IP Library Granted Patent US 12,194,996
Granted Patent B2
US 12,194,996 · App. 17/652,930 · Granted Jan 14, 2025

Dynamically adjusting adaptive cruise control

Inventors: Marjan Deljosevic (Shelby Township, MI); Ermal Gjoni (Sterling Heights, MI); Gentian Godo (Troy, MI)
Assignee: Continental Autonomous Mobility US, LLC
B60W30/16B60W50/0098B60W2050/0026B60W2050/0028B60W2510/18B60W2530/10B60W2530/20B60W2552/15B60W2554/4042B60W2554/802B60W2556/50B60W2720/10
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 12,194,996
App. No.
17/652,930
Granted
Jan 14, 2025
Kind
B2
Abstract

A dynamic adaptive cruise control method for a first vehicle includes a controller disposed within the first vehicle identifying a second vehicle in a direction of travel of the first vehicle. The controller determines a distance between the first vehicle and the second vehicle. The controller determines a safe travel distance between the first vehicle and the second vehicle based at least in part on a set of primary factors and a set of secondary factors. The controller modifies a cruise speed of the first vehicle to maintain at least the determined safe travel distance between the first vehicle and the second vehicle.

Claims (30)

1. A dynamic adaptive cruise control method for a first vehicle comprising:

a controller disposed within the first vehicle identifying a second vehicle in a direction of travel of the first vehicle;

the controller determining a distance between the first vehicle and the second vehicle;

the controller determining a safe travel distance between the first vehicle and the second vehicle, wherein the safe travel distance is determined based at least in part on a set of primary factors and a set of secondary factors;

modifying a cruise speed of the first vehicle to maintain at least the determined safe travel distance between the first vehicle and the second vehicle;

wherein determining a safe travel distance between the first vehicle and the second vehicle comprises determining a nominal safe distance based on the set of primary factors, determining at least one modifier based on the set of secondary factors and applying the at least one modifier to the nominal safe distance wherein determining at least on modifier based on the set of secondary factors comprises determining a plurality of modifiers; and

wherein a first subset of the modifiers are additive modifiers and a second subset of the modifiers are multiplicative modifiers.

2. The method of claim 1 , wherein the set of primary factors includes at least one of a preset minimum distance, a speed of the first vehicle and a speed of the second vehicle.

3. The method of claim 2 , wherein the set of primary factors includes each of the preset minimum distance, the speed of the first vehicle, and the speed of the second vehicle.

4. The method of claim 1 , wherein the set of secondary factors includes at least one of brake fade of the first vehicle, wet brake status of the first vehicle, load of the first vehicle, tire condition of the first vehicle, road conditions, and road grade.

5. The method of claim 4 , wherein the set of secondary factors includes at least [three] of brake fade of the first vehicle, wet brake status of the first vehicle, load of the first vehicle, tire condition of the first vehicle, road conditions, and road grade.

6. The method of claim 4 , further comprising receiving at least one of the brake fade, wet brake status and vehicle load from an electronic brake controller.

7. The method of claim 4 , further comprising receiving at least one of the tire conditions of the first vehicle, road conditions and road grade from one of a corresponding microcontroller, a GPS system, and a sensor.

8. The method of claim 1 , wherein applying the at least one modifier to the nominal safe distance includes multiplying the nominal safe distance by the modifier.

9. The method of claim 1 , wherein applying the at least one modifier to the nominal safe distance includes adding the modifier to the nominal safe distance.

10. The method of claim 1 , wherein determining the at least one modifier comprises identifying a value of one of the secondary factors in the set of secondary factors and checking a look up table correlating the value to a modifier corresponding to the one of the secondary factor.

11. The method of claim 1 , wherein determining the at least one modifier comprises identifying a value of one of the secondary factors in set of secondary factors and applying the value to a laboratory determined formula where an output of the formula is the modifier corresponding to the one of the secondary factors.

12. The method of claim 1 , wherein the at least one modifier is applied using mathematical order of operations.

13. The method of claim 1 , wherein at least one modifier in the first subset of modifiers is applied prior to at least one modifier in the second subset of modifiers.

14. The method of claim 1 , wherein the process is continuously iterated and the minimum safe distance is continuously updated for a full duration of cruise control operations.

15. The method of claim 14 , wherein the process is initiated on initiation of cruise control operations.

16. A controller comprising:

a processor and a memory, the memory storing instructions configured to cause the controller to identify a second vehicle in a direction of travel of a first vehicle containing the controller and determine a distance between the first vehicle and the second vehicle based on sensor signals received from the first vehicle, continuously determine a safe travel distance between the first vehicle and the second vehicle based at least in part on a set of primary factors and a set of secondary factors, and modifying a cruise speed of the first vehicle to maintain at least the determined safe travel distance between the first vehicle and the second vehicle;

wherein determining a safe travel distance between the first vehicle and the second vehicle comprises determining a nominal safe distance based on the set of primary factors, determining at least one modifier based on the set of secondary factors and applying the at least one modifier to the nominal safe distance;

wherein determining at least on modifier based on the set of secondary factors comprises determining a plurality of modifiers; and

wherein a first subset of the modifiers are additive modifiers and a second subset of the modifiers are multiplicative modifiers.

17. The controller of claim 16 , wherein the at least one modifier is applied using mathematical order of operations.

18. The controller of claim 16 , wherein at least one modifier in the first subset of modifiers is applied prior to at least one modifier in the second subset of modifiers.

19. The controller of claim 16 , wherein the process is continuously iterated and the minimum safe distance is continuously updated for a full duration of cruise control operations.

20. The controller of claim 16 , wherein the set of primary factors includes at least one of a preset minimum distance, a speed of the first vehicle and a speed of the second vehicle and wherein the set of secondary factors includes at least one of brake fade of the first vehicle, wet brake status of the first vehicle, load of the first vehicle, tire condition of the first vehicle, road conditions, and road grade.

Assignments (2)
CHANGE OF NAME Recorded Aug 3, 2022
From: CONTINENTAL ADVANCED LIDAR SOLUTIONS US, LLC
To: CONTINENTAL AUTONOMOUS MOBILITY US, LLC
Reel/Frame 061056/0043 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Mar 1, 2022
From: DELJOSEVIC, MARJAN; GJONI, ERMAL; GODO, GENTIAN
To: CONTINENTAL ADVANCED LIDAR SOLUTIONS US, LLC
Reel/Frame 059124/0662 →
Continuity (1)
Related Publication 20230278558A1 · Sep 7, 2023
References Cited (22)
US 6882923B2 · Miller · 2005 [cited by examiner]
US 20150175163A1 · Pilkington · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 20190126892A1 · Lee · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 20190367032A1 · Ito · 2019 [cited by examiner]
US 20200148213A1 · Gawande · 2020 [cited by examiner]
US 20200324766A1 · Zhao · 2020 [cited by examiner]
US 20210213948A1 · Lahti · 2021 [cited by examiner]
US 20210302977A1 · Saikyo · 2021 [cited by examiner]
US 20230150460A1 · Oshita · 2023 [cited by examiner]
US 20230294694A1 · Oshita · 2023 [cited by examiner]
US 20240025408A1 · Fukasawa · 2024 [cited by examiner]
CN 1215948A · 1999 [cited by applicant]
CN 1569524A · 2005 [cited by examiner]
DE 102012012829A1 · 2013 [cited by applicant]
JP 2019519039A · 2019 [cited by applicant]
KR 20050026127A · 2005 [cited by applicant]
KR 101531826B1 · 2015 [cited by applicant]
KR 20190109636A · 2019 [cited by applicant]
WO WO2018039114A1 · 2018 [cited by examiner]
Fan Zilin, Sep. 13, 2006, English Machine Translation_CN1569524A provided by Patent Translate by EPO and Google (Year: 2005). [cited by examiner]
Switkes Joshua P, Aug. 22, 2016, English Machine Translation_WO2018039114A1 provided by Patent Translate by EPO and Google (Year: 2016). [cited by examiner]
The International Search Report and the Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority mailed on Jun. 30, 2023 for the counterpart PCT Application No. PCT/US2023/063414. [cited by applicant]