IP Library Granted Patent US 11,765,361
Granted Patent B2
US 11,765,361 · App. 17/659,646 · Granted Sep 19, 2023

Method and apparatus for coding video data in palette mode

Inventors: Mohammed Golam Sarwer (Cupertino, CA); Yan Ye (San Diego, CA); Jiancong Luo (Skillman, NJ); Ru-Ling Liao (Beijing, CN)
Assignee: Alibaba Group Holding Limited
H04N19/157H04N19/105H04N19/186H04N19/70
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 11,765,361
App. No.
17/659,646
Granted
Sep 19, 2023
Kind
B2
Abstract

Methods for performing palette coding of video data may include: determining whether a luma component of a coding unit (CU) and chroma components of the CU are coded jointly or separately in a palette mode; and in response to the luma component and the chroma components being coded separately in the palette mode, determining a maximum separate palette-table size for the CU; determining a maximum separate palette-predictor size for the CU; and predicting the CU based on the maximum separate palette-table size and the maximum separate palette-predictor size.

Claims (57)

1. A palette coding method implemented in a decoder, comprising:

determining whether a luma component of a coding unit (CU) and chroma components of the CU are coded jointly or separately in a palette mode; and

in response to the luma component and the chroma components being coded separately in the palette mode,

determining a maximum separate palette-table size for the CU to be smaller than a maximum joint palette-table size,

determining a maximum separate palette-predictor size for the CU, and

predicting the CU based on the maximum separate palette-table size and the maximum separate palette-predictor size.

2. The method of claim 1 , wherein the maximum separate palette-table size or the maximum separate palette-predictor size is for the luma component or the chroma component.

3. The method of claim 1 , wherein determining the maximum separate palette-table size for the CU comprises: determining the maximum separate palette-table size for the CU based on a value of a first syntax element signaled in a video bitstream, and determining the maximum separate palette-predictor size for the CU comprises:

determining the maximum separate palette-predictor size for the CU based on the value of the first syntax element and a value of a second syntax element signaled in the video bitstream.

4. The method of claim 3 , wherein determining the maximum separate palette-predictor size for the CU comprises:

determining the maximum separate palette-predictor size for the CU to be a sum of the value of the first syntax element and the value of the second syntax element.

5. The method of claim 3 , wherein the first syntax element and second syntax element are signaled in a sequence parameter set (SPS) or a picture header (PH) associated with the CU.

6. The method of claim 1 , wherein determining the maximum separate palette-table size for the CU comprises:

determining the maximum separate palette-table size for the CU based on the maximum joint palette-table size.

7. The method of claim 6 , wherein determining the maximum separate palette-predictor size for the CU comprises:

determining the maximum separate palette-predictor size for the CU based on a maximum joint palette-predictor size.

8. The method of claim 7 , wherein, in response to the CU being part of a single-tree slice, the determining the maximum separate palette-table size for the CU comprises: determining the maximum separate palette-table size to be smaller than the maximum joint palette-table size, and

predicting the CU comprises: predicting the CU based on the maximum joint palette-predictor size.

9. The method of claim 7 , wherein, in response to the CU being not part of a single-tree slice, the determining the maximum separate palette-predictor size for the CU comprises: determining the maximum separate palette-predictor size to be smaller than the maximum joint palette-predictor size, and

predicting the CU comprises: predicting the CU based on the maximum separate palette-predictor size.

10. The method of claim 7 , further comprising:

determining whether a picture slice comprising the CU is a single-tree slice or a dual-tree slice; and

in response to the picture slice being a single-tree slice,

determining the maximum joint palette-table size for the CU in the picture slice, based on a value of a first syntax element signaled in a slice header of the picture slice; and

determining the maximum joint palette-predictor size for the CU, based on the value of the first syntax element and a value of a second syntax element signaled in the slice header.

11. The method of claim 10 , wherein determining the maximum joint palette-predictor size for the CU comprises:

determining the maximum joint palette-predictor size for the CU to be a sum of the value of the first syntax element and the value of the second syntax element.

12. The method of claim 10 , further comprising:

in response to the picture slice being a dual-tree slice,

determining the maximum separate palette-table size for the CU, based on a value of a third syntax element signaled in the slice header, and

determining the maximum separate palette-predictor size for the CU, based on the value of the third syntax element and a value of a fourth syntax element signaled in the slice header.

13. The method of claim 12 , wherein determining the maximum separate palette-predictor size for the CU comprises:

determining the maximum separate palette-predictor size for the CU to be a sum of the value of the third syntax element and the value of the fourth syntax element.

14. The method of claim 1 , wherein the maximum separate palette-table size is 15.

15. The method of claim 14 , wherein the maximum joint palette-table size is 31.

16. A video processing apparatus implemented in an encoder, comprising:

at least one memory for storing instructions; and

at least one processor configured to execute the instructions to cause the apparatus to perform:

determining whether a luma component of a coding unit (CU) and chroma components of the CU are coded jointly or separately in a palette mode; and

in response to the luma component and the chroma components being coded separately in the palette mode,

determining a maximum separate palette-table size for the CU to be smaller than a maximum joint palette-table size,

determining a maximum separate palette-predictor size for the CU, and

predicting the CU based on the maximum separate palette-table size and the maximum separate palette-predictor size.

17. A non-transitory computer readable storage medium storing a video bitstream for processing according to an operation comprising:

determining whether a luma component of a coding unit (CU) and chroma components of the CU are coded jointly or separately in a palette mode; and

in response to the luma component and the chroma components being coded separately in the palette mode,

determining a maximum separate palette-table size for the CU to be smaller than a maximum joint palette-table size,

determining a maximum separate palette-predictor size for the CU, and

predicting the CU based on the maximum separate palette-table size and the maximum separate palette-predictor size.

18. The non-transitory computer readable storage medium of claim 17 , wherein the operation further comprises:

determining the maximum separate palette-table size for the CU based on a value of a first syntax element signaled in the video bitstream; and

determining the maximum separate palette-predictor size for the CU based on the value of the first syntax element and a value of a second syntax element signaled in the video bitstream.

19. The non-transitory computer readable storage medium of claim 18 , wherein the operation further comprises:

determining the maximum separate palette-predictor size for the CU to be a sum of the value of the first syntax element and the value of the second syntax element.

20. The non-transitory computer readable storage medium of claim 17 , wherein the operation further comprises:

determining the maximum separate palette-table size for the CU based on the maximum joint palette-table size; and

determining the maximum separate palette-predictor size for the CU based on a maximum joint palette-predictor size.

Assignments (3)
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded May 4, 2026
From: ALIBABA INNOVATION PRIVATE LIMITED
To: HFI INNOVATION INC.
Reel/Frame 075499/0876 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Feb 12, 2026
From: ALIBABA GROUP HOLDING LIMITED
To: ALIBABA INNOVATION PRIVATE LIMITED
Reel/Frame 074832/0914 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Apr 19, 2022
From: SARWER, MOHAMMED GOLAM; YE, YAN; LUO, JIANCONG; LIAO, RU-LING
To: ALIBABA GROUP HOLDING LIMITED
Reel/Frame 059641/0745 →
Continuity (3)
Continuation 16950325 · Nov 17, 2020
Provisional Application 62954843 · Dec 30, 2019
Related Publication 20220248030A1 · Aug 4, 2022