Building control system with multi-objective control of carbon emissions and occupant comfort
A method for controlling building equipment includes providing a user interface comprising a graphical representation of a relationship between a carbon emissions control objective and a second control objective that competes with the carbon emissions control objective over a range of control strategies for the building equipment, and assigning a weight to the carbon emissions control objective or the second control objective in an objective function. The weight is associated with a control strategy that corresponds to a user selection based on the graphical representation. The method also includes generating control decisions for the building equipment using the objective function with the weight assigned to the carbon emissions control objective or the second control objective and operating the building equipment in accordance with the control decisions.
1. A method for controlling building equipment, comprising:
providing a user interface comprising a graphical representation of a relationship between a carbon emissions control objective and a second control objective that competes with the carbon emissions control objective over a range of control strategies for the building equipment;
assigning a weight to the carbon emissions control objective or the second control objective in an objective function, the weight associated with a control strategy that corresponds to a user selection based on the graphical representation;
generating control decisions for the building equipment using the objective function with the weight assigned to the carbon emissions control objective or the second control objective;
operating the building equipment in accordance with the control decisions; and
automatically adjusting the weight over time based on a difference between actual performance and a target associated with the user selection.
2. The method of claim 1 , wherein the second control objective accounts for at least one of occupant comfort, operating costs, and energy consumption.
3. The method of claim 1 , wherein the range of control strategies corresponds to a range of values for the weight.
4. The method of claim 1 , wherein generating the control decisions comprises performing an optimization of the objective function with the weight assigned to the carbon emissions control objective or the second control objective.
5. The method of claim 1 , further comprising generating different points in the graphical representation by running simulations for the range of control strategies for the building equipment.
6. The method of claim 5 , wherein running the simulations for the range of control strategies for the building equipment comprises performing optimizations of the objective function having different values of the weight to generate simulated control decisions for the building equipment.
7. The method of claim 1 , wherein the carbon emissions control objective includes carbon emissions from a plurality of buildings related to an enterprise or a plurality of vehicles related to the enterprise.
8. One or more non-transitory computer-readable media storing program instructions that, when executed by one or more processors, cause the one or more processors to perform operations comprising:
providing a user interface comprising a graphical representation of a relationship between a carbon emissions control objective and a second control objective that competes with the carbon emissions control objective over a range of control strategies for building equipment;
assigning a weight to the carbon emissions control objective or the second control objective in an objective function, the weight associated with a control strategy that corresponds to a user selection based on the graphical representation;
generating control decisions for the building equipment using the objective function with the weight assigned to the carbon emissions control objective or the second control objective;
controlling the building equipment in accordance with the control decisions; and
automatically adjusting the weight over time based on a difference between actual performance and a target associated with the user selection.
9. The one or more non-transitory computer-readable media of claim 8 , wherein the second control objective accounts for at least one of occupant comfort, operating costs, and energy consumption.
10. The one or more non-transitory computer-readable media of claim 8 , wherein generating the control decisions comprises performing an optimization of the objective function with the weight assigned to the carbon emissions control objective or the second control objective.
11. The one or more non-transitory computer-readable media of claim 8 , the operations further comprising generating different points in the graphical representation by running simulations for the range of control strategies for the building equipment.
12. The one or more non-transitory computer-readable media of claim 11 , wherein running the simulations for the range of control strategies for the building equipment comprises performing optimizations of the objective function having different values of the weight to generate simulated control decisions for the building equipment.
13. The one or more non-transitory computer-readable media of claim 8 , wherein the carbon emissions control objective includes carbon emissions from a plurality of buildings related to an enterprise or a plurality of vehicles related to the enterprise.
14. A system for controlling building equipment, comprising one or more processing circuits configured to:
provide a user interface comprising a graphical representation of a relationship between a carbon emissions control objective and a second control objective that competes with the carbon emissions control objective over a range of control strategies for the building equipment, wherein the carbon emissions control objective is based electrical consumption of the building equipment and at least one of an average carbon emissions rate, a marginal operating carbon emissions rate, or a time varying carbon emissions rate;
assign a weight to the carbon emissions control objective or the second control objective in an objective function, the weight associated with a control strategy that corresponds to a user selection based on the graphical representation;
automatically adjust the weight over time based on a difference between actual performance and a target associated with the user selection;
generate control decisions for the building equipment using the objective function with the weight assigned to the carbon emissions control objective or the second control objective; and
operate the building equipment in accordance with the control decisions.
15. The system of claim 14 , wherein the second control objective accounts for at least one of occupant comfort, operating costs, and energy consumption.
16. The system of claim 14 , wherein the range of control strategies corresponds to a range of values for the weight.
17. The system of claim 14 , wherein generating the control decisions comprises performing an optimization of the objective function with the weight assigned to the carbon emissions control objective or the second control objective.
18. The system of claim 14 , the one or more processing circuits further configured to generate different points in the graphical representation by running simulations for the range of control strategies for the building equipment.
19. The system of claim 18 , wherein running the simulations for the range of control strategies for the building equipment comprises performing optimizations of the objective function having different values of the weight to generate simulated control decisions for the building equipment.