IP Library › Granted Patent US 12,385,035
Granted Patent B2
US 12,385,035 · App. 17/610,974 · Granted Aug 12, 2025

Synthetic genome

Inventors: Julius Fredens (Swindon, GB); Kaihang Wang (Swindon, GB); Daniel De La Torre (Swindon, GB); Louise F. H. Funke (Swindon, GB); Wesley E. Robertson (Swindon, GB); Jason W. Chin (Swindon, GB)
Assignees: United Kingdom Research and Innovation; Scarab Genomics, LLC
C12N15/1031C12N1/205C12N15/902
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 12,385,035
App. No.
17/610,974
Granted
Aug 12, 2025
Kind
B2
Abstract

The current invention provides a synthetic prokaryotic genome comprising 5 or fewer occurrences of one or more sense codons; and/or a synthetic prokaryotic genome derived from a parent genome, wherein the synthetic prokaryotic genome comprises less than 10%, 5%, 2%, 1%, 0.5%, 0.1% of the occurrences of one or more sense codons, relative to the parent genome; and/or a synthetic prokaryotic genome comprising 100 or more, 200 or more, or 1000 or more genes with no occurrences of one or more sense codons.

Claims (23)

1. A synthetic E. coli genome comprising 5 or fewer occurrences of one or two serine codons,

wherein the synthetic E. coli genome further lacks a functional gene encoding an endogenous cognate tRNA for at least one of the serine codons and wherein each of the serine codons has been recoded such that the endogenous cognate tRNA for the serine codon is dispensable; and

wherein an E. coli comprising the synthetic E. coli genome is viable.

2. The synthetic E. coli genome according to claim 1 , wherein:

(i) the synthetic E. coli genome comprises no occurrences of one or two serine codons;

(ii) the one or two serine codons are selected from TCG or TCA; and/or

(iii) the synthetic E. coli genome comprises 10 or fewer occurrences, or no occurrences, of the amber stop codon (TAG).

3. A synthetic E. coli genome derived from a parent E. coli genome, wherein the synthetic E. coli genome comprises 10% or less of the occurrences of one or two serine codons, relative to the parent E. coli genome,

wherein the synthetic E. coli genome further lacks a functional gene encoding an endogenous cognate tRNA for at least one of the serine codons and wherein each of the serine codons has been recoded such that the endogenous cognate tRNA for the serine codons is dispensable; and

wherein an E. coli comprising the synthetic E. coli genome is viable.

4. The synthetic E. coli genome according to claim 3 , wherein:

(i) the one or two serine codons are selected from TCG or TCA;

(iii) 90% or more of the occurrences of the one or two serine codons in the parent E. coli genome are replaced with synonymous sense codons;

(iv) the synthetic E. coli genome comprises 10 or fewer occurrences, or no occurrences, of the amber stop codon (TAG);

(v) 99.9% or more of the occurrences of one or two serine codons in the parent E. coli genome are replaced with synonymous sense codons, and wherein all of the occurrences of TAG in the parent E. coli genome are replaced with TAA; and/or

(vi) one or more pairs of genes which share an overlapping region comprising the one or two serine codons in the parent E. coli genome are refactored.

5. The synthetic E. coli genome according to claim 4 , wherein for pairs of genes in opposite orientations, a synthetic insert is inserted between the genes, wherein the synthetic insert comprises the overlapping region; and/or wherein for pairs of genes in the same orientation, a synthetic insert is inserted between the genes, wherein the synthetic insert comprises: (i) a stop codon; (ii) about 20-200 bp from upstream of the overlapping region; and (iii) the overlapping region.

6. An E. coli host cell comprising the synthetic E. coli genome according to claim 1 or claim 3 .

7. A method for production of polypeptides comprising one or more non-proteinogenic amino acids, the method comprising culturing the E. coli host cell according to claim 6 under conditions and for a time sufficient for production of polypeptides comprising one or more non-proteinogenic amino acids.

8. The synthetic E. coli genome of claim 2 or 4 , wherein the synthetic E. coli genome lacks a functional serT gene.

9. The synthetic E. coli genome of claim 2 or 4 , wherein the synthetic E. coli genome lacks a functional serU gene.

10. The synthetic E. coli genome of claim 2 or 4 , wherein the occurrences of the TAG codon have been replaced with TAA.

11. The synthetic E. coli genome of claim 10 , wherein the synthetic E. coli genome lacks a functional prfA gene.

Priority Claims (1)
GB 1906775 · May 14, 2019 · national
Continuity (1)
Related Publication 20220282241A1 · Sep 8, 2022
References Cited (82)
US 9868956B2 · Nguyen et al. · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 11408007B2 · Isaacs · 2022 [cited by examiner]
US 11667933B2 · Fredens et al. · 2023 [cited by applicant]
US 11732001B2 · Chin et al. · 2023 [cited by applicant]
US 20150148525A1 · Chin et al. · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 20220010296A1 · Chin et al. · 2022 [cited by applicant]
US 20230340013A1 · Chin et al. · 2023 [cited by applicant]
US 20230392138A1 · Fredens et al. · 2023 [cited by applicant]
EP 2192185A1 · 2010 [cited by applicant]
WO WO2016066995A1 · 2016 [cited by applicant]
WO WO2016073079A2 · 2016 [cited by applicant]
WO WO2018020248A1 · 2018 [cited by applicant]
WO WO2020229592A1 · 2020 [cited by applicant]
WO WO2022248061A1 · 2022 [cited by applicant]
Nakabachi A et al. Science. Oct. 13, 2006;314(5797):267 (Year: 2006). [cited by examiner]
Beare et al., “Coxiella burnetti: Recent Advances and New Perspectives in Research of the Q Fever Bacterium,” text book published by Springer, 2012, Chapter 13 (Year: 2012). [cited by examiner]
McClure EE et al. Nat Rev Microbiol. Sep. 2017;15(9):544-558 (Year: 2017). [cited by examiner]
Serres MH et al. Genome Biol. 2001;2(9) (Year: 2001). [cited by examiner]
Martínez-Carranza E et al. Front Microbiol. May 29, 2018;9:1059 (Year: 2018). [cited by examiner]
U.S. Appl. No. 18/288,340, United Kingdom Research and Innovation. [cited by applicant]
U.S. Appl. No. 18/504,827, United Kingdom Research and Innovation. [cited by applicant]
U.S. Appl. No. 18/493,307, United Kingdom Research and Innovation. [cited by applicant]
Ostrov et al., “Design, synthesis, and testing toward a 57-codon genome,” Science. 353(6301):819-22 (Aug. 2016). [cited by applicant]
Sample, “World's first living organism with fully redesigned DNA created,” The Guardian. <https://www.theguardian.com/science/2019/may/15/cambridge-scientists-create-worlds-first-living-organism-with-fully-redesigned-dn… [cited by applicant]
“POAG40—RIBF_ [cited by applicant]
Isaacs et al., “Precise manipulation of chromosomes in vivo enables genome-wide codon replacement,” Science. 333(6040):348-53 (Jul. 2011). [cited by applicant]
Lajoie et al., “Probing the limits of genetic recoding in essential genes,” Science. 342(6156):361-3 (Oct. 2013). [cited by applicant]
Lajoie et al., “Genomically recoded organisms expand biological functions,” Science. 342(6156):357-60 (Oct. 2013). [cited by applicant]
Napolitano et al. “Emergent rules for codon choice elucidated by editing rare arginine codons in [cited by applicant]
International Search Report for International Application No. PCT/EP2020/063445, mailed Jul. 31, 2020 (5 pages). [cited by applicant]
International Preliminary Report on Patentability for International Application No. PCT/EP2020/063445, issued Nov. 16, 2021 (6 pages). [cited by applicant]
Wang et al. “Defining synonymous codon compression schemes by genome recoding.” available in PMC May 3, 2017, published in final edited form as: [cited by applicant]
Cambray et al. “Evaluation of 244,000 synthetic sequences reveals design principles to optimize translation in [cited by applicant]
Mukai et al. “Highly reproductive [cited by applicant]
Gibson et al. “Creation of a bacterial cell controlled by a chemically synthesized genome.” [cited by applicant]
Zhang et al. “Engineering the ribosomal DNA in a megabase synthetic chromosome.” [cited by applicant]
Richardson et al. “Design of a synthetic yeast genome.” [cited by applicant]
Lau et al. “Large-scale recoding of a bacterial genome by iterative recombineering of synthetic DNA.” [cited by applicant]
Ma et al. “Precise manipulation of bacterial chromosomes by conjugative assembly genome engineering.” available in PMC Aug. 23, 2017, published in final edited form as: [cited by applicant]
Pósfai et al. “Emergent properties of reduced-genome [cited by applicant]
Gibson et al. “Complete chemical synthesis, assembly, and cloning of a Mycoplasma genitalium genome.” [cited by applicant]
Shen et al. “Deep functional analysis of synll, a 770-kilobase synthetic yeast chromosome.” [cited by applicant]
Annaluru et al. “Total synthesis of a functional designer eukaryotic chromosome.” available in PMC May 27, 2014, published in final edited form as: [cited by applicant]
Xie et al. “Perfect designer chromosome V and behavior of a ring derivative.” Science 355.6329 (2017): eaaf4704 (9 pages). [cited by applicant]
Mitchell et al. “Synthesis, debugging, and effects of synthetic chromosome consolidation: synVI and beyond.” Science 355.6329 (2017): eaaf4831 (12 pages). [cited by applicant]
Dymond et al. “Synthetic chromosome arms function in yeast and generate phenotypic diversity by design.” available in PMC Sep. 16, 2013, published in final edited form as: [cited by applicant]
Wu et al. “Bug mapping and fitness testing of chemically synthesized chromosome X.” [cited by applicant]
Elliott et al. “Proteome labelling and protein identification in specific tissues and at specific developmental stages in an animal.” available in PMC Nov. 1, 2014, published in final edited form as: [cited by applicant]
Elliott et al. “Tagging and enriching proteins enables cell-specific proteomics.” [cited by applicant]
Krogager et al. “Labeling and identifying cell-specific proteomes in the mouse brain.” available in PMC Aug. 1, 2018, published in final edited form as: [cited by applicant]
Kouprina et al. “Exploring transformation-associated recombination cloning for selective isolation of genomic regions.” [cited by applicant]
Chin. “Expanding and reprogramming the genetic code.” [cited by applicant]
Neumann. “Rewiring translation-genetic code expansion and its applications.” [cited by applicant]
Liu et al. “Adding new chemistries to the genetic code.” [cited by applicant]
Wals et al. “Unnatural amino acid incorporation in [cited by applicant]
Badran et al. “Development of potent in vivo mutagenesis plasmids with broad mutational spectra.” Nature communications 6(1) (2015) (10 pages). [cited by applicant]
Beyer et al. “Overcoming near-cognate suppression in a release factor 1-deficient host with an improved nitro-tyrosine tRNA synthetase,” available in PMC Jul. 24, 2021, published in final edited form as: Journal of mole… [cited by applicant]
Cervettini et al. “Rapid discovery and evolution of orthogonal aminoacyl-tRNA synthetase-tRNA pairs,” available in PMC Feb. 1, 2021, published in final edited form as: Nature Biotechnology 38(8) (2020): 989-999 (33 page… [cited by applicant]
De la Torre and Chin. “Reprogramming the genetic code.” Nature Reviews Genetics 22.3 (Mar. 2021): 169-184 (16 pages). [cited by applicant]
Dunkelmann et al. “Engineered triply orthogonal pyrrolysyl-tRNA synthetase/tRNA pairs enable the genetic encoding of three distinct non-canonical amino acids,” available in PMC Jan. 4, 2021, published in final edited fo… [cited by applicant]
Fan et al. “Rationally evolving tRNAPyl for efficient incorporation of noncanonical amino acids.” Nucleic acids research 43(22) (2015) (10 pages). [cited by applicant]
Ferrer-Miralles and Villaverde. “Bacterial cell factories for recombinant protein production; expanding the catalogue.” Microbial cell factories 12(113) (2013): 1-4 (4 pages). [cited by applicant]
Fischer et al. “New codons for efficient production of unnatural proteins in a semisynthetic organism,” available in PMC Oct. 6, 2020, published in final edited form as: Nature chemical biology 16(5) (Oct. 2020): 570-57… [cited by applicant]
Forster et al. “Programming peptidomimetic syntheses by translating genetic codes designed de novo.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 100(11) (2003): 6353-6357 (5 pages). [cited by applicant]
Fredens et al. “Total synthesis of [cited by applicant]
Italia et al. “Mutually orthogonal nonsense-suppression systems and conjugation chemistries for precise protein labeling at up to three distinct sites,” available in PMC Apr. 17, 2020, published in final edited form as:… [cited by applicant]
Katz et al. “Non-canonical roles of tRNAs and tRNA mimics in bacterial cell biology.” Molecular microbiology 101.4 (2016): 545-558 (14 pages). [cited by applicant]
Korkmaz et al. “Comprehensive analysis of stop codon usage in bacteria and its correlation with release factor abundance.” Journal of Biological Chemistry 289(44) (2014): 30334-30342 (9 pages). [cited by applicant]
Ma and Isaacs. “Genomic recoding broadly obstructs the propagation of horizontally transferred genetic elements.” Cell systems 3(2) (2016): 199-207 (10 pages). [cited by applicant]
Martinez-Carranza E et al., Variability of Bacterial Essential Genes Among Closely Related Bacteria: The Case of [cited by applicant]
Meydan et al. “Retapamulin-assisted ribosome profiling reveals the alternative bacterial proteome.” Molecular cell 74.3 (May 2019): 481-493 (20 pages). [cited by applicant]
Neumann et al. “Encoding multiple unnatural amino acids via evolution of a quadruplet-decoding ribosome.” Nature 464.7287 (2010): 441-444 (4 pages). [cited by applicant]
Neumann et al. “Genetically encoding Nε-acetyllysine in recombinant proteins.” Nature chemical biology 4(4) (2008): 232-234 (3 pages). [cited by applicant]
Passioura et al. “Reprogramming the genetic code in vitro.” Trends in biochemical sciences 39(9) (2014): 400-408 (9 pages). [cited by applicant]
Robertson et al. “Sense codon reassignment enables viral resistance and encoded polymer synthesis.” Science 372.6546 (Jun. 2021): 1057-1062 (6 pages). [cited by applicant]
Rode CK, Melkerson-Watson LJ, Johnson AT, Bloch CA Type-specific contributions to chromosome size differences in [cited by applicant]
Schmied et al. “Controlling orthogonal ribosome subunit interactions enables evolution of new function,” available in PMC Jun. 1, 2019, published in final edited form as: Nature 564.7736 (2018): 444-448 (42 pages). [cited by applicant]
Su et al. “Noncanonical roles of tRNAs: tRNA fragments and beyond.” Annual review of genetics 54 (Aug. 2020): 47-69 (25 pages). [cited by applicant]
Wang et al. “Optimized orthogonal translation of unnatural amino acids enables spontaneous protein double-labelling and FRET,” available in PMC May 14, 2015, published in final edited form as: Nature chemistry 6(5) (201… [cited by applicant]
Yanagisawa et al. “Multistep engineering of pyrrolysyl-tRNA synthetase to genetically encode Nε-(o-azidobenzyloxycarbonyl) lysine for site-specific protein modification.” Chemistry & biology 15(11) (2008): 1187-1197 (11… [cited by applicant]
Young and Schultz. “Playing with the molecules of life,” available in PMC Jul. 26, 2018, published in final form as: ACS chemical biology 13(4) (2018): 854-870 (39 pages). [cited by applicant]
Zhang et al. “A semi-synthetic organism that stores and retrieves increased genetic information.” Nature 551.7682 (2017): 644-647 (4 pages). [cited by applicant]