IP Library Granted Patent US 12,409,325
Granted Patent B2
US 12,409,325 · App. 17/667,009 · Granted Sep 9, 2025

Closed-loop autocalibration method for a computer brain interface device, computer program and computer brain interface device

Inventors: Saman Hagh Gooie (Hamburg, DE); Bálint Várkuti (Munich, DE); Ricardo Smits Serena (Munich, DE)
Assignee: Ceregate GmbH
A61N1/36171A61N1/36135A61N1/36178A61N1/37247
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 12,409,325
App. No.
17/667,009
Granted
Sep 9, 2025
Kind
B2
Abstract

A computer brain interface (CBI) device of an individual applies a burst sequence of stimulation pulses to afferent sensory nerve fibers to elicit a bioelectric response via a neurostimulation interface operably connected to or integrated with the CBI device. The neurostimulation interface senses the bioelectric responses of the stimulated afferent sensory nerve fibers. The CBI device derives, based on the sensed bioelectric responses, a neural excitability profile characterizing a non-linear, dynamic excitation behavior of the afferent sensory neurons corresponding to the applied sequence of stimulation pulses. At least one stimulation parameter of the current set of stimulation parameters is adjusted based on the derived excitability profile to obtain an updated set of stimulation parameters.

Claims (74)

1. A closed-loop calibration method for updating a current set of stimulation parameters of a device, the method comprising, by a processor:

applying, via a neurostimulation interface device operably connected to the device, a burst sequence of stimulation pulses to a plurality of afferent sensory neurons targeting a sensory cortex area involved with decoding information transmitted by the device, wherein the sequence of stimulation pulses is associated with the current set of stimulation parameters, and wherein the sequence of stimulation pulses is configured to elicit a bioelectric response in the plurality of afferent sensory neurons;

recording, via the neurostimulation interface device, the elicited bioelectric response of the stimulated afferent sensory neurons;

deriving, based at least in part on the recorded bioelectric response, a neural excitability profile characterizing a non-linear, dynamic excitation behavior of the plurality of afferent sensory neurons corresponding to the applied sequence of stimulation pulses; and

adjusting, based on the derived excitability profile, at least one stimulation parameter of the current set of stimulation parameters to obtain an updated set of stimulation parameters.

2. The method of claim 1 ,

wherein the burst sequence of stimulation pulses is part of a neurostimulation signal or signal sequence applied by the device to elicit an artificial sensory perception in a sensory cortex area receiving input signals from at least a subset of the plurality of afferent sensory neurons,

wherein the burst sequence of stimulation pulses comprises a burst sequence of essentially identical pulses and/or phasic stimulation pulses; and

wherein an intra-burst pulse frequency is at least 50 Hz.

3. The method of claim 1 ,

wherein recording the elicited bioelectric response comprises recording the bioelectric response while the burst sequence of stimulation pulses is being applied, and

wherein deriving the excitability profile is based at least in part on analyzing intra-burst variations of the recorded bioelectric response.

4. The method of claim 3 ,

wherein bioelectric response is recorded after each stimulation pulse or continuously during the sequence.

5. The method of claim 1 , wherein a sampling rate of the recording is equal or larger than an inverse of a time duration between two stimulation pulses of the burst sequence of stimulation pulses.

6. The method of claim 1 ,

wherein at least two consecutive burst sequences are applied, and

wherein deriving the excitability profile is based at least in part on analyzing inter-burst variations of the recorded bioelectric response.

7. The method of claim 6 ,

wherein one or more stimulation parameters including a pulse frequency are varied among the at least two consecutive burst sequences.

8. The method of claim 1 ,

wherein at least two burst sequences are applied,

wherein deriving the excitability profile comprises analyzing the bioelectric response corresponding to each stimulation pulse within each burst sequence, and

wherein deriving the excitability profile comprises analyzing variations among the recorded bioelectric responses within one burst sequence or among consecutive burst sequences.

9. The method of claim 1 ,

wherein deriving the excitation profile comprises extracting temporal variations or dynamics of recording signal parameters or derived metrics from a plurality of subsequent recordings of the elicited bioelectric response, and

wherein the method further comprises, by the processor:

classifying the excitation behavior of a subset of the stimulated afferent sensory neurons using a closed set of discrete categories and based at least in part on the derived excitability profile.

10. The method of claim 9 ,

wherein classification is based at least in part on analyzing a temporal variation or dynamic of the excitability profile within one burst sequence of stimulation pulses or among consecutive burst sequences of stimulation pulses.

11. The method of claim 1 ,

wherein deriving the excitability profile is based at least in part on correlating the recorded bioelectric response with predictions of a non-linear mathematical model of neuronal excitability,

wherein the non-linear mathematical model comprises model parameters that vary slowly in time to capture physiologic adaptation mechanisms of the stimulated afferent sensory neurons.

12. The method of claim 1 ,

wherein the elicited bioelectric response comprises one or more compound action potentials (CAPs), and

wherein deriving the excitability profile comprises determining one or more of:

a difference of a second peak and a first valley within the elicited bioelectric response,

a number of detectable peaks or troughs,

a measure of synchrony among the bioelectric responses recorded for the burst sequence or among subsequent burst sequences of stimulation pulses, and

a delay between a stimulation pulse and the corresponding CAP.

13. The method of claim 1 ,

wherein adjusting the at least one stimulation parameter comprises comparing the derived excitability profile with a reference excitability profile,

wherein the reference excitability profile includes one or more of the following:

an amplitude of a reference bioelectric response,

intra-burst variations among bioelectric responses corresponding to single stimulation pulses within a burst sequence, and

intra-burst variations of the bioelectric response corresponding to the first and the last stimulation pulse within a burst stimulation sequence.

14. The method of claim 13 ,

wherein the reference excitability profile corresponds to a specific artificial sensory perception corresponding to a set of reference stimulation parameters associated with the reference excitability profile.

15. The method of claim 1 , the method further comprising, by the processor:

applying, via the neurostimulation interface device, a neurostimulation signal or signal sequence to at least a subset of the afferent sensory neurons using the updated stimulation parameters

wherein the neurostimulation signal or signal sequence is configured to elicit an artificial sensory perception in a sensory cortex area receiving afferent sensory input from the stimulated subset of afferent sensory neurons.

16. The method of claim 1 ,

wherein the device comprises a neurostimulation (NS) device or a computer-brain interface (CBI) device.

17. A non-transitory computer-readable memory medium storing program instructions which, when executed by a processor, cause a device to:

apply, via a neurostimulation interface device operably connected to the device, a burst sequence of stimulation pulses to a plurality of afferent sensory neurons of an individual targeting a sensory cortex area involved with decoding information transmitted by the device, wherein the sequence of stimulation pulses is associated with the current set of stimulation parameters, and wherein the sequence of stimulation pulses is configured to elicit a bioelectric response in the plurality of afferent sensory neurons;

record, via the neurostimulation interface device, the elicited bioelectric response of the stimulated afferent sensory neurons;

derive, based at least in part on the recorded bioelectric response, a neural excitability profile characterizing a non-linear, dynamic excitation behavior of the plurality of afferent sensory neurons corresponding to the applied sequence of stimulation pulses; and

adjust, based on the derived excitability profile, at least one stimulation parameter of the current set of stimulation parameters to obtain an updated set of stimulation parameters.

18. The non-transitory computer-readable memory medium of claim 17 ,

wherein the burst sequence of stimulation pulses is part of a neurostimulation signal or signal sequence applied by the device to elicit an artificial sensory perception in a sensory cortex area receiving input signals from at least a subset of the plurality of afferent sensory neurons,

wherein the burst sequence of stimulation pulses comprises a burst sequence of essentially identical pulses and/or phasic stimulation pulses; and

wherein an intra-burst pulse frequency is at least 50 Hz.

19. A device, comprising:

a processor;

a non-transitory computer-readable memory medium operably coupled to the processor; and

a neurostimulation interface device operably coupled to the processor, wherein the device is configured to:

apply, via the neurostimulation interface device, a burst sequence of stimulation pulses to a plurality of afferent sensory neurons of an individual targeting a sensory cortex area involved with decoding information transmitted by the device, wherein the sequence of stimulation pulses is associated with the current set of stimulation parameters, and wherein the sequence of stimulation pulses is configured to elicit a bioelectric response in the plurality of afferent sensory neurons;

record, via the neurostimulation interface device, the elicited bioelectric response of the stimulated afferent sensory neurons;

derive, based at least in part on the recorded bioelectric response, a neural excitability profile characterizing a non-linear, dynamic excitation behavior of the plurality of afferent sensory neurons corresponding to the applied sequence of stimulation pulses; and

adjust, based on the derived excitability profile, at least one stimulation parameter of the current set of stimulation parameters to obtain an updated set of stimulation parameters.

20. The device of claim 19 ,

wherein the device comprises:

a neurostimulation (NS) device; or

a computer brain interface (CBI) device.

Assignments (2)
CHANGE OF ADDRESS OF ASSIGNEE Recorded Mar 17, 2023
From: CEREGATE GMBH
To: CEREGATE GMBH
Reel/Frame 063115/0923 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Feb 8, 2022
From: HAGH GOOIE, SAMAN; VÁRKUTI, BÁLINT; SMITS SERENA, RICARDO
To: CEREGATE GMBH
Reel/Frame 058928/0204 →
Priority Claims (1)
EP 22151438 · Jan 13, 2022 · regional
Continuity (2)
Continuation In Part 17224953 · Apr 7, 2021
Related Publication 20220323767A1 · Oct 13, 2022
References Cited (76)
US 4445512A · Krupka et al. · 1984 [cited by applicant]
US 4488555A · Imran · 1984 [cited by applicant]
US 7751884B2 · Ternes et al. · 2010 [cited by applicant]
US 7774056B2 · Torgerson · 2010 [cited by applicant]
US 8193766B2 · Rondoni et al. · 2012 [cited by applicant]
US 8290596B2 · Wei et al. · 2012 [cited by applicant]
US 8352029B2 · Ternes et al. · 2013 [cited by applicant]
US 8364271B2 · De Ridder · 2013 [cited by applicant]
US 8380314B2 · Panken et al. · 2013 [cited by applicant]
US 8423145B2 · Pless et al. · 2013 [cited by applicant]
US 8475172B2 · Lieberman et al. · 2013 [cited by applicant]
US 8494633B2 · Tobacman · 2013 [cited by applicant]
US 8509904B2 · Rickert et al. · 2013 [cited by applicant]
US 8812128B2 · Kothandaraman · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 9095314B2 · Osorio et al. · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 9357938B2 · Ang et al. · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 9636497B2 · Bradley et al. · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 9713720B2 · Zhu · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 9974478B1 · Brokaw et al. · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 10568559B2 · Parker et al. · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 20030065366A1 · Merritt et al. · 2003 [cited by applicant]
US 20060129205A1 · Boveja et al. · 2006 [cited by applicant]
US 20060241717A1 · Whitehurst et al. · 2006 [cited by applicant]
US 20060241718A1 · Tyler et al. · 2006 [cited by applicant]
US 20070027397A1 · Fischell et al. · 2007 [cited by applicant]
US 20070250134A1 · Miesel et al. · 2007 [cited by applicant]
US 20080129517A1 · Crosby et al. · 2008 [cited by applicant]
US 20080139954A1 · Day et al. · 2008 [cited by applicant]
US 20090306741A1 · Hogle et al. · 2009 [cited by applicant]
US 20100057161A1 · Machado et al. · 2010 [cited by applicant]
US 20100063411A1 · Donoghue et al. · 2010 [cited by applicant]
US 20130150914A1 · Kelly et al. · 2013 [cited by applicant]
US 20130253299A1 · Weber et al. · 2013 [cited by applicant]
US 20140081348A1 · Fischell · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 20140379046A1 · Tcheng et al. · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 20150018724A1 · Hsu et al. · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 20150073492A1 · Kilgard et al. · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 20150290453A1 · Tyler et al. · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 20160022992A1 · Franke et al. · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 20160121118A1 · Franke et al. · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 20170080226A1 · Akhoun · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 20180050198A1 · Mazanec et al. · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 20180229046A1 · Parker et al. · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 20190030338A1 · Wu et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 20200269049A1 · Varkuti · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 20200376272A1 · Block · 2020 [cited by examiner]
DE 102019202666A1 · 2020 [cited by applicant]
DE 102019209096A1 · 2020 [cited by applicant]
EP 2552304B1 · 2015 [cited by applicant]
EP 3229893A1 · 2017 [cited by applicant]
EP 3431138A1 · 2019 [cited by applicant]
EP 2486897B1 · 2019 [cited by applicant]
KR 20170132055A · 2017 [cited by applicant]
KR 101841625B1 · 2018 [cited by applicant]
WO 2012003451A2 · 2012 [cited by applicant]
WO 2016116397A1 · 2016 [cited by applicant]
WO 2018057667A1 · 2018 [cited by applicant]
WO 2018109715A1 · 2018 [cited by applicant]
WO 2020174051A1 · 2020 [cited by applicant]
Anderson D.N., et al., “Optimized Programming Algorithm for Cylindrical and Directional Deep Brain Stimulation Electrodes,” Journal of Neural Engineering, IOP Publishing Limited, Jan. 24, 2018, 19 pages, URL: https://do… [cited by applicant]
Beauchamp M.S., et al., “Dynamic Electrical Stimulation of Sites in Visual Cortex Produces Form Vision in Sighted and Blind Humans,” bioRxiv preprint, Nov. 5, 2018, 24 pages, Retrieved from the Internet: URL: http://dx.… [cited by applicant]
Donati A.R.C., et al., “Long Term Training with a Brain-Machine Interface Based Gait Protocol Induces Partial Neurological Recovery in Paraplegic Patients,” 2016, Scientific Reports 6, Article 30383, 16 pages, Retrieved… [cited by applicant]
European Search Report for European Application No. 21168408.9, mailed on Oct. 6, 2021, 4 pages. [cited by applicant]
Examination Report for German Application No. 1020192014752.6, mailed on Jun. 16, 2020, 8 pages. [cited by applicant]
Examination Report for German Application No. 102020210676.2, mailed on Apr. 16, 2021, 5 pages. [cited by applicant]
First Office Action issued Oct. 16, 2019 for German Application No. DE102019202666.4, 16 pages. [cited by applicant]
Ghai S., et al., “Effect of Rhythmic Auditory Cueing on Parkinsonian Gait: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis,” Nature Scientific Reports, Jan. 11, 2018, vol. 8, Article 506, DOI:10.1038/s41598-017-16232-5, 19 pages. [cited by applicant]
Heming E.A., et al., “Designing a Thalamic Somatosensory Neural Prosthesis: Consistency and Persistence of Percepts Evoked by Electrical Stimulation,” IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering, … [cited by applicant]
International Search report and Written Opinion in International Application No. PCT/EP2022/059282, mailed on Jul. 11, 2022, 21 pages. [cited by applicant]
Invitation to Pay Additional Fees and Where Applicable Protest Fee and Partial International Search for PCT/EP2020/055156, mailed on May 29, 2020, 21 pages. [cited by applicant]
Lee B., et al., “Engineering Artificial Somatosensation Through Cortical Stimulation in Humans,” Frontiers in Systems Neuroscience, Jun. 4, 2018, vol. 12, Article 24, 11 pages, www.frontiersin.org. [cited by applicant]
Roelfsema P.R., et al., “Mind Reading and Writing: The Future of Neurotechnology,” Trends in Cognitive Sciences, Elsevier Limited, May 6, 2018, 14 pages, Retrieved from URL: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2018.04.001. [cited by applicant]
Rosenthal L., et al., “Sensory Electrical Stimulation Cueing May Reduce Freezing of Gait Episodes in Parkinson's Disease,” Hindawi Journal of Healthcare Engineering, 2018, Article ID 4684925, 6 pages. [cited by applicant]
Swan B.D., et al., “Sensory Percepts Induced by Microwire Array and DBS Microstimulation in Human Sensory Thalamus,” Brain Stimulation, Elsevier Incorporated, 2018, vol. 11 (2), pp. 416-422, Retrieved from URL: https://… [cited by applicant]
Yadav A.P., et al., “A Brain to Spine Interface for Transferring Artificial Sensory Information,” 2020, Scientific Reports 10, Article 900, 2020, 15 pages. [cited by applicant]
European Search Report issued in European Application No. 22151438.3, mailed on Jun. 17, 2022, 4 pages. [cited by applicant]