IP Library Granted Patent US 11,581,963
Granted Patent B2
US 11,581,963 · App. 17/724,370 · Granted Feb 14, 2023

Systems and methods for in-line interference detection in point-to-point radio links

Inventors: Gary Croke (Mill Valley, CA); Sergio Licardie (Cupertino, CA); Robert Vilhar (Ljubljana, SI); Sreco Plevel (Domzale, SI); Marius Koegelenberg (Pretoria, ZA)
Assignee: Aviat U.S., Inc.
H04B17/345
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 11,581,963
App. No.
17/724,370
Granted
Feb 14, 2023
Kind
B2
Abstract

An interference detection system comprises memory storing computer instructions to cause a processor to perform gathering a temporal snapshot of radio parameter values associated with a first site of a point-to-point radio system, the radio parameter values including at least a receive signal level (RSL) value and at least one other radio parameter value correlated with signal degradation; determining whether the RSL value is greater than an RSL threshold; determining whether the other radio parameter value indicates a threshold level of signal degradation; when the RSL is greater than the RSL threshold and the other parameter indicates a threshold level of signal degradation during the temporal snapshot, determining that external interference is present during the temporal snapshot; when the RSL is not greater than the RSL threshold, determining that the external interference is not present; and performing a responsive action to a determination of the external interference being likely present.

Claims (86)

1. An interference detection system in a point-to-point radio system, the point-to-point radio system including a first site in radio communication with a second site, comprising:

at least one processor; and

memory storing computer instructions, the computer instructions when executed by the at least one processor configured to cause the system to perform,

gathering during a specific time period a set of temporal snapshots of radio parameter values associated with at least a first site of a point-to-point radio system, the radio parameter values of each temporal snapshot including at least a receive signal level (RSL) value and at least one other radio parameter value correlated with signal degradation during the temporal snapshot;

determining a maximum RSL value in the set of RSL values of the set of temporal snapshots;

determining whether the maximum RSL value is greater than an RSL threshold;

selecting a particular at least one other radio parameter value from in the set of at least one other radio parameter values of the set of temporal snapshots;

determining whether the particular at least one other radio parameter value indicates a threshold level of signal degradation during the set of temporal snapshots;

at least when the maximum RSL value is greater than the RSL threshold and the particular at least one other radio parameter value indicate a threshold level of signal degradation, then determining that external interference is likely present during the set of temporal snapshots;

at least when the maximum RSL value is not greater than the RSL threshold, then determining that the external interference is likely not present during the set of temporal snapshots; and

performing one or more individual temporal snapshot evaluations for external interference in response to a determination of the external interference being likely present during the set of temporal snapshots.

2. The interference detection system of claim 1 , wherein the computer instructions configured to cause the system to perform one or more individual temporal snapshot evaluations comprise computer instructions configured to cause the system to perform,

gathering a particular temporal snapshot of particular radio parameter values associated with at least the first site, the particular radio parameter values including at least a particular RSL value and a particular at least one other radio parameter value correlated with signal degradation during the particular temporal snapshot;

determining whether the particular RSL value is greater than the RSL threshold;

determining whether the particular at least one other radio parameter value indicates the threshold level of signal degradation during the particular temporal snapshot;

at least when the particular RSL value is greater than the RSL threshold and the particular at least one other radio parameter value indicates the threshold level of signal degradation during the particular temporal snapshot, then determining that external interference is likely present during the particular temporal snapshot; and

at least when the particular RSL value is not greater than the RSL threshold, then determining that the external interference is likely not present during the particular temporal snapshot.

3. The interference detection system of claim 1 , wherein the radio parameter values include radio parameter values associated with a modem and a radio frequency unit at the first site during each temporal snapshot.

4. The interference detection system of claim 1 , wherein the at least one other radio parameter value includes a Demodulator Not Locked (DNL) Alarm, and wherein the at least one other radio parameter value indicates a threshold level of signal degradation at least when the DNL Alarm is active.

5. The interference detection system of claim 1 , wherein the at least one other radio parameter value includes Errored Seconds (ES) or Severely Errored Seconds (SES) value, and wherein the at least one other radio parameter value indicates a threshold level of signal degradation at least when the ES or SES value is increasing from a previous sample.

6. The interference detection system of claim 1 , wherein the at least one other radio parameter value includes a signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) value, and wherein the at least one other radio parameter value indicates a threshold level of signal degradation at least when at least the SNR value is less than a threshold.

7. The interference detection system of claim 1 , wherein the at least one other radio parameter value includes a change in an Uncoded Bit Error Rate (U-BER), and wherein the at least one other radio parameter value indicates a threshold level of signal degradation at least when the change in the U-BER is greater than a threshold.

8. The interference detection system of claim 1 , wherein the at least one other radio parameter includes Adaptive Code Modulation (ACM) data, and wherein the at least one other radio parameter value indicates a threshold level of signal degradation at least when ACM is active and negative.

9. The interference detection system of claim 1 , wherein the at least one other radio parameter value includes Automatic Transmit Power Control (ATPC) data, and wherein the at least one other radio parameter value indicates a threshold level of signal degradation at least when ATPC is enabled and a power adjustment is greater than a threshold.

10. The interference detection system of claim 1 , wherein the computer instructions when executed by the processor are further configured to cause the system to perform

evaluating interference persistence; and

determining a false positive at least when the interference persistence is less than a minimum threshold duration.

11. The interference detection system of claim 10 , wherein the computer instructions when executed by the processor are further configured to cause the system to perform

determining an amount of interference variation;

identifying the external interference as a steady interferer at least when the amount of interference variation is less than a threshold; and

identifying the external interference as a continuous bursty interferer at least when the amount of interference variation is greater than the threshold.

12. The interference detection system of claim 1 , wherein the computer instructions when executed by the processor are further configured to cause the system to perform

determining first interference effects on a first receiver at the first site in space diversity with a second receiver at the first site;

determining second interference effects on the second receiver at the first site;

comparing the first interference effects with the second interference effects; and

at least when the first interference effects are substantially the same as the second interference effects, then validating the external interference.

13. The interference detection system of claim 1 , wherein the computer instructions when executed by the processor are further configured to cause the system to perform

determining first SNR on a first receiver at the first site in space diversity with a second receiver at the first site;

determining second SNR on the second receiver; and

at least when the first SNR indicates signal degradation while the second SNR does not indicate signal degradation and when thereafter the first SNR improves or clears while the second SNR deteriorates, then identifying the external interference as a likely multipath interference.

14. The interference detection system of claim 1 , wherein the computer instructions when executed by the processor are further configured to cause the system to perform

comparing a near-end interference condition with a far-end interference condition; and

at least when the near-end interference condition is not substantially similar to the far-end interference condition, the validating the external interference.

15. The interference detection system of claim 1 , wherein the computer instructions when executed by the processor are further configured to cause the system to perform

searching a historical database for records indicative of an interference pattern or correlation with external events; and

using the interference pattern or correlation with external events to assist in identifying future interferences as not being due to an external interferer.

16. The interference detection system of claim 1 , wherein the one or more individual temporal snapshot evaluations includes an evaluation of a temporal snapshot of radio parameter values within the set of temporal snapshots.

17. The interference detection system of claim 1 , wherein the specific time period includes a 15-minute time period.

18. An interference detection method in a point-to-point radio system, the point-to-point radio system including a first site in radio communication with a second site, comprising:

gathering during a specific time period a set of temporal snapshots of radio parameter values associated with at least a first site of a point-to-point radio system, the radio parameter values of each temporal snapshot including at least a receive signal level (RSL) value and at least one other radio parameter value correlated with signal degradation during the temporal snapshot;

determining a maximum RSL value in the set of RSL values of the set of temporal snapshots;

determining whether the maximum RSL value is greater than an RSL threshold;

selecting a particular at least one other radio parameter value from in the set of at least one other radio parameter values of the set of temporal snapshots;

determining whether the particular at least one other radio parameter value indicates a threshold level of signal degradation during the set of temporal snapshots;

at least when the maximum RSL value is greater than the RSL threshold and the particular at least one other radio parameter value indicate a threshold level of signal degradation, then determining that external interference is likely present during the set of temporal snapshots;

at least when the maximum RSL value is not greater than the RSL threshold, then determining that the external interference is likely not present during the set of temporal snapshots; and

performing one or more individual temporal snapshot evaluations for external interference in response to a determination of the external interference being likely present during the set of temporal snapshots.

19. The interference detection method of claim 18 , wherein the step of performing one or more individual temporal snapshot evaluations includes,

gathering a particular temporal snapshot of particular radio parameter values associated with at least the first site, the particular radio parameter values including at least a particular RSL value and a particular at least one other radio parameter value correlated with signal degradation during the particular temporal snapshot;

determining whether the particular RSL value is greater than the RSL threshold;

determining whether the particular at least one other radio parameter value indicates the threshold level of signal degradation during the particular temporal snapshot;

at least when the particular RSL value is greater than the RSL threshold and the particular at least one other radio parameter value indicates the threshold level of signal degradation during the particular temporal snapshot, then determining that external interference is likely present during the particular temporal snapshot; and

at least when the particular RSL value is not greater than the RSL threshold, then determining that the external interference is likely not present during the particular temporal snapshot.

20. The interference detection method of claim 18 , further comprising

evaluating interference persistence; and

determining a false positive at least when the interference persistence is less than a minimum threshold duration.

21. The interference detection method of claim 18 , further comprising

determining an amount of interference variation;

identifying the external interference as a steady interferer at least when the amount of interference variation is less than a threshold; and

identifying the external interference as a continuous bursty interferer at least when the amount of interference variation is greater than the threshold.

22. The interference detection method of claim 18 , further comprising

determining first interference effects on a first receiver at the first site in space diversity with a second receiver at the first site;

determining second interference effects on the second receiver at the first site;

comparing the first interference effects with the second interference effects; and

at least when the first interference effects are substantially the same as the second interference effects, then validating the external interference.

23. The interference detection method of claim 18 , further comprising

determining first SNR on a first receiver at the first site in space diversity with a second receiver at the first site;

determining second SNR on the second receiver; and

at least when the first SNR indicates signal degradation while the second SNR does not indicate signal degradation and when thereafter the first SNR improves or clears while the second SNR deteriorates, then identifying the external interference as a likely multipath interference.

24. The interference detection method of claim 18 , further comprising

comparing a near-end interference condition with a far-end interference condition; and

at least when the near-end interference condition is not substantially similar to the far-end interference condition, the validating the external interference.

25. The interference detection method of claim 18 , further comprising

searching a historical database for records indicative of an interference pattern or correlation with external events; and

using the interference pattern or correlation with external events to assist in identifying future interferences as not being due to an external interferer.

26. The interference detection method of claim 18 , wherein the one or more individual temporal snapshot evaluations includes an evaluation of a temporal snapshot of radio parameter values within the set of temporal snapshots.

Assignments (2)
SECURITY INTEREST Recorded Jan 18, 2024
From: AVIAT U.S., INC.
To: WELLS FARGO BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, AS ADMINISTRATIVE AGENT
Reel/Frame 066168/0554 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Apr 20, 2022
From: CROKE, GARY; LICARDIE, SERGIO; VILHAR, ROBERT; PLEVEL, SRECO; KOEGELENBERG, MARIUS
To: AVIAT U.S., INC.
Reel/Frame 059655/0761 →
Continuity (3)
Continuation 17180248 · Feb 19, 2021
Provisional Application 63007526 · Apr 9, 2020
Related Publication 20220255648A1 · Aug 11, 2022