IP Library Granted Patent US 11,952,882
Granted Patent B2
US 11,952,882 · App. 17/648,034 · Granted Apr 9, 2024

Method for the determination of mud weight window in N-porosity N-permeability formations

Inventors: Chao Liu (Brookshire, TX); Yanhui Han (Houston, TX); Dung T. Phan (Brookshire, TX); Younane N. Abousleiman (Norman, OK)
Assignee: SAUDI ARABIAN OIL COMPANY
E21B44/00E21B7/04E21B21/08E21B49/00G01V1/306G01V2210/624
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 11,952,882
App. No.
17/648,034
Granted
Apr 9, 2024
Kind
B2
Abstract

A method includes obtaining total stresses and pore pressures of each porous medium of a formation, determining a first and second set of effective stresses for the formation, determining an individual collapse and fracturing mud weight for each porous medium of the formation using a first set of associated failure criteria, wherein the first set of associated failure criteria are based on the first set of effective stresses, determining an overall collapse and fracturing mud weight for the formation using a second set of associated failure criteria, wherein the second set of associated failure criteria is based on the second set of effective stresses, determining a mud weight window for the formation using the individual collapse mud weight, the individual fracturing mud weight, the overall collapse mud weight, and the overall fracturing mud weight, and transmitting a command to a drilling system based on the mud weight window.

Claims (61)

1. A method comprising:

obtaining, by a computer processor, total stresses and pore pressures of each porous medium of a formation using an N-porosity and N-permeability poroelastic wellbore solution;

determining, by the computer processor, a first set of effective stresses for each porous medium and a second set of effective stresses for the formation;

determining, by the computer processor, an individual collapse mud weight and an individual fracturing mud weight for each porous medium of the formation using a first set of associated failure criteria, wherein the first set of associated failure criteria are based on the first set of effective stresses;

determining, by the computer processor, an overall collapse mud weight and an overall fracturing mud weight for the formation using a second set of associated failure criteria, wherein the second set of associated failure criteria is based on the second set of effective stresses;

determining, by the computer processor, a mud weight window for the formation using the individual collapse mud weight, the individual fracturing mud weight, the overall collapse mud weight, and the overall fracturing mud weight; and

transmitting, by the computer processor, a command to a drilling system based on the mud weight window.

2. The method of claim 1 , further comprising:

drilling an inclined wellbore, having a plurality of angles, through the formation.

3. The method of claim 2 ,

wherein determining the mud weight window for the formation further comprises:

selecting a smallest fracturing mud weight from the individual fracturing mud weight of each porous medium and the overall fracturing mud weight.

4. The method of claim 3 ,

wherein determining the mud weight window for the formation further comprises:

selecting a largest collapse mud weight from the individual collapse mud weight of each porous medium and the overall collapse mud weight.

5. The method of claim 4 ,

wherein the mud weight window for the formation comprises the smallest fracturing mud weight and the largest collapse mud weight.

6. The method of claim 1 ,

wherein the command comprises modifying drilling mud parameters based on the mud weight window.

7. The method of claim 1 ,

wherein the command comprises adjusting wellbore trajectory, using a geosteering system, based on the mud weight window.

8. The method of claim 1 ,

wherein the first set of associated failure criteria further comprises:

one or more associated failure criteria selected from a group consisting of Mohr-Coulomb, Drucker-Prager, modified Lade, Hoek-Brown and modified Hoek-Brown failure criteria.

9. The method of claim 1 ,

wherein the second set of associated failure criteria further comprises:

one or more associated failure criteria selected from a group consisting of Mohr-Coulomb, Drucker-Prager, modified Lade, Hoek-Brown and modified Hoek-Brown failure criteria.

10. The method of claim 1 , further comprising:

extracting rock compositions, physical and mechanical properties, strength properties, and natural fractures information of the formation from well logs and core samples.

11. A system comprising:

a mud processing system coupled to a mud processing device;

a drilling system coupled to the mud processing system; and

a drilling manager comprising a computer processor, wherein the drilling manager is coupled to the drilling system and the mud processing system, the drilling manager comprising functionality for:

obtaining total stresses and pore pressures of each porous medium of a formation using an N-porosity and N-permeability poroelastic wellbore solution;

determining a first set of effective stresses for each porous medium and a second set of effective stresses for the formation;

determining an individual collapse mud weight and an individual fracturing mud weight for each porous medium of the formation using a first set of associated failure criteria, wherein the first set of associated failure criteria are based on the first set of effective stresses;

determining an overall collapse mud weight and an overall fracturing mud weight for the formation using a second set of associated failure criteria, wherein the second set of associated failure criteria is based on the second set of effective stresses;

determining a mud weight window for the formation using the individual collapse mud weight, the individual fracturing mud weight, the overall collapse mud weight, and the overall fracturing mud weight; and

transmitting a command to the drilling system based on the mud weight window.

12. The system of claim 11 , further comprising:

drilling an inclined wellbore, having a plurality of angles, through the formation.

13. The system of claim 12 ,

wherein determining the mud weight window for the formation further comprises:

selecting a smallest fracturing mud weight from the individual fracturing mud weight of each porous medium and the overall fracturing mud weight.

14. The system of claim 13 ,

wherein determining the mud weight window for the formation further comprises:

selecting a largest collapse mud weight from the individual collapse mud weight of each porous medium and the overall collapse mud weight.

15. The system of claim 14 ,

wherein the mud weight window for the formation comprises the smallest fracturing mud weight and the largest collapse mud weight.

16. The system of claim 11 ,

wherein the command comprises modifying drilling mud parameters based on the mud weight window.

17. The system of claim 11 ,

wherein the command comprises adjusting wellbore trajectory, using a geosteering system, based on the mud weight window.

18. The system of claim 11 ,

wherein the first set of associated failure criteria further comprises:

one or more associated failure criteria selected from a group consisting of Mohr-Coulomb, Drucker-Prager, modified Lade, Hoek-Brown and modified Hoek-Brown failure criteria.

19. The system of claim 11 ,

wherein the second set of associated failure criteria further comprises:

one or more associated failure criteria selected from a group consisting of Mohr-Coulomb, Drucker-Prager, modified Lade, Hoek-Brown and modified Hoek-Brown failure criteria.

20. The system of claim 11 , further comprising:

extracting rock compositions, physical and mechanical properties, strength properties, and natural fractures information of the formation from well logs and core samples.

Assignments (3)
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Oct 18, 2023
From: SAUDI ARAMCO UPSTREAM TECHNOLOGIES COMPANY
To: SAUDI ARABIAN OIL COMPANY
Reel/Frame 065268/0033 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Oct 17, 2023
From: ARAMCO SERVICES COMPANY
To: SAUDI ARAMCO UPSTREAM TECHNOLOGIES COMPANY
Reel/Frame 065255/0383 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Mar 9, 2022
From: ABOUSLEIMAN, YOUNANE N.; HAN, YANHUI; LIU, CHAO; PHAN, DUNG T.
To: ARAMCO SERVICES COMPANY
Reel/Frame 059212/0419 →
Continuity (1)
Related Publication 20230228181A1 · Jul 20, 2023