IP Library Granted Patent US 12,437,127
Granted Patent B2
US 12,437,127 · App. 17/706,435 · Granted Oct 7, 2025

Topologically optimized component design

Inventors: Joshua Coaplen (Asheville, NC); Wesley E. Allinger (Santa Cruz, CA); Daniel McCormick (Santa Cruz, CA); Paul Hammerstrom (Milford, NH)
Assignee: Fox Factory, Inc.
G06F30/15
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 12,437,127
App. No.
17/706,435
Granted
Oct 7, 2025
Kind
B2
Abstract

A method for topologically optimized component design is disclosed. The method receives at least one application parameter for a component and at least one specification for the component. The at least one application parameter and the at least one specification are utilized to generate a topologically optimized component design from at least one material.

Claims (17)

1. A method for topologically optimized component design, said method comprising:

receiving at least one application parameter for a component from a group consisting of: a travel, a wheel size, a bike type, a weight target, and a stiffness target;

receiving at least one specification for said component from a group consisting of: an allowable space, a clearance to other parts, a clearance to a vehicle model, and a clearance to a tire model;

receiving at least one engineering metric for said component, said at least one engineering metric from a group consisting of: a material type, a manufacturing type, a maximum weight, a minimum or maximum stiffness, and a stress threshold; and utilizing said at least one application parameter, said at least one specification, and said at least one engineering metric to generate a topologically optimized component design from at least one material;

utilizing said at least one application parameter and said at least one specification to generate a topologically optimized component design from at least one material;

evaluating said topologically optimized component design for manufacturability;

performing an industrial design modification to obtain a manufacturable topologically optimized component design when said evaluation for manufacturability results in said topologically optimized component design being unmanufacturable or otherwise overly constrained by available manufacturing processes;

performing a finite element analysis (FEA) on said manufacturable topologically optimized component design;

performing a plurality of iterations through said industrial design modification and said FEA until an acceptable modified topologically optimized component design is achieved;

generating a manufacturing process for said acceptable modified topologically optimized component design; and

utilizing an additive process and a subtractive process to physically generate said topologically optimized component design based on the acceptable modified topologically optimized component design.

2. The method of Claim 1 further comprising: generating a manufacturing process for said topologically optimized component design when said evaluation for manufacturability results in said topologically optimized component design being manufacturable.

3. The method of claim 1 further comprising: performing an aesthetics evaluation of said topologically optimized component design.

4. The method of claim 3 further comprising: generating a manufacturing process for said topologically optimized component design when said topologically optimized component design passes said aesthetics evaluation.

5. The method of claim 3 further comprising: performing an industrial design modification to obtain an aesthetically modified topologically optimized component design when said topologically optimized component design fails said aesthetics evaluation.

6. The method of claim 5 further comprising: performing a finite element analysis (FEA) on said aesthetically modified topologically optimized component design; and performing a plurality of iterations through said industrial design modification and said FEA until an acceptable aesthetically modified topologically optimized component design is achieved.

7. The method of claim 6 further comprising: generating a manufacturing process for said aesthetically modified topologically optimized component design.

Assignments (1)
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Sep 12, 2025
From: COAPLEN, JOSHUA; ALLINGER, WESLEY E.; MCCORMICK, DANIEL; HAMMERSTROM, PAUL
To: FOX FACTORY, INC.
Reel/Frame 072243/0276 →
Continuity (2)
Provisional Application 63167850 · Mar 30, 2021
Related Publication 20220318444A1 · Oct 6, 2022
References Cited (10)
US 9975595B2 · Galasso et al. · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 10850793B2 · Galasso · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 12124995B2 · Bujny · 2024 [cited by examiner]
US 20190352743A1 · Lu · 2019 [cited by examiner]
US 20200342067A1 · Yu et al. · 2020 [cited by applicant]
CN 112395685A · 2021 [cited by applicant]
Jeremy Smith, Redesigning a Bicycle Crank Arm for Metal Additive Manufacturing by Applying DFMAM Guidelines To the Topology Optimization Process, Mar. 2019. (Year: 2019). [cited by examiner]
Decision of Rejection for TW Application No. 111112265, Mailed Jun. 13, 2023, 11 Pages. [cited by applicant]
European Search Report for European Application No. 22165212.6 , 7 pages, Jul. 13, 2022. [cited by applicant]
Hoglund, “Topology Optimization Method for Carbon Fiber-Reinforced Fused Filament Fabrication”, Aug. 1, 2016, 1-169 Pages. [cited by applicant]
Cited By (1)
US 12,703,453