IP Library Granted Patent US 12,380,418
Granted Patent B2
US 12,380,418 · App. 17/683,145 · Granted Aug 5, 2025

Adaptive additive manufacturing for value chain networks

Inventors: Charles H. Cella (Pembroke, MA); Brent Bliven (Austin, TX); Kunal Sharma (Mumbai, IN); Teymour S. El-Tahry (Detroit, MI)
Assignee: STRONG FORCE VCN PORTFOLIO 2019, LLC
G06Q20/14B25J9/163B25J9/1653B25J9/1661B25J9/1671B25J9/1682B25J9/1697B29C64/386B29C64/393B33Y10/00B33Y50/00B33Y50/02G02B3/14G02B26/00G05B13/0265G05B13/042G05B17/02G05B19/402G05B19/4099G05D1/0027G05D1/0297G05D1/221G06F30/27G06N20/00G06N20/20G06Q10/06311G06Q10/0633G06T7/70H04L9/3239H04L9/50H04L63/1441G05B2219/32015G05B2219/40113G05B2219/49023G06F2113/10G06Q10/06G06Q10/0631G06Q10/063114G06Q10/06313G06Q10/06316G06Q10/0831G06Q10/0833G06Q10/087G06Q30/0201G06Q2220/00G06T2207/20081
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 12,380,418
App. No.
17/683,145
Filed
Feb 28, 2022
Granted
Aug 5, 2025
Kind
B2
Art Unit
2115
USPC
700/98
Abstract

An information technology system for a distributed manufacturing network includes an additive manufacturing management platform configured to manage process and production workflows for a set of distributed manufacturing network entities through design, modeling, printing, and supply chain stages. The information technology system includes an artificial intelligence system configured to learn on a training set of outcomes, parameters, and data collected from the set of distributed manufacturing network entities of the distributed manufacturing network to optimize digital production processes and workflows. The information technology system includes a distributed ledger system integrated with a digital thread configured to provide unified views of workflow and transaction information to entities in the distributed manufacturing network.

Claims (47)

1. An information technology system for a distributed manufacturing network, the information technology system comprising:

an additive manufacturing management platform configured to manage one or more production processes and production workflows for a distributed manufacturing platform, including a set of distributed manufacturing network entities, through at least one of: design, modeling, printing, or supply chain stages, wherein the set of distributed manufacturing network entities include at least one of: an additive manufacturing unit, a manufacturing node, or another type of manufacturing unit;

an artificial intelligence system configured to learn on a training set of outcomes, parameters, and data collected from the set of distributed manufacturing network entities to train models of the one or more production processes and production workflows for each of the set of distributed manufacturing network entities and the distributed manufacturing platform;

a distributed ledger system integrated with a digital thread configured to provide unified views of workflow and transaction information to entities in the distributed manufacturing network, including a customer for a component, wherein the digital thread includes more than one instruction set for manufacturing the component, each instruction set is configured to facilitate manufacturing of the component using a distinct form of additive manufacturing equipment, or a hybrid combination of manufacturing equipment;

a digital twin system configured to build manufacturing device digital twins for each of the set of distributed manufacturing network entities based on the trained models and an environment digital twin for the distributed manufacturing platform,

wherein each manufacturing device digital twin is configured to include a capacity and a set of supported manufacturing capabilities, including at least one of: a manufacturing type, material selection, or a throughput,

wherein the environment digital twin includes a set of existing one or more customers, and

wherein each manufacturing device digital twin is configured to provide a substantially real-time representation of a corresponding one of the set of distributed manufacturing network entities through data from one or more sensors positioned in, on, or near the corresponding one of the set of distributed manufacturing network entities; and

a control system configured to adjust the data and one or more parameters collected from the set of distributed manufacturing network entities in real time,

wherein the artificial intelligence system generates a set of manufacturing options by executing simulations on the manufacturing device digital twins and the environment digital twin for predicting a set of impacts corresponding to the set of manufacturing options on the distributed manufacturing platform, including the more than one instruction set for manufacturing the component included in the digital thread, and

wherein the additive manufacturing management platform schedules the manufacturing of the component based on the set of generated manufacturing options and their respective impacts on the distributed manufacturing platform and a set of existing one or more customer orders and manufactures the component based on at least one of the manufacturing schedules.

2. The information technology system of claim 1 , wherein scheduling the manufacturing of the component based on the generated set of manufacturing options and the corresponding respective impacts on the distributed manufacturing platform includes selecting at least one of the generated set of manufacturing options that minimizes waste production or maximizes material recapture and recycling.

3. The information technology system of claim 1 , wherein scheduling the manufacturing of the component based on the generated set of manufacturing options and their corresponding predicted impacts on the distributed manufacturing platform includes selecting at least one of the generated set of manufacturing options that: optimizes a material utilization, optimizes an energy utilization, or optimizes a labor utilization.

4. The information technology system of claim 1 , wherein scheduling the manufacturing of the component based on the generated set of manufacturing options and their respective impacts on the distributed manufacturing platform includes selecting at least one of the generated set of manufacturing options based on at least one of: a material cost, an energy cost, or a labor cost.

5. A distributed manufacturing network comprising:

an additive manufacturing management platform configured to manage process and production workflows for a set of distributed manufacturing network entities in a distributed manufacturing environment including at least one of: an additive manufacturing unit, a manufacturing node, or another type of manufacturing unit;

an artificial intelligence system configured to train a set of machine-learned models using learn on a training set of outcomes, parameters, and data collected from the set of distributed manufacturing network entities;

a digital twin system configured to build manufacturing digital twins of the set of distributed manufacturing network entities and an environment digital twin based on the distributed manufacturing environment and the trained set of machine-learned models,

wherein each manufacturing digital twin is configured to provide a substantially real-time representation of a corresponding distributed manufacturing network entity through data from one or more sensors positioned in, on, or near the corresponding distributed manufacturing network entity;

a control system configured to adjust the data and one or more parameters collected from the set of distributed manufacturing network entities in real time;

wherein each manufacturing digital twin is configured to include a set of supported manufacturing capabilities, including at least one of: a manufacturing type, a material selection, a material utilization, a throughput, or an energy utilization, and

wherein the artificial intelligence system is configured to generate an order fulfillment option by executing a simulation using the manufacturing digital twins and the environment digital twin, wherein the order fulfillment option includes an impact on the distributed manufacturing environment;

a distributed ledger configured to store details of a set of customer orders, wherein each of a subset of the set of customer orders includes a corresponding digital thread including more than one instruction set to facilitate manufacturing of a component of a corresponding customer order using a distinct form of additive manufacturing equipment, or a hybrid combination of manufacturing equipment; and

a job management system configured to receive a new customer order, wherein the new customer order includes at least one digital thread,

wherein the artificial intelligence system generates a set of order fulfillment options by executing a set of simulations, the set of simulations including simulations of alternative scheduling sequences based on the more than one instruction set, across the set of distributed manufacturing network entities and the distributed manufacturing environment, and

wherein the additive manufacturing management platform schedules manufacturing of a component of the new customer order based on the new customer order and the generated set of order fulfillment options and manufactures the component of the new customer order based on at least one of the manufacturing schedules.

6. The distributed manufacturing network of claim 5 wherein the new customer order includes digital threads that encode information related to a complete lifecycle of a portion of the new customer order from at least one of: design, modeling, production, validation, use, maintenance, or through disposal.

7. The distributed manufacturing network of claim 5 , wherein the new customer order is at least one of a price contingency order or a timing contingency order.

8. The distributed manufacturing network of claim 5 , wherein scheduling manufacturing of the new customer order based on the generated set of order fulfillment options and their respective impacts on the distributed manufacturing environment includes selecting at least one of the generated set of order fulfillment options based on at least one of: a material cost, an energy cost, a labor cost, or a timeline.

9. The distributed manufacturing network of claim 5 , wherein scheduling the manufacturing of the component based on the generated set of order fulfillment options and their respective impacts on the distributed manufacturing environment includes selecting at least one of the generated set of order fulfillment options based on at least one of: a minimization of waste production, a maximization of material recapture, or a maximization of recycling.

10. The distributed manufacturing network of claim 5 , wherein scheduling the manufacturing of the component based on the set of generated order fulfillment options and their respective impacts on the distributed manufacturing environment includes selecting at least one of the generated set of order fulfillment options that: optimizes a material utilization, optimizes an energy utilization, or optimizes a labor utilization.

11. A method for managing a distributed manufacturing network, the method comprising:

receiving, by a processor executing an additive manufacturing management platform, production process data and production workflow data from a set of distributed manufacturing network entities including at least one of an additive manufacturing unit or a manufacturing node;

training, by a processor executing an artificial intelligence system, machine-learned models for each of the set of distributed manufacturing network entities and the distributed manufacturing network, using a training set of parameters and data collected from the set of distributed manufacturing network entities and corresponding outcomes;

creating a set of manufacturing digital twins, each of the set of manufacturing digital twins corresponding to one of the set of distributed manufacturing network entities, and an environment digital twin for the distributed manufacturing network using the machine learned models,

wherein each of the set of manufacturing digital twins is configured to include a capacity and a set of supported manufacturing capabilities, including at least one of: a manufacturing type, a material selection, or a throughput, and

wherein each of the set of manufacturing digital twins is configured to provide a substantially real-time representation of the corresponding one of the set of distributed manufacturing network entities through data from one or more sensors positioned in, on, or near the corresponding one of the set of distributed manufacturing network entities,

receiving a customer manufacturing order, wherein the customer manufacturing order is part of a digital thread in a distributed ledger, wherein the digital thread includes more than one instruction set for manufacturing a component of the customer manufacturing order, each instruction set is configured to facilitate manufacturing of the component using a distinct form of additive manufacturing equipment, or a hybrid combination of manufacturing equipment;

updating each of the set of manufacturing digital twins and the environment digital twin based on inventory and real-time data collected from the set of distributed manufacturing network entities;

generating a set of manufacturing options by simulating different manufacturing strategies for fulfilling the customer manufacturing order using the set of manufacturing digital twins and the environment digital twin, including simulating manufacturing strategies based on the more than one instruction set of the digital thread;

coordinating manufacture of the component of the customer manufacturing order across the distributed manufacturing network;

scheduling the manufacture of the component of the customer manufacturing order based on the set of generated manufacturing options and their respective impacts on the distributed manufacturing network and a set of existing customer orders;

adjusting the data and one or more parameters collected from the set of distributed manufacturing network entities in real time; and

manufacturing the component of the customer manufacturing order based on the scheduled manufacturing of the component.

12. The method of claim 11 , wherein scheduling the manufacturing of the customer manufacturing order includes selecting a manufacturing option of the set of the generated manufacturing options that minimizes a waste production, maximizes a material recapture or maximizes a material recycling.

13. The method of claim 11 , wherein scheduling the manufacturing of the customer manufacturing order includes selecting a manufacturing option of the set of the generated manufacturing options based on at least one of: optimizing a material utilization, optimizing an energy utilization, or optimizing a labor utilization.

14. The method of claim 11 , wherein scheduling the manufacturing of the customer manufacturing order includes selecting a manufacturing option of the set of the generated manufacturing options based on at least one of: a material cost, an energy cost, or a labor cost.

Assignments (2)
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Aug 27, 2022
From: BLIVEN, BRENT; SHARMA, KUNAL
To: STRONG FORCE VCN PORTFOLIO 2019, LLC
Reel/Frame 060919/0447 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Jun 22, 2022
From: CELLA, CHARLES H.; EL-TAHRY, TEYMOUR S.
To: STRONG FORCE VCN PORTFOLIO 2019, LLC
Reel/Frame 060276/0239 →
Priority Claims (2)
IN 202111029964 · Jul 3, 2021 · national
IN 202111036187 · Aug 10, 2021 · national
Continuity (4)
Continuation PCTUS2021064233 · Dec 17, 2021
Provisional Application 63185348 · May 6, 2021
Provisional Application 63127983 · Dec 18, 2020
Related Publication 20220305735A1 · Sep 29, 2022
References Cited (140)
US 9956727B2 · Steele · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 10520922B2 · Kumar · 2019 [cited by examiner]
US 10611085B1 · Janson · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 11150633B2 · De Souza Borges Ferreira · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 11295513B1 · Godbole · 2022 [cited by applicant]
US 20030081019A1 · Frolik · 2003 [cited by applicant]
US 20080133383A1 · Regan · 2008 [cited by applicant]
US 20140223583A1 · Wegner · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 20140365258A1 · Vestal et al. · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 20150154321A1 · Schmidt · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 20160375676A1 · Ritchie · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 20170075944A1 · Overman · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 20170259502A1 · Chapiro · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 20170285585A1 · Weast et al. · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 20170334141A1 · Burton · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 20180024517A1 · Halperin · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 20180069899A1 · Lang · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 20180089563A1 · Redding et al. · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 20180094953A1 · Colson · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 20180114368A1 · Marketsmueller · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 20180136633A1 · Small · 2018 [cited by examiner]
US 20180304370A1 · Myerberg · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 20180329658A1 · Collomp · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 20180339448A1 · Fan · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 20180341248A1 · Mehr · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 20190025800A1 · Goyal et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 20190041835A1 · Cella · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 20190049929A1 · Good · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 20190087529A1 · Steingrimsson · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 20190087598A1 · Adkins · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 20190102667A1 · Bashkirov et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 20190138662A1 · Deutsch et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 20190176387A1 · Kuno · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 20190258747A1 · Milev · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 20190286384A1 · Torrent · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 20190303636A1 · Olivastri · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 20190317935A1 · Berti et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 20190339671A1 · Yona · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 20190340843A1 · McCarson · 2019 [cited by examiner]
US 20190366644A1 · Blaier · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 20200027585A1 · Russell, II · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 20200030979A1 · Bank · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 20200073850A1 · Roychowdhury · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 20200103857A1 · Wynne · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 20200112545A1 · Smith · 2020 [cited by examiner]
US 20200125078A1 · Koudal · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 20200133235A1 · El-Tahry · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 20200156321A1 · Lin · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 20200174713A1 · Lawson · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 20200184278A1 · Zadeh · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 20200272129A1 · Crothers · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 20200293822A1 · Anthony et al. · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 20200295942A1 · Bartolucci · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 20200306927A1 · Tanikella · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 20200306978A1 · Riek · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 20200341432A1 · Ishibashi · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 20200341452A1 · Bi et al. · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 20200370504A1 · Mook · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 20210016505A1 · Jau · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 20210064812A1 · Walkingshaw · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 20210096827A1 · Stump · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 20210157312A1 · Cella · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 20210178697A1 · Nilakantan · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 20210236251A1 · Menon · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 20210256580A1 · Norman · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 20210287459A1 · Cella · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 20210326974A1 · Leng · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 20210356950A1 · Garvey · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 20220004678A1 · Harris · 2022 [cited by applicant]
US 20220036404A1 · Choi · 2022 [cited by applicant]
US 20220058478A1 · Kuo · 2022 [cited by applicant]
US 20220061958A1 · Savard · 2022 [cited by applicant]
US 20220100171A1 · Miller · 2022 [cited by applicant]
US 20220161497A1 · Karri · 2022 [cited by applicant]
US 20220171898A1 · Rakshit · 2022 [cited by applicant]
US 20220172258A1 · Jain · 2022 [cited by applicant]
US 20220183703A1 · Chi · 2022 [cited by applicant]
US 20220197522A1 · Deluca · 2022 [cited by applicant]
US 20220269259A1 · Albrecht · 2022 [cited by applicant]
US 20220292617A1 · Cassoli · 2022 [cited by applicant]
US 20220318752A1 · Bailey · 2022 [cited by applicant]
US 20220334563A1 · Miller · 2022 [cited by applicant]
US 20220391845A1 · Alexa · 2022 [cited by applicant]
US 20220410483A1 · Wang · 2022 [cited by applicant]
US 20220413989A1 · Karri · 2022 [cited by applicant]
US 20230041863A1 · Uozumi · 2023 [cited by applicant]
US 20230044533A1 · Horie · 2023 [cited by applicant]
US 20230101500A1 · Iriguchi · 2023 [cited by applicant]
US 20230131125A1 · Morita · 2023 [cited by applicant]
US 20230158637A1 · Bright · 2023 [cited by applicant]
US 20240131591A1 · Chaudhry · 2024 [cited by applicant]
JP 2014021657A · 2014 [cited by applicant]
KR 101522110B1 · 2015 [cited by applicant]
WO 2020142499A1 · 2020 [cited by applicant]
A. Angrish, “Search and Tracking of 3D Product Manufacturing Data Using Deep Learning and Blockchain”, A thesis submitted to the Graduate Faculty of North Carolina State University, Industrial Engineering, Raleigh, Nort… [cited by examiner]
S. Trouton, et al., “3D-opportunity for blockchain”, Deloitte University Press, 2016 (Year: 2016). [cited by examiner]
Banziger et al., “Optimizing human-robot task allocation using a simulation tool based on standardized work descriptions”, Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing 31.7,Apr. 3, 2018. [cited by applicant]
Bilberg et al., “Digital twin driven human-robot collaborative assembly” CIRP annals 68.1, pp. 499-502, 2019. [cited by applicant]
Li et al., “A mechanism for scheduling multi robot intelligent warehouse system face with dynamic demand”, Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing 31.2, Dec. 14, 2018. [cited by applicant]
Yao et al., “Improving just-in-time delivery performance of IoT-enabled fliexible manufacturing systems with AGV based material transportation” Sensors 20.21, Nov. 6, 2020. [cited by applicant]
Borangiu et al., “Digital transformation of manufacturing. Industry of the future with cyber-physical production systems”, Sci. Technology 23, pp. 3-37, Jan. 2020. [cited by applicant]
Lee et al., “Integration of digital twin and deep learning in cyber-physical systems: towards smart manufacturing”, IET Collaborative Intelligent Manufacturing 2(1), Mar. 2020. [cited by applicant]
Diemer, “Blockchain-Implications and Use Cases for Additive Manufacturing”, Frankfurt School Blockchain Center, 2019. [cited by applicant]
Guo et al., “A framework for personalized production based on digital twin, blockchain and additive manufacturing in the context of industry 4.0”, 2020 IEEE 16th International Conference on Automation Science and Engine… [cited by applicant]
Mandolla et al., “Building a digital twin for additive manufacturing through the exploitation of blockchain: A case analysis of the aircraft industry”, Computers in Industry 109, pp. 134-152, 2019. [cited by applicant]
Trouton et al., “3D opportunity for blockchain: Additive manufacturing links the digital thread”, Deloitte Insights, Nov. 17, 2016. [cited by applicant]
Butt, “Exploring the interrelationship between additive manufacturing and Industry 4.0”, Designs 4.2, Jun. 2020. [cited by applicant]
Mukherjee et al., “A digital twin for rapid qualification of 3D printed metallic components”, Applied Materials Today 14, pp. 59-65, 2019. [cited by applicant]
Craye et al., “Biovision: a biomimetics platform for intrinsically motivated visual saliency learning”, IEEE Transactions on Cognitive and Developmental Systems, 2018. [cited by applicant]
Penumuru et al., “Identification and classification of materials using machine vision and machine learning in the context of industry 4.0”, Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, Jun. 2020. [cited by applicant]
Valluru et al., “Simulation and Analysis of Liquid Lens Behaviour for Machine Vision Applications-CA13 (AFT)”, 2019 30th Irish Signals and Systems Conference (ISSC), IEEE, 2019. [cited by applicant]
Schwarz et al., “RGB-D object recognition and pose estimation based on pre-trained convolutional neural network features”, 2015 IEEE international conference on robotics and automation (IRCA). IEEE, 2015. [cited by applicant]
Written Opinion and International Search Report for international application No. PCT/US2021/064233, mailed Apr. 22, 2022. [cited by applicant]
Chowdhury, S., Mhapsekar, K., and Anand, S. (Dec. 21, 2017). “Part Build Orientation Optimization and Neural Network-Based Geometry Compensation for Additive Manufacturing Process.” ASME. J. Manuf. Sci. Eng. Mar. 2018; … [cited by applicant]
K.-Y. Fok, N. Ganganath, C.-T. Cheng, H. H.-C. Iu and C. K. Tse, “Tool-Path Optimization using Neural Networks,” 2019 IEEE International Symposium on Circuits and Systems (ISCAS), Sapporo, Japan, 2019, pp. 1-5, doi: 10.… [cited by applicant]
Wilson, “Accenture: building suply chain resilience amidst COVID-19”, Supply Chain Magazine, May 17, 2020. [cited by applicant]
Schatteman, “Supply Chain Lessons from Covid-19: Time to Refocus on Resilience”, Bain & Company, 2020. [cited by applicant]
Ganeriwalla et al., “Three Paths to Advantage with Digital Supply Chains”, BCG Perspectives, 2016. [cited by applicant]
Deloitte, “Digital Technologies Drive Supply Chain Innovation”, CIO Journal , Sep. 26, 2018. [cited by applicant]
Kelly et al., “Supply chains and value webs”, Deloitte University Press, 2015. [cited by applicant]
IW Staff, “75% of Companies in ISM Virus Survey Report Supply Chain Disruptions”, Industry Week, Mar. 11, 2020. [cited by applicant]
MHI Deloitte, “8. 2019 MHI Annual Industry Report: Elevating Supply Chain Digital Consciousness”, 2019. [cited by applicant]
PwC, “PwC's COVID-19 CFO Pulse”, Jun. 2020. [cited by applicant]
CB Insights, “Supply Chain & Logistics Tech in Numbers” Powerpoint presentation; Jul. 2020. [cited by applicant]
O'Leary, “The Modern Supply Chain is Snapping”, The Atlantic, Mar. 19, 2020. [cited by applicant]
Bukova et al., “The Position of Industry 4.0 in the Worldwide Logistics Chain”, LOGI—Scientific Journal on Transport and Logistics, vol. 9, No. 1, 2018, pp. 18-23. [cited by applicant]
Lin et al., “Here's how global supply chains will change after COVID-19”, World Economic Forum, May 6, 2020. [cited by applicant]
Ferrantino et al., “Understanding Supply Chain 4.0 and its potential impact on global value chains”, Apr. 2017. [cited by applicant]
Anonymous, “AI Set to Drive Global Supply Chain Technology Market to $440 Billion by 2023”, ABI Research, Jan. 29, 2019. [cited by applicant]
Howells, “How the network economy is revolutionizing supply chains”, World Economic Forum, Jan. 14, 2015. [cited by applicant]
Sherif, S.U., Jawahar, N. and Balamurali, M., 2014. Sequential optimization approach for nesting and cutting sequence in laser cutting. Journal of Manufacturing Systems, 33(4), pp. 624-638. [cited by applicant]
Wu, S., Kay, M., King, R., Vila-Parrish, A. and Warsing, D., 2014. Multi-objective optimization of 3D packing problem in additive manufacturing. In IIE annual conference. Proceedings (p. 1485). Institute of Industrial a… [cited by applicant]
Reintjes, C. and Lorenz, U., 2021. Bridging mixed integer linear programming for truss topology optimization and additive manufacturing. Optimization and Engineering, 22, pp. 849-893. [cited by applicant]
Meng, L., McWilliams, B., Jarosinski, W., Park, H.Y., Jung, Y.G., Lee, J. and Zhang, J., 2020. Machine learning in additive manufacturing: a review. Jom, 72, pp. 2363-2377. [cited by applicant]
C. Narayanaswami, R. Nooyi, S. R. Govindaswamy and R. Viswanathan, “Blockchain anchored supply chain automation,” in IBM Journal of Research and Development, vol. 63, No. 2/3, pp. 7:1-7:11, Mar.-May 2019, doi: 10.1147/J… [cited by applicant]
Min et al., “Maching learning based digital twin framework for production optimization in petrochemical industry”, International Journal of Information Management 49, pp. 502-519, 2019. [cited by applicant]
Angrish, “Search and Tracking of 3D Product Manufacturing Data Using Deep Learning and Blockchain”, A thesis submitted to the Graduate Faculty of North Carolina State University, Industrial Engineering, Raleigh, North C… [cited by applicant]
Trouton, et al., “3D-opportunity for blockchain”, Deloitte University Press, 2016. [cited by applicant]
Extended European Search Report for EP App 21907970.4, dated Nov. 12, 2024, 12 pages. [cited by applicant]
Morariu Cristina et al., “Machine learning for predictive scheduling and resource allocation in large scale manufacturing systems,” Computers in Industry, Elsevier, Amsterdam, NL, vol. 120, May 12, 2020. [cited by applicant]
Cited By (4)
US 12,496,714 US 12,639,708 US 12,689,707 US 12,719,868