IP Library Granted Patent US 12,663,414
Granted Patent B2
US 12,663,414 · App. 17/816,395 · Granted Jun 23, 2026

Platform for co-culture imaging to characterize in vitro efficacy of heterotypic effector cellular therapies in cancer

Inventors: Chi-Sing Ho (Redwood City, CA); Madhavi Kannan (Bloomington, IL); Sonal Khare (Chicago, IL); Brian Larsen (Chicago, IL); Brandon Mapes (Chicago, IL); Ameen Salahudeen (Oak Park, IL); Jagadish Venkataraman (Menlo Park, CA)
Assignee: TEMPUS AI, INC.
G01N33/5082G01N21/6428G01N21/6456G01N33/5011G06T3/06G06T7/0016G06T7/11G06V10/774G06V20/695G06V20/698G16H15/00G16H30/40G01N2021/6439G06T2200/04G06T2207/10064G06T2207/20081G06T2207/30024G06T2207/30072
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 12,663,414
App. No.
17/816,395
Filed
Jul 29, 2022
Granted
Jun 23, 2026
Kind
B2
Art Unit
2665
USPC
382/134
Abstract

A method for characterizing cancer organoid response to an immune cell based therapy, includes providing a panel of different combinations of cancer organoid cells and immune cells to culturing wells and culturing the different combination under conditions that support organoid growth. Brightfield and corresponding fluorescence images of the culturing wells are captured and provided to one or more trained machine learning algorithms that identify and distinguish cancer organoid cells from immune cells and characterize cancer organoid morphology changes caused by an immune cell based therapies, from which an analytical report including a characterization of cancer organoid cell death caused by the immune cell based therapy is provided.

Claims (72)

1 . A method for characterizing cancer organoid response to an immune cell based therapy, the method comprising:

providing a first combination to a first culturing well,

wherein the first combination comprises a mixture of one or more cancer organoid cells with one or more immune cells;

culturing the first combination under conditions which support growth of the one or more cancer organoid cells, wherein culturing the first combination creates cultured cancer organoid cells and cultured immune cells;

capturing, at different time points, a plurality of brightfield images of the first culturing well comprising the first combination;

capturing, at different time points and corresponding to the plurality of brightfield images, a plurality of fluorescent images of the first culturing well comprising the first combination;

providing the plurality of brightfield images and the plurality of fluorescent images to a trained model;

distinguishing the one or more cancer organoid cells from the one or more immune cells within the plurality of fluorescent images by:

using the trained model, generating from the plurality of brightfield images a plurality of masking images of segmented organoids;

applying the plurality of masking images to the plurality of fluorescent images to identify the segmented organoids in the plurality of fluorescent images;

characterizing a response of the one or more cancer organoid cells to the one or more immune cells by comparing at least one of the plurality of fluorescent images to another one of the plurality of fluorescent images;

and

generating an analytical report including the cancer organoid response to the immune cell based therapy, wherein the analytical report includes a characterization of (i) cancer organoid morphology change over time caused by the immune cell based therapy and/or (ii) cell death caused by the immune cell based therapy.

2 . The method of claim 1 , further comprising:

performing a stacking process on the plurality of fluorescent images to generate flattened fluorescent images of organoids within the first culturing well for each different time point; and

wherein providing the plurality of fluorescent images to the trained model comprises providing the flattened fluorescent images to the trained model.

3 . The method of claim 1 , wherein the plurality of fluorescent images are three-dimensional (3D) fluorescence images, the method further comprising:

performing a flattening process on the 3D fluorescence images to generate 2D fluorescence images of the first combination within the first culturing well for each different time point; and

wherein providing the plurality of fluorescent images to the trained model comprises providing the 2D fluorescence images to the trained model.

4 . The method of claim 1 , wherein the plurality of fluorescent images are three-dimensional (3D) fluorescence images, the method further comprising:

performing a slice on the 3D fluorescence images to generate 2D fluorescence images of the first combination within the first culturing well for each different time point; and

wherein providing the plurality of fluorescent images to the trained model comprises providing the 2D fluorescence images to the trained model.

5 . The method of claim 1 , further comprising, prior to providing the first combination of the one or more cancer organoid cells and the one or more immune cells to the first culturing well:

selecting the first combination of the one or more cancer organoid cells and the one or more immune cells based on cancer cell characteristics and the immune cell based therapy.

6 . The method of claim 1 , further comprising:

providing a second combination of the one or more cancer organoid cells and the one or more immune cells to a second culturing well, wherein the second combination represents a different concentration of the one or more cancer organoid cells to the one or more immune cells than the first combination.

7 . The method of claim 6 , wherein generating the analytical report comprises:

providing a comparison of immune cell based therapy efficacies between the first combination and the second combination.

8 . The method of claim 1 , wherein characterizing the cancer organoid morphology change caused by the immune cell based therapy comprises: characterizing cell death, cytokine secretion, and/or a shape change.

9 . The method of claim 1 , wherein characterizing the cancer organoid morphology change comprises: quantifying a number of cancer organoid cell deaths corresponding to each respective periodic capture of the plurality of brightfield images and the corresponding plurality of fluorescent images.

10 . The method of claim 1 , wherein characterizing the cancer organoid morphology change comprises:

determining (i) a number and/or percentage of the one or more cancer organoid cells undergoing a phenotypic change over the different time points, (ii) proliferation of the one or more cancer organoid cells over the different time points, and/or (iii) a change in morphology of the one or more cancer organoid cells over the different time points.

11 . The method of claim 1 , further comprising:

identifying, using the trained model, the one or more cancer organoid cells that are surrounded by the one or more immune cells;

identifying, using the trained model, a spatial relationship between the one or more cancer organoid cells resistant to the immune cell based therapy;

characterizing, using the trained model, migration and/or chemotaxis of the one or more immune cells, and/or

characterizing, using the trained model, co-localization of the one or more immune cells and the one or more cancer organoid cells.

12 . The method of claim 1 , further comprising:

quantifying a number of immune cell deaths in each of the plurality of brightfield images using the corresponding plurality of fluorescent images.

13 . The method of claim 1 , wherein the trained model comprises an organoid trained segmentation model for identifying cancer organoid cells in the plurality of brightfield images.

14 . The method of claim 1 , wherein the trained model comprises an immune cell trained segmentation model for identifying immune cells in the plurality of brightfield images.

15 . The method of claim 1 , wherein identifying and distinguishing the cultured cancer organoid cells and/or the cultured immune cells comprises:

using the trained model, generating from the plurality of brightfield images a second plurality of masking images of the one or more immune cells or a combination of the one or more cancer organoid cells and the one or more immune cells.

16 . The method of claim 1 , wherein the plurality of masking images comprises a binary mask of segmented cancer organoid cells.

17 . The method of claim 15 , wherein the second plurality of masking images comprises a binary mask of the one or more immune cells.

18 . The method of claim 15 , wherein the plurality of masking images comprise a categorical mask differentiating between the one or more cancer organoid cells and one or more types of immune cells, and wherein the categorical mask comprising a plurality of boundary types, each identifying a different one of the one or more cancer organoid cells and the one or more types of immune cells.

19 . The method of claim 1 , wherein the trained model comprises a machine learning algorithm trained using a plurality of training images, wherein at least some of the plurality of training images include annotations identifying one or more of organoid targets, organoids of different morphology, organoids of different locations, and organoids generated by different culturing methods.

20 . The method of claim 1 , wherein the trained model comprises a machine learning algorithm trained using a plurality of training images, wherein at least some of the plurality of training images include annotations identifying one or more of fluorescence dye regions, different cell types, immune cell therapies, and degrees of immune cell therapy response.

21 . The method of claim 15 , wherein the trained model comprises a machine learning algorithm trained using a plurality of training images, wherein the plurality of training images are obtained from a pre-trained segmentation model, and wherein the pre-trained segmentation model removed the one or more cancer organoid cells, leaving the one or more immune cells.

22 . The method of claim 1 , wherein the trained model comprises a machine learning algorithm trained using a plurality of training images, wherein the plurality of training images are obtained from a pre-trained segmentation model, and wherein the pre-trained segmentation model removed the one or more immune cells, leaving the one or more cancer organoid cells.

23 . The method of claim 1 , wherein the trained model comprises a machine learning algorithm trained using a plurality of training images obtained from a pre-trained segmentation model that is segmented out from a series of input images of the one or more immune cells and the one or more cancer organoid cells.

24 . The method of claim 1 , wherein the trained model comprises a segmentation model trained to detect the one or more cancer organoid cells and having a first machine learning algorithm trained using a plurality of training images.

25 . The method of claim 15 , wherein the trained model comprises a segmentation model trained to detect immune cells and having a first machine learning algorithm trained using a plurality of training images and a plurality of corresponding training fluorescence images having the one or more immune cells labeled.

26 . The method of claim 1 , wherein generating the analytical report comprises:

generating a time-lapse imaging of the one or more cancer organoid cells and/or the one or more immune cells at the different time points to identify cell death.

27 . The method of claim 1 , wherein generating the analytical report comprises:

identifying the one or more cancer organoid cells resistant to the immune cell based therapy and/or identifying the one or more cancer organoid cells susceptible to the immune cell based therapy based on changes in the one or more cancer organoid cells over the different time points.

28 . The method of claim 1 , wherein the analytical report further includes a structured file of intensity values, pixel location, size, index, and/or death of the one or more cancer organoid cells within the plurality of brightfield images and the corresponding plurality of fluorescent images.

29 . The method of claim 1 , further comprising: applying an intensity normalization process to each of the plurality of fluorescent images by determining a background intensity of each respective image and normalizing the background intensity by subtracting the background intensity from each respective image.

30 . The method of claim 1 , wherein providing the plurality of brightfield images and the plurality of fluorescent images to the trained model comprises: combining the plurality of brightfield images and the plurality of fluorescent images into one or more multi-channel images to be provided to the trained model.

31 . The method of claim 1 , further comprising: quantifying metabolic activity of the one or more cancer organoid cells and/or the one or more immune cells.

32 . The method of claim 1 , further comprising:

characterizing a presence or amount of one or more biomarkers; and

generating the analytical report to further include the characterized presence or amount of the one or more biomarkers.

33 . The method of claim 1 , further comprising:

quantifying a proportion of specific cell types from the first combination of the one or more cancer organoid cells and the one or more immune cells using fluorescence-activated cell sorting (FACS); and

generating the analytical report to further include the quantified proportion of specific cell types.

34 . The method of claim 1 , wherein the one or more immune cells are peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs).

35 . The method of claim 1 , wherein the one or more immune cells are lymphocytes, monocytes, and/or dendritic cells.

36 . The method of claim 1 , wherein the one or more immune cells are T cells and/or natural killer (NK) cells.

37 . The method of claim 1 , wherein the one or more immune cells are neutrophils, eosinophils, basophils, and/or macrophages.

38 . The method of claim 1 , wherein the one or more cancer organoid cells are derived from at least one of anal cancer, a basal cell skin cancer, a squamous cancer, a benign cancer, a brain cancer, a glioblastoma, a breast cancer, a bladder cancer, a cervical cancer, a colon cancer, a colorectal cancer, an endometrial cancer, an esophageal cancer, a head and neck cancer, a liver cancer, a hepatobiliary cancer, a kidney cancer, a renal cancer, a gastric cancer, a gastrointestinal cancer, a lung cancer, a non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), a mesothelial cancer of the pleural cavity, a mesothelioma, an ovarian cancer, a pancreatic cancer, a prostate cancer, a rectal cancer, a lymphoma, a melanoma, a skin cancer, a meningioma, a sarcoma, and a thymus cancer.

Assignments (4)
RELEASE OF SECURITY INTEREST Recorded May 13, 2026
From: ARES CAPITAL CORPORATION, AS COLLATERAL AGENT
To: TEMPUS AI, INC. (F/K/A TEMPUS LABS, INC.)
Reel/Frame 075608/0784 →
CHANGE OF NAME Recorded Feb 9, 2024
From: TEMPUS LABS, INC.
To: TEMPUS AI, INC.
Reel/Frame 066544/0110 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Dec 1, 2022
From: HO, CHI-SING; KANNAN, MADHAVI; KHARE, SONAL; LARSEN, BRIAN; MAPES, BRANDON; SALAHUDEEN, AMEEN; VENKATARAMAN, JAGADISH
To: TEMPUS LABS, INC.
Reel/Frame 061947/0181 →
SECURITY INTEREST Recorded Sep 22, 2022
From: TEMPUS LABS, INC.
To: ARES CAPITAL CORPORATION, AS COLLATERAL AGENT
Reel/Frame 061506/0316 →
Continuity (4)
Provisional Application 63263761 · Nov 8, 2021
Provisional Application 63227877 · Jul 30, 2021
Provisional Application 63203749 · Jul 29, 2021
Related Publication 20230036156A1 · Feb 2, 2023
References Cited (76)
US 10395772B1 · Lucas et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 10746736B2 · Varadarajan · 2020 [cited by examiner]
US 10902952B2 · Lucas et al. · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 10957041B2 · Yip et al. · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 10975445B2 · Venkat et al. · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 11043283B1 · Bell et al. · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 11043304B2 · Lozac'Hmeur et al. · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 11081210B2 · Perera · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 11211144B2 · Zhu et al. · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 11211147B2 · Finkle et al. · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 11414700B2 · Perera et al. · 2022 [cited by applicant]
US 11415571B2 · Larsen et al. · 2022 [cited by applicant]
US 11422355B2 · Jackson · 2022 [cited by examiner]
US 11475981B2 · Tell et al. · 2022 [cited by applicant]
US 11610307B2 · Yip · 2023 [cited by examiner]
US 12241830B2 · Boehm · 2025 [cited by examiner]
US 20200075169A1 · Lau et al. · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 20200098448A1 · Shah et al. · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 20200118644A1 · Khan et al. · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 20200135303A1 · Barber · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 20200210852A1 · Igartua et al. · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 20200211716A1 · Lefkofsky et al. · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 20200258601A1 · Lau · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 20200335102A1 · Lefkofsky et al. · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 20200365232A1 · Jaros et al. · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 20200365268A1 · Michuda et al. · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 20200381087A1 · Ozeran et al. · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 20200395097A1 · Chang et al. · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 20210057042A1 · Beaubier et al. · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 20210057071A1 · Barber et al. · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 20210090694A1 · Colley et al. · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 20210098078A1 · Lozac'Hmeur et al. · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 20210115511A1 · Blidner · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 20210118526A1 · Barber · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 20210118559A1 · Lefkofsky · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 20210151192A1 · Lucas et al. · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 20210155989A1 · Salahudeen et al. · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 20210172931A1 · Larsen · 2021 [cited by examiner]
US 20210269878A1 · Blidner · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 20210325308A1 · Kannan et al. · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 20210398617A1 · Finkle et al. · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 20210407080A1 · Szu · 2021 [cited by examiner]
US 20220341914A1 · Larsen et al. · 2022 [cited by applicant]
US 20230289968A1 · Martinelli · 2023 [cited by examiner]
US 20240029409A1 · Aidt · 2024 [cited by examiner]
US 20240168016A1 · Cai · 2024 [cited by examiner]
US 20240272161A1 · Taube · 2024 [cited by examiner]
WO 2020142563A1 · 2020 [cited by applicant]
WO 2020168008A1 · 2020 [cited by applicant]
WO 2020198380A1 · 2020 [cited by applicant]
WO 2021081253A1 · 2021 [cited by applicant]
WO 2021113821A1 · 2021 [cited by applicant]
WO 2021113846A1 · 2021 [cited by applicant]
WO 2021168143A1 · 2021 [cited by applicant]
Larsen B, Kannan M et al. A pan-cancer organoid platform for precision medicine. Cell Rep. Jul. 27, 2021;36(4):109429. doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2021.109429. PMID: 34320344. (Year: 2021). [cited by examiner]
Bar-Ephraim et al., Organoids in immunological research, Nat. Rev. Immunol., 20(5):279-293 (2020). [cited by applicant]
Berryman et al., Image-based Cell Phenotyping Using Deep Learning, Communications Biology, 22: (2020). [cited by applicant]
Borten et al.,Automated brightfield morphometry of 3D organoid populations by OrganoSeg. Scientific Reports, 8:5319: (2018). [cited by applicant]
Cancian et al., Development of a Deep-Learning Pipeline to Recognize and Characterize Macrophages in Colo-Rectal Liver Metastasis, Cancers, 13(3313):10 (2021). [cited by applicant]
Cepa., Segmentation of Total Cell Area in Brightfield Microscopy Images, Methods and Protocols, 1(43):8 (2018). [cited by applicant]
Daoust., Image Classification., TensorFlow Documentation., Web. Jan. 7, 2021; 10 pages. [cited by applicant]
International Application No. PCT/US22/038960, International Search Report and Written Opinion, mailed Nov. 1, 2022. [cited by applicant]
Kepp et al., A fluorescent biosensor-based platform for the discovery of immunogenic cancer cell death inducers, Oncoimmunology, 8(8):e1606665 (2019). [cited by applicant]
Larsen et al., A pan-cancer organoid platform for precision medicine, Cell Reports, 36(4):109429 (2021). [cited by applicant]
Mencattini et al., Discovering the hidden messages within cell trajectories using a deep learning approach for in vitro evalualion of cancer drug treatmertts, Scientific Reports, 10:7653 (2020). [cited by applicant]
Neal et al., Organoid modeling of the tumor immune microenvironment, Cell, 40: (2018). [cited by applicant]
Noller et al., A Practical Approach to Quantitative Processing and Analysis of Small Biological Structures by Fluorescent Imaging, J Biomol Tech, 27(3):90-97 (2016). [cited by applicant]
Piccinini et al., Software tools for 3D nuclei segmentation and quantitative analysis in multicellular, aggregates Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal, 18:1287-1300 (2020). [cited by applicant]
Scanlan et al., Cancer/testis antigens: an expanding family of targets for cancer immunotherapy, Immunol. Rev., 188:22-32 (2002). [cited by applicant]
Takuoka et al., 3D convolutional neural networks-based segmentation to acquire quantitative criteria of the nucleus during mouse embryogenesis, Systems Biology and Application, 6(32):12 (2020). [cited by applicant]
Wu et al., RCNN-SliceNet: A Slice and Cluster Approach for Nuclei Centroid Detection in Three-Dimensional Fluorescence Microscopy Images, arXIV, 11: (2021). [cited by applicant]
Zhou et al., Self Pre-training with Masked Autoencoders for Medical Image Analysis. arXiv, 12: (2022). [cited by applicant]
Zhuge et al., Deep learning 2D and 3D optical sectioning microscopy using cross-modality Pix2Pix Cgan image translation, Biomedical Optics Express, 12(12):18 (2021). [cited by applicant]
Bhinder et al., Artificial Intelligence in Cancer Research and Precision Medicine, Cancer Discovery, 11(4):900-915 (Apr. 2021). [cited by applicant]
European Application No. 22850400.7, European Search Report and Written Opinion, mailed Apr. 14, 2025. [cited by applicant]
Xing et al., Robust Nucleus/Cell Detection and Segmentation in Digital Pathology and Microscopy Images: A Comprehensive Review, IEEE Reviews in Biomedical Engineering, 9:234-263 (Jan. 2016). [cited by applicant]