IP Library Granted Patent US 12,387,125
Granted Patent B1
US 12,387,125 · App. 17/859,823 · Granted Aug 12, 2025

Low-frequency activation of single-qubit quantum logic gates

Inventors: Matthew J. Reagor (San Rafael, CA); Nicolas Didier (Berkeley, CA); Gregory M. Stiehl (Ithaca, NY)
Assignee: Rigetti & Co, LLC
G06N10/40G06N10/20
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 12,387,125
App. No.
17/859,823
Granted
Aug 12, 2025
Kind
B1
Abstract

In a general aspect, a parametrically activated single-qubit quantum logic gate is performed in a quantum computing system. In some cases, a superconducting quantum processing unit includes a tunable qubit device. A single-qubit quantum logic gate is performed on a qubit defined by the tunable qubit device by communicating one or more control signals from a control system to the tunable qubit device. The tunable qubit device has a range of qubit operating frequencies, and the one or more control signals include only frequencies that are below the range of qubit operating frequencies.

Claims (52)

1. A method of operating a superconducting quantum processing unit comprising a tunable qubit device, the method comprising:

performing a single-qubit quantum logic gate on a qubit defined by the tunable qubit device by communicating one or more control signals from a control system to the tunable qubit device, wherein the tunable qubit device has a range of qubit operating frequencies, and the one or more control signals comprise only frequencies that are below the range of qubit operating frequencies.

2. The method of claim 1 , wherein the range of qubit operating frequencies comprises a minimum frequency greater than 1 GigaHertz, and communicating the one or more control signals comprises driving the tunable qubit device at a drive frequency below the minimum frequency.

3. The method of claim 1 , wherein the tunable qubit device has an average qubit operating frequency over a duration of the one or more control signals, and communicating the one or more control signals comprises driving the tunable qubit device at a drive frequency equal to a subharmonic of the average qubit operating frequency.

4. The method of claim 1 , wherein the tunable qubit device has an average qubit operating frequency over a duration of the one or more control signals, the one or more control signals comprise a drive signal and a flux modulation signal, and the flux modulation signal comprises a modulation frequency equal to a subharmonic of the average qubit operating frequency shifted by the drive signal.

5. The method of claim 1 , wherein:

the tunable qubit device comprises:

a superconducting circuit loop, and

a flux bias element that applies a magnetic flux to the superconducting circuit loop; and

communicating the one or more control signals comprises communicating a flux modulation signal to the flux bias element; and

the flux modulation signal comprises only frequencies that are below the range of qubit operating frequencies.

6. The method of claim 5 , wherein:

the tunable qubit device further comprises a drive line;

communicating the one or more control signals comprises communicating a drive signal to the drive line; and

the drive signal comprises only frequencies that are below the range of qubit operating frequencies.

7. The method of claim 5 , wherein the flux modulation signal is defined by a modulation frequency and a modulation amplitude, and the method comprises determining, by operation of the control system, a value of the modulation frequency and a value of the modulation amplitude.

8. The method of claim 7 , wherein determining the value of the modulation frequency and the value of the modulation amplitude comprises performing Rabi oscillation measurements of qubit population transfer over a range of the modulation frequency and a range of the modulation amplitude.

9. The method of claim 8 , wherein determining the value of the modulation frequency and the value of the modulation amplitude further comprises optimizing the value of the modulation frequency and the value of the modulation amplitude.

10. The method of claim 5 , wherein the superconducting circuit loop comprises two Josephson junctions, and the tunable qubit device comprises a shunt capacitor in parallel with each of the two Josephson junctions.

11. The method of claim 10 , wherein the range of qubit operating frequencies of the tunable qubit device is defined at least in part by Josephson energies of the two Josephson junctions and a capacitance of the shunt capacitor.

12. The method of claim 1 , wherein the tunable qubit device comprises a tunable transmon device.

13. A quantum computing system comprising:

a superconducting quantum processing unit comprising a tunable qubit device; and

a control system communicably coupled to the superconducting quantum processing unit, the control system configured to perform operations comprising:

performing a single-qubit quantum logic gate on a qubit defined by the tunable qubit device by communicating one or more control signals to the tunable qubit device, wherein the tunable qubit device has a range of qubit operating frequencies, and the one or more control signals comprise only frequencies that are below the range of qubit operating frequencies.

14. The system of claim 13 , wherein the range of qubit operating frequencies comprises a minimum frequency greater than 1 GigaHertz, and communicating the one or more control signals comprises driving the tunable qubit device at a drive frequency below the minimum frequency.

15. The system of claim 13 , wherein the tunable qubit device has an average qubit operating frequency over a duration of the one or more control signals, and communicating the one or more control signals comprises driving the tunable qubit device at a drive frequency equal to a subharmonic of the average qubit operating frequency.

16. The system of claim 13 , wherein the tunable qubit device has an average qubit operating frequency over a duration of the one or more control signals, the one or more control signals comprise a drive signal and a flux modulation signal, and the flux modulation signal comprises a modulation frequency equal to a subharmonic of the average qubit operating frequency shifted by the drive signal.

17. The system of claim 13 , wherein:

the tunable qubit device comprises:

a superconducting circuit loop, and

a flux bias element that applies a magnetic flux to the superconducting circuit loop; and

communicating the one or more control signals comprises communicating a flux modulation signal to the flux bias element; and

the flux modulation signal comprises only frequencies that are below the range of qubit operating frequencies.

18. The system of claim 17 , wherein:

the tunable qubit device further comprises a drive line;

communicating the one or more control signals comprises communicating a drive signal to the drive line; and

the drive signal comprises only frequencies that are below the range of qubit operating frequencies.

19. The system of claim 17 , wherein the flux modulation signal is defined by a modulation frequency and a modulation amplitude, and the method comprises determining, by operation of the control system, a value of the modulation frequency and a value of the modulation amplitude.

20. The system of claim 19 , wherein determining the value of the modulation frequency and the value of the modulation amplitude comprises performing Rabi oscillation measurements of qubit population transfer over a range of the modulation frequency and a range of the modulation amplitude.

21. The system of claim 20 , wherein determining the value of the modulation frequency and the value of the modulation amplitude further comprises optimizing the value of the modulation frequency and the value of the modulation amplitude.

22. The system of claim 17 , wherein the superconducting circuit loop comprises two Josephson junctions, and the tunable qubit device comprises a shunt capacitor in parallel with each of the two Josephson junctions.

23. The system of claim 22 , wherein the range of qubit operating frequencies of the tunable qubit device is defined at least in part by Josephson energies of the two Josephson junctions and a capacitance of the shunt capacitor.

24. The system of claim 13 , wherein the tunable qubit device comprises a tunable transmon device.

25. A quantum computing system comprising:

a superconducting quantum processing unit comprising a tunable qubit device, wherein the tunable qubit device has a range of qubit operating frequencies; and

means for performing a single-qubit quantum logic gate on a qubit defined by the tunable qubit device,

wherein the single-qubit quantum logic gate is performed by communicating one or more control signals to the tunable qubit device, and the one or more control signals comprise only frequencies that are below the range of qubit operating frequencies.

26. The system of claim 25 , wherein the means for performing the single-qubit quantum logic gate comprises a control system that is communicably coupled to the superconducting quantum processing unit and configured to:

identify signal parameters for the single-qubit quantum logic gate;

generate the one or more control signals according to the signal parameters; and

communicate the one or more control signals to the tunable qubit device.

Assignments (4)
RELEASE OF SECURITY INTEREST Recorded Dec 12, 2024
From: TRINITY CAPITAL INC.
To: RIGETTI & CO, LLC
Reel/Frame 069603/0771 →
RELEASE OF SECURITY INTEREST Recorded Dec 12, 2024
From: TRINITY CAPITAL INC.
To: RIGETTI & CO, LLC; RIGETTI INTERMEDIATE LLC; RIGETTI COMPUTING, INC.
Reel/Frame 069603/0831 →
AMENDED AND RESTATED INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY SECURITY AGREEMENT Recorded Jul 8, 2024
From: RIGETTI & CO, LLC; RIGETTI INTERMEDIATE LLC; RIGETTI COMPUTING, INC.
To: TRINITY CAPITAL INC.
Reel/Frame 068146/0416 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Apr 10, 2023
From: REAGOR, MATTHEW J.; DIDIER, NICOLAS; STIEHL, GREGORY M.; RIGET & CO, INC.
To: RIGETTI & CO, LLC
Reel/Frame 063276/0831 →
Continuity (1)
Provisional Application 63219222 · Jul 7, 2021
References Cited (19)
US 9892365B2 · Rigetti et al. · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 10056908B2 · Rigetti et al. · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 10352992B1 · Zeng et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 10483980B2 · Sete et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 20160292586A1 · Rigetti et al. · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 20170230050A1 · Rigetti et al. · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 20190007051A1 · Sete · 2019 [cited by examiner]
US 20190392344A1 · Kelly · 2019 [cited by examiner]
Nakamura , et al., “Rabi Oscillations in a Josephson-Junction Charge Two-Level System”, Phys.Rev.Lett., Dec. 10, 2001, 4 pgs. [cited by applicant]
Wang , et al., “Cavity Attenuators for Superconducting Qubits”, Phys.Rev.Applied, Jan. 16, 2019, 9 pgs. [cited by applicant]
Caldwell , et al., “Parametrically Activated Entangling Gates Using Transmon Qubits”, arXiv:1706.06562v2 [quant-oh], Dec. 8, 2017, 7 pgs. [cited by applicant]
Fried , et al., “Assessing the Influence of Broadband Instrumentation Noise on Parametrically Modulated Superconducting Qubits”, arXiv:1908.11370v1, Aug. 29, 2019, 6 pgs. [cited by applicant]
Houck , et al., “Life after charge noise: recent results with transmon qubits”, arXiv:0812.1865v1, Dec. 10, 2008, 6 pgs. [cited by applicant]
Kono , et al., “Breaking the trade-off between fast control and long lifetime of a superconducting qubit”, arXiv:2002.01635v2, Mar. 9, 2020, 22 pgs. [cited by applicant]
Leonard , et al., “Digital coherent control of a superconducting qubit”, arXiv:1806.07930v1, Jun. 20, 2018, 13 pgs. [cited by applicant]
Naik , et al., “Random access quantum information processors”, arXiv:1705:00579, May 1, 2017, 7 pgs. [cited by applicant]
Scarlino , et al., “Second harmonic coherent driving of a spin qubit in a Si/SiGe quantum dot”, arXiv:1504.06436v1, Apr. 24, 2015, 9 pgs. [cited by applicant]
Wallraff , et al., “sideband Transitions and Two-Tone Spectroscopy of a Superconducting Qubit Strongly Coupled to an On-Chip Cavity”, PRL 99, 050501, Jul. 30, 2007, 4 pgs. [cited by applicant]
Zhang , et al., “Universal fast flux control of a coherent, low-frequency qubit”, arXiv:2002.10653v1, Feb. 25, 2020, 12 pgs. [cited by applicant]