IP Library Granted Patent US 12,330,653
Granted Patent B2
US 12,330,653 · App. 17/596,295 · Granted Jun 17, 2025

Method for validating a model associated with vehicle dynamics

Inventors: Leo Laine (Härryda, SE); Emil Klintberg (Torslanda, SE); Peter Nilsson (Hovås, SE)
Assignee: VOLVO TRUCK CORPORATION
B60W30/18172B60T8/1725B60T8/17551B60W10/04B60W10/184B60T2240/06B60T2270/86B60W2520/10B60W2520/263B60W2520/266B60W2552/40
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 12,330,653
App. No.
17/596,295
Granted
Jun 17, 2025
Kind
B2
Abstract

A method for validating a model of vehicle dynamics for use in autonomous driving. The method comprising setting a wheel slip limit on an operation of at least one vehicle torque device, obtaining a model of vehicle dynamics based on the set wheel slip limit, and validating the model of vehicle dynamics based on the set wheel slip limit.

Claims (36)

1. A computer implemented method for validating a model of vehicle dynamics for use in autonomous driving, the method comprising:

determining a maximum wheel slip limit;

setting a wheel slip limit on an operation of at least one vehicle torque device based on the maximum wheel slip limit;

obtaining a model associated with vehicle dynamics, the model of vehicle dynamics being a model representing a relationship between a lateral tire force acting on a vehicle and a wheel slip value, with the wheel slip value being restricted within the wheel slip limit;

validating the model of vehicle dynamics based on the set wheel slip limit; and controlling the at least one vehicle torque device based on the set wheel slip limit, wherein the wheel slip limit comprises a limit on a longitudinal tire slip, s x , given by s x =

R

ω

-

v

x

"\[LeftBracketingBar]"

R

ω

"\[RightBracketingBar]"

,

where R denotes a radius of a wheel tire, ω denotes an angular velocity of the wheel tire and v x denotes a longitudinal speed of the tire, wherein the wheel slip limit comprises a limit on a lateral tire slip, S yt , given by where v y denotes a tire translational velocity, R denotes a radius of a wheel tire, and ω denotes an angular velocity of the wheel tire.

2. The method according to claim 1 , wherein the at least one vehicle torque device comprises a braking device.

3. The method according to claim 1 , wherein the at least one vehicle torque device comprises a propulsion device.

4. The method according to claim 1 , comprising setting a wheel slip control bandwidth requirement or rise time requirement on the operation of the at least one vehicle torque device.

5. The method according to claim 1 , wherein the wheel slip limit is configured in dependence of a road friction condition or a road friction coefficient μ.

6. The method according to claim 1 , wherein the wheel slip limit comprises a range of acceptable wheel slip values and a tolerance value indicating a required wheel slip control precision.

7. The method according to claim 1 , wherein the model of vehicle dynamics comprises a lateral steering capability.

8. The method according to claim 1 , wherein the model of vehicle dynamics models a lateral tire force F y acting on the vehicle.

9. The method according to claim 1 , wherein the model of vehicle dynamics comprises a cornering stiffness value associated with the vehicle.

10. The method according to claim 1 , comprising transmitting one or more model capabilities corresponding to the validated model of vehicle traffic situation management unit.

11. The method according to claim 1 , wherein the model of vehicle dynamics is an explicit model of vehicle dynamics.

12. The method according to claim 1 , wherein the model of vehicle dynamics is arranged to account for a tire and/or torque device wear effect.

13. The method according to claim 1 , wherein the model of vehicle dynamics is arranged to account for an axle load and/or an axle load distribution of the vehicle.

14. The method according to claim 1 , comprising authenticating the vehicle torque device to determine compliance with the wheel slip limit.

15. A non-transitory computer readable medium carrying a computer program comprising program code for performing the steps of claim 1 when said program code is run on a computer or on processing circuitry of a control unit.

16. The control unit arranged to validate a model of vehicle dynamics for use in autonomous driving, the control unit being configured to perform the steps of the method according to claim 1 .

17. The vehicle comprising the control unit according to claim 16 .

Assignments (2)
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Jan 25, 2024
From: VOLVO TRUCK CORPORATION
To: VOLVO AUTONOMOUS SOLUTIONS AB
Reel/Frame 066369/0330 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Mar 1, 2022
From: LAINE, LEO; KLINTBERG, EMIL; NILSSON, PETER
To: VOLVO TRUCK CORPORATION
Reel/Frame 059137/0419 →
Continuity (1)
Related Publication 20220306117A1 · Sep 29, 2022
References Cited (44)
US 10384672B1 · Katzourakis · 2019 [cited by examiner]
US 20090069993A1 · Inoue · 2009 [cited by examiner]
US 20090118905A1 · Takenaka et al. · 2009 [cited by applicant]
US 20090319114A1 · Takenaka · 2009 [cited by examiner]
US 20110035086A1 · Kim · 2011 [cited by examiner]
US 20170158225A1 · Brown · 2017 [cited by examiner]
US 20180037234A1 · Hoedt et al. · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 20180105158A1 · Namuduri · 2018 [cited by examiner]
US 20190024781A1 · Chrungoo et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 20200023852A1 · Yi · 2020 [cited by examiner]
US 20200290596A1 · Birch · 2020 [cited by examiner]
CN 104812612A · 2015 [cited by applicant]
DE 102007034143A1 · 2009 [cited by applicant]
EP 1719676A1 · 2006 [cited by applicant]
EP 2927066A1 · 2015 [cited by applicant]
GB 2480852A · 2011 [cited by applicant]
JP H03128770A · 1991 [cited by applicant]
JP H04372451A · 1992 [cited by applicant]
JP H0511055A · 1993 [cited by applicant]
JP H05176580A · 1993 [cited by applicant]
JP H07117656A · 1995 [cited by applicant]
JP H10226347A · 1998 [cited by applicant]
JP H10264798A · 1998 [cited by applicant]
JP 2001018780A · 2001 [cited by applicant]
JP 2001334922A · 2001 [cited by applicant]
JP 2009083820A · 2009 [cited by applicant]
JP 2009214753A · 2009 [cited by applicant]
JP 2010276446A · 2010 [cited by applicant]
JP 2018205940A · 2018 [cited by applicant]
JP 2019519430A · 2019 [cited by applicant]
JP 2020530922A · 2020 [cited by applicant]
KR 19990041251A · 1999 [cited by applicant]
KR 20170035142A · 2017 [cited by applicant]
WO 2004067307A1 · 2004 [cited by applicant]
WO 2013087169A1 · 2013 [cited by applicant]
WO 2017215751A1 · 2017 [cited by applicant]
WO 2018143759A1 · 2018 [cited by applicant]
WO 2019032728A1 · 2019 [cited by applicant]
International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Feb. 19, 2020 in corresponding International PCT Application No. PCT/EP2019/065739, 10 pages. [cited by applicant]
International Preliminary Report on Patentability dated Oct. 28, 2020 in corresponding International PCT Application No. PCT/EP2019/065739, 7 pages. [cited by applicant]
Japan Office Action dated Jun. 2, 2023 in corresponding Japan Patent Application No. 2021-572903, 21 pages. [cited by applicant]
Chinese Office Action dated Mar. 29, 2024 in corresponding Chinese Patent Application No. 201980097384.4, 14 pages. [cited by applicant]
Japanese Office Action dated Jan. 16, 2025 in corresponding Japanese Patent Application No. 2021-572903, 15 pages. [cited by applicant]
Chinese Office Action dated Oct. 8, 2024 in corresponding Chinese Patent Application No. 201980097384.4, 18 pages. [cited by applicant]
Cited By (1)
US 12,515,639