IP Library Granted Patent US 12,409,345
Granted Patent B2
US 12,409,345 · App. 17/629,937 · Granted Sep 9, 2025

Aberration corrections for dynamically changing media during ultrasound therapy

Inventors: Kobi Vortman (Tirat Carmel, IL); Yoav Levy (Hinanit, IL)
Assignee: INSIGHTEC LTD.
A61N7/02A61N2007/0039A61N2007/0078A61N2007/0095
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 12,409,345
App. No.
17/629,937
Granted
Sep 9, 2025
Kind
B2
Abstract

Various approaches to delivering ultrasound energy to a target region include, prior to delivery of the ultrasound energy, populating a data structure relating multiple real-time parameter values to corresponding correction values for one or more ultrasound parameter values associated with one or more transducer elements for generating a focal zone of acoustic energy in at least the first portion of the target region; and during the treatment, (i) predicting or causing measurement of at least one of the real-time parameter values in the second portion of the target region or the non-target region; (ii) based at least in part on the predicted or measured real-time parameter value(s) and contents of the data structure, determine the correction value(s) for the ultrasound parameter value(s); and (iii) activate the transducer element(s) based at least in part on the determined correction value(s) for the ultrasound parameter value(s) so as to generate the focal zone in the second portion of the target region.

Claims (57)

1. A system for delivering ultrasound energy to a target region during treatment thereof, the system comprising:

an ultrasound transducer comprising a plurality of transducer elements; and

a controller configured to:

(a) prior to the treatment, populate a data structure relating a plurality of real-time parameter values to corresponding correction values for at least one ultrasound parameter value associated with at least one transducer element for generating a focal zone of acoustic energy in at least a first portion of the target region; and

(b) during the treatment:

(i) predict or cause measurement of at least one of the real-time parameter values in a second portion of the target region or a non-target region;

(ii) based at least in part on the predicted or measured real-time parameter value and contents of the data structure, determine the correction value for the at least one ultrasound parameter value; and

(iii) activate the at least one transducer element based at least in part on the determined correction value so as to generate the focal zone in the second portion of the target region.

2. The system of claim 1 , wherein each of the real-time parameter values in the data structure represents a change in a value of an associated real-time parameter.

3. The system of claim 2 , wherein the associated real-time parameter comprises at least one of a temperature, a change in tissue perfusion, a number of cavitation events, an accumulated energy absorbed in the target and/or non-target regions, a number of sonications, a time interval between sonications, a contrast in magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) image, a temperature profile as a function of time, or an amplitude and/or a phase associated with an acoustic signal reflected from intervening tissue located between the ultrasound transducer and the target region.

4. The system of claim 1 , wherein the data structure comprises a plurality of ranges of the real-time parameter values, each range corresponding to one of the correction values for the at least one ultrasound parameter value, the controller being further configured to:

identify the range of the real-time parameter values to which the predicted or measured real-time parameter value belongs; and

based thereon, determine the correction value for the at least one ultrasound parameter.

5. The system of claim 1 , wherein the data structure comprises a plurality of ranges of the real-time parameter values, each range corresponding to a range of the correction values for the at least one ultrasound parameter value, the controller being further configured to:

identify the range of the real-time parameter values in the data structure to which the predicted or measured real-time parameter value belongs;

based thereon, determine the corresponding range of the correction values; and

determine the correction value for the at least one ultrasound parameter value in the range of the correction values based at least in part on where within the identified range the predicted or measured real-time parameter value occurs.

6. The system of claim 1 , further comprising at least one of an imager or a temperature-measurement device for measuring the at least one of the real-time parameter values at the second portion of the target region or the non-target region.

7. The system of claim 1 , wherein the controller is further configured to predict the at least one of the real-time parameter values at the second portion of the target region or the non-target region using a physical model.

8. The system of claim 1 , wherein the ultrasound parameter value comprises at least one of a frequency, a phase or a power level.

9. The system of claim 8 , wherein the controller is further configured to adjust the power level associated with the at least one transducer element so as to achieve a target temperature in the second portion of the target region.

10. The system of claim 1 , wherein the controller is further configured to repeat steps (i)-(iii) during the treatment.

11. The system of claim 1 , wherein the plurality of real-time parameter values in the data structure do not include the predicted or measured real-time parameter value, the controller being further configured to determine the correction value for the at least one ultrasound parameter value using an interpolation or an extrapolation based on the plurality of real-time parameter values and the corresponding correction values for the at least one ultrasound parameter value in the data structure.

12. The system of claim 1 , wherein the plurality of real-time parameter values in the data structure comprise combinations of the parameter values measured in real-time and the parameter values computed using a physical model.

13. The system of claim 1 , wherein the first portion and the second portion of the target region are the same.

14. The system of claim 1 , wherein the first portion of the target region is different from the second portion of the target region.

15. The system of claim 14 , wherein the controller is further configured to determine the correction value for the at least one ultrasound parameter value using an interpolation or an extrapolation based on the plurality of real-time parameter values in the data structure and the corresponding correction values for the at least one ultrasound parameter value for generating the focal zone in the first portion of the target region.

16. The system of claim 1 , wherein the controller is further configured to:

determine an acoustic energy delivered to the focal zone by the at least one transducer element after traversing an intervening tissue region; and

adjust a power level associated with the at least one transducer element based at least in part on the delivered acoustic energy.

17. The system of claim 16 , wherein the controller is further configured to reduce the power level of the at least one transducer element when the delivered acoustic energy in the focal zone is below a predetermined threshold.

18. The system of claim 16 , wherein the controller is further configured to increase the power level of the at least one transducer element when the delivered acoustic energy in the focal zone exceeds a predetermined threshold.

19. The system of claim 1 , wherein the controller is further configured to predict or cause measurement of a distribution of the at least one of the real-time parameter values in the second portion of the target region or the non-target region, wherein the correction value for the at least one ultrasound parameter value is further determined based on the predicted or measured distribution of the at least one of the real-time parameter values.

20. A method of operating a system for delivering ultrasound energy to a target region during treatment thereof, the system comprising an ultrasound transducer comprising a plurality of transducer elements and a controller, the method comprising:

(a) prior to the treatment, populating a data structure relating a plurality of real-time parameter values to corresponding correction values for at least one ultrasound parameter value associated with at least one transducer element for generating a focal zone of acoustic energy in at least a first portion of the target region; and

(b) during the treatment:

(i) predicting or causing measurement of at least one of the real-time parameter values in a second portion of the target region or a non-target region;

(ii) based at least in part on the predicted or measured real-time parameter value and contents of the data structure, determining the correction value for the at least one ultrasound parameter value; and

(iii) activating the at least one transducer element based at least in part on the determined correction value so as to generate the focal zone in the second portion of the target region.

21. The method of claim 20 , wherein each of the real-time parameter values in the data structure represents a change in a value of an associated real-time parameter.

22. The method of claim 21 , wherein the associated real-time parameter comprises at least one of a temperature, a change in tissue perfusion, a number of cavitation events, an accumulated energy absorbed in the target and/or non-target regions, a number of sonications, a time interval between sonications, a contrast in magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) image, a temperature profile as a function of time, or an amplitude and/or a phase associated with an acoustic signal reflected from intervening tissue located between the ultrasound transducer and the target region.

23. The method of claim 20 , wherein the data structure comprises a plurality of ranges of the real-time parameter values, each range corresponding to one of the correction values for the at least one ultrasound parameter value, the method further comprising:

identifying the range of the real-time parameter values to which the predicted or measured real-time parameter value belongs; and

based thereon, determining the correction value for the at least one ultrasound parameter.

24. The method of claim 20 , wherein the data structure comprises a plurality of ranges of the real-time parameter values, each range corresponding to a range of the correction values for the at least one ultrasound parameter value, the method further comprising:

identifying the range of the real-time parameter values in the data structure to which the predicted or measured real-time parameter value belongs;

based thereon, determining the corresponding range of the correction values; and

determining the correction value for the at least one ultrasound parameter value in the range of the correction values based at least in part on where within the identified range the predicted or measured real-time parameter value occurs.

25. The method of claim 20 , wherein the at least one of the real-time parameter values at the second portion of the target region or the non-target region is predicted using a physical model.

26. The method of claim 20 , wherein the ultrasound parameter value comprises at least one of a frequency, a phase or a power level.

27. The method of claim 26 , further comprising adjusting the power level associated with the at least one transducer element so as to achieve a target temperature in the second portion of the target region.

28. The method of claim 20 , further comprising repeating steps steps (i)-(iii) during the treatment.

29. The method of claim 20 , wherein the plurality of real-time parameter values in the data structure do not include the predicted or measured real-time parameter value, the method further comprising computationally determining the correction value for the at least one ultrasound parameter value using an interpolation or an extrapolation based on the plurality of real-time parameter values and the corresponding correction values for the at least one ultrasound parameter value in the data structure.

30. The method of claim 20 , wherein the first portion and the second portion of the target region are the same.

31. The method of claim 20 , wherein the first portion of the target region is different from the second portion of the target region.

32. The method of claim 31 , further comprising computationally determining the correction value for the at least one ultrasound parameter value using an interpolation or an extrapolation based on the plurality of real-time parameter values in the data structure and the corresponding correction values for the at least one ultrasound parameter value for generating the focal zone in the first portion of the target region.

33. The method of claim 20 , further comprising predicting or causing measurement of a distribution of the at least one of the real-time parameter values in the second portion of the target region or the non-target region, wherein the correction value for the at least one ultrasound parameter value is further determined based on the predicted or measured distribution of the at least one of the real-time parameter values.

Assignments (2)
SECURITY INTEREST Recorded Sep 1, 2022
From: INSIGHTEC, INC.; INSIGHTEC LTD.
To: PERCEPTIVE CREDIT HOLDINGS III, LP
Reel/Frame 061365/0820 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Feb 22, 2022
From: VORTMAN, KOBI; LEVY, YOAV
To: INSIGHTEC, LTD.
Reel/Frame 059065/0225 →
Continuity (2)
Provisional Application 62878481 · Jul 25, 2019
Related Publication 20220288424A1 · Sep 15, 2022
References Cited (67)
US 11123575B2 · Vortman et al. · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 11358007B2 · De Picciotto et al. · 2022 [cited by applicant]
US 20040122323A1 · Vortman · 2004 [cited by examiner]
US 20070016039A1 · Vortman · 2007 [cited by examiner]
US 20080030104A1 · Prus · 2008 [cited by applicant]
US 20080221382A1 · Karshafian et al. · 2008 [cited by applicant]
US 20100143241A1 · Johnson et al. · 2010 [cited by applicant]
US 20100179425A1 · Zadicario · 2010 [cited by examiner]
US 20120116221A1 · Sehgal et al. · 2012 [cited by applicant]
US 20130046229A1 · Konofagou et al. · 2013 [cited by applicant]
US 20130331738A1 · Borelli · 2013 [cited by applicant]
US 20140343421A1 · Kim et al. · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 20140378737A1 · Carpenter et al. · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 20150196638A1 · Czamola et al. · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 20150359603A1 · Levy · 2015 [cited by examiner]
US 20180071553A1 · Vortman · 2018 [cited by examiner]
US 20190083065A1 · Vitek et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 20190178851A1 · Prus · 2019 [cited by examiner]
US 20190350486A1 · Walczak et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 20200085409A1 · Grinfeld et al. · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 20200171327A1 · Levy · 2020 [cited by examiner]
US 20200323515A1 · Levy · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 20210146157A1 · Levy et al. · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 20210187331A1 · Zadicario et al. · 2021 [cited by applicant]
CN 105682739A · 2016 [cited by applicant]
EP 2343103A1 · 2011 [cited by applicant]
EP 2676702A1 · 2013 [cited by applicant]
JP 2006511265A · 2006 [cited by applicant]
JP 2015525108A · 2015 [cited by applicant]
JP 2015534488A · 2015 [cited by applicant]
WO WO2010118307A1 · 2010 [cited by applicant]
WO WO2013034709A1 · 2013 [cited by applicant]
WO WO2014053950A1 · 2014 [cited by applicant]
WO WO2014118632A1 · 2014 [cited by applicant]
WO WO2018020315A1 · 2018 [cited by applicant]
WO WO20180130867A1 · 2018 [cited by applicant]
WO WO20190002947A1 · 2019 [cited by applicant]
WO WO20190058171A1 · 2019 [cited by applicant]
WO WO20190116095A1 · 2019 [cited by applicant]
WO WO20190116097A1 · 2019 [cited by applicant]
WO WO20190116107A1 · 2019 [cited by applicant]
WO WO2021014221A1 · 2021 [cited by applicant]
Notice for Reason of Rejection for Japanese Patent Application No. 2022-504136, dated Feb. 13, 2023. [cited by applicant]
Insightec, Ltd., International Search Report and Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority mailed Nov. 19, 2018 for International Application No. PCT/IB18/000841 (11 pages). [cited by applicant]
Insightec, Ltd., International Search Report and Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority mailed Nov. 28, 2018 for International Application No. PCT/IB18/000811 (12 pages). [cited by applicant]
Insightec, Ltd., International Search Report and Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority mailed Nov. 12, 2018 for International Application No. PCT/IB18/000834 (12 pages). [cited by applicant]
Insightec, Ltd., International Search Report and Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority mailed Nov. 23, 2020 for International Application No. PCT/IB2020/000677 (17 pages). [cited by applicant]
Insightec, Ltd., Extended European Search Report, EP18180302.4, Nov. 21, 2018, 5 pgs. [cited by applicant]
Decision to Grant, EP18180302.4, Jan. 30, 2020, 2 pgs. [cited by applicant]
Decision to Grant, EP18768933.6, Jul. 1, 2021, 3 pgs. [cited by applicant]
Insightec, Ltd., Communication Pursuant to Article 94(3), EP18759374.4, Sep. 20, 2021, 4 pgs. [cited by applicant]
Insightec, Ltd., Allowance Notification for Invention, CN201880043567.3, Jan. 30, 2022, 2 pgs. [cited by applicant]
First Office Action, CN201880056389, Feb. 1, 2021, 19 pgs. [cited by applicant]
Second Office Action, CN201880056389, Aug. 30, 2021, 19 pgs. [cited by applicant]
First Office Action, CN201880043399.8, Feb. 2, 2021, 7 pgs. [cited by applicant]
Notification to Grant Patent Right for Invention, CN201880043399.8, Aug. 30, 2021, 3 pgs. [cited by applicant]
De Picciotto, Notice of Allowance, U.S. Appl. No. 16/622,004, May 5, 2022, 9 pgs. [cited by applicant]
Vlacos, F. et al., “Permeability Assessment of the Focused Ultrasound-Induced Blood-Brain Barrier Opening Using Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced MRI,” Phys. Med. Biol. 55 (2010) 5451-5466, 16 pages. [cited by applicant]
Vortman, Office Action, U.S. Appl. No. 15/637,163, May 13, 2019, 15 pgs. [cited by applicant]
Vortman, Office Action, U.S. Appl. No. 15/637,163, Dec. 6, 2019, 12 pgs. [cited by applicant]
Vortman, Office Action, U.S. Appl. No. 15/637,163, May 21, 2020, 14 pgs. [cited by applicant]
Vortman, Final Office Action, U.S. Appl. No. 15/637,163, Sep. 18, 2020, 15 pgs. [cited by applicant]
Vortman, Notice of Allowance, U.S. Appl. No. 15/637,163, May 28, 2021, 11 pgs. [cited by applicant]
Levy, Office Action, U.S. Appl. No. 16/622,005, Sep. 29, 2022, 20 pgs. [cited by applicant]
Jolesz FA. MRI-guided focused ultrasound surgery. Annu Rev Med. 2009;60:417-30. doi: 10.1146/annurev.med.60.041707.170303. PMID: 19630579; PMCID: PMC4005559 (Year: 2009), 17 pgs. [cited by applicant]
Park et al., Evaluation of permeability, doxorubicin delivery, and drug retention in a rat brain tumor model after ultrasound-induced blood-tumor barrier disruption, Journal of Controlled Release, vol. 250, Mar. 28, 201… [cited by applicant]
Chai et al., Magnetic-resonance imaging for kinetic analysis of permeability changes during focused ultrasound-induced blood-brain barrier opening and brain drug delivery, Journal of Controlled Release, vol. 192, Oct. 2… [cited by applicant]