IP Library Granted Patent US 12,354,485
Granted Patent B2
US 12,354,485 · App. 17/653,667 · Granted Jul 8, 2025

Systems and methods for monitoring a flight plan of an aircraft

Inventors: Stephen Solomon Altus (Campbell, CA); William Jenden (Vancouver, CA); Michael Rowell (Castle Rock, CO); Anthony Bradford Coult (Excelsio, MN); Charles Taylor (Dallas, TX); Jason Aggarwal (Brighton & Hove, GB); Jonathan Geddes Cocks (Victoria, CA)
Assignee: The Boeing Company
G08G5/34G08G5/21G08G5/26
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 12,354,485
App. No.
17/653,667
Granted
Jul 8, 2025
Kind
B2
Abstract

A system and method include a monitoring control unit configured to compare an initial flight plan, as generated by a flight planner for an aircraft, and an assessed flight plan, as determined by air traffic control. The monitoring control unit is configured to determine one or more differences between the initial flight plan and the assessed flight plan. The monitoring control unit is configured to output a notification signal to the flight planner regarding the one or more differences between the initial flight plan and the assessed flight plan.

Claims (44)

1. A system comprising:

a monitoring control unit including one or more processors configured to compare an initial flight plan, as generated by a flight planner for an aircraft, and an assessed flight plan, as determined by air traffic control, wherein the initial flight plan includes (a) a desired route for a flight from a departure location to an arrival location, (b) an amount of fuel for the desired route, (c) available cargo capacity, and (d) available passenger capacity, and wherein the initial flight plan provides an intent to operate the aircraft between the departure location and the arrival location, wherein the initial flight plan is submitted by the flight planner to the air traffic control for assessment,

wherein the monitoring control unit is configured to:

determine one or more differences between the initial flight plan and the assessed flight plan,

continually automatically monitor information published by a flight plan publication sub-system in real time, wherein the monitoring control unit monitors and receives the information in real time from the flight plan publication sub-system as the information is published, wherein the information includes a route the air traffic control intends to assign to the aircraft on departure, and wherein the information is not sent by the air traffic control to the aircraft, and

output a notification signal to the flight planner regarding information including the one or more differences between the initial flight plan and the assessed flight plan.

2. The system of claim 1 , wherein the air traffic control is configured to receive the initial flight plan from the flight planner, and determine the assessed flight plan from the initial flight plan.

3. The system of claim 1 , wherein the flight plan publication sub-system is configured to receive the assessed flight plan from the air traffic control, and wherein the flight plan publication sub-system is configured to publish the information including the assessed flight plan.

4. The system of claim 3 , wherein the flight plan publication sub-system comprises a System Wide Information Management (SWIM) publication service.

5. The system of claim 1 , wherein, in response to the monitoring control unit determining that the assessed flight plan matches the initial flight plan, the monitoring control unit is configured to inform the flight planner that the initial flight plan is approved.

6. The system of claim 1 , wherein the monitoring control unit is configured to automatically output the notification signal immediately, in real time, in response to determining the one or more differences.

7. The system of claim 1 , wherein the one or more differences comprise a different route between the departure location and the arrival location, an amount of fuel for the flight, a predicted fuel burn, a time of the flight, the available cargo capacity, and the available passenger capacity.

8. The system of claim 1 , wherein the flight planner generates a revised initial flight in response to a review of the one or more differences between the initial flight plan and the assessed flight plan.

9. The system of claim 1 , further comprising one or more robots, wherein the one or more robots are configured to receive an aspect change signal from the flight planner, wherein the aspect change signal is based on the assessed flight plan and comprises one or more changes to one or more aspects of a flight of the aircraft, and wherein the one or more robots are configured to automatically change one or more aspects for the flight based on the aspect change signal.

10. The system of claim 9 , wherein the one or more changes to the one or more aspects comprises reduction or addition of fuel, reduction or addition of cargo, and reduction or addition of passenger capacity.

11. A method comprising:

comparing, by a monitoring control unit including one or more processors, an initial flight plan, as generated by a flight planner for an aircraft, and an assessed flight plan, as determined by air traffic control, wherein the initial flight plan includes (a) a desired route for a flight from a departure location to an arrival location, (b) an amount of fuel for the desired route, (c) available cargo capacity, and (d) available passenger capacity, and wherein the initial flight plan provides an intent to operate the aircraft between the departure location and the arrival location;

continually automatically monitoring, by the monitoring control unit, information published by a flight plan publication sub-system, wherein the information includes a route the air traffic control intends to assign to the aircraft on departure, and wherein the information is not sent by the air traffic control to the aircraft, and wherein said continually automatically monitoring comprises receiving and monitoring the information in real time from the flight plan publication sub-system as the information is published;

determining, by the monitoring control unit, one or more differences between the initial flight plan and the assessed flight plan; and

outputting, by the monitoring control unit, a notification signal to the flight planner regarding the information including the one or more differences between the initial flight plan and the assessed flight plan.

12. The method of claim 11 , further comprising:

receiving, by the air traffic control, the initial flight plan from the flight planner; and

determining, by the air traffic control, the assessed flight plan from the initial flight plan.

13. The method of claim 11 , further comprising:

receiving, by the flight plan publication sub-system in communication with the monitoring control unit and the air traffic control, the assessed flight plan from the air traffic control; and

publishing, by the flight plan publication sub-system, the information including the assessed flight plan.

14. The method of claim 13 , wherein the flight plan publication sub-system comprises a System Wide Information Management (SWIM) publication service.

15. The method of claim 11 , wherein, in response to the monitoring control unit determining that the assessed flight plan matches the initial flight plan, informing, by the monitoring control unit, the flight planner that the initial flight plan is approved.

16. The method of claim 11 , wherein said outputting comprises automatically outputting the notification signal immediately, in real time, in response to determining the one or more differences.

17. The method of claim 11 , wherein the one or more differences comprise a different route between the departure location and the arrival location, an amount of fuel for the flight, a predicted fuel burn, a time of the flight, the available cargo capacity, and the available passenger capacity.

18. The method of claim 11 , further comprising generating, by the flight planner, a revised initial flight in response to a review of the one or more differences between the initial flight plan and the assessed flight plan.

19. The method of claim 11 , further comprising:

receiving, by one or more robots, an aspect change signal from the flight planner, wherein the aspect change signal is based on the assessed flight plan and comprises one or more changes to one or more aspects of a flight of the aircraft; and

automatically changing, by the one or more robots, one or more aspects for the flight based on the aspect change signal.

20. A system comprising:

a monitoring control unit including one or more processors configured to compare initial flight plans, as generated by one or more flight planners for a plurality of aircraft, and assessed flight plans, as determined by air traffic control, wherein each of the initial flight plans include (a) a desired route for a flight from a departure location to an arrival location, (b) an amount of fuel for the desired route, (c) available cargo capacity, and (d) available passenger capacity, and wherein each of the initial flight plans provide an intent to operate the aircraft between the departure location and the arrival location, wherein the initial flight plans are submitted by the one or more flight planners to the air traffic control for assessment; and

a flight plan publication sub-system in communication with the monitoring control unit and the air traffic control,

wherein the air traffic control is configured to receive the initial flight plans from the one or more flight planners, and determine the assessed flight plans from the initial flight plans,

wherein the flight plan publication sub-system is configured to receive the assessed flight plans from the air traffic control,

wherein the flight plan publication sub-system is configured to publish the assessed flight plans,

wherein the monitoring control unit is configured to:

determine one or more differences between the initial flight plans and the assessed flight plans,

continually automatically monitor information published by the flight plan publication sub-system in real time, wherein the monitoring control unit monitors and receives the information in real time from the flight plan publication sub-system as the information is published, wherein the information includes a route the air traffic control intends to assign to the aircraft on departure, and wherein the information is not sent by the air traffic control to the aircraft, and

output notification signals to the one or more flight planners regarding the information including one or more differences between the initial flight plans and the assessed flight plans.

Assignments (3)
SECURITY INTEREST Recorded Nov 17, 2025
From: FOREFLIGHT LLC; JEPPESEN FOREFLIGHT, INC.
To: APOLLO ADMINISTRATIVE AGENCY LLC, AS COLLATERAL AGENT
Reel/Frame 073622/0920 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Oct 22, 2025
From: THE BOEING COMPANY
To: BOEING DIGITAL SOLUTIONS, INC.
Reel/Frame 073156/0773 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Mar 7, 2022
From: ALTUS, STEPHEN SOLOMON; JENDEN, WILLIAM; ROWELL, MICHAEL; COULT, ANTHONY BRADFORD; TAYLOR, CHARELS; AGGARWAL, JASON; COCKS, JONATHAN
To: THE BOEING COMPANY
Reel/Frame 059181/0138 →
Continuity (1)
Related Publication 20230282120A1 · Sep 7, 2023
References Cited (23)
US 6922631B1 · Dwyer · 2005 [cited by examiner]
US 9734723B1 · Bruno · 2017 [cited by examiner]
US 11176833B1 · McGaughy · 2021 [cited by examiner]
US 11380208B1 · Moeykens · 2022 [cited by examiner]
US 11572183B1 · Overfield · 2023 [cited by examiner]
US 20090228202A1 · Wipplinger · 2009 [cited by examiner]
US 20100030401A1 · Rogers · 2010 [cited by examiner]
US 20100250026A1 · Deker · 2010 [cited by examiner]
US 20130046422A1 · Cabos · 2013 [cited by examiner]
US 20150199906A1 · Judy · 2015 [cited by examiner]
US 20170069213A1 · Thomas · 2017 [cited by examiner]
US 20170183105A1 · Fournier · 2017 [cited by examiner]
US 20170233108A1 · Kleywegt · 2017 [cited by examiner]
US 20180082595A1 · Hamilton · 2018 [cited by examiner]
US 20180239948A1 · Rutschman · 2018 [cited by examiner]
US 20180366010A1 · Agam · 2018 [cited by examiner]
US 20190147748A1 · Boozarjomehri · 2019 [cited by examiner]
US 20210192961A1 · Lebbos · 2021 [cited by examiner]
US 20220013018A1 · Schwindt · 2022 [cited by examiner]
US 20220238025A1 · McCann · 2022 [cited by examiner]
US 20220250768A1 · Oshima · 2022 [cited by examiner]
US 20230040301A1 · Da Conceicao · 2023 [cited by examiner]
US 20230057311A1 · Moeykens · 2023 [cited by examiner]