IP Library Granted Patent US 12,524,826
Granted Patent B2
US 12,524,826 · App. 17/684,191 · Granted Jan 13, 2026

Determining biomarkers from histopathology slide images

Inventors: Stephen Yip (Chicago, IL); Irvin Ho (Wilmette, IL); Lingdao Sha (Chicago, IL); Boleslaw Osinski (Chicago, IL); Aly Azeem Khan (Chicago, IL); Andrew J. Kruger (Chicago, IL); Michael Carlson (Chicago, IL); Abel Greenwald (Chicago, IL); Caleb Willis (Chicago, IL)
Assignee: TEMPUS AI, INC.
G06T1/20G06F18/21G06F18/2431G06T7/0012G06T7/11G06T11/00G06V10/44G06V10/764G06V10/82G06T2207/20081G06T2207/30024G06T2207/30096
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 12,524,826
App. No.
17/684,191
Granted
Jan 13, 2026
Kind
B2
Abstract

A generalizable and interpretable deep learning model for predicting biomarker status and biomarker metrics from histopathology slide images is provided.

Claims (44)

1 . A computer-implemented method of identifying one or more molecular biomarkers in a digital image of a hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) stained slide, the computer-implemented method comprising:

receiving, via one or more processors, the digital image of the H&E stained slide at an image-based biomarker prediction system;

separating, via one or more processors, the digital image of the H&E stained slide into a plurality of tile images, where each of the plurality of tile images corresponds to a respective region of a tissue in the digital image;

applying the plurality of tile images to one or more trained classifiers trained on information including both

(1) a first plurality of training images corresponding to training H&E stained slides,

wherein each training H&E stained slide is separated into an initial plurality of training H&E stained tiles,

wherein each training H&E stained tile is associated with an inferred tissue classification status, and

wherein the first plurality of training images comprises training H&E stained tiles, from the initial plurality of training H&E stained tiles, having an inferred tissue classification status corresponding to a desired tissue classification, and

(2) a second plurality of training images corresponding to training immunohistochemistry (IHC) stained slides,

wherein each of training IHC stained slides is separated into training IHC stained tiles, and

wherein each of the training IHC stained slides are stained for the one or more molecular biomarkers and;

predicting, via the one or more trained classifiers, one or more molecular biomarkers for each of the plurality of tile images having a target tissue; and

identifying, via the one or more processors, the one or more molecular biomarkers in the digital image based at least in part on the one or more molecular biomarkers of the plurality of tile images having the target tissue.

2 . The computer-implemented method of claim 1 , wherein one or more molecular biomarkers include programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1), phosphatase and tensin homolog (PTEN), epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR), β catenin/catenin β1, neurotrophic tyrosine kinase receptor (NTRK), phosphatidylinositol-4,5-bisphosphate 3-kinase, catalytic subunit a (PIK3CA), receptor tyrosine-protein kinase erbB-2 (HER2), androgen receptor (AR), estrogen receptor (ER), or progesterone receptor (PR).

3 . The computer-implemented method of claim 1 , wherein the target tissue is tumor tissue.

4 . The computer-implemented method of claim 3 , wherein the inferred tissue classification status include stroma, epithelium, lymphocyte, or necrosis.

5 . The computer-implemented method of claim 3 , wherein the inferred tissue classification status include tissues other than tumor tissue.

6 . The computer-implemented method of claim 3 , wherein the inferred tissue classification status includes not tissue.

7 . The computer-implemented method of claim 1 , wherein the target tissue is tumor tissue having lymphocytes.

8 . The computer-implemented method of claim 1 , wherein separating the digital image into the plurality of tile images comprises:

performing an image tiling process, using the one or more processors, by applying a tiling mask to the digital image to separate the digital image into the plurality of tile images.

9 . The computer-implemented method of claim 8 , wherein the tiling mask comprises tiles of an equivalent size.

10 . The computer-implemented method of claim 8 , wherein the tiling mask comprises tiles having a rectangular shape.

11 . The computer-implemented method of claim 8 , wherein the tiling mask comprises tiles characterized by topology and/or morphology of pixels or groups of pixels.

12 . The computer-implemented method of claim 1 , wherein the image-based biomarker prediction system is communicatively coupled to a pathology slide scanner system through a communication network, such that the image-based biomarker prediction system receives the digital image from the pathology slide scanner system over the communication network, or the image-based biomarker prediction system is contained within a pathology slide scanner system.

13 . A system comprising a pathology slide scanner system configured to perform the computer-implemented method of claim 1 .

14 . The computer-implemented method of claim 1 , further comprising generating a report containing:

the digital image and indicating the one or more molecular biomarkers in the digital image,

the digital image and a digital overlay visualizing the one or more molecular biomarkers in the digital image,

the digital image and a digital overlay visualizing regions of tissue having the one or more molecular biomarkers in the digital image, or

one or more clinical trials or therapies associated with the one or more molecular biomarkers in the digital image.

15 . The computer-implemented method of claim 1 further comprising:

separating, via the one or more processors, tiles of the plurality of tile images having a target tissue from tile images of the plurality of tile images having one or more other targets by

applying the plurality of tile images to a deep learning framework having one or more trained tissue classifiers, wherein the one or more trained tissue classifiers are each trained to classify the target tissue or each of the one or more other targets.

16 . The computer-implemented method of claim 15 , further comprising: identifying, using the one or more processors, cells within the digital image using a trained cell segmentation model within the deep learning framework.

17 . The computer-implemented method of claim 16 , further comprising separating tiles of the plurality of tile images having the target tissue based on a target tissue classification or an other target classification determined for each tile image and on the cells within the digital image.

18 . The computer-implemented method of claim 16 , wherein the trained cell segmentation model is a pixel-resolution three-dimensional UNet classification model trained to classify a cell interior, a cell border, and a cell exterior.

19 . The computer-implemented method of claim 16 , further comprising training the one or more trained tissue classifiers by:

receiving, at the deep learning framework, a plurality of H&E slide training images from a training images dataset, each of the plurality of H&E slide training images having a label corresponding to a tissue classification;

performing tile-based tissue classification analysis on each of the plurality of H&E slide training images;

performing a pixel-based cell segmentation analysis on each of the plurality of H&E slide training images;

performing a tile-based tissue classification analysis on each of the plurality of H&E slide training images; and

in response, generating the one or more trained tissue classifiers.

20 . The computer-implemented method of claim 1 , wherein the one or more molecular biomarkers in the digital image is communicated to a genomic sequencing system for performing molecular sequencing in response.

Assignments (4)
RELEASE OF SECURITY INTEREST Recorded May 13, 2026
From: ARES CAPITAL CORPORATION, AS COLLATERAL AGENT
To: TEMPUS AI, INC. (F/K/A TEMPUS LABS, INC.)
Reel/Frame 075608/0784 →
CHANGE OF NAME Recorded Feb 9, 2024
From: TEMPUS LABS, INC.
To: TEMPUS AI, INC.
Reel/Frame 066544/0110 →
SECURITY INTEREST Recorded Sep 22, 2022
From: TEMPUS LABS, INC.
To: ARES CAPITAL CORPORATION, AS COLLATERAL AGENT
Reel/Frame 061506/0316 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Apr 8, 2022
From: YIP, STEPHEN; HO, IRVIN; SHA, LINGDAO; OSINSKI, BOLESLAW; KHAN, ALY AZEEM; KRUGER, ANDREW J.; CARLSON, MICHAEL; GREENWALD, ABEL; WILLIS, CALEB
To: TEMPUS LABS, INC.
Reel/Frame 059550/0395 →
Continuity (10)
Continuation 17169162 · Feb 5, 2021
Continuation 16830186 · Mar 25, 2020
Continuation In Part 16732242 · Dec 31, 2019
Continuation In Part 16412362 · May 14, 2019
Provisional Application 62983524 · Feb 28, 2020
Provisional Application 62889521 · Aug 20, 2019
Provisional Application 62824039 · Mar 26, 2019
Provisional Application 62787047 · Dec 31, 2018
Provisional Application 62671300 · May 14, 2018
Related Publication 20220405919A1 · Dec 22, 2022
References Cited (334)
US 6463438B1 · Veltri et al. · 2002 [cited by applicant]
US 9996664B2 · Lloyd et al. · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 10049450B2 · Madabhushi et al. · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 10078895B2 · Madabhushi et al. · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 10102418B2 · Bredno et al. · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 10426442B1 · Schnorr · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 10699163B1 · Shah et al. · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 10733726B2 · Lloyd · 2020 [cited by examiner]
US 10957041B2 · Yip · 2021 [cited by examiner]
US 10991097B2 · Yip et al. · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 11100933B2 · Lefkofsky et al. · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 11263748B2 · Yip et al. · 2022 [cited by applicant]
US 11682098B2 · Yip · 2023 [cited by examiner]
US 11741365B2 · Khan · 2023 [cited by applicant]
US 20030215936A1 · Kallioniemi et al. · 2003 [cited by applicant]
US 20060064248A1 · Saidi et al. · 2006 [cited by applicant]
US 20070216909A1 · Everett et al. · 2007 [cited by applicant]
US 20100111396A1 · Boucheron · 2010 [cited by applicant]
US 20110188728A1 · Sammak et al. · 2011 [cited by applicant]
US 20130136325A1 · Sakamoto et al. · 2013 [cited by applicant]
US 20140073922A1 · Mammone · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 20140140607A1 · Jonas · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 20140337052A1 · Pellini et al. · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 20150100246A1 · Remzi et al. · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 20160042511A1 · Chukka et al. · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 20160063724A1 · Tunstall et al. · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 20160103973A1 · Singal et al. · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 20160110584A1 · Remiszewski et al. · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 20160217253A1 · Newman et al. · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 20160253466A1 · Agaian et al. · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 20160333420A1 · Stern et al. · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 20170076046A1 · Barnes et al. · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 20170076442A1 · Schoenmeyer et al. · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 20170233827A1 · Moffitt et al. · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 20170337682A1 · Liao et al. · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 20170372117A1 · Bredno et al. · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 20180005136A1 · Gai et al. · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 20180057859A1 · Nelson et al. · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 20180075597A1 · Liu et al. · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 20180089373A1 · Matsuguchi et al. · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 20180121759A1 · Gabrani et al. · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 20180129911A1 · Madabhushi et al. · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 20180137394A1 · Wenzel et al. · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 20180203974A1 · Venn · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 20180239949A1 · Chander et al. · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 20180276339A1 · Planey et al. · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 20180340870A1 · Gustafson et al. · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 20190034591A1 · Mossin et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 20190043242A1 · Risser · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 20190087532A1 · Madabhushi et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 20190169685A1 · Georgiadis et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 20190370965A1 · Lay · 2019 [cited by examiner]
US 20190392580A1 · Kapil et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 20200090330A1 · Chefd'Hotel et al. · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 20200098448A1 · Shah et al. · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 20200105417A1 · Dolan · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 20200176080A1 · Newman et al. · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 20200258223A1 · Yip et al. · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 20200349399A1 · Kopparapu · 2020 [cited by examiner]
US 20200372637A1 · Ha · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 20200381104A1 · Ceballos et al. · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 20200388029A1 · Saltz · 2020 [cited by examiner]
US 20210150701A1 · Thagaard · 2021 [cited by examiner]
US 20220390451A1 · Dittamore et al. · 2022 [cited by applicant]
CN 107369151A · 2017 [cited by applicant]
JP 2011145264A · 2011 [cited by applicant]
JP 2013113680A · 2013 [cited by applicant]
JP 2017516992A · 2017 [cited by applicant]
JP 2019502384A · 2019 [cited by applicant]
WO 2004081564A1 · 2004 [cited by applicant]
WO 2016118860A1 · 2016 [cited by applicant]
WO WO2016141169A1 · 2016 [cited by examiner]
WO 2017087415A1 · 2017 [cited by applicant]
WO 2017198790A1 · 2017 [cited by applicant]
WO 2018001689A1 · 2018 [cited by applicant]
WO 2018065434A1 · 2018 [cited by applicant]
WO 2018067937A1 · 2018 [cited by applicant]
WO 2018136664A1 · 2018 [cited by applicant]
WO 2018143406A1 · 2018 [cited by applicant]
WO 2018156133A1 · 2018 [cited by applicant]
WO 2018158412A1 · 2018 [cited by applicant]
WO 2018165103A1 · 2018 [cited by applicant]
WO 2018191553A1 · 2018 [cited by applicant]
WO 2018200840A1 · 2018 [cited by applicant]
WO 2018231771A1 · 2018 [cited by applicant]
WO 2020068880A1 · 2020 [cited by applicant]
Ronneberger et al. “U-Net: Convolutional Networks for Biomedical Image Segmentation,” Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention—MICCAI 2015. MICCAI 2015. Lecture Notes in Computer Science( ), vol. 9351.… [cited by examiner]
Dey et al., Visualizing the structure of RNA-seq expression data using grade of membership models, PLoS Genetics, 13(5) (2017). [cited by applicant]
Dienstmann et al., Consensus molecular subtypes and the evolution of precision medicine in colorectal cancer, Nat. Rev. Cancer, 17:14 (2017). [cited by applicant]
Dimitrakopoulou et al., Deblender: a semi-/unsupervised multi-operational computational method for complete deconvolution of expression data from heterogeneous samples, BMC Bioin., 19(1):1-17 (2018). [cited by applicant]
Echle et al., Clinical-grade detection of microsatellite instability in colorectal tumors by deep learning, Gastroenterology, 159(4):1406-16 (2020). [cited by applicant]
Erkkila et al., Probabilistic analysis of gene expression measurements from heterogeneous tissues, Bioinformatics, 26(10):2571-2577 (2010). [cited by applicant]
Ertosun et al., Automated grading of gliomas using deep learning in digital pathology images: A modular approach with ensemble of convolutional neural networks, AMIA. Annu. Symp. Proceedings AMIA. Symp., 1899-908 (2015). [cited by applicant]
Esteva et al., Dermatologist-level classification of skin cancer with deep neural networks, Nature, 542:115-118 (2017). [cited by applicant]
European Application No. 19907257.0, Supplementary European search report and Search Opinion, mailed Aug. 29, 2022. [cited by applicant]
European Application No. 19907353.7 Supplementary European search report and Search Opinion, mailed Jul. 28, 2022. [cited by applicant]
European Patent Application No. 19804054.5, Extended European Search Report, dated Jan. 12, 2022. [cited by applicant]
Evaluation of Automatic Class III Designation for MSK-Impact (Integrated Mutation Profiling of Actionable Cancer Targets), Decision Summary, 57 pp. (publicly available before May 14, 2018). [cited by applicant]
Fabrizio et al., Beyond microsatellite testing: assessment of tumor mutational burden identifies subsets of colorectal cancer who may respond to immune checkpoint inhibition, Journal of Gastrointestinal Oncology, 9(4):6… [cited by applicant]
FDA Summary of safety and effectiveness data (SSED), PD-L1 IHC 22C3 pharmDx, Dako North America, Inc., (Oct. 2, 2015). [cited by applicant]
FDA Summary of safety and effectiveness data (SSED), PD-L1 IHC 22C3 pharmDx, Dako North America, Inc., (Sep. 22, 2017). [cited by applicant]
Feldman et al., Tissue processing and hematoxylin and eosin staining, Methods Mol. Biol., 1180:31-43 (2014). [cited by applicant]
Final Office Action, U.S. Appl. No. 17/139,784, Aug. 20, 2021, 23 pages. [cited by applicant]
FoundationOne CDx (Trademark) Technical Information, Foundation Medicine, Inc., Cambridge, Massachusetts, 43 pp. (Nov. 2017). [cited by applicant]
FoundationOne Liquid, Genomic Testing 6 pages (2019). [cited by applicant]
Gan et al., Applicability of Next generation sequencing technology in microsatellite instabilty testing, Genes, 6:46-59 (2015). [cited by applicant]
Ganin et al., Domain-adversarial training of neural networks, The journal of machine learning research, 17:2096-2030 (2016). [cited by applicant]
Garg et al., Patterns of locoregional failure in stage III non-small cell lung cancer treated with definitive chemoradiation therapy, Pract. Radiat. Oncol., 4:342-8 (2014). [cited by applicant]
Gertych et al., Convolutional neural networks can accurately distinguish four histologic growth patterns of lung adenocarcinoma in digital slides, Sci. Rep., nature.com, 9:1483 (2019). [cited by applicant]
GitHub, “HistomicsTK”, available online at <https://github.com/DigitalSlideArchive/HistomicsTK>, retrieved on Apr. 17, 2020, 3 pages. [cited by applicant]
Gong et al., DeconRNASeq: a statistical framework for deconvolution of heterogeneous tissue samples based on mRNA-Seq data, Bioinformatics, 29(8):1083-1085 (2013). [cited by applicant]
Greenson et al., Pathologic predictors of microsatellite instability in colorectal cancer, Am. J. Surg. Pathol., 126-33, 33(1) (2009). [cited by applicant]
Grossman et al., Toward a shared vision for cancer genomic data, The New England Journal of Medicine, 375:1109-1112 (2016). [cited by applicant]
Grossmann et al., Defining the biological basis of radiomic phenotypes in lung cancer, Elife, 6:e23421 (2017). [cited by applicant]
Gutman et al., The digital slide archive: a software platform for management, integration, and analysis of histology for cancer research, Cancer Research, 77:e75-e78 (2017). [cited by applicant]
Hause et al., Classification and characterization of microsatellite instability across 18 cancer types, Nature Medicine, 22:1342-1350 (2016). [cited by applicant]
He et al., Deep residual learning for image recognition, Proceedings of the IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, 770-778 (2016). [cited by applicant]
Heindl et al., Microenvironmental niche divergence shapes BRCA1-dysregulated ovarian cancer morphological plasticity, Nat. Commun., (2018), doi:10.1038/s41467-018-06130-3. [cited by applicant]
Herbst et al., Pembrolizumab versus docetaxel for previously treated, PD-L1-positive, advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (KEYNOTE-010): a randomised controlled trial Lancet, 387:1540-50 (2016). [cited by applicant]
Herbst et al., Predictive correlates of response to the anti-PD-L1 antibody MPDL3280A in cancer patients, Nature, 515:563-7 (2014). [cited by applicant]
Ilse et al., Attention-based deep multiple instance learning, Proceedings of the 35th International Conference on Machine Learning, PMLR 80:2127-2136 (2018). [cited by applicant]
Ing et al., A novel machine learning approach reveals latent vascular phenotypes predictive of renal cancer outcome, Sci. Rep., 7:13190 (2017). [cited by applicant]
International Application No. PCT/US19/69161, International Search Report and Written Opinion, mailed Apr. 14, 2020. [cited by applicant]
International Application No. PCT/US2019/032313, International Search Report and Written Opinion, mailed Jul. 26, 2019. [cited by applicant]
International Application No. PCT/US2019/069164, International Search Report and Written Opinion, mailed Apr. 9, 2020. [cited by applicant]
International Application No. PCT/US2020/024748, International Search Report and Written Opinion, mailed Aug. 3, 2020. [cited by applicant]
International Application No. PCT/US2020/024748, Invitation to Pay Additional Fees, mailed Jun. 10, 2020. [cited by applicant]
International Application No. PCT/US2022/011041, International Search Report and Written Opinion, mailed Feb. 23, 2022. [cited by applicant]
Ioffe et al., Batch normalization: Accelerating deep network training by reducing internal covariate shift [Internet], arXiv [cs.LG], (2015), Available from: http://arxiv.org/abs/1502.03167. [cited by applicant]
Janowczyk et al., Deep learning for digital pathology imageanalysis: A comprehensive tutorial with selected use cases, J. Pathol. Inform., 7:29 (2016). [cited by applicant]
Janzic et al., PD-L1 Expression in Squamous-cell Carcinoma and Adenocarcinoma of the lung, Radiol. Oncol., 51:357-62 (2017). [cited by applicant]
Kapil et al., Deep semi supervised generative learning for automated PD-L1 tumor cell scoring on NSCLC tissue needle biopsies, 1-10 (2018). [cited by applicant]
Kather et al., Deep learning can predict microsatellite instability directly from histology in gastrointestinal cancer, Nat. Med., 25:1054-1054 (2019). [cited by applicant]
Kather et al., Predicting survival from colorectal cancer histology slides using deep learning: A retrospective multicenter study, PLoS medicine 16:e1002730 (2019). [cited by applicant]
Kazandjian et al., FDA approval summary: Nivolumab for the treatment of metastatic non-small cell lung cancer with progression on or after platinum-based chemotherapy, Oncologist., 21:634-42 (2016). [cited by applicant]
Kerr et al., Programmed death ligand-1 immunohistochemistry: Friend or foe?, Arch. Pathol. Lab. Med., 140:326-31 (2016). [cited by applicant]
Keytruda medication guide, p. 46, from prescribing information guide, Merck & Co. Inc., revised (Sep. 2017) (Reference ID: 4156447). [cited by applicant]
Do et al., Clustering approaches to identifying gene expression patterns from DNA microarray data, Mol. Cells, 25(2):1-10 (2007). [cited by applicant]
Witmer et al., Multi-label Classification of Stem Cell Microscopy Images Using Deep Learning, IEEE, 1: 1-6(2018). [cited by applicant]
Vassilakopoulou et al., Evaluation of PD-L1 expression and associated tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes in laryngeal squamous cell carcinoma, Clin. Cancer Res., 22:704-13 (2016). [cited by applicant]
Velcheti et al., Programmed death ligand-1 expression in non-small cell lung cancer, Lab. Invest., 94:107-16 (2014). [cited by applicant]
Vilar et al., Microsatellite instability in colorectal cancer-the stable evidence, Nat. Rev. Clin. Oncol., 7:153-162 (2010). [cited by applicant]
Wang et al., Comprehensive analysis of lung cancer pathology images to discover tumor shape and boundary features that predict survival outcome, Scientific Reports, 8:10393 (2018). [cited by applicant]
Wang et al., Deep learning assessment of tumor proliferation in breast cancer histological images, IEEE Int. Conf. Bioinfo. Biomed. (BIBM), 600-603 (2017). [cited by applicant]
Wang et al., Transcriptome deconvolution of heterogeneous tumor samples with immune infiltration, iScience, 9:451-460 (2018). [cited by applicant]
Way et al., Discovering pathway and cell-type signatures in transcriptomic compendia with machine learning, Peer J Preprints., Sep. 20, 2018, 157-160. [cited by applicant]
Weinstein et al., The cancer genome atlas pan-cancer analysis project, Nat. Gene., 45:1113-1120 (2013). [cited by applicant]
Wetteland et al., A multiscale approach for whole-slide image segmentation of five tissue classes in urothelial carcinoma slides, Technology in Cancer Research & Treatment, 19:1-15 (2020). [cited by applicant]
Wimberly et al., PD-L1 expression correlates with tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes and response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer, Cancer Immunol. Res., 3(4):326-332 (2015). [cited by applicant]
Xing et al., Deep Learning in Microscopy Image Analysis: A Survey, IEEE, Trans. Neur. Netw. Learn. Syst., 29(10):4550-4568 (2018). [cited by applicant]
Xu et al., A deep convolutional neural network for segmenting and classifying epithelial and stromal regions in histopathological images, Neurocomputing, 191:214-223 (2016). [cited by applicant]
Yala et al., A deep learning mammography-based model for improved breast cancer risk prediction, Radiology, 292(1):60-66 (2019). [cited by applicant]
Yang et al., A deep learning approach for tumor tissue image classification, BioMed., (2016). [cited by applicant]
Yi et al., Microvessel prediction in H&E stained pathology images using fully convolutional neural networks, BMC Bioinformatics, 19:64 (2018). [cited by applicant]
Yoshihara et al., Inferring tumour purity and stromal and immune cell admixture from expression data, Nat. Comm., 4:2612, pp. 11 (2013). [cited by applicant]
Young et al., Gene ontology analysis for RNA-seq: accounting for selection bias, Genome. Biol., 11:R14 (2010). [cited by applicant]
Yu et al., Predicting non-small cell lung cancer prognosis by fully automated microscopic pathology image features, Nat. Comm., 7:12474 (2016). [cited by applicant]
Yuan et al. Quantitative image analysis of cellular heterogeneity in breast tumors complements genomic profiling, Science Translational Medicine, 4(157):157ra143 (2012). [cited by applicant]
Yuan et al., Supplementary materials for quantitative image analysis of cellular heterogeneity in breast tumors complements genomic profiling, (2012), doi:10.1126/scitranslmed.3004330. [cited by applicant]
Zaslavsky et al., Infino: a bayesian hierarchical model improves estimates of immune infiltration into tumor microenvironment, 25 pp., posted Nov. 21, 2017 (downloaded from the Internet at: https://www.biorxiv.org/conte… [cited by applicant]
Zhang et al., Adversarial deep learning for microsatellite instability prediction from histopathology, slides, First Conference on Medical Imaging with Deep Learning (MIDL, 2018), Amsterdam, The Netherlands. [cited by applicant]
Zhang et al., Aspect-augmented adversarial network for domain adaptation, Transactions of the Association for Computational Linguistics, 5:515-528 (2017). [cited by applicant]
Zhu et al., Deciphering genomic underpinnings of quantitative MRI-based radiomic phenotypes of invasive breast carcinoma, Sci. Rep., 5, Article No. 17787 (2015). [cited by applicant]
Zoltan et al., Correlation between microsatellite instability and morphology in colorectal cancer, Magy Onkol., 54(2):169-78 (2010). [cited by applicant]
OpenSeadragon API: Getting Started, available online at <https://openseadragon.github.io/docs/>, 3 (2020). [cited by applicant]
Orange et al., Identification of three rheumatoid arthritis disease subtypes by machine learning integration of synovial histologic features and RNA sequencing data, Arthritis Rheumatol., 70:690-701 (2018). [cited by applicant]
Pardoll, The blockade of immune checkpoints in cancer immunotherapy, Nat. Rev. Cancer, 12:252-264 (2012). [cited by applicant]
Patel et al., Development of immunohistochemistry services for cancer care in western Kenya: Implications for low- and middle-income countries, S. Afr. J. Lab. Clin. Med., 5:187 ( 2016). [cited by applicant]
Patel et al., PD-L1 expression as a predictive biomarker in cancer immunotherapy, Mol. Cancer Ther., 14:847-56 (2015). [cited by applicant]
PD-L1 IHC 28-8 pharmDx Guide, 13 pp. Dako North America Inc. (Oct. 2015 edition). [cited by applicant]
Pellegrino et al., “Controversies in oncology: are genomic tests quantifying homologous recombination repair deficiency (HRD) useful for treatment decision making?,” ESMO Open 4(2) (2018). [cited by applicant]
PMA P170019: FDA Summary of Safety and Effectiveness of Data, FoundationOne CDx (Trademark), 58 pp. (Nov. 30, 2017). [cited by applicant]
Popovici et al., Image-based surrogate biomarkers for molecular subtypes of colorectal cancer, Bioinformatics, 33(13):2002-2009 (2017). [cited by applicant]
Press Release—Guardant Health Presents Data on Immunotherapy-related Biomarkers MSI and TMB in blood of advanced cancer patients at European Society of Medical Oncology Annual Meeting, 4 pages, (2018). [cited by applicant]
Quon et al., Computational purification of individual tumor gene expression profiles leads to significant improvements in prognostic prediction, Genome Med., 5(3):29 (2013). [cited by applicant]
Quon et al., ISOLATE: a computational strategy for identifying the primary origin of cancers using high-throughput sequencing, Bioinformatics, 25(21):2882-2889 (2009). [cited by applicant]
Rajpurkar et al., Deep learning for chest radiograph diagnosis: A retrospective comparison of the CheXNext algorithm to practicing radiologists, PLOS Medicine, (2018). [cited by applicant]
Ratcliffe et al., Agreement between programmed cell death ligand-1 diagnostic assays across multiple protein expression cutoffs in non-small cell lung cancer. Clin. Cancer Res., 23:3585-91 (2017). [cited by applicant]
Redox awarded patent for its electronic medical record integration technology, Aug. 29, 2018. [cited by applicant]
Rimm et al., A prospective, Multi-institutional, Pathologist-based assessment of 4 immunohistochemistry assays for PD-L1 expression in non-small cell lung cancer, JAMA. Oncol., 3:1051-8 (2017). [cited by applicant]
Rivenson et al., Deep learning-based virtual histology staining using auto-fluorescence of label-free tissue, Nat. Biomed. Eng., (2019). [cited by applicant]
Roach et al., Development of a companion diagnostic PD-L1 immunohistochemistry assay for pembrolizumab therapy in non-small-cell lung cancer, Appl. Immunohistochem. Mol. Morphol., 24:392-7 (2016). [cited by applicant]
Roche Molecular Systems, Inc., NAVIFY Tumor Board, available online at <https://www.navify.com/tumorboard/>, retrieved on 9 (2020). [cited by applicant]
Ronneberger et al., U-Net: Convolutional networks for biomedical image segmentation, arXiv:1505.04597 [cs] (2015), https://arxiv.org/abs/1505.04597. [cited by applicant]
Russakovsky et al., ImageNet large scale visual recognition challenge [Internet], arXiv [cs.CV], (2014), Available from: http://arxiv.org/abs/1409.0575. [cited by applicant]
Saillard et al., Self supervised learning improves dMMR/MSI detection from histology slides across multiple cancers, Poster and oral presentation at the MICCAI 2021 COMPAY Workshop (submitted Jul. 19, 2021). [cited by applicant]
Saltz et al., Spatial organization and molecular correlation of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes using deep learning on pathology images, Cell Reports, 23:181-193 (2018). [cited by applicant]
Schaumberg et al., H&E-stained whole slide image deep learning predicts spop mutation state in prostate cancer, bioRxiv, 1-14 (2016). [cited by applicant]
Schmidhuber, Deep learning in neural networks: an overview, Neural Netw. Elsevier, 61:85-117 (2015). [cited by applicant]
Shah et al., Deep learning assessment of tumor proliferation in breast cancer histological images, IEEE International Conference on Bioinformatics and Biomedicine (BIBM), (2016). [cited by applicant]
Shah et al., Deep learning assessment of tumor proliferation in breast cancer histological images, Int. Conf. Bioinform. Biomed., (2017). [cited by applicant]
Shah et al., Deep learning assessment of tumor proliferation in breast cancer histological images, Int. Cont. Bioinform. Biomed., (2017). [cited by applicant]
Shen-Orr et al., Cell type-specific gene expression differences in complex tissues, Nat. Methods, 7(4):287, pp. 5 (2010). [cited by applicant]
Simonyan et al., Very deep convolutional networks for large-scale image recognition, 10 (2014). [cited by applicant]
Springenberg et al (“Striving for Simplicity: the All Convolutional Net” 2015) (Year: 2015). [cited by applicant]
Springenberg et al., Striving for simplicity: The All Convolutional Net., ICLR (2014). [cited by applicant]
Stanford ML Group, CheXNext: Deep learning for chest radiograph diagnosis, downloaded from the Internet at: <https://stanfordmlgroup.github.io/projects/chexnext/> (Nov. 2018). [cited by applicant]
Sul et al., FDA approval summary: Pembrolizumab for the treatment of patients with metastatic non-small cell lung cancer whose tumors express programmed death-ligand 1, Oncologist., 21:643-50 (2016). [cited by applicant]
Sundar et al., Nivolumab in NSCLC: latest evidence and clinical potential, Ther. Adv. Med. Oncol., 7:85-96 (2015). [cited by applicant]
Szegedy et al., Going deeper with convolutions, IEEE, 9 (2015). [cited by applicant]
Teng et al., Classifying cancers based on T-cell infiltration and PD-L1, Cancer Res., 75:2139-45 (2015). [cited by applicant]
Thorsson et al., The immune landscape of cancer, Immunity, 48:812-830 (2018). [cited by applicant]
Thrane et al., Spatially resolved transcriptomics enables dissection of genetic heterogeneity in stage III cutaneous malignant melanoma, Cancer Res., 78(20):5970-5979, (2018). [cited by applicant]
Tizhoosh et al., Artificial intelligence and digital pathology: Challenges and opportunities, J. Pathol. Inform, 9:38 (2018). [cited by applicant]
Tsujikawa et al., Quantitative multiplex immunohistochemistry reveals myeloid-inflamed tumor-immune complexity associated with poor prognosis. Cell Reports, 19:203-217 (2017). [cited by applicant]
Tzeng et al.,. Adversarial discriminative domain adaptation, Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, 7167-7176 (2017). [cited by applicant]
U.S. Food & Drug Administration (FDA), KEYTRUDA label [Internet], [cited Last accessed Feb. 12, 2019], Available from: https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/drugsatfda_docs/label/2017/125514s024lbl.pdf#page=46. [cited by applicant]
U.S. Food & Drug Administration (FDA), PD-L1 IHC 22C3 pharmDx. Summary of Safety and Effectiveness Data [Internet], [cited Last accessed Feb. 12, 2019], Available from: https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/cdrh_docs/pdf15/P15… [cited by applicant]
U.S. Food & Drug Administration, Letter of Review of FoundationOne CDx (Trademark), 5 pp. (Nov. 30, 2017). [cited by applicant]
Ulyanov et al., Instance normalization: the missing ingredient for fast stylization, arXiv:1607.08022, 1-6 (2017). [cited by applicant]
Umar et al., Revised bethesda guidelines for hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer (lynch syndrome) and microsatellite instability, Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 96:261-268 (2004). [cited by applicant]
University Hospital of Liege and Osimis S.A., REST API of Orthanc, available online at <https://book.orthanc-server.com/users/rest.html#>, 17 (2015). [cited by applicant]
Uzzan et al., Microvessel density as a prognostic factor in women with breast cancer, Cancer Res., 64(9):2941-55 (2004). [cited by applicant]
Vasconcelos et al., Increasing deep learning melanoma classification by classical and expert knowledge based image transforms, CoRR, (2017). [cited by applicant]
Cummings et al., The Role of Next-Generation Sequencing in Enabling Personalized Oncology Therapy, Clin. Transl. Sci., 9:283-292 (2016). [cited by applicant]
Dey et al., Clustering RNA-seq expression data using grade of membership, 2016, bioRxiv preprint, p. 1-34. (Year: 2016). [cited by applicant]
Sheikhzadeh et al., “Automatic labeling of molecular biomarkers of whole slide immunohistochemistry images using fully convolutional networks,” Dec. 30, 2016, arXiv:1612.09420v1. (Year: 2016). [cited by applicant]
Yi et al., Automatic extraction of cell nuclei from H&E—stained histopathological images, J. Med. Imagin., 4(2):027502:1-12 (2017). [cited by applicant]
Kim et al., The landscape of microsatellite instability in colorectal and endometrial cancer genomes, Cell, 155(4):21 (2013). [cited by applicant]
Kitano et al., Tumour-infiltrating lymphocytes are correlated with higher expression levels of PD-1 and PD-L1 in early breast cancer, ESMO Open, 2:e000150 (2017). [cited by applicant]
Komura et al., Machine learning methods for histopathological image analysis, Comput. Struct. Biotechnol. J., 16:34-42 (2018). [cited by applicant]
Korbar et al., Looking under the hood: Deep neural network visualization to interpret whole-slide image analysis outcomes for colorectal polyps, 2017 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition Workshops,… [cited by applicant]
Korfiatis et al., Residual deep convolutional neural network predicts MGMT methylation status, J. Digit. Imaging, 30(5):622-628 (2017). [cited by applicant]
Kristensen et al., Principles and methods of integrative genomic analyses in cancer, Nat. Rev., 14:299-313 (2014). [cited by applicant]
Krupinski et al., A new software platform to improve multidisciplinary tumor board workflows and user satisfaction: A pilot study, J. Pathol. Inform., 9:26 (2018). [cited by applicant]
Kurakin et al., Adversarial Examples in the Physical World, Technical report, (2016). [cited by applicant]
Lan et al., Quantitative histology analysis of the ovarian tumour microenvironment, Sci. Rep., 5:16317 (2015). [cited by applicant]
Lecun et al., Deep learning, Nature, 521:436-444 (2015). [cited by applicant]
Leek et al., Association of macrophage infiltration with angiogenesis and prognosis in invasive breast carcinoma, Cancer Res., 56:4625-9 (1996). [cited by applicant]
Lemery et al., First FDA approval agnostic of cancer site—when a biomarker defines the indication, N. Engl. J. Med., 377:1409-1412 (2017). [cited by applicant]
Letter from U.S. Department of Health & Human Services to Agfa Healthcare N.V., regarding Enterprise Imaging XERO Viewer 8.1, dated (Jul. 3, 2017). [cited by applicant]
Letter from U.S. Department of Health & Human Services to Arterys, Inc. regarding Arterys Software v2.0, dated (Oct. 28, 2016). [cited by applicant]
Letter from U.S. Department of Health & Human Services to Arterys, Inc. regarding Arterys Viewer, dated (Jul. 18, 2017). [cited by applicant]
Letter from U.S. Department of Health & Human Services to Brainlab AG regarding DICOM Viewer, dated (Apr. 13, 2016). [cited by applicant]
Letter from U.S. Department of Health & Human Services to Healthmyne Inc. regarding Healthmyne PACS, dated (Aug. 20, 2015). [cited by applicant]
Letter from U.S. Department of Health & Human Services to Healthmyne Inc. regarding Healthmyne, dated (Jan. 15, 2016). [cited by applicant]
Letter from U.S. Department of Health and Human Services to Philips Medical Systems Nederland B.V. regarding Philips Intellisite Pathology Solution (PIPS), dated (Oct. 13, 2017). [cited by applicant]
Letter from U.S. Food & Drug Administration to Arterys, Inc. regarding Arterys Oncology DL, dated (Jan. 25, 2018). [cited by applicant]
Letter from U.S. Food & Drug Administration to Dako North America, Inc. regarding PD-L1 IHC 22C3 pharmDx, dated (Aug. 16, 2018). [cited by applicant]
Letter from U.S. Food & Drug Administration to Dako North America, Inc. regarding PD-L1 IHC 22C3 pharmDx, dated (Jun. 12, 2018). [cited by applicant]
Levenson et al., Pigeons ( [cited by applicant]
Levine et al., Rise of the machines: Advances in deep learning for cancer diagnosis, Trends in Cancer, 5(3):157-169 (2019). [cited by applicant]
Li et al., Deep learning based radiomics (DLR) and its usage in noninvasive IDH1 prediction for low grade glioma, Sci. Rep., 7(1):5467 (2017). [cited by applicant]
Li et al., Gland segmentation in colon histology images using hand-crafted features and convolutional neural networks, 2016 IEEE Int. Symp. Biom. Imag., 1405-1408 (2016). [cited by applicant]
Li et al., Landscape of tumor-infiltrating T cell repertoire of human cancers, Nat. Genet., 48(7):725-732 (2016). [cited by applicant]
Litjens et al., A survey on deep learning in medical image analysis, Med. Image Anal. Elsevier, 42:60-88 (2017). [cited by applicant]
Litjens et al., Deep learning as a tool for increased accuracy and efficiency of histopathological diagnosis, Sci. Rep. Nature.com, 6:26286 (2016). [cited by applicant]
Liu et al., Artificial intelligence-based breast cancer nodal metastasis detection, Arch. Pathol. Lab. Med. arpa., 2018-0147-OA (2018). doi: 10.5858/arpa.2018-0147-OA. [cited by applicant]
Liu et al., Detecting cancer metastases on gigapixel pathology images, 13 (2017). [cited by applicant]
Long et al., Fully convolutional networks for semantic segmentation, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 39:640-651 (2017), https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/7298965. [cited by applicant]
Lowe, Distinctive image features from scale-invariant keypoints, Int. J. Computer Vision, 28 (2004). [cited by applicant]
Luo et al., Comprehensive computational pathological image analysis predicts lung cancer prognosis, J. Thorac. Oncol., 12:501-509 (2017). [cited by applicant]
Madabhushi et al., Image analysis and machine learning in digital pathology: Challenges and opportunities, Med. Image Anal., 33:170-175 (2016). [cited by applicant]
Mclaughlin et al., Quantitative assessment of the heterogeneity of PD-L1 expression in non-small-cell lung cancer, JAMA Oncol. American Medical Association, 2:46-54 (2016). [cited by applicant]
Mehta et al., Multilabel multiclass classication of OCT images augmented with age, gender and visual acuity data, (2018). [cited by applicant]
Meng et al., Predictive biomarkers in PD-1/PD-L1 checkpoint blockade immunotherapy, Cancer Treat. Rev., 41:868-76 (2015). [cited by applicant]
Mobadersany et al., Predicting cancer outcomes from histology and genomics using convolutional networks, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A., 115:E2970-9 (2018). [cited by applicant]
Murphy et al., Comparison of the microsatellite instability analysis system and the bethesda panel for the determination of microsatellite instability in colorectal cancers, Journal of Molecular Diagnostics, 8(3):305-31… [cited by applicant]
Myronenko, 3D MRI brain tumor segmentation using autoencoder regularization, downloaded from the Internet at: <https://arxiv.org/pdf/1810.11654.pdf> (published Nov. 19, 2018). [cited by applicant]
Nalisnik et al., Interactive phenotyping of large-scale histology imaging data with HistomicsML, Sci. Rep., 1-12 (2017). [cited by applicant]
Nawaz et al., Beyond immune density: critical role of spatial heterogeneity in oestrogen receptor-negative breast cancer, doi:10.1038/modpathol., 37 (2015). [cited by applicant]
Newburn, Understanding the role of Human Leukocyte Antigen in Cancer Immunotherapy, Personalis, (2019). [cited by applicant]
Newman et al., Determining cell type abundance and expression from bulk tissues with digital cytometry, Nat. Biotec., 37:773-782 (2019). [cited by applicant]
Newman et al., Robust enumeration of cell subsets from tissue expression profiles, Nat. Methods, 12(5):453-457 (2015). [cited by applicant]
Non-Final Office Action received for U.S. Appl. No. 17/169,162, mailed on Jun. 28, 2021, 17 pages. [cited by applicant]
Notice of Allowance, U.S. Appl. No. 17/169,162, Jan. 26, 2022, 5 pages. [cited by applicant]
O'Rourke et al., Is concurrent chemoradiation the standard of care for locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer?, A review of guidelines and evidence, Clin. Oncol., 22:347-55 (2010). [cited by applicant]
“John Hopkins University Study Finds Laboratory-Developed Liquid Biopsy Tets Can Give Different Results; Call for ‘Improved Certification’ of Medical Laboratories That Develop These LDTs”, Dark Daily, 6 pages (2018). [cited by applicant]
“Technical Specifications,” FoundationOne (Registered) Liquid, Foundation Medicine, Inc. (2018). [cited by applicant]
Abdel-Rahman, Correlation between PD-L1 expression and outcome of NSCLC patients treated with anti-PD-1/PD-L1 agents: A meta-analysis, Crit. Rev. Oncol. Hematol., 101:75-85 (2016). [cited by applicant]
Abels et al., Current state of the regulatory trajectory for whole slide imaging devices in the USA, Journal of Pathology Informatics, 1:23 (2017). [cited by applicant]
Aderi, Pathology services in developing countries—the West African experience, Arch. Pathol. Lab. Med., 135:183-6 (2011). [cited by applicant]
Aerts et al., Decoding tumour phenotype by noninvasive imaging using a quantitative radiomics approach, Nat. Commun., 5:4006 (2014). [cited by applicant]
Ahn et al., DeMix: deconvolution for mixed cancer transcriptomes using raw measured data, Bioinformatics, 29(15):1865-1871 (2013). [cited by applicant]
Anders et al., Differential expression analysis for sequence count data, Genome Biology, 11:R106 (2010). [cited by applicant]
Ash et al., Joint analysis of gene expression levels and histological images identifies genes associated with tissue morphology, 1-28 (2018). [cited by applicant]
Ayers et al., IFN-g-related mRNA profile predicts clinical response to PD-1 blockade, The Journal of Clinical Investigation, 127(8):2930-2940 (2017). [cited by applicant]
Baas et al., Relationship between level of PD-L1 expression and outcomes in the KEYNOTE-010 study of pembrolizumab vs docetaxel for previously treated, PD-L1-Positive Nsclc., J. Clin. Orthod. American Society of Clinica… [cited by applicant]
Bandi et al., From detection of individual metastases to classification of lymph node status at the patient level: the CAMELYON17 challenge, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging, 38:550-560 (2019). [cited by applicant]
Bankhead et al., QuPath: Open source software for digital pathology image analysis, Sci. Rep., 7:16878 (2017). [cited by applicant]
Beaubier et al., Clinical validation of the tempus xT next-generation targeted oncology sequencing assay, Oncotarget, 10:2384-2396 (2019). [cited by applicant]
Bejnordi et al., Diagnostic assessment of deep learning algorithms for detection of lymph node metastases in women with breast cancer, Jama, 318:2199-2210 (2017). [cited by applicant]
Bellevicine et al., How to prepare cytological samples for molecular testing, In: schmitt F. (eds) molecular applications in cytology, Springer, Cham., https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-74942-6_2 (2018). [cited by applicant]
Bellevicine et al., How to prepare cytological samples for molecular testing, Journal of Clinical Pathology 70:819-826 (2017). [cited by applicant]
Bensch et al., 89Zr-atezolizumab imaging as a non-invasive approach to assess clinical response to PD-L1 blockade in cancer, Nat. Med., 24:1852-1858 (2018). [cited by applicant]
Bergado et al., Recurrent multiresolution convolutional networks for vhr image classification, (2018), <Downloaded from the Internet https://arxiv.org/pdf/1806.05793.pdf > <Downloaded on: Mar. 15, 2020> < DOI: 10.1109/T… [cited by applicant]
Borghaei et al., Nivolumab versus docetaxel in advanced nonsquamous non-small-cell lung cancer, N. Engl. J. Med., 373:1627-39 (2015). [cited by applicant]
Brahmer et al., Safety and activity of anti-PD-L1 antibody in patients with advanced cancer, N. Engl. J. Med., 366:2455-65 (2012). [cited by applicant]
Bray et al., Global cancer statistics 2018: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries, CA Cancer J. Clin., 68:394-424 (2018). [cited by applicant]
Brugnara et al., Management training for pathology residents: i. results of a national survey, American journal of clinical pathology, 101:559-563 (1994). [cited by applicant]
Bunescu et al., Multiple instance learning for sparse positive bags, Proceedings of the 24th Annual Intl. Conf. on Machine Learning (ICML-2007). [cited by applicant]
Buttner et al., Programmed death-ligand 1 immunohistochemistry testing: A review of analytical assays and clinical implementation in non-small-cell lung cancer, J. Clin. Oncol., 35:3867-76 (2017). [cited by applicant]
Bychkov et al., Deep learning for tissue microarray image-based outcome prediction in patients with colorectal cancer, Proc. of SPIE, 9791:979115 (2016). [cited by applicant]
Campanella et al., Clinical-grade computational pathology using weakly supervised deep learning on whole slide images, Nature Medicine, 25:1301-1309 (2019). [cited by applicant]
Caravagna et al., Algorithimic methods to infer the evolutionary trajectories in cancer progression, PNAS., 113(28):E4025-E4034 (2016). [cited by applicant]
Cardiff et al., Manual hematoxylin and eosin staining of mouse tissue sections, Cold Spring Harb Protoc., 655-8 (2014). [cited by applicant]
Carter et al,. Absolute quantification of somatic DNA alterations in human cancer, Nat. Biotechnol., 30:413-421 (2012). [cited by applicant]
Chang et al., Deep-learning convolutional neural networks accurately classify genetic mutations in gliomas, Am. J. Neuroradiology, (2018). [cited by applicant]
Chang et al., Residual convolution neural network for determination of IDH status in low- and high-grade gliomas from MR imaging, Clin. Cancer Res., 24(5):1073-1081 (2018). [cited by applicant]
Chang, Chemotherapy, chemoresistance and the changing treatment landscape for NSCLC, Lung Cancer, 71:3-10 (2011). [cited by applicant]
Chen et al., Microscope 2.0: An augmented reality microscope with real-time artificial integration, Nat. Med., 25:1453-1457 (2019). [cited by applicant]
Chen et al., Pathomic fusion: An integrated framework for fusing histopathology and genomic features for cancer diagnosis and prognosis, downloaded from the Internet at: <https://arxiv.org/pdf/1912.08937v1.pdf> (Dec. 18… [cited by applicant]
Clark et al., Analytical validation of a hybrid capture—based next-generation sequencing clinical assay for genomic profiling of cell-free circulating tumorDNA, The Journal of Molecular Diagnostics, 20(5):686-702 (2018). [cited by applicant]
Clarke et al., Statistical expression deconvolution from mixed tissue samples, Bioinformatics, 26(8):1043-1049 (2010). [cited by applicant]
Clunie, HIMA_2017_DICOMWSI_Clunie [PowerPoint slides]. Retrieved from https://www.dclunie.com/papers/HIMA_2017_DICOMWSI_Clunie.pdf, (2017). [cited by applicant]
Cobos et al., Computational deconvolution of transcriptomics data from mixed cell populations, Bioinformatics, 1-11 (2018). [cited by applicant]
Cooper et al., PanCancer insights from the cancer genome atlas: the pathologist's perspective, J. Pathol., 244:512-524 (2018). [cited by applicant]
Cortes-Ciriano et al., A molecular portrait of microsatellite instability across multiple cancers, Nat. Commun., 8:12 (2017). [cited by applicant]
Coudray et al., Classification and mutation prediction from non-small cell lung cancer histopathology images using deep learning, bioRxiv, 23 (2017). [cited by applicant]
Couture et al., Image analysis with deep learning to predict breast cancer grade, ER status, histologic subtype, and intrinsic subtype, NPJ. Breast Cancer, 4:30 (2018). [cited by applicant]
Cruz-Roa et al., Accurate and reproducible invasive breast cancer detection in whole-slide images: A Deep Learning approach for quantifying tumor extent, Scientific Reports, 7:46450, 14 (2017). [cited by applicant]
Cruz-Roa et al., High-throughput adaptive sampling for whole-slide histopathology image analysis (HASHI) via convolutional neural networks: Application to invasive breast cancer detection, PLoS One, 13(5):e0196828 (2018… [cited by applicant]
D'Incecco et al., PD-1 and PD-L1 expression in molecularly selected non-small-cell lung cancer patients, Br. J. Cancer, 112:95-102 (2015). [cited by applicant]
Daume et al., Domain adaptation for statistical classifiers, Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research, 26:101-126 (2006). [cited by applicant]
Denkert et al., Standardized evaluation of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes in breast cancer: results of the ring studies of the international immuno-oncology biomarker working group, Mod. Pathol., 29:1155-64 (2016). [cited by applicant]
Department of health and human services. Part I. overview information, Integration of imaging and fluid-based tumor monitoring in cancer therapy (R01 Clinical Trial Optional), (Feb. 5, 2018). [cited by applicant]
Dey et al., Visualizing the structure of RNA-seq expression data using grade of membership models, PLoS Genet., 13(3):e1006599 (2017). [cited by applicant]
Chen et al., Analysis of Pre-Analytic Factors Affecting the Success of Clinical Next-Generation Sequencing of Solid Organ Malignancies, Cancers, 7(3):1699-1715 (Aug. 2015). [cited by applicant]
European Application No. 22734819.0, European Search Report and Written Opinion, mailed Oct. 25, 2024. [cited by applicant]
Japanese Patent Application No. 2021-538465, Notice of Reasons for Refusal, dated Jul. 24, 2024. [cited by applicant]
Bray et al., Near-optimal probabilistic RNA-seq quantification, Nature Biotechnology, 34(1):525-527 (Apr. 2016). [cited by applicant]
Eide et al., CMScaller: an R package for consensus molecular subtyping of colorectal cancer pre-clinical models, Scientific Reports, 7(16618):1-8 (Nov. 2017). [cited by applicant]
Guinney et al., The consensus molecular subtypes of colorectal cancer, Nature Medicine, 21(11):1350-1356 (Oct. 2015). [cited by applicant]
Mariette et al., Consensus on the pathological definition and classification of poorly cohesive gastric carcinoma, Gastric Cancer, 22(1):1-9 (Aug. 2019). [cited by applicant]
Melichar et al., Predictive and Prognostic Significance of Tumor-infiltrating Lymphocytes in Patients with Breast Cancer Treated with Neoadjuvant Systemic Therapy, Anticancer Research, 34(3):1115-1125 (Mar. 2014). [cited by applicant]
Naito et al., CD8+ T Cells Infiltrated within Cancer Cell Nests as a Prognostic Factor in Human Colorectal Cancer, Cancer Res, 58(16):3491-3494 (1998). [cited by applicant]
Patro et al., Sailfish enables alignment-free isoform quantification from RNA-seq reads using lightweight algorithms, Nature Biotechnology, 32(5):462-464 (Apr. 2014). [cited by applicant]
Patro et al., Salmon provides fast and bias-aware quantification of transcript expression, Nature Methods, 14(4):417-419 (Apr. 2017). [cited by applicant]
Peng et al., Genome-wide transcriptome profiling of homologous recombination DNA repair, Nature Communications, 5(3361):1-11 (Feb. 2014). [cited by applicant]
Rivenson et al., Virtual histological staining of unlabelled tissue-autofluorescence images via deep learning, Nature Biomedical Engineering, 3(1):466-477 (Mar. 2019). [cited by applicant]
Van Laar et al., Implementation of a novel microarray-based diagnostic test for cancer of unknown primary, International Journal of Cancer, 125(6):1390-1397 (Sep. 2009). [cited by applicant]
Gaffney et al., Factors that drive the increasing use of FFPE tissue in basic and translational cancer research, 2018, 93(5), p. 373-386 (Year: 2018). [cited by applicant]
Hardwick et al., Spliced synthetic genes as internal controls in RNA sequencing experiments, Nature Methods, 13 (9):792-801 (Sep. 2016). [cited by applicant]
Beck et al., Systematic analysis of breast cancer morphology uncovers stromal features associated with survival, Science Translational Medicine, 3(108):1-11(108ra113) (Nov. 2011). [cited by applicant]