IP Library Granted Patent US 12,648,798
Granted Patent B2
US 12,648,798 · App. 17/723,753 · Granted Jun 9, 2026

Systems for attenuation of increased spinal flexion loads post-fusion and associated methods

Inventors: Anup Gandhi (Superior, CO); Jason Inzana (Westminster, CO); John Caridi (Westminster, CO); Samuel Cho (Westminster, CO)
Assignee: Highridge Medical, LLC
A61B17/7053A61B17/7001A61B17/7002A61B17/7011A61B17/7022A61B17/7031A61B17/7032A61B17/7043A61B17/7049A61B17/7062A61B17/7083A61B17/8869A61B17/7067A61B17/707
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 12,648,798
App. No.
17/723,753
Granted
Jun 9, 2026
Kind
B2
Abstract

Implementations described herein include devices and systems for attenuation of increased spinal flexion loads post-fusion that include a transition member. The transition member may have a tension component coupleable to a fused vertebra of a plurality of fused vertebra of a fusion implant and to an adjacent unfused vertebra. The tension component may be tensionable to a selected value. The tension component may modulate a flexion range of motion of the adjacent unfused vertebra as a function of the selected value of tension of the tension component. The transition member may attenuate spinal flexion loads on adjacent unfused vertebra post-operatively.

Claims (26)

1 . A fusion system, comprising:

a fusion implant capable of connecting to a plurality of fused vertebrae;

a transition member including a tension component capable of connecting to a fused vertebra of the plurality of fused vertebrae and an unfused vertebra disposed proximate the fused vertebra, the tension component comprising a flexible elongate member capable of passing through an aperture in the transition member to interface with the proximate unfused vertebra; and

a second transition member with a second tension component capable of coupling a second fused vertebra of the plurality of fused vertebrae and a second unfused vertebra positioned proximate the second fused vertebra, the second tension component comprising a second flexible elongate member capable of passing through a second aperture in the second transition member to interface with the second unfused vertebra,

wherein the tension component is tensionable to a selected value of tension by pulling a first end of the flexible elongate member through the aperture of the transition member to reduce a length of a portion of the flexible elongate member coupled to the proximate unfused vertebra;

wherein the second tension component is tensionable to a selected value of tension by pulling a first end of the second flexible elongate member through the second aperture of the transition member to reduce a length of a portion of the second flexible elongate member coupled to the second unfused vertebra;

wherein the second tension component is tensionable independently from the tension component;

wherein the tension component modulates a flexion range of motion of the proximate unfused vertebra as a function of the selected value of tension of the tension component;

wherein the transition member post-operatively attenuates spinal flexion loads on the proximate unfused vertebra; and

wherein the second tension component is positioned superior to the tension component.

2 . The fusion system of claim 1 , wherein the flexible elongate member comprises a tether, a cord, a band, or a flexible rod, wherein the transition member comprises a clamp and a set screw, and wherein the set screw is adjustable to secure the flexible elongate member within the clamp.

3 . The fusion system of claim 2 , wherein the tension component further comprises a bone implant, and wherein the bone implant is configured to engage with the fused vertebra.

4 . The fusion system of claim 3 , wherein a first end of the tension component is received by the bone implant after the tension component has been tensioned to the selected value of tension.

5 . The fusion system of claim 2 , wherein the set screw is further adjustable to secure the clamp to a bone implant.

6 . The fusion system of claim 5 , wherein the bone implant comprises a vertebral rod.

7 . The fusion system of claim 1 , wherein the flexible elongate member is configured to be looped around at least a portion of the proximate unfused vertebra.

8 . A system, comprising:

a first transition member including a first tension component capable of connecting to a first fused vertebra of a plurality of fused vertebrae and a first unfused vertebra positioned proximate the first fused vertebra, the first tension component comprising a first flexible elongate member capable of passing through a first aperture in the first transition member to interface with the first unfused vertebra; and

a second transition member with a second tension component capable of connecting to a second fused vertebra of the plurality of fused vertebrae and a second unfused vertebra positioned proximate the second fused vertebra, the second tension component comprising a second flexible elongate member capable of passing through a second aperture in the second transition member to interface with the second unfused vertebra,

wherein the first tension component is tensionable to a selected value of tension by pulling a first end of the first flexible elongate member through the first aperture of the first transition member to reduce a length of a portion of the first flexible elongate member coupled to the first unfused vertebra;

wherein the second tension component is tensionable to a selected value of tension by pulling a first end of the second flexible elongate member through the second aperture of the second transition member to reduce a length of a portion of the second flexible elongate member coupled to the second unfused vertebra; and

wherein the second tension component is tensionable independently from the first tension component.

9 . The system of claim 8 , wherein the first transition member comprises a clamp and a set screw, and wherein the set screw is adjustable to secure the first flexible elongate member within the clamp.

10 . The system of claim 9 , wherein the first flexible elongate member comprises a tether, a cord, a band, or a flexible rod.

11 . The system of claim 10 , wherein the first tension component further comprises a bone implant, and wherein the bone implant is configured to engage with the first fused vertebra.

12 . The system of claim 8 , wherein the first tension component modulates a flexion range of motion of the first unfused vertebra as a function of the selected value of tension of the first tension component.

Assignments (4)
CHANGE OF NAME Recorded Oct 8, 2025
From: ZIMMER BIOMET SPINE, INC.
To: HIGHRIDGE MEDICAL, LLC
Reel/Frame 073058/0964 →
CHANGE OF NAME Recorded Sep 19, 2025
From: ZIMMER BIOMET SPINE, INC.
To: HIGHRIDGE MEDICAL, LLC
Reel/Frame 072956/0064 →
GRANT OF A SECURITY INTEREST -- PATENTS Recorded Apr 1, 2024
From: ZIMMER BIOMET SPINE, LLC; EBI, LLC
To: CERBERUS BUSINESS FINANCE AGENCY, LLC
Reel/Frame 066970/0806 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Apr 19, 2022
From: GANDHI, ANUP; INZANA, JASON; CARIDI, JOHN; CHO, SAMUEL
To: ZIMMER BIOMET SPINE, INC.
Reel/Frame 059637/0975 →
Continuity (3)
Division 16275751 · Feb 14, 2019
Provisional Application 62632039 · Feb 19, 2018
Related Publication 20220233217A1 · Jul 28, 2022
References Cited (54)
US 8740941B2 · Thramann · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 10758274B1 · Bess · 2020 [cited by examiner]
US 11344337B2 · Gandhi et al. · 2022 [cited by applicant]
US 20080021466A1 · Shadduck et al. · 2008 [cited by applicant]
US 20090024165A1 · Ferree · 2009 [cited by applicant]
US 20090105715A1 · Belliard et al. · 2009 [cited by applicant]
US 20090264932A1 · Alamin et al. · 2009 [cited by applicant]
US 20110245875A1 · Karim · 2011 [cited by applicant]
US 20130261668A1 · Douget · 2013 [cited by examiner]
US 20140012326A1 · Alamin · 2014 [cited by examiner]
US 20140094851A1 · Gordon · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 20160235447A1 · Mundis, Jr. et al. · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 20160242825A1 · Simpson et al. · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 20180078286A1 · Le Couedic et al. · 2018 [cited by applicant]
EP 2723260 · 2014 [cited by applicant]
WO WO2016166448 · 2016 [cited by applicant]
Official Action for European Patent Application No. 19158113.1, dated Sep. 18, 2023 6 pages. [cited by applicant]
Varlet, V, et al., “Junctional spinal disorders in operated adult spinal deformities: present understanding and future perspectives”, Eur Spine J (2013) 22 (Suppl 2): S276-S295, (2013), 20 pgs. [cited by applicant]
Aubin, Carl-Eric, et al., “Instrumentation Strategies to Reduce the Risks of Proximal Junctional Kyphosis in Adult Scoliosis: A Detailed Biomechanical Analysis”, Spine Deformity 3 (2015) 211e218, (2015), 8 pgs. [cited by applicant]
Bess, Shay, et al., “The effect of posterior polyester tethers on the biomechanics of proximal junctional kyphosis: a finite element analysis”, J Neurosurg 2017: 26:125-133, (2016), 10 pgs. [cited by applicant]
Cahill, Patrick J., et al., “The use of a transition rod may prevent proximal junctional kyphosis in the thoracic spine after scoliosis surgery: a finite element analysis”, SPINE vol. 37, No. 12, pp. E687-E695, (2012), … [cited by applicant]
Cammarata, Marco, et al, “Biomecanical risk factors for proximal junctional kyphosis: a detailed numerical analysis of surgical instrumentation variables”, SPINE vol. 39, No. 8, pp. E500-E507, (2014), 8 pgs. [cited by applicant]
Cha, Jae-Ryong, et al., “Pedicle screw fixation and posterior fusion for lumbar degenerative diseases: effects on individual paraspinal muscles and lower back pain; a single-center, prospective study”, BMC Musculoskelet… [cited by applicant]
Cho, Samuel K., “Proximal junctional kyphosis following adult spinal deformity surgery”, Eur Spine J (2014) 23:2726-2736, (2014), 11 pgs. [cited by applicant]
Denis, Francis, et al., “Incidence and risk factors for proximal and distal junctional kyphosis following surgical treatment for Scheuermann kyphosis: minimum five-year follow-up”, SPINE vol. 34, No. 20, pp. E729-E734, … [cited by applicant]
Glattes, R. Chris, et al., “Proximal junctional kyphosis in adult spinal deformity following long instrumented posterior spinal fusion: incidence, outcomes, and risk factor analysis”, SPINE vol. 30, No. 14, pp. 1632-164… [cited by applicant]
Helgeson, Melvin D., “Evaluation of proximal junctional kyphosis in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis following pedicle screw, hook, or hybrid instrumentation”, SPINE vol. 35, No. 2, pp. 177-181, (2010), 5 pgs. [cited by applicant]
Hyun, Seung-Jae, et al., “Patients with proximal junctional kyphosis after stopping at thoracolumbar junction have lower muscularity, fatty degeneration at the thoracolumbar area”; Spine J 2016; 16:1095-1101, (2016), 7 … [cited by applicant]
Kim, Dong-Yun, “Comparison of multifidus muscle atrophy and trunk extension muscle strength: percutaneous versus open pedicle screw fixation”, SPINE vol. 30, No. 1, pp. 123-129, (2004), 7 pgs. [cited by applicant]
Kim, Han Jo, et al., “Combined anterior-posterior surgery is the most important risk factor for developing proximal junctional kyphosis in idiopathic scoliosis”, Clin Orthop Relat Res (2012) 470:1633-1639, (2012), 7 pgs. [cited by applicant]
Kim, Han Jo, et al., “Patients with proximal junctional kyphosis requiring revision surgery have higher postoperative lumbar lordosis and larger sagittal balance corrections”, SPINE vol. 39, No. 9, pp. E576-E580, (2014)… [cited by applicant]
Kim, Han Jo, et al., “Proximal junctional kyphosis as a distinct form of adjacent segment pathology after spinal deformity surgery: a systematic review”, SPINE vol. 37, No. 22S, pp. S144-S164, (2012), 21 pgs. [cited by applicant]
Kim, Yongjung, et al., “Proximal junctional kyphosis in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis after 3 different types of posterior segmental spinal instrumentation and fusions: incidence and risk factor analysis of 410 cases”… [cited by applicant]
Kim, Yongjung, et al., “Proximal junctional kyphosis in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis following segmental posterior spinal instrumentation and fusion: minimum 5-year follow-up”. SPINE vol. 30, No. 18, pp. 2045-2050, (… [cited by applicant]
Lai, Po-Liang, et al., “Relation between laminectomy and development of adjacent segment instability after lumbar fusion with pedicle fixation”, SPINE vol. 29, No. 22, pp. 2527-2532, (2004), 6 pgs. [cited by applicant]
Lau, Darryl, et al., “Proximal junctional kyphosis and failure after spinal deformity surgery: a systematic review of the literature as a background to classification development”, SPINE vol. 39, No. 25, pp. 2093-2102, … [cited by applicant]
Liebsch, Christian, et al., “The rib cage stabilizes U1e t1uman U10racic spine: An in vitro study using stepwise reduction of rib cage structures”, PloS one 2017; 12: e0178733, (2017), 13 pgs. [cited by applicant]
Mayer, Tom G., et al., “Comparison of CT scan muscle measurements and isokinetic trunk strength in postoperative patients”, Spine 1989; 14:33-36, (1989), 4 pgs. [cited by applicant]
Mcgill, Stuart M., “Estimation of force and extensor moment contributions of the disc and ligaments at L4-L5”, Spine 1988; 13:1395-1402, (1988), 8 pgs. [cited by applicant]
Metzger, Melodie F., et al., “Biomechanical Analysis of the Proximal Adjacent Segment after Multilevel Instrumentation of the Thoracic Spine: Do Hooks Ease the Transition?”, Global Spine J 2016;6:335-343., (2016), 9 pgs. [cited by applicant]
Panjabi, Manohar, et al., “Physiologic strains in the lumbar spinal ligaments. An in vitro biomechanical study 1981 Volvo Award in Biomechanics”, Spine 1982; 7:192-203, (1982), 12 pgs. [cited by applicant]
Scheer, Justin, et al., “Development of Validated Computer-based Preoperative Predictive Model for Proximal Junction Failure (PJF) or Clinically Significant PJK with 86% Accuracy Based on 510 ASD Patients With 2-year Fo… [cited by applicant]
Thawrani, Dinesh P., et al., “Transverse process hooks at upper instrumented vertebra provide more gradual motion transition than pedicle screws”, SPINE vol. 39, No. 14, pp. E826 -E832, (2014), 7 pgs. [cited by applicant]
Theologis, Alexander A, et al., “Economic Impact of Revision Surgery for Proximal Junctional Failure After Adult Spinal Deformity Surgery: A Cost Analysis of 57 Operations in a 10-year Experience at a Major Deformity Ce… [cited by applicant]
Yagi, Mitsuru, et al., “Incidence, risk factors, and natural course of proximal junctional kyphosis: surgical outcomes review of adult idiopathic scoliosis. Minimum 5 years of follow-up”, SPINE vol. 37, No. 17, pp. 1479… [cited by applicant]
European Application Serial No. 19158113.1, Extended European Search Report mailed Jul. 18, 2019, 9 pgs. [cited by applicant]
European Application Serial No. 19158113.1, Response filed Feb. 20, 2020 to Extended European Search Report mailed Jul. 18, 2019, 10 pgs. [cited by applicant]
Official Action for U.S. Appl. No. 16/275,751, dated Dec. 7, 2020 8 pages, Restriction Requirement. [cited by applicant]
Official Action for U.S. Appl. No. 16/275,751, dated Feb. 23, 2021 15 pages. [cited by applicant]
Final Action for U.S. Appl. No. 16/275,751, dated Sep. 3, 2021 15 pages. [cited by applicant]
Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 16/275,751, dated Jan. 19, 2022 12 pages. [cited by applicant]
Supplemental Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 16/275,751, dated Feb. 28, 2022 4 pages. [cited by applicant]
Official Action for European Patent Application No. 19158113.1, dated Sep. 2, 2024 6 pages. [cited by applicant]
Invitation to Grant for European Patent Application No. 19158113.1, dated May 13, 2025 9 pages. [cited by applicant]