Protecting a computer device from escalation of privilege attacks

1. A system, comprising:

a memory storing a token cache and an operating system; and

at least one computing device in communication with the memory, the at least one computing device being configured to:

receive a first notification that a process has started on the at least one computing device;

in response to the first notification, record a first access token associated with the process into the token cache;

receive a second notification that the process has interacted with the operating system to perform at least one of a set of predetermined operations on the at least one computing device;

in response to the second notification, capture a second access token from the process;

perform a comparison of the second access token captured from the process against the first access token recorded into the token cache; and

determine that an escalation of privilege attack has occurred based on the comparison of the second access token captured from the process against the first access token recorded in the token cache.

2. The system of claim 1 , wherein the at least one computing device is further configured receive the second notification subsequent to the first notification.

3. The system of claim 1 , wherein the at least one computing device is further configured to present a custom message on a display associated with the at least one computing device in response to determining the escalation of privilege attack has occurred.

4. The system of claim 3 , wherein the custom message comprises specific text configured in a policy file.

5. The system of claim 1 , wherein the at least one computing device is further configured to perform an audit of the first notification and the second notification based on a policy file.

6. The system of claim 1 , wherein the set of predetermined operations comprises at least one of:

creation of a child process of a user process;

requesting access to a system registry managed by the operating system;

loading an image of executable code into the memory; and

requesting access to a file system of the at least one computing device.

7. The system of claim 1 , wherein the at least one computing device is further configured to terminate the process in response to determining that the escalation of privilege attack has occurred.

8. A method, comprising

receiving, via at least one computing device, a first notification that a process has started on the at least one computing device;

in response to the first notification, recording, via the at least one computing device, a first access token associated with the process into a token cache;

receiving, via the at least one computing device, a second notification that the process has interacted with an operating system of the at least one computing device to perform at least one of: a set of predetermined operations on the at least one computing device;

in response to the second notification, capturing, via the at least one computing device, a second access token from the process;

performing, via the at least one computing device, a comparison of the second access token captured from the process against the first access token recorded into the token cache; and

determining, via the at least one computing device, that an escalation of privilege attack has occurred based on the comparison of the second access token captured from the process against the first access token recorded in the token cache.

9. The method of claim 8 , wherein the second notification is received subsequent to the first notification.

10. The method of claim 8 , wherein performing the comparison further comprises detecting an unexpected change between the second access token and the first access token recorded into the token cache.

11. The method of claim 8 , wherein performing the comparison further comprises determining that a memory address of the second access token differs from a memory address of the first access token recorded into the token cache.

12. The method of claim 8 , wherein performing the comparison further comprises determining that a security identifier of the second access token differs from a security identified of the first access token recorded into token cache.

13. The method of claim 8 , further comprising suspending the process in response to determining that the escalation of privilege attack has occurred.

14. A non-transitory computer-readable medium embodying a program that, when executed by at least one computing device, causes the at least one computing device to:

receive a first notification that a process has started on the at least one computing device;

in response to the first notification, record a first access token associated with the process into a token cache;

receive a second notification that the process has interacted with an operating system of the at least one computing device to perform at least one of: a set of predetermined operations on the at least one computing device;

in response to the second notification, capture a second access token from the process;

perform a comparison of the second access token captured from the process against the first access token recorded into the token cache; and

determine that an escalation of privilege attack has occurred based on the comparison of the second access token captured from the process against the first access token recorded in the token cache.

15. The non-transitory computer-readable medium of claim 14 , wherein the program further causes the at least one computing device to:

monitor a set of trigger points where the process interacts with the operating system; and

examine a current access token for the process in response to one of the set of trigger points being activated.

16. The non-transitory computer-readable medium of claim 15 , wherein the program further causes the at least one computing device to receive, via one of the set of trigger points, a callback indicating that a thread has been created by the process.

17. The non-transitory computer-readable medium of claim 14 , wherein the program further causes the at least one computing device to determine that the second access token has additional privileges than the first access token.

18. The non-transitory computer-readable medium of claim 14 , wherein the program further causes the at least one computing device to determine that a memory address of the second access token differs from a memory address of the first access token recorded into token cache.

19. The non-transitory computer-readable medium of claim 14 , wherein the program further causes the at least one computing device to determine that a security identifier of the second access token differs from a security identifier of the first access token recorded into token cache.

20. The non-transitory computer-readable medium of claim 14 , wherein the program further causes the at least one computing device to perform a mitigation action in response to determining that the escalation of privilege attack has occurred.