Systems and methods for hazard mitigation
A system and method to avoid collisions on highways, and to minimize the fatalities, injury, and damage when a collision is unavoidable. The system includes sensor means to detect other vehicles, and computing means to evaluate when a collision is imminent and to determine whether the collision is avoidable. If the collision is avoidable by a sequence of controlled accelerations and decelerations and steering, the system implements that sequence of actions automatically. If the collision is unavoidable, a different sequence is implemented to minimize the overall harm of the unavoidable collision. The system further includes indirect mitigation steps such as flashing the brake lights automatically. An optional post-collision strategy is implemented to prevent secondary collisions, particularly if the driver is incapacitated. Adjustment means enable the driver to set the type and timing of automatic interventions.
1. Non-transitory computer-readable media in a subject vehicle, the media containing instructions that when executed by a computing environment cause the subject vehicle to implement a method comprising: a. determining that a collision between the subject vehicle and a second vehicle is imminent; b. calculating an initial collision time at which the subject vehicle and the second vehicle are predicted to collide; c. selecting a selected sequence of actions, each action comprising an acceleration or a deceleration or a steering action or a waiting time; d. calculating a modified collision time at which the subject vehicle and the second vehicle are predicted to collide when the first vehicle performs the selected sequence of actions; and e. if the modified collision time is greater than the initial collision time, performing the selected sequence of actions; wherein the method further comprises: a. determining that the subject vehicle is predicted to avoid the collision after performing the selected sequence of actions; and b. performing the selected sequence of actions; and wherein the method further comprises: a. while the subject vehicle is performing the selected sequence of actions, determining that the subject vehicle is predicted to avoid the collision if the subject vehicle performs an alternate sequence of actions instead of the selected sequence of actions; b. determining which, of the selected sequence of actions and the alternate sequences of actions, is associated with a lower magnitude of acceleration; and c. if the alternate sequence of actions is associated with a lower magnitude of acceleration than the selected sequence of actions, performing the alternate sequence of actions instead of the selected sequence of actions.
2. The media of claim 1 , the method further comprising: a. calculating a first amount of harm expected to be caused by the collision after the subject vehicle performs the selected sequence of actions; b. calculating a second amount of harm expected to be caused by the collision after the subject performs the alternate sequence of actions; and c. if the second amount of harm is less than the first amount of harm, performing, by the subject vehicle, the alternate sequence of actions.
3. The media of claim 1 , wherein the sequence of actions further comprises at least one conditional instruction that depends on a sensor measurement value or a calculated value based on a sensor measurement value.
4. The media of claim 3 , wherein the conditional instruction causes a first set of actions to be implemented if the sensor measurement value is above a predetermined threshold, and a second set of actions to be implemented if the sensor measurement value is below the predetermined threshold.