Centralized mediation between ad-replacement platforms
A method and system for controlling dynamic ad replacement. An example method involves a computing system detecting that first and second ad-replacement platforms are or will be in contention with each other for replacement of a replaceable ad in a media stream and, responsive to at least the detecting, the computing system (i) deciding that the first ad-replacement platform should replace the replaceable ad and that the second ad-replacement platform should not replace the replaceable ad, and (ii) based on the deciding, causing the first ad-replacement platform to replace the replaceable ad and the second ad-replacement platform to not replace the replaceable ad.
1. A method for controlling dynamic ad replacement, the method comprising:
detecting, by a computing system, that a first media client including a first ad-replacement platform is or will be in contention with a second media client including a second ad-replacement platform for replacement of a replaceable ad in a media stream; and
causing, by the computing system responsive to the detecting, the first ad-replacement platform to replace the replaceable ad in favor of the second ad-replacement platform based at least on consideration of a historical dynamic-ad-replacement success rate of at least one of the first and second ad-replacement platforms, wherein a media presentation device includes one of the first and second ad-replacement platforms, and wherein a device that serves the media stream to the media presentation device includes the other of the first and second ad-replacement platforms.
2. The method of claim 1 , wherein the detecting comprises detecting that the first and second media clients are located at a same customer premises as each other.
3. The method of claim 1 , wherein the detecting comprises detecting that the first and second media clients are in a same media-delivery path as each other.
4. The method of claim 1 , wherein the detecting comprises referring to correlation data that indicates that the first and second media clients are likely to be in dynamic-ad-replacement contention.
5. The method of claim 1 , wherein the detecting comprises:
receiving from at least one of the first and second ad-replacement systems a query to determine whether to replace the replaceable ad; and
performing the detecting in response to at least receiving the query.
6. The method of claim 1 , wherein the first ad-replacement platform is part of a first ad-replacement system and the second ad-replacement platform is part of a second ad-replacement system, and wherein the detecting comprises:
receiving from at least one of the first and second ad-replacement systems a query to determine whether to replace the replaceable ad; and
performing the detecting in response to at least receiving the query.
7. The method of claim 1 , wherein the detecting is performed without first receiving a query to determine whether one of the first and second ad-replacement platforms should replace the replaceable ad.
8. The method of claim 1 , wherein the first ad-replacement platform is part of a first ad-replacement system and the second ad-replacement platform is part of a second ad-replacement system, and wherein the causing the second ad-replacement platform to not replace the replaceable ad comprises engaging in control signaling with at least one of the first and second ad-replacement systems.
9. The method of claim 1 , further comprising: causing the second ad-replacement platform to forgo engaging in preparation for replacement of the replaceable ad, before the first ad-replacement platform replaces the replaceable ad.
10. A computing system comprising:
at least one processor;
at least one non-transitory data storage; and
program instructions stored in the at least one non-transitory data storage and executable by the at least one processor to carry out operations for controlling dynamic ad replacement, the operations including:
detecting that a first media client including a first ad-replacement platform is or will be in contention with a second media client including a second ad-replacement platform for replacement of a replaceable ad in a media stream; and
causing, responsive to the detecting, the first ad-replacement platform to replace the replaceable ad in favor of the second ad-replacement platform based at least on consideration of a historical dynamic-ad-replacement success rate of at least one of the first and second ad-replacement platforms, wherein a media presentation device includes one of the first and second ad-replacement platforms, and wherein a device that serves the media stream to the media presentation device includes the other of the first and second ad-replacement platforms.
11. The system of claim 10 , wherein the operation of the detecting comprises at least one action selected from the group consisting of (i) detecting that the first and second media clients are located at a same customer premises as each other and (ii) detecting that the first and second media clients are in a same media-delivery path as each other.
12. The system of claim 10 , wherein the operations further comprise causing the second ad-replacement platform to forgo engaging in preparation for replacement of the replaceable ad, before the first ad-replacement platform replaces the replaceable ad.
13. At least one non-transitory computer-readable medium embodying program instructions executable by at least one processor to carry out operations for controlling dynamic ad replacement, the operations including:
detecting that a first media client including a first ad-replacement platform is or will be in contention with a second media client including a second ad-replacement platform for replacement of a replaceable ad in a media stream; and
causing, responsive to the detecting, the first ad-replacement platform to replace the replaceable ad in favor of the second ad-replacement platform based at least on consideration of a historical dynamic-ad-replacement success rate of at least one of the first and second ad-replacement platforms, wherein a media presentation device includes one of the first and second ad-replacement platforms, and wherein a device that serves the media stream to the media presentation device includes the other of the first and second ad-replacement platforms.
14. The at least one non-transitory computer-readable medium of claim 13 , wherein the operation of the detecting comprises at least one action selected from the group consisting of (i) detecting that the first and second media clients are located at a same customer premises as each other and (ii) detecting that the first and second media clients are in a same media-delivery path as each other.
15. The at least one non-transitory computer-readable medium of claim 13 , wherein the operations further comprise causing the second ad-replacement platform to forgo engaging in preparation for replacement of the replaceable ad, before the first ad-replacement platform replaces the replaceable ad.