IP Library Granted Patent US 11,899,719
Granted Patent B2
US 11,899,719 · App. 17/668,890 · Granted Feb 13, 2024

Systems and methods for determining whether to modify content

Inventor: Alejandro Sanchez Pulido (Chatsworth, CA)
Assignee: Rovi Guides, Inc.
G06F16/901G06F16/587G06F16/5854G06F16/5866G06F21/10
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 11,899,719
App. No.
17/668,890
Granted
Feb 13, 2024
Kind
B2
Abstract

The system determines whether content such as an image is suitable for content modification based on one or more criteria. The system includes decision engines or modules configured to evaluate one or more suitability metrics based on corresponding criteria such as publication status, restriction status, context, compatibility, and classification. If content is unsuitable for content modification because of entities or context depicted therein, privacy status, incompatibility with content modification, properties of the content file itself, or other aspects, the system generates a tag indicating the content is unsuitable for content modification. If content is suitable for content modification because of entities or context depicted therein, publication status, compatibility with content modification, properties of the content file itself, or other aspects, the system generates a content modification tag indicating the content is suitable for content modification. Metadata associated with the content is updated based on the flag.

Claims (52)

1. A method comprising:

receiving, at a content sharing service, a request to modify a content item;

determining that the content item is available via the content sharing service to a plurality of devices;

determining that the content item is associated with a no-modification rule; and

in response to determining that the content item is available via the content sharing service to the plurality of devices and determining that the content item is associated with the no-modification rule:

denying the request to modify the content item.

2. The method of claim 1 , further comprising:

determining a publication status of the content item; and

in response to determining that the publication status of the content item is not published, associating the content item with the no-modification rule.

3. The method of claim 2 , wherein the determining the publication status of the content item comprises:

determining a content signature of the content item;

comparing the content signature with reference content signatures of a plurality of content items; and

based on the comparison, determining whether the content signature matches a reference content signature.

4. The method of claim 2 , wherein the determining the publication status of the content item comprises:

accessing metadata of the content item, wherein the metadata includes publication information.

5. The method of claim 1 , further comprising:

determining whether the content item is restricted; and

in response to determining that the content item is restricted from modification, associating the content item with the no-modification rule.

6. The method of claim 5 , wherein the determining whether the content item is restricted is based on user preference information.

7. The method of claim 5 , wherein the determining whether the content item is restricted is based on a classification.

8. The method of claim 1 , further comprising:

determining whether the content item is compatible with modification; and

in response to determining that the content item is not compatible with modification, associating the content item with the no-modification rule.

9. The method of claim 8 , wherein the determining whether the content item is compatible with modification is based on metadata.

10. The method of claim 8 , wherein the content item comprises an image and the determining whether the content item is compatible with modification is based on a visual aspect of the image.

11. A system comprising:

input/output circuitry configured to:

receive, at a content sharing service, a request to modify a content item; and

control circuitry configured to:

determine that the content item is available via the content sharing service to a plurality of devices;

determine that the content item is associated with a no-modification rule; and

in response to determining that the content item is available via the content sharing service to the plurality of devices and determining that the content item is associated with the no-modification rule:

deny the request to modify the content item.

12. The system of claim 11 , wherein the control circuitry is further configured to:

determine a publication status of the content item; and

in response to determining that the publication status of the content item is not published, associate the content item with the no-modification rule.

13. The system of claim 12 , wherein the control circuitry is configured to determine the publication status of the content item by:

determining a content signature of the content item;

comparing the content signature with reference content signatures of a plurality of content items; and

based on the comparison, determining whether the content signature matches a reference content signature.

14. The system of claim 12 , wherein the control circuitry is configured to determine the publication status of the content item by:

accessing metadata of the content item, wherein the metadata includes publication information.

15. The system of claim 11 , wherein the control circuitry is further configured to:

determine whether the content item is restricted; and

in response to determining that the content item is restricted from modification, associate the content item with the no-modification rule.

16. The system of claim 15 , wherein the determining whether the content item is restricted is based on user preference information.

17. The system of claim 15 , wherein the determining whether the content item is restricted is based on a classification.

18. The system of claim 11 , wherein the control circuitry is further configured to:

determine whether the content item is compatible with modification; and

in response to determining that the content item is not compatible with modification, associate the content item with the no-modification rule.

19. The system of claim 18 , wherein the determining whether the content item is compatible with modification is based on metadata.

20. The system of claim 18 , wherein the content item comprises an image and the determining whether the content item is compatible with modification is based on a visual aspect of the image.

Assignments (3)
CHANGE OF NAME Recorded Oct 3, 2024
From: ROVI GUIDES, INC.
To: ADEIA GUIDES INC.
Reel/Frame 069106/0178 →
SECURITY INTEREST Recorded May 3, 2023
From: ADEIA GUIDES INC.; ADEIA IMAGING LLC; ADEIA MEDIA HOLDINGS LLC; ADEIA MEDIA SOLUTIONS INC.; ADEIA SEMICONDUCTOR ADVANCED TECHNOLOGIES INC.; ADEIA SEMICONDUCTOR BONDING TECHNOLOGIES INC.; ADEIA SEMICONDUCTOR INC.; ADEIA SEMICONDUCTOR SOLUTIONS LLC; ADEIA SEMICONDUCTOR TECHNOLOGIES LLC; ADEIA SOLUTIONS LLC
To: BANK OF AMERICA, N.A., AS COLLATERAL AGENT
Reel/Frame 063529/0272 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Feb 10, 2022
From: PULIDO, ALEJANDRO SANCHEZ
To: ROVI GUIDES, INC.
Reel/Frame 058976/0417 →
Continuity (2)
Continuation 16404531 · May 6, 2019
Related Publication 20220343625A1 · Oct 27, 2022