IP Library Granted Patent US 12,259,333
Granted Patent B1
US 12,259,333 · App. 17/585,427 · Granted Mar 25, 2025

Comparing gemstone signatures using angular spectrum information

Inventors: Loretta Catherine Castoro (Burlingame, CA); Meghan Elizabeth Ryterski (Tucson, AZ); Matthew Bryan Heger (Tucson, AZ); Ludovico Borghi (Tucson, AZ); Emily Elizabeth Calara English (Tucson, AZ); Chengyu Zhu (Tucson, AZ); Jose Sasian (Tucson, AZ)
Assignee: The RealReal, Inc.
G01N21/87G01N21/27G01N21/47G01N2021/4704G01N2201/062
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 12,259,333
App. No.
17/585,427
Granted
Mar 25, 2025
Kind
B1
Abstract

A system comprises a faceted structure imaging assembly and a faceted structure image analyzer. Signature information of the gemstone is obtained and compared to stored signature information. The signature information includes angular spectrum information generated by the imaging assembly while a colored light pattern is reflected onto the gemstone. The signature information uniquely identifies the gemstone and indicates whether an entity was the source of the gemstone. The signature information comparison involves comparing an angular spectrum image obtained by the imaging assembly to stored angular spectrum images. In one example, the system compares the obtained signature information to stored signature information to validate a source of the gemstone. In another example, the system obtains signature information of the gemstone and forwards the signature information to a remote validation system. The remote validation system compares the signature information to stored signature information and forwards a validation result to the system.

Claims (30)

1. A method comprising:

reflecting light onto a crystalline structure in a mounted setting, wherein the crystalline structure is not loose and is fixed within the mounted setting;

obtaining an angular spectrum image of the crystalline structure from an image analyzer, wherein the angular spectrum image is part of signature information that uniquely identifies the crystalline structure; and

comparing the angular spectrum image to stored angular spectrum images to validate a source of the crystalline structure, wherein the comparing is performed using an image analyzer that analyzes pixels of the angular spectrum image and that analyzes pixels of the stored angular spectrum images.

2. The method of claim 1 , wherein each of the stored angular spectrum images is part of stored signature information that uniquely identifies a prior analyzed crystalline structure.

3. The method of claim 1 , wherein the angular spectrum image is obtained using an image sensor, wherein at least one other dimension of the crystalline structure is determined using the image sensor, and wherein crystalline structure is authenticated by also comparing the at least one other dimension to prior obtained dimensions.

4. The method of claim 1 , wherein the reflecting of light onto the crystalline structure involves directing light onto color features disposed along an inner surface of a cylinder, wherein the cylinder covers the crystalline structure, and wherein at least some light reflected from the color features is reflected by the crystalline structure onto a center of the cylinder.

5. The method of claim 4 , wherein the color features comprise a first color feature, a second color feature, and a third color feature, and wherein each of the first color feature, the second color feature, and the third color feature reflects different color light.

6. The method of claim 5 , wherein the first color feature is disposed along the inner surface of the cylinder such that light reflected from the first color feature enters the crystalline structure from a first range of angles, wherein the second color feature is disposed along the inner surface of the cylinder such that light reflected from the second color feature enters the crystalline structure from a second range of angles, and wherein the third color feature is disposed along the inner surface of the cylinder such that light reflected from the third color feature enters the crystalline structure from a third range of angles.

7. The method of claim 1 , wherein the comparing of the angular spectrum image to stored angular spectrum images involves comparing color characteristics between images.

8. The method of claim 1 , wherein the angular spectrum image is sensed while the crystalline structure is in the mounted setting and without removing the crystalline structure from the setting.

9. The method of claim 1 , wherein the mounted setting is not part of any assembly used to analyze the crystalline structure.

10. A system comprising:

an imaging assembly, wherein the imaging assembly is configured to reflect light onto color features disposed above a crystalline structure that is mounted within a setting and to obtain an angular spectrum image of an upper surface of the crystalline structure, and wherein the crystalline structure is not loose and is fixed within the setting; and

an image analyzer, wherein the image analyzer is configured to receive the angular spectrum image and compare the angular spectrum image to other stored angular spectrum images via pixel analysis thereby authenticating a source of the crystalline structure, and wherein the authenticating is performed based in part on the angular spectrum image comparison of the image analyzer.

11. The system of claim 10 , wherein the authenticating indicates whether a particular entity provided the crystalline structure or whether the crystalline structure was obtained from a particular location.

12. The system of claim 10 , wherein the angular spectrum image is obtained while the crystalline structure redirects light reflected by the color features disposed above the crystalline structure onto an image sensor.

13. The system of claim 10 , wherein the imaging assembly includes a cylindrical structure having an aperture, and wherein the color features are disposed along an inner surface of the cylindrical structure.

14. The system of claim 10 , wherein the color features cause light of varying color to enter the crystalline structure, and wherein color indicates a range of angles upon which light enters the crystalline structure.

15. The system of claim 10 , wherein the light is provided by a light source disposed below the crystalline structure while the crystalline structure is mounted in the setting and without removing the crystalline structure from the setting.

16. The system of claim 10 , wherein the setting is not part of the imaging assembly.

17. A method comprising:

obtaining signature information of a crystalline structure mounted in a setting using an imaging assembly that has an image sensor, mounted crystalline structure holder, and cylinder, wherein the signature information includes an angular spectrum image of the crystalline structure obtained while a colored light pattern is reflected from an inner surface of the cylinder onto the crystalline structure, and wherein the crystalline structure is not loose and is fixed within the setting; and

comparing the signature information of the crystalline structure to prior obtained signature information by performing pixel analysis of the angular spectrum image to authenticate a source of the crystalline structure.

18. The method of claim 17 , wherein the comparing is performed by a crystalline structure analysis system.

19. The method of claim 17 , wherein the comparing is performed by a remote validation system.

20. The method of claim 17 , wherein the angular spectrum image is an Angular Spectrum Evaluation Tool (ASET) image.

21. The method of claim 17 , wherein the comparing involves matching images based on color characteristics.

22. The method of claim 17 , wherein the colored light pattern is generated in part by a light source disposed below the crystalline structure while the crystalline structure is mounted in the setting and without removing the crystalline structure from the setting.

23. The method of claim 17 , wherein the setting is not part of the imaging assembly.

Assignments (4)
SECURITY INTEREST Recorded Feb 29, 2024
From: THE REALREAL, INC.
To: GLAS TRUST COMPANY LLC, AS NOTES COLLATERAL AGENT
Reel/Frame 066605/0991 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Jan 27, 2022
From: CASTORO, LORETTA CATHERINE; RYTERSKI, MEGHAN ELIZABETH; HEGER, MATTHEW BRYAN; BORGHI, LUDOVICO; CALARA ENGLISH, EMILY ELIZABETH; ZHU, CHENGYU
To: THE REALREAL, INC.
Reel/Frame 058799/0117 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Jan 27, 2022
From: SASIAN, JOSE
To: ARIZONA BOARD OF REGENTS ON BEHALF OF THE UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA
Reel/Frame 058799/0199 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Jan 27, 2022
From: ARIZONA BOARD OF REGENTS ON BEHALF OF THE UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA
To: THE REALREAL, INC.
Reel/Frame 058799/0290 →
Continuity (1)
Continuation 16398214 · Apr 29, 2019
References Cited (28)
US 6239867B1 · Aggarwal · 2001 [cited by examiner]
US 7336347B2 · Sasian et al. · 2008 [cited by applicant]
US 7355683B2 · Sasian et al. · 2008 [cited by applicant]
US 7372552B2 · Sasian et al. · 2008 [cited by applicant]
US 7382445B2 · Sasian et al. · 2008 [cited by applicant]
US 7420657B2 · Sasian et al. · 2008 [cited by applicant]
US 7751034B2 · Sasian et al. · 2010 [cited by applicant]
US 8098369B2 · Sasian et al. · 2012 [cited by applicant]
US 9250193B2 · Smith · 2016 [cited by examiner]
US 9599570B2 · Quick · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 10809117B1 · Castoro et al. · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 11248947B1 · Castoro et al. · 2022 [cited by applicant]
US 20050190356A1 · Sasian · 2005 [cited by examiner]
US 20060244946A1 · Underwood · 2006 [cited by examiner]
US 20100085635A1 · Verboven et al. · 2010 [cited by applicant]
US 20130016210A1 · Smith · 2013 [cited by applicant]
US 20130329212A1 · High · 2013 [cited by applicant]
US 20160161421A1 · Eder · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 20170153215A1 · Janoff · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 20170241913A1 · Gu · 2017 [cited by examiner]
US 20170276612A1 · Gaywala et al. · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 20170307537A1 · Yeung et al. · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 20180156735A1 · Fitch · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 20180300546A1 · Schaefer · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 20190187063A1 · Grof et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 20190251347A1 · Timpone et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 20200050834A1 · Niskanen · 2020 [cited by applicant]
Jose Sasian, Jason Quick, Jacob Sheffield, James Caudill, and Peter Yantzer, “Evaluation Of Brilliance, Fire, And Scintillation In Round Brilliant Gemstones”, Optical Engineering, vol. 46(9), Sep. 2007 (25 pages). [cited by applicant]