IP Library Granted Patent US 11,464,980
Granted Patent B2
US 11,464,980 · App. 17/724,652 · Granted Oct 11, 2022

Method and device for feedback control of neural stimulation

Inventors: Peter Scott Vallack Single (Artarmon, AU); Dean Michael Karantonis (Artarmon, AU)
Assignee: Saluda Medical Pty Ltd
A61N1/36139A61N1/0551A61N1/36062A61N1/36071
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 11,464,980
App. No.
17/724,652
Granted
Oct 11, 2022
Kind
B2
Abstract

A method of controlling a neural stimulus by use of feedback. The neural stimulus is applied to a neural pathway in order to give rise to an evoked action potential on the neural pathway. The stimulus is defined by at least one stimulus parameter. A neural compound action potential response evoked by the stimulus is measured. From the measured evoked response a feedback variable is derived. A feedback loop is completed by using the feedback variable to control the at least one stimulus parameter value. The feedback loop adaptively compensates for changes in a gain of the feedback loop caused by electrode movement relative to the neural pathway.

Claims (15)

1. A method of suppressing pain by applying a neural stimulus, the method comprising:

delivering stimuli from at least one stimulus electrode to a tissue in the dorsal column of a patient, each stimulus defined by a stimulus intensity parameter;

measuring a neural response sensed at at least one sense electrode and evoked in response to a stimulus;

determine from the measured evoked neural response a feedback variable;

complete a feedback control loop by applying a proportional adjustment to the stimulus intensity parameter, wherein the proportional adjustment in proportion to an error between the feedback variable and a target intensity; and

setting a gain based a characteristic of a neural response growth curve, wherein the neural response growth curve is a relation of a neural response intensity to the stimulus intensity parameter,

wherein the proportional adjustment is determined by multiplying the error by the gain.

2. The method of claim 1 , wherein setting the value of the gain comprises:

comparing each of a plurality of measured neural responses to a corresponding stimulus intensity parameter to determine the characteristic of a neural response growth curve, and

setting the gain based on the determined characteristic of the neural response growth curve.

3. The method of claim 2 , wherein the characteristic is a slope of the neural response growth curve.

4. The method of claim 3 , wherein setting the value of the gain comprises setting the gain such that the feedback control loop has a predetermined corner frequency.

5. The method of claim 4 , wherein setting the value of the gain comprises setting the value of the gain to be the predetermined corner frequency divided by the slope.

6. The method of claim 4 , wherein the predetermined corner frequency is between a heartbeat frequency and a sample rate of the feedback control loop.

7. The method of claim 1 , wherein the gain is set when the patient is in a most sensitive posture, being a posture in which the characteristic is greatest.

Assignments (2)
SECURITY INTEREST Recorded Mar 14, 2025
From: SALUDA MEDICAL PTY LTD
To: PERCEPTIVE CREDIT HOLDINGS IV, LP
Reel/Frame 070518/0710 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Jun 3, 2022
From: SINGLE, PETER SCOTT VALLACK; KARANTONIS, DEAN MICHAEL
To: SALUDA MEDICAL PTY LTD
Reel/Frame 060094/0384 →
Priority Claims (1)
AU 2014905031 · Dec 11, 2014 · national
Continuity (4)
Continuation 17532725 · Nov 22, 2021
Continuation 16669393 · Oct 30, 2019
Continuation 15535008
Related Publication 20220249848A1 · Aug 11, 2022