IP Library Granted Patent US 11,774,426
Granted Patent B1
US 11,774,426 · App. 17/813,602 · Granted Oct 3, 2023

Emissions detection system and methods

Inventors: Nathan C. Eichenlaub (Denver, CO); Kieran J. Lynn (Denver, CO); William J. Foiles (Denver, CO)
Assignee: PROJECT CANARY, PBC
G01N33/0062G01D21/02G01N33/0031G01N2033/0068
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 11,774,426
App. No.
17/813,602
Filed
Jul 19, 2022
Granted
Oct 3, 2023
Kind
B1
Art Unit
2855
USPC
73/31.02
Abstract

In one illustrative configuration, a method of locating an emission source of a target substance at a site is disclosed. The method may include obtaining predicted substance concentrations of the target substance from a prediction model to generate a mapping of a weighted mean of the plurality of the predicted substance concentrations grouped in a predetermined number of feature groups. A simulated plume model is generated for each emission source present at the site to calculate representative circular normal distributions for each air quality monitor. By performing an analysis of the plurality of representative circular normal distributions in relation to the mapping, a target emission source is identified.

Claims (90)

1. An operating emissions quantification method for quantifying emissions of a target substance from operating devices at a site, the method comprising:

providing a first air quality monitor comprising:

a first sensor responsive to the target substance; and

a first location at which the first air quality monitor is located on the site;

measuring a first set of onsite parameters with the first air quality monitor over a period of time to obtain a plurality of individual measurements of each parameter of the first set of onsite parameters, wherein the plurality of individual measurements of the first set of onsite parameters comprises:

a first measured substance concentration of the target substance measured with the first air quality monitor; and

a first set of individual atmospheric readings;

transmitting the first measured substance concentration to a first server;

transmitting the first set of individual atmospheric readings to the first server;

procuring a height of planetary boundary layer (hPBL) data for the site from a second server;

training a prediction model associated with the first air quality monitor:

obtaining a plurality of first predicted substance concentrations of the target substance corresponding to the first air quality monitor from the prediction model, with at least:

the first set of individual atmospheric readings; and

the hPBL data for the site;

wherein the plurality of first predicted substance concentrations is obtained over a predefined period at a predefined frequency;

generating a mapping of a weighted mean of the plurality of first predicted substance concentrations grouped in each feature group of a predetermined number of feature groups, wherein the predetermined number of feature groups together are representative of feature values over a predetermined range;

obtaining a location map of a plurality of emission sources at the site, the location map comprising a location and an identity associated with each of the plurality of emission sources;

for each emission source of the plurality of emission sources:

generating a simulated plume model, based on a wind-direction; and

calculating a plurality of representative circular normal distributions for each air quality monitor, using the simulated plume model, by setting a plurality of presumed flux values to the simulated plume model;

performing an analysis of the plurality of representative circular normal distributions in relation with the mapping to identify a relevant representative circular normal distribution from the plurality of representative circular normal distributions, wherein the relevant representative circular normal distribution is indicative of a target emission source; and

determining the target emission source, based on the analysis and the location map.

2. The operating emissions quantification method of claim 1 , wherein the hPBL data further comprises:

a trapping condition corresponding to wind stagnation;

wherein during emission of the substance from an emission source, the trapping condition is associated with a gradual accumulation of the substance in an atmosphere surrounding the site and a higher first measured substance concentration of the target substance measured with the first air quality monitor.

3. The operating emissions quantification method of claim 1 , wherein the second server is High Resolution Rapid Refresh (HRRR) maintained by National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA).

4. The operating emissions quantification method of claim 3 further comprising procuring the hPBL data from the second server periodically at a predetermined frequency,

wherein the hPBL data is refreshed on an hourly-basis to a resolution of 3 kilometers.

5. The operating emissions quantification method of claim 1 , wherein the prediction model associated with the first air quality monitor is trained with the hPBL data continuously procured from the second server periodically at a second predetermined frequency, for at least 24 hours.

6. The operating emissions quantification method of claim 1 , wherein the first set of individual atmospheric readings comprises at least one of atmospheric reading selected from:

a wind speed,

a wind direction,

a barometric pressure,

an air temperature, and

a humidity level.

7. The operating emissions quantification method of claim 1 ,

wherein each feature group is associated with a wind-direction bucket; and

wherein a predetermined number of wind-direction buckets together are representative of wind-directions over a full circle.

8. The operating emissions quantification method of claim 7 , wherein generating the mapping further comprises:

comparing a plurality of first measured substance concentrations with the plurality of first predicted substance concentrations of the target substance to create at least an at least one adjustment factor;

obtaining from the prediction model, a wind-direction contribution value representative of a contribution of the wind-direction in each of the plurality of first predicted substance concentrations as predicted by the prediction model;

adjusting a plurality of wind-direction contribution values corresponding to the plurality of first predicted substance concentrations, using the at least one adjustment factor to obtain a plurality of adjusted wind-direction contribution values;

grouping the plurality of adjusted wind-direction contribution values into the predetermined number of wind-direction buckets;

for each of the predetermined number of wind-direction buckets, determining a weighted mean of the plurality of first predicted substance concentrations grouped in each wind-direction bucket of the predetermined number of wind-direction buckets; and

generating the mapping of the weighted mean of the plurality of first predicted substance concentrations grouped in each wind-direction bucket of the predetermined number of wind-direction buckets, for wind directions in a full circle.

9. A system for quantifying emissions of a target substance from operating devices at a site comprising:

one or more processors configured to:

provide a first air quality monitor comprising:

a first sensor responsive to the target substance; and

a first location at which the first air quality monitor is located on the site

measure a first set of onsite parameters with the first air quality monitor over a period of time to obtain a plurality of individual measurements of each parameter of the first set of onsite parameters, wherein the plurality of individual measurements of the first set of onsite parameters comprises:

a first measured substance concentration of the target substance measured with the first air quality monitor; and

a first set of individual atmospheric readings;

transmit the first measured substance concentration to a first server;

transmit the first set of individual atmospheric readings to the first server;

procure a height of planetary boundary layer (hPBL) data for the site from a second server;

train a prediction model associated with the first air quality monitor:

obtain a plurality of first predicted substance concentrations of the target substance corresponding to the first air quality monitor from the prediction model, with at least:

the first set of individual atmospheric readings; and

the hPBL data for the site;

wherein the plurality of first predicted substance concentrations is obtained over a predefined period at a predefined frequency;

generate a mapping of a weighted mean of the plurality of first predicted substance concentrations grouped in each feature group of a predetermined number of feature groups, wherein the predetermined number of feature groups together are representative of feature values over a predetermined range;

obtain a location map of a plurality of emission sources at the site, the location map comprising a location and an identity associated with each of the plurality of emission sources;

for each emission source of the plurality of emission sources:

generate a simulated plume model, based on a wind-direction; and

calculate a plurality of representative circular normal distributions for each air quality monitor, using the simulated plume model, by setting a plurality of presumed flux values to the simulated plume model;

perform an analysis of the plurality of representative circular normal distributions in relation with the mapping to identify a relevant representative circular normal distribution from the plurality of representative circular normal distributions, wherein the relevant representative circular normal distribution is indicative of a target emission source; and

determine the target emission source, based on the analysis and the location map.

10. The system of claim 9 , wherein the hPBL data further comprises:

a trapping condition corresponding to wind stagnation;

wherein during emission of the substance from an emission source, the trapping condition is associated with a gradual accumulation of the substance in an atmosphere surrounding the site and a higher first measured substance concentration of the target substance measured with the first air quality monitor.

11. The system of claim 9 , wherein the second server is High Resolution Rapid Refresh (HRRR) maintained by National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA).

12. The system of claim 11 , further comprising procuring the hPBL data from the second server periodically at a predetermined frequency;

wherein the hPBL data is refreshed on an hourly-basis to a resolution of 3 kilometers.

13. The system of claim 9 , wherein the prediction model associated with the first air quality monitor is trained with the hPBL data continuously procured from the second server periodically at a second predetermined frequency, for at least 24 hours.

14. The system of claim 9 , wherein the first set of individual atmospheric readings comprises at least one of atmospheric reading selected from:

a wind speed;

a wind direction;

a barometric pressure;

an air temperature, and

a humidity level.

15. The system of claim 9 , wherein each feature group is associated with a wind-direction bucket; and

wherein a predetermined number of wind-direction buckets together are representative of wind-directions over a full circle.

16. The system of claim 15 , wherein generating the mapping further comprises:

comparing a plurality of first measured substance concentrations with the plurality of first predicted substance concentrations of the target substance to create at least an at least one adjustment factor;

obtaining from the prediction model, a wind-direction contribution value representative of a contribution of the wind-direction in each of the plurality of first predicted substance concentrations as predicted by the prediction model;

adjusting a plurality of wind-direction contribution values corresponding to the plurality of first predicted substance concentrations, using the at least one adjustment factor to obtain a plurality of adjusted wind-direction contribution values;

grouping the plurality of adjusted wind-direction contribution values into the predetermined number of wind-direction buckets;

for each of the predetermined number of wind-direction buckets, determining a weighted mean of the plurality of first predicted substance concentrations grouped in each wind-direction bucket of the predetermined number of wind-direction buckets; and

generating the mapping of the weighted mean of the plurality of first predicted substance concentrations grouped in each wind-direction bucket of the predetermined number of wind-direction buckets, for wind directions in a full circle.

Assignments (2)
INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY SECURITY AGREEMENT Recorded Feb 23, 2024
From: PROJECT CANARY, PBC
To: SILICON VALLEY BANK, A DIVISION OF FIRST-CITIZENS BANK & TRUST COMPANY
Reel/Frame 066662/0483 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Jul 20, 2022
From: EICHENLAUB, NATHAN C.; LYNN, KIERAN J.; FOILES, WILLIAM J.
To: PROJECT CANARY, PBC
Reel/Frame 060569/0371 →
Continuity (1)
Provisional Application 63323703 · Mar 25, 2022
Cited By (3)
US 12,190,281 US 12,394,183 US 12,664,509