SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR INCREASING PRODUCTIVITY OF AGENTS IN A CONTACT CENTER BY IMPROVING AN AUTOMATIC-SCHEDULING GENERATION IN A WORKFORCE MANAGEMENT (WFM) APPLICATION

1 . A computerized-method for increasing productivity of agents in a contact center by improving an automatic-scheduling generation in a Workforce Management (WFM) application, said computerized-method comprising:

in a computerized-system comprising one or more processors, one or more applications, and a memory including a data store of agents' metrics and skills and a data store of applications, said one or more processors are operating an Agent Productivity Score Generator (APSG) module, for each agent in the data store of agents' metrics and skills, said APSG module comprising:

(i) receiving an activity type and a period for agents shift placement;

(ii) retrieving historical-data of a preconfigured number of metrics from the data store of agents' metrics and the data store of applications for each scheduled-shift during a preconfigured period;

(iii) calculating a weighted sum of the retrieved historical-data of the preconfigured number of metrics and preconfigured attributed weight thereof to yield an Agent Productivity Score (APS) for each scheduled-shift in the preconfigured period; and

(iv) selecting a shift having a highest APS and adding the selected shift of the agent to a list-of-maximum-shifts,

wherein when the list-of-maximum-shifts is having all agents in the data store of agents' metrics and skills then the list-of-maximum-shifts is sent to the WFM for an automatic shift-schedule generation for the activity type and a determined period, based on the list-of-maximum-shifts and other input parameters, and

wherein the automatically generated shift-schedule is presented to a user via a display unit.

2 . The computerized-method of claim 1 , wherein the other input parameters are (i) forecast and staffing plans; and (ii) agent's skills and preferences.

3 . The computerized-method of claim 1 , wherein the preconfigured number of metrics are selected from at least one of: (i) level of adherence; (ii) quality score; (iii) Average Handle Time (AHT); (iv) agent sentiment score; (v) available time; (vi) average speed of answer (vii) concurrent time; (viii) consult time; (ix) working time; (x) agent contracts; (xi) holds; (xii) refused contacts; (xiii) takeovers; (xiv) occupancy; (xv) active talk time; and (xvi) working rate.

4 . The computerized-method of claim 3 , wherein each metric of the preconfigured number of metrics is converted into an aggregated percentage value of the metric during a preconfigured period.

5 . The computerized-method of claim 1 , wherein a nature of each preconfigured attributed weight is selected from (i) positive; (ii) zero; and (iii) negative,

wherein for each metric, an attributed weight is determined as positive when a metric has a positive correlation with the APS, the attributed weight is determined as zero when a metric is not considered for APS calculation and the attributed weight is determined as negative when the metric has a negative correlation with APS.

6 . The computerized-method of claim 3 , wherein the preconfigured number of metrics are retrieved from at least one application of: (i) Automatic Call Distribution (ACD); (ii) Quality Management (QM); (iii) Workforce Management (WFM); (iv) Interaction Analytics (IA); and (v) other applications.

7 . The computerized-method of claim 1 , wherein upon selection of a manual schedule change via a Graphical User Interface (GUI) for shift schedules update, the APSG is operated for each agent in the data store of agent's metrics and skills which are not scheduled for the received period.

8 . The computerized-method of claim 1 , wherein the APSG module is further comprising generating a report showing trends of the agents preconfigured number of metrics against past shift-schedules.

9 . The computerized-method of claim 8 , wherein the report is used for agents coaching purposes.

10 . The computerized-method of claim 1 , wherein each day in the period includes two or more shifts.

11 . The computerized-method of claim 1 , wherein the retrieved historical-data of the preconfigured number of metrics are converted to a percentage value for the calculated weighted sum of the retrieved historical-data of the preconfigured number of metrics.

12 . A computerized-system for increasing productivity of agents in a contact center by improving an automatic-scheduling generation in a Workforce Management (WFM) application, said computerized-system comprising:

one or more processors,

one or more applications, and a memory including a data store of agents' metrics and skills and a data store of applications,

said one or more processors are configured to operate an Agent Productivity Score Generator (APSG) module, for each agent in the data store of agents' metrics and skills,

said APSG module is configured to:

(i) receive an activity type and a period for agents shift placement;

(ii) retrieve historical-data of a preconfigured number of metrics from the data store of agents' metrics and skills and the data stores of applications or each scheduled-shift during a preconfigured period;

(iii) calculate a weighted sum of the retrieved historical-data of the preconfigured number of metrics and preconfigured attributed weight thereof to yield an Agent Productivity Score (APS) for each shift in the preconfigured period;

(iv) select a shift having a highest APS and adding the selected shift of the agent to a list-of-maximum-shifts,

wherein when the list-of-maximum-shifts is having all agents in the data store of agents' metrics and skills the list-of-maximum-shifts is sent to the WFM for an automatic shift-schedule generation for the activity type for a determined period, based on the list-of-maximum-shifts and other input parameters, and

wherein the automatically generated shift-schedule is presented to a user via a display unit.