IP Library Granted Patent US 12,270,989
Granted Patent B2
US 12,270,989 · App. 17/682,800 · Granted Apr 8, 2025

Stiffening structures for micro-electro-mechanical system (MEMS) micromirrors

Inventors: Kenneth Alexander Diest (Kirkland, WA); Katherine Marie Smyth (Seattle, WA); Daniel Guenther Greif (Redmond, WA)
Assignee: Meta Platforms Technologies, LLC
G02B26/0833B81B3/007B81C1/00658G02B26/101B81B2201/042
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 12,270,989
App. No.
17/682,800
Granted
Apr 8, 2025
Kind
B2
Abstract

An apparatus, system, and method for micro-electro-mechanical system (MEMS) micromirror including a plurality of stiffening structures is described. The MEMS micromirror includes a mirror surface to reflect light, a support platform coupled along a mirror surface, and a plurality of stiffening structures formed from or coupled to the support platform. In some examples, a dimensionality or density of the stiffening structures scale across an area of the support platform in a manner to assist in keeping the mirror surface flat under torsional force.

Claims (28)

1. A micro-electromechanical system (MEMS) micromirror, comprising:

a mirror surface to reflect light;

a support platform coupled along the mirror surface; and

a plurality of stiffening structures formed from or coupled to the support platform, wherein a relative density of the stiffening structures scales inversely with a height of the stiffening structures as their positions move outward across an area of the support platform in a manner to assist in keeping the mirror surface flat under torsional force.

2. The MEMS micromirror of claim 1 , wherein in addition to the height of the stiffening structures, a dimensionality includes a shape, thickness, or size of each of the plurality of stiffening structures and one or more additional dimensionalities scale hierarchically relative to the density of the stiffening structures.

3. The MEMS micromirror of claim 1 , wherein the stiffening structures extend radially outward from a center of the MEMS micromirror.

4. The MEMS micromirror of claim 3 , wherein the stiffening structures are radially offset from an axis of rotation of the MEMS micromirror.

5. The MEMS micromirror of claim 1 , wherein each of the plurality of stiffening structures include a height that extends in a perpendicular manner from the support platform and the height varies according to a position or spacing of the stiffening structures.

6. The MEMS micromirror of claim 1 , wherein the plurality of stiffening structures forms a grid structure and a density of the plurality of stiffening structures increases radially towards an outer portion of the support platform.

7. The MEMS micromirror of claim 1 , wherein the mirror surface comprises a reflective layer and wherein a portion of the reflective layer and the support platform form a mirror element.

8. The MEMS micromirror of claim 7 , wherein the mirror element includes a plurality of holes extending through the reflective layer and through a thickness of the support substrate.

9. A method of forming a micro-electro-mechanical system (MEMS) micromirror, comprising:

forming a support substrate; and

forming a reflective layer over a first surface of the support substrate, wherein the support substrate is formed to include a plurality of stiffening structures on a second surface that is opposite the first surface and wherein a relative density of the plurality of stiffening structures scales inversely with a height of the stiffening structures as their positions move outward across an area of the second surface to assist in keeping the reflective layer optically flat under torsional force.

10. The method of claim 9 , wherein in addition to the height of the stiffening structures, one or more additional dimensionalities of the plurality of stiffening structures scales hierarchically relative to the density of the stiffening structures.

11. The method of claim 10 , wherein a size or thickness of each of the plurality of stiffening structures decreases as their positions move radially outward in an area of the support substrate.

12. The method of claim 10 , wherein each of the plurality of stiffening structures have a height that extends in a perpendicular manner from the second surface and the height varies according to a position or spacing of the stiffening structures.

13. The method of claim 9 , wherein forming the support substrate includes forming the support substrate from at least one of silicon, silicon nitride, silicon oxide or silicon carbide.

14. The method of claim 9 , wherein the plurality of stiffening structures forms concentric circles or ellipses across an area of the support substrate.

15. An optical scanner comprising:

a light source configured to emit source light;

a micro-electromechanical system (MEMS) micromirror including a mirror surface to receive the source light; and

processing logic configured to:

drive the light source to emit the source light; and

drive the MEMS micromirror to rotate about at least one axis to redirect the source light as image light to form an image, wherein the MEMS micromirror includes a plurality of stiffening structures having a density which scales inversely with a height of the stiffening structures across an area of the mirror surface to assist in keeping the mirror surface flat under torsional force about the at least one axis.

16. The optical scanner of claim 15 , wherein the density of stiffening structures in the plurality increases as their positions move radially outward in an area of a support substrate coupled to the mirror surface.

17. The optical scanner of claim 15 , wherein a first dimensionality including the height and a second dimensionality of the plurality of stiffening structures scales hierarchically relative to the density of the plurality of stiffening structures.

18. The optical scanner of claim 15 , wherein the plurality of stiffening structures form a grid across an area of the support substrate.

Assignments (2)
CHANGE OF NAME Recorded Jun 1, 2022
From: FACEBOOK TECHNOLOGIES, LLC
To: META PLATFORMS TECHNOLOGIES, LLC
Reel/Frame 060246/0845 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Mar 31, 2022
From: DIEST, KENNETH ALEXANDER; SMYTH, KATHERINE MARIE; GREIF, DANIEL GUENTHER
To: FACEBOOK TECHNOLOGIES, LLC
Reel/Frame 059459/0714 →
Continuity (1)
Related Publication 20230273424A1 · Aug 31, 2023
References Cited (10)
US 9910269B2 · Van Lierop · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 20050139542A1 · Dickensheets et al. · 2005 [cited by applicant]
US 20110149361A1 · Moidu · 2011 [cited by examiner]
US 20210255373A1 · Yasumura · 2021 [cited by applicant]
Hofmann U., et al., “Resonant Biaxial 7-mm MEMS Mirror for Omnidirectional Scanning,” Journal of Micro/Nanolithography, MEMS, and MOEMS, 2014, vol. 13, No. 1, 13 pages. [cited by applicant]
Ji C.H., et al., “An Electrostatic Scanning Micromirror with Diaphragm Mirror Plate and Diamond-Shaped Reinforcement Frame,” Journal of Micromechanics and Microengineering, Apr. 7, 2006, pp. 1033-1039. [cited by applicant]
Lutzenberger B.J., “Analysis and Design of MEMS Scan Mirrors Using Periodically Stiffened Silicon Nitride,” Montana State University, Apr. 2006, 147 pages. [cited by applicant]
Milanovic V., et al., “Gimbal-Less Monolithic Silicon Actuators for Tip-Tilt-Piston Micromirror Applications,” IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Quantum Electronics, 2004, vol. 10, No. 3, pp. 462-471. [cited by applicant]
Su J.G., et al., “Surface-Micromachined 2D Optical Scanners with Optically Flat Single-Crystalline Silicon Micromirrors,” Proceedings of Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE), 2001, vol. 4293, pp. 46… [cited by applicant]
International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Application No. PCT/US2023/013906, mailed Jun. 22, 2023, 9 pages. [cited by applicant]