IP Library Granted Patent US 11,898,995
Granted Patent B2
US 11,898,995 · App. 17/612,070 · Granted Feb 13, 2024

Method for evaluating crack in metal member and method for evaluating fatigue damage in metal member

Inventors: Hiroaki Fukushima (Tokyo, JP); Yuichi Hirakawa (Tokyo, JP); Hiroaki Yoshida (Yokohama, JP); Masahiko Yamashita (Yokohama, JP); Takeo Tokumoto (Yokohama, JP)
Assignee: MITSUBISHI HEAVY INDUSTRIES, LTD.
G01N3/068G01N3/34G01N33/2045
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 11,898,995
App. No.
17/612,070
Granted
Feb 13, 2024
Kind
B2
Abstract

A method for evaluating a crack in a metal member comprises a first removal step (S 10 ) and a second removal step (S 20 ). In the first removal step (S 10 ), a step for electrolyzing a metal member having an oxide scale formed on a surface thereof, a step for acquiring an image of the oxide scale as a first image, and a step for determining whether or not a scale crack has occurred are repeated until occurrence of a scale crack is determined. In the second removal step (S 20 ), a step for electrolyzing the metal member having the scale crack, a second image acquisition step for acquiring an image of the oxide scale as a second image, and a second determination step for determining whether or not the scale crack has disappeared are repeated until disappearance of the oxide scale is determined.

Claims (29)

1. A method for evaluating a crack in a metal, the method comprising:

a first removal step of performing electrolytic treatment on a metal having an oxide scale layer formed on a surface thereof until a scale crack is generated in the oxide scale layer;

a second removal step of removing the oxide scale layer by performing the electrolytic treatment until the scale crack generated in the first removal step disappears; and

an evaluation step of measuring and evaluating a crack formed on a surface of a base material of the metal in which the scale crack has disappeared in the second removal step,

wherein the first removal step includes:

a step of performing the electrolytic treatment on the metal having oxide scale generated on the surface thereof;

a step of acquiring a first image by imaging the oxide scale; and

a step of determining whether or not the scale crack has been generated in the oxide scale on the basis of the first image by comparison of images, and

the second removal step includes:

a step of performing the electrolytic treatment on the metal in which the scale crack is generated;

a step of acquiring a second image by imaging the oxide scale; and

a step of determining whether or not the scale crack has disappeared on the basis of the second image by comparison of images.

2. The method for evaluating a crack in a metal according to claim 1 ,

wherein in the first removal step, a first master image, which is obtained in a state where the scale crack is generated on a surface of the oxide scale, and the first image are compared with each other in a case where it is to be determined whether or not the scale crack has been generated on the surface of the oxide scale.

3. The method for evaluating a crack in a metal according to claim 1 ,

wherein in the second removal step, a second master image, which is obtained in a state where the scale crack has disappeared, and the second image are compared with each other in a case where it is to be determined whether or not the scale crack has disappeared.

4. The method for evaluating a crack in a metal according to claim 1 ,

wherein the second removal step further includes a step of setting a time for which the electrolytic treatment is to be performed on the metal in which the scale crack is generated in a case where it is determined that the scale crack has not disappeared.

5. The method for evaluating a crack in a metal according to claim 4 ,

wherein master data in which a state of the scale crack is associated with an electrolytic treatment time that is required for the scale crack to disappear, which is set according to the state of the scale crack, is prepared in advance, and

in the step of setting a time for which the electrolytic treatment is to be performed, the time for which the electrolytic treatment is to be performed on the metal in which the scale crack is generated is set on the basis of the second image and the master data.

6. The method for evaluating a crack in a metal according to claim 4 ,

wherein in the step of setting a time for which the electrolytic treatment is to be performed, the time for which the electrolytic treatment is to be performed on the metal in which the scale crack is generated is set on the basis of a growth direction of the scale crack.

7. The method for evaluating a crack in a metal according to claim 4 ,

wherein in the step of setting a time for which the electrolytic treatment is to be performed, the time for which the electrolytic treatment is to be performed on the metal in which the scale crack is generated is set on the basis of a width dimension of the scale crack.

8. The method for evaluating a crack in a metal according to claim 1 ,

wherein the electrolytic treatment is performed in a strongly acid solution that does not contain a corrosion inhibitor for inhibiting corrosion of the metal.

9. A method for evaluating fatigue damage in a metal, the method comprising:

evaluating a degree of fatigue damage of the metal on a basis of a state of a crack formed on the surface of the base material of the metal that is evaluated by the method for evaluating a crack in a metal according to claim 1 .

Assignments (2)
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Apr 6, 2022
From: MITSUBISHI POWER, LTD.
To: MITSUBISHI HEAVY INDUSTRIES, LTD.
Reel/Frame 059620/0080 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Nov 17, 2021
From: FUKUSHIMA, HIROAKI; HIRAKAWA, YUICHI; YOSHIDA, HIROAKI; YAMASHITA, MASAHIKO; TOKUMOTO, TAKEO
To: MITSUBISHI POWER, LTD.
Reel/Frame 058141/0644 →
Priority Claims (1)
JP 2019-125456 · Jul 4, 2019 · national
Continuity (1)
Related Publication 20220349790A1 · Nov 3, 2022