IP Library Granted Patent US 12,313,739
Granted Patent B2
US 12,313,739 · App. 17/874,895 · Granted May 27, 2025

Multi-perspective ensonification system and method

Inventors: Jens Steenstrup (B'Kara, MT); Christopher Tiemann (Austin, TX); Peter Bilodeau (Austin, TX); Mark Chun (Austin, TX); Kirk Hobart (Austin, TX)
Assignee: R3VOX LTD
G01S15/89G01S7/53G01S7/54
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 12,313,739
App. No.
17/874,895
Granted
May 27, 2025
Kind
B2
Abstract

A survey system and method to improve one or more of survey quality, efficiency, and utility for example by utilizing a vessel mounted MBES and a selected survey plan to check sound speed(s) via eliciting echoes from reflectors in colocated groups of reflectors using multi-perspective ensonification.

Claims (43)

1. A method of obtaining multi-perspective sonar data comprising the steps of:

installing a multibeam echo sounder system (“MBES”) on a water going vehicle for use on a waterbody such that plural transducers are in a single MBES projector array and plural transducers are in a single MBES hydrophone array;

traversing a vehicle route while operating the MBES where multiple receive beams intersect a transmit beam such that along the vehicle route i) plural primary areas are ensonified, ii) plural secondary areas are ensonified, iii) each primary area is overlapped by a respective secondary area, and iv) for each overlap a first acoustic transmission from a first MBES location follows a first path to a first reflector and a reciprocal echo path back to the first MBES location to obtain a first travel time from a first perspective, and a second acoustic transmission from a second MBES location different from the first follows a second path to a second reflector and a reciprocal echo path back to the second MBES location to obtain a second travel time from a second perspective;

with aid of the first and second travel times, determining if the first and second reflectors are colocated;

where the reflectors are colocated and with aid of the first and second travel times, determining a depth of the first reflector and a depth of the second reflector; and,

finding a sound speed that tends to minimize a mathematical function dependent upon at least the depth of the first reflector and the depth of the second reflector.

2. The method of claim 1 wherein the MBES projector array and MBES hydrophone array are in a Mills Cross arrangement.

3. The method of claim 1 wherein the reflectors are located on a waterbody bottom divided into areas, the reflectors determined to be colocated if they are found in the same area.

4. The method of claim 1 wherein:

for travel times obtained from the multiple overlaps, modeling propagation of sound through the waterbody to locate in three dimensions reflectors that returned the echoes; and,

one of the dimensions indicating a waterbody depth and the other two dimensions indicating coordinates in a reflector plane facing a free surface of the waterbody.

5. The method of claim 4 further comprising the step of:

given an estimate of sound speed as a function of depth, testing a consistency of this estimate with the multi-perspective sonar.

6. The method of claim 4 further comprising the step of:

given an estimate of sound speed as a function of depth, testing a consistency of this estimate with travel times corresponding to the echoes.

7. The method of claim 4 further comprising the step of:

given an estimate of sound speed as a function of depth, improving the estimate using the multi-perspective sonar data.

8. The method of claim 4 further comprising the step of:

given an estimate of sound speed as a function of depth, improving the estimate using travel times corresponding to the echoes.

9. The method of claim 4 further comprising the step of:

absent an estimate of sound speed as a function of depth, deriving an estimate of sound speed as a function of depth using the multi-perspective sonar data.

10. The method of claim 4 further comprising the step of:

absent an estimate of sound speed as a function of depth, deriving an estimate of sound speed as a function of depth using travel times corresponding to the echoes.

11. The method of claim 4 further comprising the steps of:

identifying reflectors colocated in a reflector plane; and,

choosing adjusted sound speed values to reduce disagreements in colocated reflector depths.

12. The method of claim 11 wherein the disagreements in depth are used to construct a system of simultaneous equations that is overdetermined, plural adjustments to respective sound speed values being indicated by a solution to the simultaneous equations.

13. The method of claim 12 wherein pre-existing estimates of sound speed as a function of depth are perturbed one at a time, in both a positive and a negative direction, effects of the perturbations on travel times used in derivation of plural adjustments to respective sound speed values.

14. The method of claim 1 wherein a vehicle's non-intersecting first and second vehicle routes are chosen such that operating the MBES while traversing the vehicle routes results in (i) at least partially superimposed first and second waterbody bottom fans that overlap at a site and (ii) multiple echoes from multiple colocated reflectors at the site.

15. The method of claim 1 wherein a vehicle's intersecting first and second vehicle routes are chosen such that operating the MBES while traversing the vehicle routes results in (i) at least partially superimposed first and second waterbody bottom fans that overlap at a site and (ii) multiple echoes from multiple colocated reflectors at the site.

16. The method of claim 1 wherein MBES operation while traversing a single vehicle route results in (i) at least partially superimposed first and second waterbody fans that overlap at a site and (ii) multiple echoes from multiple colocated reflectors at the site.

17. The method of claim 16 wherein the first waterbody fan results from a forwardly pitched fan at time1 and the second waterbody fan results from a rearwardly pitched fan at time2 where time2>time1.

18. The method of claim 4 further comprising the step of operating the vehicle and the MBES to conduct a bathymetric survey.

19. The method of claim 18 further comprising the step of:

assigning each reflector to one of multiple zones that partition the reflector plane; and,

wherein reflectors assigned to the same zone are colocated reflectors.

20. The method of claim 19 wherein each of plural zones includes a respective group of 2 to 100 colocated reflectors.

21. The method of claim 20 wherein the zones have a characteristic dimension that is a function of a beam width and an altitude measured vertically between the MBES and a waterbody bottom.

22. The method of claim 20 wherein the zones have a characteristic dimension that varies proportionally with water depth.

23. The method of claim 1 further comprising the steps of:

identifying colocated reflectors; and,

choosing sound speed values to reduce disagreements in colocated reflector depths;

wherein a portion of a pre-existing bathymetric survey map is corrected when data used to make the map are used to find adjusted sound speed values and the survey map is recreated by replacing the chosen sound speed values with the adjusted sound speed values.

Assignments (2)
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Sep 27, 2023
From: R2SONIC, LLC
To: R3VOX LTD
Reel/Frame 065044/0601 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Jul 14, 2023
From: STEENSTRUP, JENS; TIEMANN, CHRISTOPHER; BILODEAU, PETER; CHUN, MARK; HOBART, KIRK
To: R2SONIC, LLC
Reel/Frame 064261/0900 →
Continuity (4)
Continuation 16516084 · Jul 18, 2019
Continuation 16016632 · Jun 24, 2018
Provisional Application 62528354 · Jul 3, 2017
Related Publication 20220404492A1 · Dec 22, 2022
References Cited (48)
US 3144631A · Lustig et al. · 1964 [cited by applicant]
US 5200931A · Kosalos et al. · 1993 [cited by applicant]
US 5287330A · Gilmour · 1994 [cited by applicant]
US 5318028A · Mitchell · 1994 [cited by applicant]
US 5323362A · Mitchell · 1994 [cited by applicant]
US 5433202A · Mitchell · 1995 [cited by applicant]
US 5483499A · Brumley et al. · 1996 [cited by applicant]
US 5596549A · Sheriff · 1997 [cited by applicant]
US 6195808B1 · Berliner · 2001 [cited by applicant]
US 6204778B1 · Bergan · 2001 [cited by applicant]
US 6285628B1 · Kiesel · 2001 [cited by applicant]
US 6438071B1 · Hansen et al. · 2002 [cited by applicant]
US 6987707B2 · Feintuch · 2006 [cited by applicant]
US 7092440B1 · Dress et al. · 2006 [cited by applicant]
US 7215598B2 · Guthmann · 2007 [cited by applicant]
US 7355924B2 · Zimmerman · 2008 [cited by applicant]
US 7547283B2 · Mourad · 2009 [cited by applicant]
US 7972271B2 · Johnson · 2011 [cited by applicant]
US 8220408B2 · Stone · 2012 [cited by applicant]
US 8248298B2 · Lalezari · 2012 [cited by applicant]
US 8300502B2 · Yockney · 2012 [cited by applicant]
US 8305841B2 · Riorden et al. · 2012 [cited by applicant]
US 8385152B2 · Brumley · 2013 [cited by applicant]
US 9244168B2 · Proctor · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 9664783B2 · Brown · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 9739881B1 · Pavek · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 9784825B2 · Brown · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 9817116B1 · Steenstrup et al. · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 9817117B1 · Steenstrup et al. · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 9869752B1 · Premus · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 10067228B1 · Steenstrup et al. · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 10132924B2 · Steenstrup et al. · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 11199624B2 · Napolitano · 2021 [cited by examiner]
US 20070025183A1 · Zimmerman et al. · 2007 [cited by applicant]
US 20080137483A1 · Sawrie · 2008 [cited by applicant]
US 20100302907A1 · Brumley · 2010 [cited by applicant]
US 20120327741A1 · Pearce · 2012 [cited by applicant]
US 20130016584A1 · Zhou · 2013 [cited by examiner]
US 20160011326A1 · Caute et al. · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 20200264290A1 · Napolitano · 2020 [cited by examiner]
EP 2299292A1 · 2011 [cited by applicant]
WO WO03065073A1 · 2003 [cited by applicant]
Degauque, Pierre et al. “Propagation Modelling and Channel Characterization”, Mobile Broadband Multimedia Networks, 2006, 119-217. (year: 2006). [cited by applicant]
Clarke, Thomas L. “Transverse Doppler Current Profilers”, Ocean Acoustics Division/AOML/NOAA, Miama, FL, 194-198. [cited by applicant]
Jung, Donghwan, Kim, Jeasoo, Byun, Gihoon. “Numerical modeling and simulation technique in time-domain for multibeam echo sounder,” International Journal of Naval Architecture and Ocean Engineering 10.2 (2017); 225-235.… [cited by applicant]
Larry A. Mayer; Frontiers in Seafloor Mapping and Visualization, Marine Geophysical Researches, Kluwer Academic Publishers, DO, vol. 27, No. Mar. 1, 2006, pp. 7-17, XP019403134, ISSN; 1573-0581, DOI; 10.1007/S11001-005-… [cited by applicant]
Jaffe J S et al.: “Multibeam Imaging Using Spatially Variant Insonification”, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, American Institute of Physics for the Accoustical Society of America, New York, NY, US, vol… [cited by applicant]
Stytsenko Eugene et al.: “A mid-range 3D sonar”, 2013 MTS/IEEE Oceans-Bergen, IEEE, Jun. 10, 2013, pp. 1-5, XP032487863, DOI; 10.1109/OCEANS-BERGEN, 2013.6607998. [cited by applicant]