IP Library Granted Patent US 12,627,332
Granted Patent B2
US 12,627,332 · App. 17/752,534 · Granted May 12, 2026

Time-division multiplexing to reduce alien crosstalk in cables

Inventors: Seid Alireza Razavi Majomard (Belmont, CA); David Shen (Saratoga, CA)
Assignee: INFINEON TECHNOLOGIES AMERICAS CORP.
H04B3/32
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 12,627,332
App. No.
17/752,534
Granted
May 12, 2026
Kind
B2
Abstract

A transceiver transmits data via a first cable among a plurality of cables in a wired communication network, and selectively operates in one of (i) an active mode for transmitting data to a link partner via the first cable and (ii) a low power mode during which the transceiver quiets transmissions to conserve power. A crosstalk detector determines that transmission of data in the first cable is causing crosstalk in one or more second cables. A controller, in response to the crosstalk detector determining that transmission of the data in the first cable is causing crosstalk in one or more second cables, controls the transceiver to operate in the low power mode during a plurality of first time periods to reduce crosstalk in the one or more second cables during the plurality of first time periods.

Claims (77)

1 . A first communication device in a wired communication network, the first communication device comprising:

a first transceiver configured to transmit data via a first cable among a plurality of cables in the wired communication network, and to selectively operate according to a power saving mechanism that defines (i) an active mode for transmitting data and (ii) a low power mode defined by the power saving mechanism during which transmissions are quieted to conserve power;

a second transceiver configured to transmit data via a second cable among the plurality of cables in the wired communication network, and to selectively operate according to the power saving mechanism that defines (i) the active mode and (ii) the low power mode;

a crosstalk detector that is configured to determine that transmission of data in the first cable is causing crosstalk in the second cable; and

a controller that is configured to, in response to the crosstalk detector determining that transmission of the data in the first cable is causing crosstalk in the second cable:

control the first transceiver to operate in the low power mode defined by the power saving mechanism during a plurality of first time periods to reduce crosstalk in the second cable during the plurality of first time periods, and

control the second transceiver to operate according to the power saving mechanism to restrict, to the plurality of first time periods, transmission of data via the second cable.

2 . The first communication device of claim 1 , wherein the crosstalk detector is configured to:

receive one or more signal quality measurements that correspond to (i) the second cable, and (ii) when transmission by the first transceiver via the first cable is occurring; and

determine that transmission of data in the first cable is causing crosstalk in the second cable based on the one or more signal quality measurements.

3 . The first communication device of claim 2 , wherein the crosstalk detector is configured to:

receive one or more error rates of data transmitted in the second cable when transmission by the first transceiver via the first cable is occurring; and

determine that transmission of data in the first cable is causing crosstalk in the second cable based on the one or more error rates of data transmitted in the second cable when transmission by the first transceiver via the first cable is occurring.

4 . The first communication device of claim 2 , wherein the crosstalk detector is configured to:

receive one or more signal level measurements that correspond to (i) when transmission by the second transceiver via the second cable is not occurring, and (ii) when transmission by the first transceiver via the first cable is occurring; and

determine that transmission of data in the first cable is causing crosstalk in the second cable based on the one or more signal level measurements.

5 . The first communication device of claim 1 , wherein the crosstalk detector is configured to:

determine that transmission of data in the second cable is causing crosstalk in the first cable; and

determine that transmission of data in the first cable is causing crosstalk in the second cable based on determining that transmission of data in the second cable is causing crosstalk in the first cable.

6 . The first communication device of claim 1 , wherein the controller is configured to:

control the first transceiver to operate in the active mode defined by the power saving mechanism outside of the plurality of first time periods.

7 . The first communication device of claim 1 , wherein the controller is configured to:

retrieve time-division multiplexing (TDM) scheduling information from a memory; and

determine when the plurality of first time periods occur using the TDM scheduling information.

8 . The communication device of claim 1 , wherein the controller is further configured to, in response to the crosstalk detector determining that transmission of the data in the first cable is causing crosstalk in the second cable:

control the second transceiver to operate in the low power mode defined by the power saving mechanism during a plurality of second time periods that are different than the plurality of first time periods, and

control the first transceiver to operate in the active mode defined by the power saving mechanism during the plurality of second time periods.

9 . A method for mitigating effects of crosstalk in a wire communication network, the method comprising:

transmitting, by a first transceiver of a first network device, data via a first cable among a plurality of cables;

transmitting, by a second transceiver of the first network device, data via a second cable among the plurality of cables;

determining, at circuitry associated with the first transceiver, that transmission of data in the first cable is causing crosstalk in the second cable; and

in response to determining that transmission of the data in the first cable is causing crosstalk in the second cable, entering, with respect to the first transceiver, a low power mode defined by a power saving mechanism to quiet transmission by the first transceiver via the first cable during a plurality of first time periods to reduce crosstalk in the second cable during the plurality of first time periods; and

in response to determining that transmission of the data in the first cable is causing crosstalk in the second cable, using the power saving mechanism, with respect to the second transceiver, to restrict, to the plurality of first time periods, transmission of data by the second transceiver via the second cable.

10 . The method for mitigating effects of crosstalk of claim 9 , further comprising:

measuring signal quality in the second cable when transmission by the first transceiver via the first cable is occurring;

wherein determining that transmission of data in the first cable is causing crosstalk in the second cable is based on measurements of signal quality in the second cable when transmission by the first transceiver via the first cable is occurring.

11 . The method for mitigating effects of crosstalk of claim 10 , wherein:

measuring signal quality in the second cable when transmission by the first transceiver via the first cable is occurring comprises measuring one or more error rates of data transmitted in the second cable when transmission by the first transceiver via the first cable is occurring; and

determining that transmission of data in the first cable is causing crosstalk in the second cable is based on the one or more error rates of data transmitted in the second cable when transmission by the first transceiver via the first cable is occurring.

12 . The method for mitigating effects of crosstalk of claim 10 , wherein:

measuring signal quality in the second cable when transmission by the first transceiver via the first cable is occurring comprises measuring one or more signal level measurements that correspond to (i) when transmission by the second transceiver via the second cable is not occurring, and (ii) when transmission by the first transceiver via the first cable is occurring; and

determining that transmission of data in the first cable is causing crosstalk in the second cable is based on the one or more signal level measurements.

13 . The method for mitigating effects of crosstalk of claim 9 , wherein determining that transmission of data in the first cable is causing crosstalk in the second cable comprises determining that transmission of data in the second cable is causing crosstalk in the first cable.

14 . The method for mitigating effects of crosstalk of claim 9 , wherein:

entering, with respect to the first transceiver, the low power mode defined by the power saving mechanism to quiet transmission by the first transceiver via the first cable during the plurality of first time periods to reduce crosstalk in the one or more second cables during the plurality of first time periods comprises causing, by control circuitry, the first transceiver to operate in the low power mode defined by the power saving mechanism during the plurality of first time periods; and

the method further comprises operating the first transceiver in an active mode defined by the power saving mechanism outside of the plurality of first time periods.

15 . The method for mitigating effects of crosstalk method of claim 9 , wherein quieting transmission by the first transceiver via the first cable during the plurality of first time periods to reduce crosstalk in the second cable during the plurality of first time periods comprises:

retrieving time-division multiplexing (TDM) scheduling information from a memory; and

determining when the plurality of first time periods occur using the TDM scheduling information.

16 . The method for mitigating effects of crosstalk of claim 9 , further comprising:

in response to determining that transmission of the data in the first cable is causing crosstalk in the second cable, entering, with respect to the second transceiver, the low power mode defined by the power saving mechanism to quiet transmission by the second transceiver via the second cable during a plurality of second time periods that are different than the plurality of first time periods; and

in response to determining that transmission of the data in the first cable is causing crosstalk in the second cable, entering, with respect to the first transceiver, the active mode defined by the power saving mechanism during the plurality of second time periods.

17 . A communication device in a wired communication network, the communication device comprising:

a plurality of transceivers, each transceiver being configured to transmit data via a respective cable among a plurality of cables in the wired communication network, and to selectively operate according to a power saving mechanism that defines (i) an active mode for transmitting data to a respective link partner via the respective cable and (ii) a low power mode during which the respective transceiver quiets transmissions to conserve power, the plurality of transceivers including i) a first transceiver configured to communicate via a first cable among the plurality of cables, and il) a second transceiver configured to communicate via a second cable among the plurality of cables; and

a controller that is configured to:

receive crosstalk level information from the plurality of transceivers, the crosstalk level information indicating respective levels of alien crosstalk in respective cables among the plurality of cables, and

in response to the crosstalk level information, control multiple transceivers among the plurality of transceivers to operate according to the power saving mechanism to reduce crosstalk, including:

controlling the first transceiver to operate in the low power mode defined by the power saving mechanism during a plurality of first time periods to reduce crosstalk in the second cable during the plurality of first time periods, and

control the second transceiver to control the second transceiver to operate according to the power saving mechanism to restrict, to the plurality of first time periods, transmission of data via the second cable.

18 . The communication device of claim 17 , wherein the controller comprises a crosstalk detector that is configured to:

receive a signal quality measurement regarding data transmitted in the second cable when transmission in the first cable is occurring; and

determine that transmission of data in the first cable is causing crosstalk in the second cable based on the signal quality measurement.

19 . The communication device of claim 18 , wherein the crosstalk detector is configured to:

receive an error rate measurement regarding data transmitted in the second cable when transmission in the first cable is occurring; and

determine that transmission of data in the first cable is causing crosstalk in the second cable based on the error rate measurement.

20 . The communication device of claim 18 , wherein the crosstalk detector is configured to:

receive a signal level measurement that corresponds to (i) when transmission in the second cable is not occurring, and (ii) when transmission in the first cable is occurring; and

determine that transmission of data in the first cable is causing crosstalk in the second cable based on the signal level measurement.

21 . The communication device of claim 18 , wherein the controller is further configured to, in response to the crosstalk detector determining that transmission of the data in the first cable is causing crosstalk in the second cable:

control the second transceiver to operate in the low power mode defined by the power saving mechanism during a plurality of second time periods that are different than the plurality of first time periods, and

control the first transceiver to operate in the active mode defined by the power saving mechanism during the plurality of second time periods.

22 . The communication device of claim 17 , wherein the controller comprises a crosstalk detector that is configured to:

determine that transmission of data in the first cable is causing crosstalk in the second cable; and

determine that transmission of data in the second cable is causing crosstalk in the first cable based on determining that transmission of data in the first cable is causing crosstalk in the second cable.

23 . The communication device of claim 18 , wherein the controller is configured to:

retrieve time-division multiplexing (TDM) scheduling information from a memory; and

determine the respective time periods during which the one or more transceivers are to operate in the low power mode defined by the power saving mechanism using the TDM scheduling information.

Assignments (4)
MERGER Recorded Sep 5, 2025
From: INFINEON TECHNOLOGIES US NEWCO LLC
To: INFINEON TECHNOLOGIES AMERICAS CORP.
Reel/Frame 072563/0932 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Aug 22, 2025
From: MARVELL ASIA PTE LTD
To: INFINEON TECHNOLOGIES US NEWCO LLC
Reel/Frame 072517/0429 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Jul 18, 2025
From: MAJOMARD, SEID ALIREZA RAZAVI; SHEN, DAVID
To: MARVELL SEMICONDUCTOR, INC.
Reel/Frame 071765/0158 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Jul 18, 2025
From: MARVELL SEMICONDUCTOR, INC.
To: MARVELL ASIA PTE LTD
Reel/Frame 071765/0243 →
Continuity (2)
Provisional Application 63192438 · May 24, 2021
Related Publication 20220376739A1 · Nov 24, 2022
References Cited (27)
US 8179910B2 · Diab et al. · 2012 [cited by applicant]
US 9893756B1 · Sedarat et al. · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 10069521B1 · Farjadrad · 2018 [cited by examiner]
US 10211881B2 · Wang · 2019 [cited by examiner]
US 10754402B2 · Atkinson · 2020 [cited by examiner]
US 20050063422A1 · Lazar · 2005 [cited by examiner]
US 20080292007A1 · Lida · 2008 [cited by examiner]
US 20100115316A1 · Diab · 2010 [cited by examiner]
US 20130070823A1 · Malkin · 2013 [cited by examiner]
US 20130279552A1 · Gomez Martinez · 2013 [cited by examiner]
US 20130308941A1 · Diab · 2013 [cited by examiner]
US 20150280826A1 · Effenberger · 2015 [cited by examiner]
US 20150365256A1 · Afkhami · 2015 [cited by examiner]
US 20160323014A1 · Starr · 2016 [cited by examiner]
US 20190280795A1 · Kuipers · 2019 [cited by examiner]
US 20200235780A1 · Bains · 2020 [cited by examiner]
US 20200295911A1 · Wu et al. · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 20200326771A1 · Wu et al. · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 20210013925A1 · Kassel · 2021 [cited by examiner]
US 20220103397A1 · Fung et al. · 2022 [cited by applicant]
WO 2012084221A2 · 2012 [cited by applicant]
International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT/US2022/030749, mailed Sep. 16, 2022 (12 pages). [cited by applicant]
Barrass et al., “10GBASE-T: 10 Gigabit Ethernet over Twisted-pair Copper,” v. 1.0, Ethernet Alliance, 44 pages (Aug. 2007). [cited by applicant]
Jones, “10GBASE-T Tutorial Overview,” Institute for Electrical and Electronics Engineers, 34 pages, available at https://www.ieee802.org/3/10GBT/public/jan03/jones_2_0103.pdf (Jan. 2003). [cited by applicant]
Muller et al., “IEEE 802 10GBASE-T Tutorial Overview,” Institute for Electrical and Electronics Engineers, 56 pages, available at https://www.ieee802.org/3/10GBT/public/nov03/10GBASETtutorial.pdf (Nov. 2003). [cited by applicant]
Ungerboeck, “10GBASE-T: 10Gbits/s Ethernet over copper,” Broadcom, 23 pages, available at https://www.southampton.ac.uk/˜sqc/EL336/10GBASE-T.pdf (Sep. 2006). [cited by applicant]
“How Much Does Office Building Wiring Cost?” CostOwl.com, available at https://www.costowl.com/b2b/cabling-wiring/cabling-wiring-office-building-cost/#network-cabling-considerations, last updated Dec. 8, 2021 (2 pages). [cited by applicant]