IP Library Granted Patent US 12,474,417
Granted Patent B2
US 12,474,417 · App. 17/587,869 · Granted Nov 18, 2025

Systems and methods for controlling super capacitor charge voltage to extend super capacitor life

Inventors: Mattia Lovati (San Stefano, IT); Christopher J. Merkl (Milwaukee, WI); George J. Dietz (Delafield, WI); Gary A. Romanowich (Slinger, WI); Kevin A. Weiss (Gurnee, IL)
Assignee: Tyco Fire & Security GmbH
G01R31/64G01R27/2605
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 12,474,417
App. No.
17/587,869
Granted
Nov 18, 2025
Kind
B2
Abstract

A method of determining a lifetime parameter of a capacitor in a failsafe device includes measuring an amount of energy required to return the failsafe device to a failsafe position, measuring an effective capacitance of the capacitor, and comparing the amount of energy to the effective capacitance to determine the lifetime parameter of the capacitor.

Claims (38)

1 . A method of determining a lifetime parameter of a capacitor in a failsafe device, the method comprising:

measuring an amount of energy required to return the failsafe device to a failsafe position;

determining an effective capacitance of the capacitor using a measured value associated with energy used by a resistor or a motor of the failsafe device and a constant value representing energy of remaining components of the failsafe device;

comparing the amount of energy to the effective capacitance to determine the lifetime parameter of the capacitor;

determining, based on the effective capacitance, a charge voltage for the capacitor; and

charging the capacitor using the charge voltage with a boost buck circuit, wherein the boost buck circuit is configured to step-down an input voltage provided to the capacitor and step-up an output voltage from the capacitor that is provided to the motor.

2 . The method of claim 1 , wherein the lifetime parameter is a length of time associated with a remaining operational period of the capacitor.

3 . The method of claim 1 , wherein the failsafe device is an actuator.

4 . The method of claim 1 , wherein the lifetime parameter is an amount of time required to charge the capacitor to a level associated with the amount of energy required to return the failsafe device to the failsafe position.

5 . The method of claim 1 , wherein the lifetime parameter is diagnostic information associated with physically testing an ability of the capacitor to return the failsafe device to the failsafe position.

6 . The method of claim 1 , the method further comprising sending the lifetime parameter to a building management system (BMS), wherein the lifetime parameter indicates that the capacitor should be replaced.

7 . A method of charging a capacitor in a failsafe device, the method comprising:

measuring an amount of energy required to return the failsafe device to a failsafe position;

measuring an effective capacitance of the capacitor using a measured value associated with energy used by a resistor or a motor of the failsafe device and a constant value representing energy of remaining components of the failsafe device;

determining, based on the effective capacitance and the amount of energy, a charge voltage for the capacitor; and

charging the capacitor using the charge voltage with a boost buck circuit, wherein the boost buck circuit is configured to step-down an input voltage provided to the capacitor and step-up an output voltage from the capacitor that is provided to the motor.

8 . The method of claim 7 , wherein the failsafe device is an actuator.

9 . The method of claim 7 , further comprising:

comparing the amount of energy to the effective capacitance to determine a lifetime parameter of the capacitor; and

sending the lifetime parameter.

10 . The method of claim 9 , wherein the lifetime parameter indicates that the capacitor should be replaced.

11 . The method of claim 9 , wherein the lifetime parameter is a length of time associated with a remaining operational period of the capacitor.

12 . The method of claim 9 , wherein the lifetime parameter is an amount of time required to charge the capacitor to a level associated with the amount of energy required to return the failsafe device to the failsafe position.

13 . The method of claim 9 , wherein the lifetime parameter is diagnostic information associated with physically testing an ability of the capacitor to return the failsafe device to the failsafe position.

14 . A failsafe device assembly, comprising:

an actuator;

a capacitor; and

a processing circuit comprising a processor and memory, the memory having instructions stored thereon that, when executed by the processor, cause the processing circuit to:

compare an amount of energy required to return the actuator to a failsafe position to an effective capacitance of the capacitor to determine an operational parameter of the actuator, wherein the effective capacitance of the capacitor is determined using a measured value associated with energy used by a resistor or a motor of the actuator and a constant value representing energy of remaining components of the actuator;

operate the actuator according to the operational parameter;

determine, based on the effective capacitance, a charge voltage for the capacitor; and

charge the capacitor using the charge voltage.

15 . The failsafe device assembly of claim 14 , wherein the operational parameter describes a speed with which the actuator returns to the failsafe position.

16 . The failsafe device assembly of claim 15 , wherein determining the operational parameter of the actuator further includes receiving a selection of the speed from a user.

17 . The failsafe device assembly of claim 14 , wherein the memory has further instructions stored thereon that, when executed by the processor, cause the processing circuit to:

compare the amount of energy to the effective capacitance to determine a lifetime parameter of the capacitor; and

send the lifetime parameter.

18 . The failsafe device assembly of claim 17 further comprising an artificial intelligence module that is configured to correlate a control charge voltage of a voltage regulator to the lifetime parameter to determine the control charge voltage that is applied to the capacitor.

Assignments (4)
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Jul 3, 2025
From: MERKL, CHRISTOPHER J.
To: JOHNSON CONTROLS TECHNOLOGY COMPANY
Reel/Frame 071607/0108 →
NUNC PRO TUNC ASSIGNMENT Recorded Jul 3, 2025
From: JOHNSON CONTROLS TECHNOLOGY COMPANY
To: JOHNSON CONTROLS TYCO IP HOLDINGS LLP
Reel/Frame 071607/0167 →
NUNC PRO TUNC ASSIGNMENT Recorded Jul 3, 2025
From: LOVATI, MATTIA; DIETZ, GEORGE J.; ROMANOWICH, GARY A.; WEISS, KEVIN A.
To: JOHNSON CONTROLS TYCO IP HOLDINGS LLP
Reel/Frame 071607/0233 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Jul 3, 2025
From: JOHNSON CONTROLS TYCO IP HOLDINGS LLP
To: TYCO FIRE & SECURITY GMBH
Reel/Frame 071607/0308 →
Continuity (4)
Continuation In Part 16574806 · Sep 18, 2019
Provisional Application 63144446 · Feb 1, 2021
Provisional Application 62733584 · Sep 19, 2018
Related Publication 20220155384A1 · May 19, 2022
References Cited (43)
US 3588652A · Lewis · 1971 [cited by applicant]
US 5278454A · Strauss et al. · 1994 [cited by applicant]
US 5422808A · Catanese et al. · 1995 [cited by applicant]
US 5498951A · Okamura et al. · 1996 [cited by applicant]
US 5519295A · Jatnieks · 1996 [cited by applicant]
US 5744876A · Fangio · 1998 [cited by applicant]
US 5744923A · Strauss et al. · 1998 [cited by applicant]
US 6100655A · McIntosh · 2000 [cited by applicant]
US 6384579B2 · Watanabe · 2002 [cited by examiner]
US 7023163B2 · Charles · 2006 [cited by examiner]
US 7671569B2 · Kolb · 2010 [cited by examiner]
US 8138706B2 · Ochsenbein et al. · 2012 [cited by applicant]
US 8242624B2 · Brookfield · 2012 [cited by examiner]
US 9024591B2 · Narita · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 9041361B2 · Viancino et al. · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 9379577B2 · Stupka · 2016 [cited by examiner]
US 9812898B2 · Spivey et al. · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 10133251B2 · Furrer et al. · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 10461559B2 · Armstrong · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 11870280B2 · Merkl · 2024 [cited by examiner]
US 20130113441A1 · Narita · 2013 [cited by examiner]
US 20140062200A1 · Stupka · 2014 [cited by examiner]
US 20150226343A1 · Jenks · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 20150340882A1 · Gä-th · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 20160061468A1 · Alexander · 2016 [cited by examiner]
US 20160276868A1 · Stupka · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 20170293293A1 · Brownie et al. · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 20170295058A1 · Gottschalk et al. · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 20180067465A1 · Daraiseh et al. · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 20200091747A1 · Merkl et al. · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 20220155384A1 · Lovati et al. · 2022 [cited by applicant]
CN 205781222 · 2016 [cited by applicant]
EP 2005504A1 · 2008 [cited by applicant]
JP 4022362B2 · 2007 [cited by applicant]
KR 549772 · 2006 [cited by applicant]
KR 101259450 · 2013 [cited by applicant]
WO WO2018011150A1 · 2018 [cited by applicant]
EP Search Report on EP Appl. Ser. No. 22154414.1 dated Jun. 13, 2022 (9 pages). [cited by applicant]
Liu et al., “Review on reliability of supercapacitors in energy storage applications,” Applied Energy, Aug. 12, 2020, vol. 278, No. 115436 (13 pages). [cited by applicant]
Schachner et al., “Comparison of Energy Harvesting Concepts for Heating, Ventilation and Air Conditioning Systems,” IECON 2018—44th Annual Conference of the IEEE Industrial Electronics Society, IEEE, Oct. 21, 2018 (pp. … [cited by applicant]
CN Office Action for CN Appl. Ser. No. 202210111291.6 dated Aug. 31, 2024 (18 pages). [cited by applicant]
CN Office Action for CN Appl. Ser. No. 202210111291.6 dated May 29, 2025 (9 pages). [cited by applicant]
CN Office Action for CN Appl. Ser. No. 202210111291.6 dated Sep. 19, 2025 (12 pages). [cited by applicant]