IP Library Granted Patent US 11,625,935
Granted Patent B2
US 11,625,935 · App. 17/690,176 · Granted Apr 11, 2023

Systems and methods for classification of scholastic works

Inventor: Kenneth Neumann (Lakewood, CO)
Assignee: KPN INNOVATIONS, LLC.
G06V30/418G06K9/6256G06V30/414G06V30/416
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 11,625,935
App. No.
17/690,176
Granted
Apr 11, 2023
Kind
B2
Abstract

A system for classification of scholastic works includes a computing device configured to receive a first scholastic work, identify an author and a category of the first scholastic work, determine at least a work theme by receiving theme training data, the theme training data including a plurality of entries, each entry including a training textual element and a correlated theme, training a theme classifier as a function of the training data, and determining the at least a work theme as a function of the plurality of textual elements and the theme classifier, calculate a reliability quantifier as a function of the at least a theme, the author, and the category, select the scholastic work as a function of the reliability quantifier, derive, from the scholastic work, at least a correlation between a dietary practice and alleviation of a disease state, and store the at least a correlation in an expert database.

Claims (79)

1. A system for classification of scholastic works, the system comprising a computing device,

wherein the computing device is configured to:

receive a first scholastic work including a plurality of textual elements;

identify an author and a category of the first scholastic work;

determine at least a work theme, wherein determining further comprises:

receiving theme training data, the theme training data including a plurality of entries, each entry including a training textual element and a correlated theme;

training a theme classifier as a function of the training data; and

determining the at least a work theme as a function of the plurality of textual elements and the theme classifier;

calculate a reliability quantifier as a function of the at least a work theme, the author, and the category;

select the scholastic work as a function of the reliability quantifier;

derive, from the scholastic work, at least a correlation between a dietary practice and alleviation of a disease state; and

store the at least a correlation in an expert database.

2. The system of claim 1 , wherein calculating the reliability quantifier comprises determining an expert prestige factor, wherein the expert prestige factor quantifies the prestige of the author.

3. The system of claim 2 , wherein the expert prestige factor relates to the reliability of the author.

4. The system of claim 2 , wherein the expert prestige factor is based on the reputation of the author in the scientific community of the author.

5. The system of claim 2 , wherein the computing device is further configured to:

recalculate the reliability quantifier, wherein recalculating the reliability quantifier comprises recalculating the expert prestige factor; and

remove the at least a correlation from the expert database as a function of the recalculated reliability quantifier.

6. The system of claim 1 , wherein calculating the reliability quantifier further comprises:

receiving a plurality of publications by the at least an author;

training an author theme classifier using the theme training data;

identifying at least an author theme as a function of the plurality of publications and the author theme classifier;

comparing the at least an author theme to the theme; and

calculating the reliability quantifier as a function of the comparing.

7. The system of claim 1 , wherein calculating the reliability quantifier further comprises:

identifying a publisher of the first scholastic work;

determining at least a publisher theme of the publisher;

comparing the at least a publisher theme to the theme; and

calculating the reliability quantifier as a function of the comparing.

8. The system of claim 6 , wherein determining the at least a publisher theme further comprises:

receiving a plurality of publications of the publisher;

training a publisher theme classifier using the theme training data; and

identifying the at least a publisher theme as a function of the plurality of publications and the publisher theme classifier.

9. The system of claim 1 , wherein the computing device is further configured to:

receive unfavorable scholarship of the first scholastic work; and

remove the at least a correlation from the expert database.

10. The system of claim 9 , wherein receiving unfavorable scholarship of the first scholastic work comprises:

receiving a second scholastic work;

identifying at least a citation of the first scholastic work in the second scholastic work; and

recalculating the reliability quantifier as a function of the at least a citation.

11. A method of classification of scholastic works, the method comprising:

receiving, at a computing device, a first scholastic work including a plurality of textual elements;

identifying, by the computing device, an author and a category of the first scholastic work;

determining, by the computing device, at least a work theme, wherein determining further comprises:

receiving theme training data, the theme training data including a plurality of entries, each entry including a training textual element and a correlated theme;

training a theme classifier as a function of the training data; and

determining the at least a work theme as a function of the plurality of textual elements and the theme classifier;

calculating, by the computing device, a reliability quantifier as a function of the at least a work theme, the author, and the category;

selecting, by the computing device, the scholastic work as a function of the reliability quantifier;

deriving, by the computing device and from the scholastic work, at least a correlation between a dietary practice and alleviation of a disease state; and

storing, by the computing device the at least a correlation in an expert database.

12. The method of claim 1 , wherein calculating the reliability quantifier comprises determining an expert prestige factor, wherein the expert prestige factor quantifies the prestige of the author.

13. The method of claim 12 , wherein the expert prestige factor relates to the reliability of the author.

14. The method of claim 12 , wherein the expert prestige factor is based on the reputation of the author in the scientific community of the author.

15. The method of claim 12 , further comprising:

recalculating the reliability quantifier, wherein recalculating the reliability quantifier comprises recalculating the expert prestige factor; and

removing the at least a correlation from the expert database as a function of the recalculated reliability quantifier.

16. The method of claim 11 , wherein calculating the reliability quantifier further comprises:

receiving a plurality of publications by the at least an author;

training an author theme classifier using the theme training data;

identifying at least an author theme as a function of the plurality of publications and the author theme classifier;

comparing the at least an author theme to the theme; and

calculating the reliability quantifier as a function of the comparing.

17. The method of claim 11 , wherein calculating the reliability quantifier further comprises:

identifying a publisher of the first scholastic work;

determining at least a publisher theme of the publisher;

comparing the at least a publisher theme to the theme; and

calculating the reliability quantifier as a function of the comparing.

18. The method of claim 17 , wherein determining the at least a publisher theme further comprises:

receiving a plurality of publications of the publisher;

training a publisher theme classifier using the theme training data; and

identifying the at least a publisher theme as a function of the plurality of publications and the publisher theme classifier.

19. The method of claim 11 , further comprising:

receiving unfavorable scholarship of the first scholastic work; and

removing the at least a correlation from the expert database.

20. The method of claim 19 , wherein receiving unfavorable scholarship of the first scholastic work comprises:

receiving a second scholastic work;

identifying at least a citation of the first scholastic work in the second scholastic work; and

recalculating the reliability quantifier as a function of the at least a citation.

Assignments (1)
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded May 29, 2025
From: NEUMANN, KENNETH
To: KPN INNOVATIONS LLC
Reel/Frame 071548/0046 →
Continuity (2)
Continuation 16912126 · Jun 25, 2020
Related Publication 20220198815A1 · Jun 23, 2022