IP Library Granted Patent US 12,359,404
Granted Patent B2
US 12,359,404 · App. 17/881,436 · Granted Jul 15, 2025

Detecting untraversable environment and preventing damage by a vehicle

Inventors: Lee Kamp Redden (Palo Alto, CA); Divya Sharma (San Jose, CA); Kent Michael Anderson (Signal Mountain, TN); Bryon William Majusiak (Incline Village, NV); Benjamin Ray Chostner (San Francisco, CA); James Patrick Ostrowski (Mountain View, CA)
Assignee: Deere & Company
E02F9/261E02F9/205G05D1/0214G05D1/0246G06V10/82G06V20/588G07C5/0808
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 12,359,404
App. No.
17/881,436
Granted
Jul 15, 2025
Kind
B2
Abstract

A vehicle moves through an environment (e.g., a farming, construction, mining, or forestry environment) and performs one or more actions in the environment. Portions of the environment may include moisture, such as puddles or mud patches. A control system associated with the vehicle may include a traversability model or a moisture model to help the vehicle operate in the environment with the moisture. In particular, the control system may employ the traversability model to reduce the likelihood of the vehicle attempting to traverse an untraversable portion of the environment, and the control system may employ the moisture model to reduce the likelihood of the vehicle performing an action that will damage a portion of the environment.

Claims (35)

1. A method for operating in a construction environment with moisture by a construction vehicle, the method comprising:

moving, by the construction vehicle, along a route in the construction environment;

identifying a construction action to perform by the construction vehicle at a portion of the construction environment, the identified construction action to be performed as the construction vehicle moves through the portion along the route;

determining a measure of moisture for the portion of the construction environment by applying a moisture model to an image of the portion of the construction environment, the moisture model configured to determine the measure of moisture for the portion of the construction environment based on the image of the portion of the construction environment;

determining a likelihood that the construction vehicle performing the identified construction action will enlarge a water run-off channel or form a water run-off channel in the portion of the construction environment based on the identified construction action and the determined measure of moisture for the portion of the construction environment; and

responsive to the likelihood that the construction vehicle performing the identified construction action will enlarge the water run-off channel or form the water run-off channel in the portion of the construction environment exceeding a threshold likelihood, performing a second construction action by the construction vehicle, wherein a likelihood that the construction vehicle performing the second construction action will enlarge the water run-off channel or form the water run-off channel in the portion of the construction environment is less than the threshold likelihood.

2. The method of claim 1 , wherein the second construction action is performed instead of the identified construction action.

3. The method of claim 1 , wherein the second construction action comprises nullifying the identified construction action such that the identified construction action is not performed as the construction vehicle moves along the route.

4. The method of claim 1 , wherein the second construction action includes at least one of: modifying the route or modifying a driving parameter of the construction vehicle.

5. The method of claim 1 , wherein determining the likelihood that the identified construction action will enlarge the water run-off channel or form the water run-off channel in the portion of the construction environment is further based on the route.

6. The method of claim 1 , determining the likelihood that the identified construction action will enlarge the water run-off channel or form the water run-off channel in the portion of the construction environment is further based on diagnostic information from one or more sensors of the construction vehicle.

7. The method of claim 1 , wherein determining the likelihood that the identified construction action will enlarge the water run-off channel or form the water run-off channel in the portion of the construction environment is further based on characteristics describing the construction vehicle, the characteristics including at least one of: a wheel type, a wheel size, a tread type, an engine/motor type, a drive type, a make, a model, a weight, a fuel level, a treatment mechanism, or a coupling mechanism of the construction vehicle.

8. The method of claim 1 , wherein determining the likelihood that the identified construction action will enlarge the water run-off channel or form the water run-off channel in the portion of the construction environment is further based on one or more ground types in the portion of the construction environment and a gradient of the portion of the construction environment.

9. The method of claim 1 , wherein the construction vehicle is autonomous.

10. The method of claim 1 , wherein the moisture model is machine learned.

11. The method of claim 1 , wherein determining the likelihood comprises applying the measure of moisture and the identified construction action to a model configured to determine the likelihood.

12. A construction vehicle configured to:

move along a route in a construction environment;

identify a construction action to perform at a portion of the construction environment, the identified construction action to be performed as the construction vehicle moves through the portion along the route;

determine a measure of moisture for the portion of the construction environment by applying a moisture model to an image of the portion of the construction environment captured by the construction vehicle, the moisture model configured to determine the measure of moisture for the portion of the construction environment based on the image of the portion of the construction environment;

determine a likelihood that the construction vehicle performing the identified construction action will enlarge a water run-off channel or form a water run-off channel in the portion of the construction environment based on the identified construction action and the determined measure of moisture for the portion of the construction environment; and

responsive to the likelihood that the construction vehicle performing the identified construction action will enlarge the water run-off channel or form the water run-off channel in the portion of the construction environment exceeding a threshold likelihood, perform a second construction action, wherein a likelihood that the construction vehicle performing the second construction action will enlarge the water run-off channel or form the water run-off channel in the portion of the construction environment is less than the threshold likelihood.

13. The construction vehicle of claim 12 , wherein the second construction action is performed instead of the identified construction action.

14. The construction vehicle of claim 12 , wherein the second construction action comprises nullifying the identified construction action such that the identified construction action is not performed as the construction vehicle moves along the route.

15. The construction vehicle of claim 12 , wherein the second construction action includes at least one of: modifying the route or modifying a driving parameter of the construction vehicle.

16. The construction vehicle of claim 12 , wherein determining the likelihood that the identified construction action will enlarge the water run-off channel or form the water run-off channel in the portion of the construction environment is further based on the route.

17. The construction vehicle of claim 12 , determining the likelihood that the identified construction action will enlarge the water run-off channel or form the water run-off channel in the portion of the construction environment is further based on diagnostic information from one or more sensors of the construction vehicle.

18. The construction vehicle of claim 12 , wherein determining the likelihood that the identified construction action will enlarge the water run-off channel or form the water run-off channel in the portion of the construction environment is further based on characteristics describing the construction vehicle, the characteristics including at least one of: a wheel type, a wheel size, a tread type, an engine/motor type, a drive type, a make, a model, a weight, a fuel level, a treatment mechanism, or a coupling mechanism of the construction vehicle.

19. The construction vehicle of claim 12 , wherein determining the likelihood that the identified construction action will enlarge the water run-off channel or form the water run-off channel in the portion of the construction environment is further based on one or more ground types in the portion of the construction environment and a gradient of the portion of the construction environment.

20. A non-transitory computer-readable storage medium storing instructions that, when executed by a computer, cause the computer to perform operations comprising:

moving, by a construction vehicle, along a route in a construction environment with moisture;

identifying a construction action to perform by the construction vehicle at a portion of the construction environment, the identified construction action to be performed as the construction vehicle moves through the portion along the route;

determining a measure of moisture for the portion of the construction environment by applying a moisture model to an image of the portion of the construction environment, the moisture model configured to determine the measure of moisture for the portion of the construction environment based on the image of the portion of the construction environment;

determining a likelihood that the construction vehicle performing the identified construction action will enlarge a water run-off channel or form a water run-off channel in the portion of the construction environment based on the identified construction action and the determined measure of moisture for the portion of the construction environment; and

responsive to the likelihood that the construction vehicle performing the identified construction action will enlarge the water run-off channel or form the water run-off channel in the portion of the construction environment exceeding a threshold likelihood, performing a second construction action by the construction vehicle, wherein a likelihood that the construction vehicle performing the second construction action will enlarge the water run-off channel or form the water run-off channel in the portion of the construction environment is less than the threshold likelihood.

Assignments (2)
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Oct 11, 2024
From: BLUE RIVER TECHNOLOGY INC.
To: DEERE & COMPANY
Reel/Frame 069164/0195 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Oct 10, 2022
From: REDDEN, LEE KAMP; SHARMA, DIVYA; ANDERSON, KENT MICHAEL; MAJUSIAK, BRYON WILLIAM; CHOSTNER, BENJAMIN RAY; OSTROWSKI, JAMES PATRICK
To: BLUE RIVER TECHNOLOGY INC.
Reel/Frame 061368/0195 →
Continuity (2)
Provisional Application 63230430 · Aug 6, 2021
Related Publication 20230038422A1 · Feb 9, 2023
References Cited (55)
US 5751576A · Monson · 1998 [cited by applicant]
US 5884224A · McNabb · 1999 [cited by examiner]
US 6427781B1 · Buhler · 2002 [cited by examiner]
US 9139998B1 · Conner, Jr. · 2015 [cited by examiner]
US 9658201B2 · Redden · 2017 [cited by examiner]
US 10912251B2 · Pickett et al. · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 11479213B1 · Kentley-Klay · 2022 [cited by applicant]
US 20080131202A1 · Slater · 2008 [cited by applicant]
US 20120237083A1 · Lange · 2012 [cited by examiner]
US 20120323452A1 · Green et al. · 2012 [cited by applicant]
US 20140236431A1 · Hendrickson et al. · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 20150338848A1 · Kumar · 2015 [cited by examiner]
US 20160108606A1 · Strutynsky · 2016 [cited by examiner]
US 20180025560A1 · Matsuzaki · 2018 [cited by examiner]
US 20180050704A1 · Tascione · 2018 [cited by examiner]
US 20180070527A1 · Richt · 2018 [cited by examiner]
US 20180092295A1 · Sugumaran et al. · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 20180257657A1 · Blank · 2018 [cited by examiner]
US 20180271015A1 · Redden et al. · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 20190129435A1 · Madsen et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 20190217864A1 · Kusukame et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 20190362146A1 · Polzounov et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 20200029490A1 · Bertucci et al. · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 20200093054A1 · Aesaert et al. · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 20200107490A1 · Zemenchik · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 20200114843A1 · Foster · 2020 [cited by examiner]
US 20200128734A1 · Brammeier · 2020 [cited by examiner]
US 20200193589A1 · Peshlov et al. · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 20200236834A1 · Balani et al. · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 20200344939A1 · Sporrer et al. · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 20210029865A1 · Smith et al. · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 20210120730A1 · Anderson · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 20210149406A1 · Javault · 2021 [cited by examiner]
US 20210191409A1 · Ready-Campbell · 2021 [cited by examiner]
US 20210192294A1 · Stanhope et al. · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 20210251128A1 · Rupp · 2021 [cited by examiner]
US 20210321568A1 · Garton · 2021 [cited by examiner]
US 20220026921A1 · Halder · 2022 [cited by examiner]
US 20220117215A1 · Sibley et al. · 2022 [cited by applicant]
US 20220183209A1 · Scott-Robinson et al. · 2022 [cited by applicant]
US 20220269282A1 · Ascherl · 2022 [cited by examiner]
US 20220406104A1 · Maeder et al. · 2022 [cited by applicant]
US 20230039092A1 · Anderson · 2023 [cited by examiner]
US 20230040430A1 · Redden · 2023 [cited by examiner]
US 20230121070A1 · Kanai et al. · 2023 [cited by applicant]
US 20230255137A1 · McMahan · 2023 [cited by examiner]
US 20240026655A1 · Stander et al. · 2024 [cited by applicant]
PCT International Search Report and Written Opinion, PCT Application No. PCT/US22/39462, Feb. 7, 2023, 14 pages. [cited by applicant]
PCT Invitation to Pay Additional Fees, PCT Application No. PCT/US22/39462, Aug. 4, 2022, 2 pages. [cited by applicant]
United States Office Action, U.S. Appl. No. 17/396,193, Nov. 22, 2023, 32 pages. [cited by applicant]
United States Office Action, U.S. Appl. No. 17/396,170, Aug. 25, 2023, 15 pages. [cited by applicant]
PCT International Search Report and Written Opinion, PCT Application No. PCT/US22/39085, Oct. 31, 2022, 15 pages. [cited by applicant]
Rankin, A.L. et al., “Daytime Water Detection by Fusing Multiple Cues for Autonomous Off-Road Navigation,” 24th Army Science Conference, Nov. 2004, pp. 1-8. [cited by applicant]
European Patent Office, Extended European Search Report, European Patent Application No. 22853778.3, Jan. 16, 2025, 10 pages. [cited by applicant]
United States Office Action, U.S. Appl. No. 17/396,193, filed Dec. 27, 2024, 27 pages. [cited by applicant]