IP Library Granted Patent US 11,879,288
Granted Patent B2
US 11,879,288 · App. 17/686,397 · Granted Jan 23, 2024

Automated window mechanism with pinch protection

Inventors: David R. Hall (Provo, UT); Jerome Miles (Spanish Fork, UT)
Assignee: Hall Labs LLC
E05F15/73E05F15/665H02P23/18E05Y2201/434E05Y2201/716E05Y2201/722E05Y2400/31E05Y2400/36E05Y2400/40E05Y2400/54E05Y2800/70E05Y2900/148
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 11,879,288
App. No.
17/686,397
Granted
Jan 23, 2024
Kind
B2
Abstract

The invention is systems and methods of operating a window with an automated window mechanism. The systems and methods include moving with the automated window mechanism a sliding panel of a window relative to a window frame to open or close the window. The sliding panel moves through a proximate closing zone. The method also includes in the proximate closing zone, operating the automated window mechanism in a limited state comprising at least one of reduced velocity, reduced current to the automated window mechanism, or reduced voltage to the automated window mechanism.

Claims (36)

1. An automated window mechanism, comprising:

a motor coupled to a window and configured to move the window relative to a window frame, the window having a defined path of motion including a first end point and a second end point;

a force measurement component operably coupled to the motor and configured to measure a force exerted by the motor as defined by one or more of current, voltage, or velocity of the motor;

a processor; and

memory storing one or more computer-readable instructions executable by the processor to perform acts comprising:

storing a force map defined as a force as a function of position of the window relative to the frame, wherein deviation from the force map is monitored by a polling component having a predetermined polling rate for checks of deviation from the force map, and wherein deviation from the force map by more than a predetermined tolerance causes the motor to stop; and

upon reaching a proximate closing zone a predefined distance from one or more of the first or second end points, instructing the motor to operate in a safe state.

2. The automated window mechanism of claim 1 wherein the safe state comprises at least one of reduced velocity, reduced current, reducing voltage supplied to motor.

3. The automated window mechanism of claim 1 wherein the safe state further comprises an increased polling rate.

4. The automated window mechanism of claim 1 wherein the safe state further comprises a lower tolerance for deviation from the force map.

5. The automated window mechanism of claim 1 wherein the predefined distance is two inches.

6. The automated window mechanism of claim 1 wherein the safe state comprises an increased sensitivity in the force measurement component.

7. A system for an automated window mechanism, comprising:

a force measuring component measuring forces in a motor, the motor being connected to a movable window to move the movable window along a window path;

a processor; and

a memory storing computer-readable instructions that when executed by the processor to perform acts, the acts comprising:

measuring a force deviation from an expected value at one of a plurality of positions along the window path; and

limiting movement of the movable window based, at least in part, upon the force deviation.

8. The system of claim 7 , the acts further comprising storing a force map defining a force exertion of the motor along the window path, and wherein measuring the force deviation comprises measuring the force deviation by comparing an actual force in the motor to the force map at a given location.

9. The system of claim 8 , the acts further comprising establishing the force map using the motor to move the movable window along the window path and recording an actual force exertion.

10. The system of claim 7 wherein limiting movement of the window comprises operating the motor at at least one or a reduce velocity, reduced current, or reducing voltage supplied to the motor.

11. The system of claim 7 wherein the acts further comprise limiting movement of the movable window based, at least in part, upon approaching an end of the window path.

12. The system of claim 7 wherein the window path includes a closed position and when the movable window is within a predetermined proximity to the closed position, the motor is instructed to operate in a safe mode.

13. The system of claim 12 wherein the safe mode comprises one or more of a lower speed and a lower torque.

14. The system of claim 12 wherein the safe mode comprises a n increased frequency of measuring the force deviation from the expected value.

15. A method of operating a window with an automated window mechanism, the method comprising:

moving with the automated window mechanism a sliding panel of a window relative to a window frame to open or close the window, wherein the sliding panel moves through a proximate closing zone; and

in the proximate closing zone, operating the automated window mechanism in a limited state comprising at least one of reduced velocity, reduced current to the automated window mechanism, or reduced voltage to the automated window mechanism.

16. The method of claim 15 , further comprising:

storing a force map for the sliding panel defining a force exerted by the automated window mechanism at a plurality of points along the window frame;

measuring a force exerted by the automated window mechanism;

calculating a deviation from the force map by comparing the force exerted to the force map; and

if the deviation exceeds a threshold, stopping the automated window mechanism.

17. The method of claim 16 , further comprising calculating the deviation more frequently in the proximate closing zone than other window positions.

18. The method of claim 16 wherein the threshold is lower in the proximate closing zone.

19. The method of claim 15 wherein the proximate closing zone comprises two inches away from a closed position.

Assignments (4)
CORRECTIVE ASSIGNMENT TO CORRECT THE ASSIGNOR NAME FROM HALL LABS LLC TO HALL LABS, LLC AND ASSIGNEE NAME FROM D&D-SW, LLC. TO D&D-SW, LLC AND ASSIGNEE ADDRESS FROM 26040 TO 26040 YNEZ ROAD PREVIOUSLY RECORDED ON REEL 68769 FRAME 749. ASSIGNOR(S) HEREBY CONFIRMS THE ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST. Recorded Jul 2, 2025
From: HALL LABS, LLC
To: D&D-SW, LLC
Reel/Frame 071784/0229 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Nov 1, 2024
From: HALL, DAVID R
To: HALL LABS LLC
Reel/Frame 069105/0406 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Nov 1, 2024
From: MILES, JEROME
To: HALL LABS LLC
Reel/Frame 069105/0469 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Oct 2, 2024
From: HALL LABS LLC
To: D&D-SW, LLC.
Reel/Frame 068769/0749 →