IP Library Granted Patent US 12,217,418
Granted Patent B2
US 12,217,418 · App. 17/584,752 · Granted Feb 4, 2025

Method and system for machine learning classification based on structure or material segmentation in an image

Inventor: Yu Peng (Melbourne, AU)
Assignee: CURVEBEAM AI LIMITED
G06T7/0012A61B5/4509A61B5/4842A61B5/7267A61B5/7275G06F18/2148G06F18/217G06F18/2431G06T7/11G06F18/2411G06F18/24323G06T2207/20076G06T2207/20081G06T2207/20084G06T2207/30008G06T2207/30096G06V2201/03
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 12,217,418
App. No.
17/584,752
Granted
Feb 4, 2025
Kind
B2
Abstract

A system and method for classifying a structure or material in an image of a subject. The system comprises: a segmenter configured to segment an image into one or more segmentations that correspond to respective structures or materials in the image, and to generate from the segmentations one or more segmentation maps of the image (each of the segmentation maps representing the image) including categorizations of pixels or voxels of the segmentation maps assigned from one or more respective predefined sets of categories; a classifier that implements a classification machine learning model configured to generate, based on the segmentations maps, one or more classifications and to assign to the classifications respective scores indicative of a likelihood that the structure or material, or the subject, falls into the respective classifications; and an output for outputting a result indicative of the classifications and scores.

Claims (46)

1. A system for classifying a structure or material in an image of a subject, comprising:

a segmenter configured to segment an image into one or more segmentations that correspond to respective structures or materials in the image, and to generate from the segmentations one or more segmentation maps of the image including categorizations of pixels or voxels of the segmentation maps assigned from one or more respective predefined sets of categories;

a classifier that implements a trained classification machine learning model configured to generate, based on the segmentations maps, one or more classifications and to assign to the classifications respective scores indicative of a likelihood that the structure or material, or the subject, falls into the respective classifications; and

an output for outputting a result indicative of the classifications and scores;

wherein the segmenter comprises:

a structure segmenter configured to generate structure segmentation maps including categorizations of the pixels or voxels assigned from a predefined set of structure categories and to employ a structure segmentation machine learning model to generate the structure segmentation maps,

a material segmenter configured to generate material segmentation maps including categorizations of the pixels or voxels assigned from a predefined set of material categories and to employ a material segmentation machine learning model to generate the material segmentation maps, and/or

an abnormality segmenter configured to generate abnormality segmentation maps including categorizations of the pixels or voxels assigned from a predefined set of abnormality or normality categories and to employ an abnormality segmentation model to generate the abnormality segmentation maps.

2. A system as claimed in claim 1 , wherein the classifier generates the one or more classifications based on the segmentations maps and non-image data pertaining to the subject.

3. A system as claimed in claim 1 , further comprising a segmentation map processor configured to down-sample or otherwise process the segmentation maps before the segmentation maps are input by the classifier.

4. A system as claimed in claim 1 , wherein the classification machine learning model comprises

(a) a neural network, a support vector machine, and/or a decision tree; or

(b) a neural network that includes convolutional neural network layers and fully-connected neural network layers.

5. A system as claimed in claim 1 , wherein the image is a medical image, and the classifications correspond to

(i) probabilities that the structure or material, or the subject, will sustain a specified condition or symptom in respective timeframes;

(ii) probabilities that the structure or material, or the subject, will sustain a specified condition or symptom in respective timeframes that include a shorter-term timeframe, a longer-term timeframe, and at least one intermediate-term timeframe intermediate the shorter-term timeframe and the longer-term timeframe;

(iii) probabilities that the structure or material, or the subject, will sustain respective conditions or symptoms;

(iv) probabilities of respective rates of disease or pathology progression;

(v) probabilities of respective rates of disease or pathology progression, the classifications comprising classifications corresponding any one or more of: stable, modest deterioration, and accelerated deterioration;

(vi) probabilities of efficacy of respective treatment options;

(vii) probabilities of efficacy of respective treatment options, the treatment options including an antiresorptive treatment and/or an anabolic treatment;

(viii) respective medical conditions; and/or

(ix) respective medical conditions that include any one or more of: osteomalacia, tumour, osteonecrosis and infection.

6. A system as claimed in claim 1 , wherein the trained classification machine learning model is a model trained with image data and non-image data relating to training subjects, and generates the respective scores based on image data and non-image data relating to the subject.

7. A computer-implemented method for classifying a structure or material in an image of a subject, comprising:

segmenting an image into one or more segmentations that correspond to respective structures or materials in the image;

generating from the segmentations one or more segmentation maps of the image including categorizations of pixels or voxels of the segmentation maps assigned from respective predefined sets of categories of the structure or material;

using a trained classification machine learning model to generate, based on the segmentations maps, one or more classifications and to assign to the classifications respective scores indicative of a likelihood that the structure or material, or the subject, falls into the respective classifications; and

outputting a result indicative of the classifications and scores;

wherein forming the one or more segmentations comprises:

generating structure segmentation maps including categorizations of the pixels or voxels assigned from a predefined set of structure categories and employing a structure segmentation machine learning model to generate the structure segmentation maps,

generating material segmentation maps including categorizations of the pixels or voxels assigned from a predefined set of material categories and employing a material segmentation machine learning model to generate the material segmentation maps, and/or

generating abnormality segmentation maps including categorizations of the pixels or voxels assigned from a predefined set of abnormality or normality categories and employing an abnormality segmentation model to generate the abnormality segmentation maps.

8. A method as claimed in claim 7 , wherein the trained classification machine learning model generates (i) the one or more classifications based on the segmentations maps and non-image data pertaining to the subject, and/or (ii) the respective scores based on image data and non-image data relating to the subject having been trained with image data and non-image data relating to training subjects.

9. A method as claimed in claim 7 , wherein the image is a medical image, and the classification machine learning model is configured to generate one or more classifications that correspond to

(i) probabilities that the structure or material, or the subject, will sustain a specified condition or symptom in respective timeframes;

(ii) probabilities that the structure or material, or the subject, will sustain a specified condition or symptom in respective timeframes that include a shorter-term timeframe, a longer-term timeframe, and at least one intermediate-term timeframe intermediate the shorter-term timeframe and the longer-term timeframe;

(iii) probabilities that the structure or material, or the subject, will sustain respective conditions or symptoms;

(iv) probabilities of respective rates of disease or pathology progression;

(v) probabilities of respective rates of disease or pathology progression, the classifications comprising classifications corresponding any one or more of: stable, modest deterioration, and accelerated deterioration;

(vi) probabilities of efficacy of respective treatment options;

(vii) probabilities of efficacy of respective treatment options, the treatment options including an antiresorptive treatment and/or an anabolic treatment;

(viii) respective medical conditions; and/or

(ix) respective medical conditions that include any one or more of: osteomalacia, tumour, osteonecrosis and infection.

10. A computer-implemented diagnostic method, comprising the method of claim 7 .

11. A non-transitory computer-readable medium, comprising a computer program comprising program code configured, when executed by one of more computing devices, to implemented the method of claim 7 .

Assignments (1)
CHANGE OF NAME Recorded Apr 5, 2023
From: STRAXCORP PTY. LTD
To: CURVEBEAM AI LIMITED
Reel/Frame 063235/0689 →
Continuity (2)
Continuation 16448474 · Jun 21, 2019
Related Publication 20220147757A1 · May 12, 2022
References Cited (33)
US 5769074A · Barnhill et al. · 1998 [cited by applicant]
US 11263497B2 · Peng · 2022 [cited by examiner]
US 20050020903A1 · Krishnan et al. · 2005 [cited by applicant]
US 20050049497A1 · Krishnan et al. · 2005 [cited by applicant]
US 20090028403A1 · Bar-Aviv et al. · 2009 [cited by applicant]
US 20130208970A1 · Fujisawa · 2013 [cited by applicant]
US 20160171682A1 · Abedini et al. · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 20160292855A1 · Metzger · 2016 [cited by examiner]
US 20170213339A1 · Hibbard et al. · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 20180089505A1 · El-Khamy et al. · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 20180315188A1 · Tegzes et al. · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 20190005684A1 · De Fauw · 2019 [cited by examiner]
US 20190065907A1 · Strong et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 20200184274A1 · Lee · 2020 [cited by examiner]
US 20200211185A1 · Hu · 2020 [cited by examiner]
US 20200245960A1 · Richter · 2020 [cited by examiner]
US 20200410677A1 · Keshwani · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 20210098127A1 · Kalafut · 2021 [cited by examiner]
US 20210150714A1 · Buerger et al. · 2021 [cited by applicant]
CN 1839391A · 2006 [cited by applicant]
CN 1914617A · 2007 [cited by applicant]
WO WO2010115885 · 2010 [cited by applicant]
WO WO2019106061A1 · 2019 [cited by applicant]
Australian Examination Report for Application No. 2019204380, dated Aug. 12, 2019. [cited by applicant]
Second Examination Report in Australian Application No. 2019204380, mailed May 20, 2020. [cited by applicant]
Mehta et al., “Y-Net: Joint Segmentation and Classification for Diagnosis of Breast Biopsy Images”, International Conference on Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention, 2018. [cited by applicant]
Krishnaraj A. et al., “Simulating Dual-Energy X-Ray Absorptiometry in CT Using Deep-Learning Segmentation Cascade”, Journal of the American College of Radiology, Elseveir, Amsterdam, NL, vol. 16, No. 10, Oct. 2019, pp. … [cited by applicant]
Chen L. et al., “Measuring Bone Density Connectivity Using Dual Energy X-Ray Absorptiometry Images”, International Journal of Fuzzy Logic and Intelligent Systems, vol. 17, No. 4, Dec. 2017, pp. 235-244. [cited by applicant]
Deniz C. et al., “Segmentation of the Proximal Femur from MR Images using Deep Convolutional Neural Networks”, Arxiv.org, Cornell University Library, 201 Olin Library Cornell University Ithaca, NY 14853, Apr. 20, 2017. … [cited by applicant]
European Search Report (Application No. 20177226.6) mailed Oct. 15, 2020. [cited by applicant]
Chinese Office Action for Application No. 202010563984.X, mailed Mar. 19, 2024 (9 pages). [cited by applicant]
Krishnaraj et al., “Simulating Dual-Energy X-Ray Absorptiometry in CT Using Deep-Learning Segmentation Cascade”, Journal of the American College of Radiology, 2019. [cited by applicant]
Chinese Office Action for Application No. 202010563984.X, mailed Aug. 9, 2024 (20 pages). [cited by applicant]