Cloud Computing, pp. 321-326 (Dec… [cited by applicant]
Amato, et al., “Towards Multimodal Surveillance for Smart Building Security,” Proceedings, vol. 2, Issue 2, pp. 1-8 (Jan. 9, 2018). [cited by applicant]
European Search Report dated Mar. 15, 2022 as received in application No. 21213921. [cited by applicant]
European Search Report dated Apr. 4, 2022 as received in application No. 21213922. [cited by applicant]
Arbanas et al. “Decentralized planning and control for UAV-UGV cooperative teams” 2018. [cited by applicant]
CN Office Action dated Mar. 22, 2024 as received in Application No. 202111630089.6. [cited by applicant]
Chinese Search Report dated Mar. 20, 2025 as received in Application No. 202111627648.8. [cited by applicant]