IP Library Granted Patent US 12,291,752
Granted Patent B2
US 12,291,752 · App. 17/562,111 · Granted May 6, 2025

Methods for predicting the survival time and treatment responsiveness of a patient suffering from a solid cancer with a signature of at least 7 genes

Inventors: Jerome Galon (Paris, FR); Franck Pages (Paris, FR); Bernard Mlecnik (Paris, FR); Gabriela Bindea (Paris, FR)
Assignees: INSERM (INSTITUT NATIONAL DE LA SANTÉ ET DE LA RECHERCHE MÉDICALE); UNIVERSITE DE PARIS DESCARTES; ASSISTANCE PUBLIQUE-HÔPITAUX DE PARIS (APHP)
C12Q1/6886C12Q2537/143C12Q2600/112C12Q2600/118C12Q2600/158C12Q2600/16
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 12,291,752
App. No.
17/562,111
Granted
May 6, 2025
Kind
B2
Abstract

The present invention relates to a method for predicting the survival time of a patient suffering from a solid cancer comprising i) determining in a tumor sample obtained from the patient the gene expression level of at least 7 genes selected from the group consisting of CCR2, CD3D, CD3E, CD3G, CD8A, CXCL10, CXCL11, GZMA, GZMB, GZMK, GZMM, IL15, IRF1, PRF1, STAT1, CD69, ICOS, CXCR3, STAT4, CCL2, and TBX21, ii) comparing every expression level determined at step i) with their predetermined reference value and iii) providing a good prognosis when all expression levels determined at step i) are higher than their predetermined reference values, or providing a bad prognosis when all expression levels determined at step i) are lower than their predetermined reference values or providing an intermediate prognosis when at least one expression level determined value is higher than its predetermined value. The method is also particularly suitable for predicting the responsiveness of the patient to a treatment.

Claims (2)

1. A method for treating a patient suffering from a lymphoma, wherein said method comprises the steps of: i) measuring in a tumor sample obtained from the patient, prior to anti-cancer treatment, the gene expression level of at least all of the following genes: CCR2, CD3D, CD3E, CD3G, CD8A, CXCL10, CXCL11, GZMA, GZMB, GZMK, GZMM, IL15, IRF1, PRF1, STAT1, CD69, ICOS, CXCR3, STAT4, CCL2, and TBX21; ii) comparing every expression level determined at step i) with a corresponding predetermined reference value; iii) selecting the patient as being a responder to at least one immunotherapy when all expression levels determined at step i) are either higher or lower than the corresponding predetermined reference value; and iv) administering said immunotherapy to said patient assessed as being a responder thereto in step iii), wherein said at least one immunotherapy is an antibody directed against any one of CTLA4, PD1, PDL1, TIM3, LAG3, B7H3, B7H4, TREM, BTLA, LIGHT or B7H6; or an immune cell selected from T cells, NK cells, dendritic cells or B cells; or any combination thereof.

2. The method according to claim 1 , wherein the lymphoma is Hodgkin's disease or a non-Hodgkin's lymphoma.

Assignments (3)
MERGER Recorded Aug 25, 2023
From: UNIVERSITE PARIS DIDEROT-PARIS 7; UNIVERSITE PARIS DESCARTES
To: UNIVERSITE DE PARIS
Reel/Frame 064702/0827 →
CHANGE OF NAME Recorded Aug 25, 2023
From: UNIVERSITE DE PARIS
To: UNIVERSITÉ PARIS CITÉ
Reel/Frame 064727/0194 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Dec 27, 2021
From: GALON, JEROME; PAGES, FRANCK; MLECNIK, BERNARD; BINDEA, GABRIELA
To: INSERM (INSTITUT NATIONAL DE LA SANTÉ ET DE LA RECHERCHE MÉDICALE); UNIVERSITE DE PARIS DESCARTES; ASSISTANCE PUBLIQUE-HÔPITAUX DE PARIS (APHP)
Reel/Frame 058479/0577 →
Priority Claims (1)
EP 12305836 · Jul 12, 2012 · regional
Continuity (2)
Continuation 14413856
Related Publication 20220259665A1 · Aug 18, 2022
References Cited (16)
US 5595756A · Bally · 1997 [cited by examiner]
US 20090215053A1 · Galon · 2009 [cited by examiner]
WO WO2011094483A2 · 2011 [cited by examiner]
Tockman et al. Considerations in bringing a cancer biomarker to clinical application. Cancer Res., 1992, 52:2711 s-2718s (Year: 1992). [cited by examiner]
Ahmadzada et al. An Update on Predictive Biomarkers for Treatment Selection in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer. J Clin Med. Jun. 15, 2018;7(6):153 (Year: 2018). [cited by examiner]
McKean et al. Biomarkers in Precision Cancer Immunotherapy: Promise and Challenges. Am Soc Clin Oncol Educ Book. May 2020;40:e275-e291 (Year: 2020). [cited by examiner]
Christiansen et al. Biological impediments to monoclonal antibody-based cancer immunotherapy. Mol Cancer Ther, 2004, 3:1493-1501 (Year: 2004). [cited by examiner]
Topp et al. Antibody transport in cultured tumor cell layers. Journal of Controlled Release, 1998, 53:15-23 (Year: 1998). [cited by examiner]
Heppner et al. Tumor heterogeneity: biological implications and therapeutic consequences. Cancer Metastasis Review 2:5-23; 1983 (Year: 1983). [cited by examiner]
Sporn et al. Chemoprevention of Cancer, Carcinogenesis, vol. 21 (2000), 525-530 (Year: 2000). [cited by examiner]
Auerbach et al. Angiogenesis assays: problems and pitfalls. Cancer and Metastasis Reviews, 2000, 19: 167-172 (Year: 2000). [cited by examiner]
Gura T. Systems for identifying new frugs are often faulty. Science, 1997, 278(5340): 1041-1042 (Year: 1997). [cited by examiner]
Jain RK. Barriers to drug delivery in solid tumors. Scientific American, Jul. 1994,58-65 (Year: 1994). [cited by examiner]
Hait. Anticancer drug development: the grand challenges. Nature Reviews/Drug Discovery, 2010, 9, pp. 253-254 (Year: 2010). [cited by examiner]
Gravanis et al. The changing world of cancer drug development: the regulatory bodies' perspective. Chin Clin Oncol, 2014, 3, pp. 1-5 (Year: 2014). [cited by examiner]
Beans. Targetingmetastasis to halt cancer's spread. PNAS 2018; 115(50): 12539-12543 (Year: 2018). [cited by examiner]