IP Library Granted Patent US 12,372,683
Granted Patent B2
US 12,372,683 · App. 17/753,486 · Granted Jul 29, 2025

Autonomous operations in oil and gas fields

Inventors: Morten Kristensen (Lysaker, NO); Marie LeFranc (Lysaker, NO); Bertrand Theuveny (Paris, FR); Hadrien Dumont (Paris, FR); Nikita Chugunov (Arlington, MA); Sebastien Roche (Paris, FR); Wiwin Yuliana (Beijing, CN); Zhenning Bao (Beijing, CN); Erwan Olliero (Houston, TX); Ram Sunder Kalyanraman (Houston, TX); Thomas Pfeiffer (Sugar Land, TX); Claude Signer (Paris, FR); Simon Edmundson (Houston, TX); Hua Yu (Beijing, CN); Ke Jiang (Beijing, CN); Vassilis Varveropoulos (Sugar Land, TX); Henri-Pierre Valero (Paris, FR); Eric Jeanson (Houston, TX); Guillaume Borrel (Paris, FR); Pierre Bettinelli (Bucharest, RO); Joel Le Calvez (Houston, TX)
Assignee: Schlumberger Technology Corporation
G01V20/00E21B41/00E21B47/005G06F30/28E21B2200/20G06F2113/08
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 12,372,683
App. No.
17/753,486
Granted
Jul 29, 2025
Kind
B2
Abstract

The present disclosure relates to a system that is operable to receive an execution plan and execute a control operation on one or more equipment based operations within the execution plan. The one or more operations may include a data capturing operation associated with a resource site. In one embodiment, the system may be operable to execute at least a first operation in response to a success variable of the data capturing operation indicating a successful execution of the data capturing operation. The first operation may include a quality control operation that is executed by comparing at least one characteristic of the captured data to an expected characteristic to generate quality state data. The quality state data may have one of an acceptable status and an undesirable status. In response to the quality state data indicating an acceptable status for the quality control operation, executing at least a second operation.

Claims (62)

1. A method for performing a service at a resource site, wherein the service includes capturing sensor data at the resource site using at least one sensor, the method comprising:

receiving an execution plan at the resource site, the execution plan including one or more operations associated with executing the service, each operation comprised in the one or more operations being associated with at least one of a failure variable or a success variable;

executing the execution plan, at least in part, at the resource site, wherein executing the execution plan comprises:

executing a lowering operation to lower a downhole tool comprising the at least one sensor to a first location within a wellbore at the resource site; and

executing a control operation comprised in the one or more operations on one or more equipment to trigger an action by the one or more equipment, the control operation including a data capturing operation of data associated with the resource site, the captured data including the sensor data;

in response to a success variable indicating a successful execution of the data capturing operation, executing at least a first operation including a quality control operation on the captured data, the quality control operation including comparing at least one characteristic associated with the captured data to an expected characteristic to generate quality state data, the quality state data having one of an acceptable status and an undesirable status;

in response to the quality state data indicating an acceptable status, executing at least a second operation; and

in response to a second success variable of the lowering operation indicating a successful execution of the lowering operation, executing at least a third operation comprising at least one of triggering the at least one sensor or parameterizing the at least one sensor according to an equipment model comprised in the execution plan.

2. The method of claim 1 , wherein the execution plan includes at least one of:

a resource model representative of the resource site including at least one of a parameter value or an uncertainty value of one or more parameters of the resource model; or

an equipment model, including at least a parameterization of the one or more equipment.

3. The method of claim 2 , wherein the equipment model includes a parameterization of the at least one sensor, wherein the one or more operations includes parameterizing the at least one sensor based on the equipment model to capture data associated with the resource site.

4. The method of claim 2 , wherein the one or more operations include updating at least one of the resource model or the equipment model in response to the quality state data indicating an undesirable status for the quality control operation.

5. The method of claim 1 , wherein the data capturing operation includes acquiring sensor data from at least a first target location of the resource site, wherein executing the execution plan further comprises executing an operation that acquires sensor data from at least a second target location in response to the quality state data indicating an undesirable status, wherein the second target location is different from the first target location.

6. The method of claim 1 , wherein the quality control operation includes evaluating an accuracy of the captured data using one of a machine learning system or an artificial intelligence system to confirm the accuracy of the captured data based on historical data associated with the resource site.

7. The method of claim 1 , wherein the quality control operation is executed based on a quality control (QC) model of the execution plan including at least the expected characteristic.

8. The method of claim 1 , wherein:

the data capturing operation includes acquiring the sensor data using the at least one sensor at least at a first target location of the resource site; and

the quality control operation including evaluating an accuracy of one or more acquisition parameters used during the data capturing operation, wherein the acquisition parameters include one or more sensor parameters.

9. The method of claim 8 , wherein executing the execution plan includes at least one of:

updating a parameter of at least one sensor, in response to the quality state data indicating an undesirable status; or

acquiring sensor data from at least a second target location in response to the quality state data indicating an undesirable status, wherein the second target location is different from the first target location.

10. The method of claim 8 , wherein executing the execution plan includes at least one of:

transmitting the sensor data to a remote server in response to the quality state data indicating the acceptable status; or

analyzing the sensor data to generate at least one of a parameter value or an uncertainty value for one or more parameters of a resource model.

11. The method of claim 1 , wherein:

the data capturing operation includes analyzing the acquired sensor data to generate at least one of a parameter value or an uncertainty value of one or more parameters associated with a resource model of a wellbore; and

the quality control operation includes evaluating an accuracy of the parameter value and the uncertainty value of the one or more parameters.

12. The method of claim 11 , further comprising at least one of:

transmitting at least one of the generated parameter value or the uncertainty value of the one or more parameters to a remote server in response to the quality state data indicating an acceptable status for the quality control operation; or

updating the resource model.

13. A method for performing a service at a resource site, wherein the service includes capturing sensor data at the resource site using at least one sensor, the method comprising:

receiving an execution plan at the resource site, the execution plan including one or more operations associated with executing the service, each operation comprised in the one or more operations being associated with at least one of a failure variable or a success variable;

executing the execution plan, at least in part, at the resource site, wherein executing the execution plan comprises:

executing a lowering operation to lower a downhole tool comprising the at least one sensor to a first location within a wellbore at the resource site; and

executing a control operation comprised in the one or more operations on one or more equipment to trigger an action by the one or more equipment, the control operation including a data capturing operation of data associated with the resource site, the captured data including the sensor data;

in response to a success variable indicating a successful execution of the data capturing operation, executing at least a first operation including a quality control operation on the captured data, the quality control operation including comparing at least one characteristic associated with the captured data to an expected characteristic to generate quality state data, the quality state data having one of an acceptable status and an undesirable status;

in response to the quality state data indicating an acceptable status, executing at least a second operation, wherein executing the the at least the second operation includes:

capturing the sensor data using the at least one sensor in at least one target location;

in response to a success variable indicating a successful capturing of the sensor data, executing the quality control operation on the sensor data by comparing at least a characteristic associated with the sensor data to an expected characteristic to generate quality state data, the quality state data indicating one of an acceptable or undesirable status for the sensor data;

in response to the quality state data indicating an acceptable status for the sensor data, analyzing the sensor data to generate at least one of a parameter value or an uncertainty for one or more parameters of a resource model; and

in response to a success variable indicating a successful generation of the at least one of the parameter value or the uncertainty value, executing a quality control operation on the at least one of the parameter value or the uncertainty value by comparing at least a characteristic derived from the generated at least one of the parameter value or the uncertainty value, wherein a quality state data of the quality control operation indicates an acceptable status for at least one of the parameter value or the uncertainty value.

14. The method of claim 13 , further comprising:

receiving an updated execution plan including an updated set of operations; and

executing the updated execution plan to control the one or more equipment according to the updated set of operations.

15. The method of claim 14 , wherein:

the execution plan is a first execution plan; and

the updated execution plan is transmitted to the resource site during execution of the first execution plan.

16. The method of claim 13 , wherein the at least one sensor includes at least one of an electromagnetic sensor, a resistivity sensor, an acoustic sensor, an optical sensor, a pressure sensor, an accelerometer, a magnetometer, a temperature sensor, a chemical sensor, a nuclear sensor, a pH sensor, a viscosity sensor, a density sensor, a fluorescence sensor, a volume sensor, a level sensor, a weight sensor, a torque sensor, a microseismic sensor, a seismic sensor or a flow sensor.

17. The method of claim 13 , wherein the one or more equipment includes at least one of a winch, crane, pressure-control equipment, flowhead, flow meter, flare, choke, valve, packer, perforating gun, a downhole tool and components thereof, the at least one sensor, or a processor.

18. A system for performing a service at a resource site, wherein the service includes capturing sensor data at the resource site using at least one sensor, wherein the system includes one or more processors and memory storing instructions that are executable by the one or more processors to:

receive an execution plan, the execution plan including one or more operations associated with executing the service, each operation comprised in the one or more operations being associated with at least one of a failure variable or a success variable;

execute a control operation on one or more equipment based on the one or more operations of the execution plan, wherein the execution plan includes executing a lowering operation to lower a downhole tool including the at least one sensor to a first location within a wellbore at the resource site, wherein executing the execution plan comprises executing a control operation comprised in the one or more operations on one or more equipment to trigger an action by the one or more equipment, wherein the control operation comprises a data capturing operation associated with the resource site, the captured data including the sensor data;

in response to a success variable of the data capturing operation indicating a successful execution of the data capturing operation, execute at least a first operation including a quality control operation by comparing at least one characteristic of the captured data to an expected characteristic to generate quality state data, the quality state data having one of an acceptable status and an undesirable status; and

in response to the quality state data indicating an acceptable status for the quality control operation, executing at least a second operation; and

in response to a success variable of the lowering operation indicating a successful execution of the lowering operation, executing at least a third operation comprising at least one of triggering the at least one sensor or parameterizing the at least one sensor according to an equipment model comprised in the execution plan.

19. The system according to claim 18 , wherein the one or more equipment includes at least one of a winch, crane, pressure-control equipment (PCE), flowhead, flow meter, flare, choke, valve, packer, perforating gun, a downhole tool and components thereof, the at least one sensor, or a processor.

20. The system of claim 19 , wherein the execution plan includes at least one of:

a resource model representative of the resource site including at least one of a parameter value or an uncertainty value of one or more parameters of the resource model;

an equipment model, including at least a parameterization of at least one equipment at the resource site; or

a quality control model, including the expected characteristic.

21. The system of claim 18 , wherein the execution plan comprises of one of more operations comprising at least one of pumping a fluid into a wellbore, triggering an action on a tool, triggering a perforating gun, or withdrawing fluid from a formation at the resource site.

Assignments (1)
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Mar 10, 2022
From: KRISTENSEN, MORTEN; LE FRANC, MARIE EMELINE CECILE; THEUVENY, BERTRAND; DUMONT, HADRIEN; CHUGUNOV, NIKITA; ROCHE, SEBASTIEN; YULIANA, WIWIN; BAO, ZHENNING; OLLIERO, ERWAN; KALYANRAMAN, RAM SUNDER; PFEIFFER, THOMAS; SIGNER, CLAUDE; EDMUNDSON, SIMON; YU, HUA; JIANG, KE; VARVEROPOULOS, VASSILIS; VALERO, HENRI-PIERRE; JEANSON, ERIC; BORREL, GUILLAUME; BETTINELLI, PIERRE; LE CALVEZ, JOEL
To: SCHLUMBERGER TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION
Reel/Frame 059359/0056 →
Continuity (4)
Provisional Application 62939047 · Nov 22, 2019
Provisional Application 62925980 · Oct 25, 2019
Provisional Application 62895755 · Sep 4, 2019
Related Publication 20220243575A1 · Aug 4, 2022
References Cited (52)
US 6012017A · Van Bemmel et al. · 2000 [cited by applicant]
US 6549854B1 · Malinverno et al. · 2003 [cited by applicant]
US 10119387B2 · Van Kuijk et al. · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 10121261B2 · Kherroubi et al. · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 10203428B2 · Morton et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 20090168595A1 · Wu et al. · 2009 [cited by applicant]
US 20090182541A1 · Crick et al. · 2009 [cited by applicant]
US 20090299636A1 · Carnegie · 2009 [cited by examiner]
US 20140129506A1 · Al-Yami · 2014 [cited by examiner]
US 20160245946A1 · Kalyanraman et al. · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 20160356125A1 · Bello et al. · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 20170205388A1 · Thomas · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 20170370191A1 · Fox et al. · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 20180321421A1 · Halabe · 2018 [cited by examiner]
US 20190025450A1 · Teague · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 20190106982A1 · Willerth · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 20190170899A1 · Morton et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 20200291772A1 · Thiruvenkatanathan · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 20200370418A1 · Fries et al. · 2020 [cited by applicant]
CN 110045417A · 2019 [cited by applicant]
WO 2016134018A2 · 2016 [cited by applicant]
WO 2016179766A1 · 2016 [cited by applicant]
WO 2018236495A1 · 2018 [cited by applicant]
WO 2019055565A1 · 2019 [cited by applicant]
WO 2020112974A1 · 2020 [cited by applicant]
WO 2020185918A1 · 2020 [cited by applicant]
WO 2021046344A1 · 2021 [cited by applicant]
WO 2021046356A1 · 2021 [cited by applicant]
WO 2021046380A1 · 2021 [cited by applicant]
WO 2021046385A1 · 2021 [cited by applicant]
Substantive Exam issued in Saudi Arabia Patent Application No. 522431815 dated Nov. 21, 2023, 12 pages with English translation. [cited by applicant]
Communication Pursuant to Article 94(3) EPC issued in EP Application 20781136.5 dated Feb. 15, 2023, 5 pages. [cited by applicant]
Sharma PV, Environmental and Engineering Geophysics 1997, Cambridge University Press, Chapter 2, Gravity Surveying (pp. 11-64). [cited by applicant]
Sharma PV, Environmental and Engineering Geophysics 1997, Cambridge University Press, Chapter 4, Seismic Surveys (pp. 112-189). [cited by applicant]
Shaposhnikov, P. et al., “Advanced Techniques in Integrated Cement Evaluation”, presented at the SPWLA 54th Annual Logging Symposium, New Orleans, Louisiana, U.S.A. 2013, 15 pages. [cited by applicant]
Hare, J. L. et al., “The 4-D microgravity method for waterflood surveillance: A model study for the Prudhoe Bay Reservoir, Alaska”, Geophysics, 1999, 64(1), 78. [cited by applicant]
Bangerth, W. et al., “An Autonomic Reservoir Framework for the Stochastic Optimization of Well Placement”, Cluster Computing, Kluwer Academic Publishers, BO, 2005, 8(4), pp. 255-269. [cited by applicant]
International Search Report and Written Opinion of International Patent Application No. PCT/US2020/049397 dated Feb. 8, 2021, 16 pages. [cited by applicant]
International Preliminary Report on Patentability of International Patent Application No. PCT/US2020/049397 dated Mar. 17, 2022, 13 pages. [cited by applicant]
International Search Report and Written Opinion of International Patent Application No. PCT/US2020/049416 dated Feb. 8, 2021, 21 pages. [cited by applicant]
International Search Report and Written Opinion of International Patent Application No. PCT/US2020/049416 dated Apr. 28, 2021 , 24 pages. [cited by applicant]
International Preliminary Report on Patentability of International Patent Application No. PCT/US2020/049416 dated Mar. 17, 2022, 15 pages. [cited by applicant]
International Search Report and Written Opinion of International Patent Application No. PCT/US2020/049428 dated Dec. 21, 2020, 10 pages. [cited by applicant]
International Preliminary Report on Patentability of International Patent Application No. PCT/US2020/049428 dated Mar. 17, 2022, 8 pages. [cited by applicant]
International Search Report and Written Opinion of International Patent Application No. PCT/US2020/049449 dated Nov. 18, 2020, 10 pages. [cited by applicant]
International Preliminary Report on Patentability of International Patent Application No. PCT/US2020/049449 dated Mar. 17, 2022, 8 pages. [cited by applicant]
International Search Report and Written Opinion of International Patent Application No. PCT/US2020/049454 dated Dec. 9, 2020 (10 pages). [cited by applicant]
International Preliminary Report on Patentability of International Patent Application No. PCT/US2020/049454 dated Mar. 17, 2022, 8 pages. [cited by applicant]
Invitation to pay Additional Fees of International Patent Application PCT/US2020/049416, dated Dec. 17, 2020 (28 pages). [cited by applicant]
Communication Pursuant to Article 94(3) EPC issued in EP Application 20775988.7 dated Jan. 26, 2024, 8 pages. [cited by applicant]
First Exam Report issued in Kuwait Patent Application No. KW/P/2022/000191 received Feb. 22, 2024, 5 pages. [cited by applicant]
Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 17/753,489 dated Mar. 21, 2024, 38 pages. [cited by applicant]