IP Library Granted Patent US 12,536,633
Granted Patent B2
US 12,536,633 · App. 17/571,233 · Granted Jan 27, 2026

Systems and methods for food analysis, feedback, and recommendation using a sensor system

Inventors: Yibing Michelle Wang (Temple City, CA); Radwanul Hasan Siddique (Monrovia, CA); Kamil Bojanczyk (San Jose, CA)
Assignee: Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.
G06T7/0002G06N5/04G06T7/62G06V20/68G16H20/60G06T2207/10028G06T2207/20081
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 12,536,633
App. No.
17/571,233
Granted
Jan 27, 2026
Kind
B2
Abstract

Systems and methods for analyzing food are disclosed. A first sensor captures first sensor data. A processor determines, based on the first sensor data, whether food has been detected, and invokes a second sensor in response to the determining. The second sensor captures second sensor data. The processor predicts, based on the first and second sensor data, a characteristic of the food. The processor further predicts a body's response to the food based on the characteristic, and outputs a recommendation based on the predicting of the body's response.

Claims (79)

1 . A method for analyzing food comprising:

training a machine learning model based on training data including food data and a reaction of a user to the food data;

capturing, by a first sensor, first sensor data of a food item, wherein the first sensor data includes an image of the food item;

determining, by a processor, based on the first sensor data, whether food has been detected,

wherein the determining includes extracting one or more features of the food item, and identifying a first name of the food item based on the extracted features;

invoking, by the processor, a second sensor;

capturing, by the second sensor, second sensor data of the food item;

predicting, by the processor, based on the first and second sensor data, a characteristic of the food item, wherein the predicting includes:

identifying, by the processor, a second name for the food item based on the second sensor data, wherein the second name is different from the first name;

comparing, by the processor, the first name with the second name;

based on the comparing of the first name with the second name;

determining an inconsistency between the first name and the second name;

determining a first ranking associated with the first sensor and a second ranking associated with the second sensor;

determining that the second ranking is higher than the first ranking;

selecting, by the processor, the second name for the food item based on the second ranking being higher than the first ranking; and

predicting, by the processor, the characteristic of the food item based on the second name;

receiving, by the processor, from a third sensor, a body measurement of a user;

predicting, by the processor, a body's response to the food item based on the characteristic, wherein the predicting includes:

providing to the machine learning model, as input data, the characteristic of the food item and the body measurement; and

receiving from the machine learning model, a prediction of a change of the body measurement of the user based on the input data; and

outputting, by the processor, a recommendation based on the predicting of the body's response.

2 . The method of claim 1 , wherein the first sensor is a two-dimensional (2D) camera, and the first sensor data includes a two-dimensional image of the food captured by the 2D camera, the method further comprising:

extracting one or more features from the image; and

identifying the second name based on the one or more features.

3 . The method of claim 2 , wherein the second sensor is a three-dimensional (3D) camera, and the second sensor data includes depth information of the food captured by the 3D camera, the method further comprising:

computing volume of the food based on the depth information.

4 . The method of claim 2 , wherein the second sensor is a polarization camera, and the second sensor data includes a polarization image of the food captured by the polarization camera, the method further comprising:

determining, by the processor, molecular arrangement of the food based on the polarization image.

5 . The method of claim 2 , wherein the second sensor is a polarization camera, and the second sensor data includes a polarization image of the food item captured by the polarization camera, the method further comprising:

determining, by the processor, freshness of the food item based on the polarization image.

6 . The method of claim 2 , wherein the second sensor is a spectrometer, and the second sensor data includes wavelength of light absorption or transmittance, the method further comprising:

determining, by the processor, a molecular component of the food item based on the wavelength.

7 . The method of claim 1 , wherein the characteristic of the food item includes at least one of food nutrient or food volume.

8 . The method of claim 1 , wherein the predicting the characteristic of the food item includes:

validating the first name based on the second sensor data.

9 . The method of claim 1 , wherein the predicting the body's response to the food item includes:

invoking the machine learning model for predicting a level of at least one of glucose, triglycerides, or cholesterol, based on the characteristic of the food.

10 . The method of claim 1 , wherein the recommendation includes modifying an aspect of the food item.

11 . A system for analyzing food comprising:

a first sensor for capturing first sensor data of a food item, wherein the first sensor data includes an image of the food item;

a second sensor for capturing second sensor data;

a third sensor for capturing a body measurement of a user; and

a processing system coupled to the first sensor and the second sensor, the processing system comprising a processor and memory storing instructions that, when executed by the processor, cause the processor to perform:

training a machine learning model based on training data including food data and a reaction of a user to the food data;

receiving, from the first sensor, the first sensor data including the image of the food item;

determining, based on the first sensor data, whether food has been detected, wherein the determining includes extracting one or more features of the food item, and identifying a first name of the food item based on the extracted features;

invoking the second sensor;

receiving, from the second sensor, second sensor data;

predicting, based on the first and second sensor data, a characteristic of the food item, wherein the predicting includes:

identifying a second name for the food item based on the second sensor data, wherein the second name is different from the first name;

comparing the first name with the second name;

based on the comparing of the first name with the second name:

determining an inconsistency between the first name and the second name;

determining a first ranking associated with the first sensor and a second ranking associated with the second sensor;

determining that the second ranking is higher than the first ranking;

selecting the second name for the food item based on the comparing second ranking being higher than the first ranking; and

predicting the characteristic of the food item based on the second name;

receiving, from the third sensor, the body measurement of the user;

predicting a body's response to the food item based on the characteristic, wherein the predicting includes:

providing to the machine learning model, as input data, the characteristic of the food item and the body measurement; and

receiving from the machine learning model, a prediction of a change of the body measurement of the user based on the input data; and

outputting a recommendation based on the predicting of the body's response.

12 . The system of claim 11 , wherein the first sensor is a two-dimensional (2D) camera, and the first sensor data includes a two-dimensional image of the food captured by the 2D camera, wherein the instructions further cause the processor to:

extract one or more features from the image; and

identify a second name based on the one or more features.

13 . The system of claim 12 , wherein the second sensor is a three-dimensional (3D) camera, and the second sensor data includes depth information of the food captured by the 3D camera, wherein the instructions further cause the processor to:

compute volume of the food based on the depth information.

14 . The system of claim 12 , wherein the second sensor is a polarization camera, and the second sensor data includes a polarization image of the food captured by the polarization camera, wherein the instructions further cause the processor to:

determine molecular arrangement of the food based on the polarization image.

15 . The system of claim 12 , wherein the second sensor is a polarization camera, and the second sensor data includes a polarization image of the food item captured by the polarization camera, wherein the instructions further cause the processor to:

determine freshness of the food item based on the polarization image.

16 . The system of claim 12 , wherein the second sensor is a spectrometer, and the second sensor data includes wavelength of light absorption or transmittance, wherein the instructions further cause the processor to:

determine a molecular component of the food item based on the wavelength.

17 . The system of claim 11 , wherein the characteristic of the food item includes at least one of food nutrient or food volume.

18 . The system of claim 11 , wherein the instructions that cause the processor to predict the characteristic of the food item include instructions that cause the processor to:

validate the first name based on the second sensor data.

19 . The system of claim 11 , wherein the instructions that cause the processor to predict the body's response to the food item include instructions that cause the processor to:

invoke a machine learning model for predicting a level of at least one of glucose, triglycerides, or cholesterol, based on the characteristic of the food.

20 . The system of claim 11 , wherein the instructions that cause the processor to output a recommendation include instructions that cause the processor to recommend modifying an aspect of the food item.

Assignments (1)
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Feb 1, 2022
From: WANG, YIBING MICHELLE; SIDDIQUE, RADWANUL HASAN; BOJANCZYK, KAMIL
To: SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD.
Reel/Frame 058842/0561 →
Continuity (2)
Provisional Application 63279534 · Nov 15, 2021
Related Publication 20230153972A1 · May 18, 2023
References Cited (38)
US 9254099B2 · Connor · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 9442100B2 · Connor · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 9509893B2 · Korenaga et al. · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 9529385B2 · Connor · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 9536449B2 · Connor · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 9892501B2 · Dehais et al. · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 10207859B2 · Minvielle · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 10314492B2 · Connor · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 10402980B2 · Mutti et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 10458845B2 · Connor · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 10685488B1 · Kumar · 2020 [cited by examiner]
US 10803315B2 · Cho et al. · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 10819905B1 · Liu · 2020 [cited by examiner]
US 10919144B2 · Sinnet et al. · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 10971031B2 · Ortiz · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 20160073886A1 · Connor · 2016 [cited by examiner]
US 20160140870A1 · Connor · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 20160275362A1 · Aoki · 2016 [cited by examiner]
US 20170323481A1 · Tran · 2017 [cited by examiner]
US 20180149583A1 · Pi · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 20190293620A1 · Farkas et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 20190295440A1 · Hadad · 2019 [cited by examiner]
US 20200042816A1 · Gatto et al. · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 20200152312A1 · Connor · 2020 [cited by examiner]
US 20200160263A1 · Kuettner · 2020 [cited by examiner]
US 20200250531A1 · Rai · 2020 [cited by examiner]
US 20200334628A1 · Goldberg · 2020 [cited by examiner]
US 20220392609A1 · Hadad · 2022 [cited by examiner]
KR 1020190027196A · 2019 [cited by applicant]
WO WO2019155220A1 · 2019 [cited by applicant]
WO WO2020099498A1 · 2020 [cited by applicant]
WO WO2020111611A1 · 2020 [cited by applicant]
Ando, Yoshikazu et al., “DepthCalorieCam: A Mobile Application for Volume-Based Food Calorie Estimation using Depth Cameras”, MA DiMa '19, Oct. 21, 2019, Nice, France, 6 pages. [cited by applicant]
Min, Weiqing, et al., “A Survey on Food Computing,” arXiv:1808.07202v5 [cs.CY] Jul. 16, 2019, 42 pages. [cited by applicant]
Nawrocka, Agnieszka et al., “Determination of Food Quality by Using Spectroscopic Methods,” In Advances in agrophysical research, IntechOpen, 2013, 23 pages. [cited by applicant]
Subhi, Mohammed Ahmed, et al., “Vision-Based Approaches for Automatic Food Recognition and Dietary Assessment: A Survey,” IEEE Access, vol. 7, 2019, pp. 35370-35381. [cited by applicant]
Tess, “3D scanner smartphone accessory, NutriRay3D, counts calories by scanning your food”, Jan. 21, 2016, 4 pages. [cited by applicant]
https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=io.foodvisor.foodvisor&hl=en_US&gl=US, accessed Nov. 2, 2021, 4 pages. [cited by applicant]