IP Library › Granted Patent US 12,398,334
Granted Patent B2
US 12,398,334 · App. 17/894,997 · Granted Aug 26, 2025

Controlled blending of transmix fractions into defined hydrocarbon streams

Inventors: John Colin Robbins (Houston, TX); Gary S. Wawak (Houston, TX)
Assignee: Texon Midstream, LLC
C10L1/04G05D11/132G05D11/138G05D11/139C10L2200/0423C10L2200/0446C10L2200/0461C10L2290/24C10L2290/543C10L2290/58C10L2290/60
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 12,398,334
App. No.
17/894,997
Granted
Aug 26, 2025
Kind
B2
Abstract

Automated methods and systems for blending high sulfur hydrocarbons, particularly those derived from transmix, into low sulfur hydrocarbon streams are provided. Also provided are methods for splitting transmix into usable hydrocarbon fractions and blending the fractions back into defined hydrocarbon streams.

Claims (37)

1. A system for blending hydrocarbon sulfur into a defined hydrocarbon stream without violating a pre-determined sulfur concentration limit comprising:

a) a defined hydrocarbon stream comprising a defined hydrocarbon sulfur concentration and a defined hydrocarbon flow rate;

b) a second hydrocarbon stream in fluid communication with the defined stream, comprising a second sulfur concentration higher than the defined hydrocarbon sulfur concentration and a second flow rate;

c) a blended stream comprising a combination of the defined stream and the second hydrocarbon stream;

d) an IPU on which is stored a maximum sulfur concentration for the defined stream, programmed to calculate a ratio or rate at which the second hydrocarbon stream can be added to the defined stream based on the maximum sulfur concentration and a measured sulfur concentration of the defined stream, the second hydrocarbon stream, or the blended stream;

e) a sampler and a sulfur analyzer at a defined stream, second hydrocarbon stream or blended stream sampling point in electronic communication with the IPU, electronically configured to withdraw samples from the defined stream, second hydrocarbon stream or blended stream, measure the sulfur concentration of the defined stream, second hydrocarbon or blended stream, and transmit or make accessible the measured sulfur concentration to the IPU; and

f) a flow regulator interposed between the defined hydrocarbon and second hydrocarbon streams, in electronic communication with the IPU, electronically configured to receive or access the rate or ratio from the IPU and adjust the second flow rate without exceeding the ratio or rate;

wherein the defined hydrocarbon stream, the second hydrocarbon stream, and the blended stream comprise distillate; and

wherein the sampler is located on the blended stream downstream of the flow regulator, or the second hydrocarbon stream upstream of the flow regulator.

2. The system of claim 1 , wherein the sulfur concentration of the defined hydrocarbon stream is used to calculate the rate or ratio in addition to the sulfur concentration of the second hydrocarbon stream or the blended stream, and the sulfur concentration of the defined hydrocarbon stream is an assumed concentration accessible to the IPU.

3. The system of claim 1 , wherein the sulfur concentration of the defined hydrocarbon stream is also used to calculate the rate or ratio in addition to the sulfur concentration of the second hydrocarbon stream or the blended stream, and the sulfur concentration of the defined hydrocarbon stream is an actual concentration, further comprising a sampler and a sulfur analyzer in fluid communication with the defined hydrocarbon stream and in electronic communication with the IPU, electronically configured to withdraw samples from the defined hydrocarbon stream, measure the sulfur concentration of the defined hydrocarbon stream, and transmit or make accessible the sulfur concentration to the IPU.

4. The system of claim 1 , further comprising:

a) a transmix supply comprising the second hydrocarbon stream and a third hydrocarbon stream, wherein the second and third streams have different boiling points;

b) a hydrocarbon splitter in fluid communication with the transmix supply and the defined hydrocarbon stream, capable of splitting the second and third streams based on boiling point; and

c) piping exiting the splitter configured to direct the fractional transmix stream toward the flow regulator.

5. The system of claim 4 , further comprising piping exiting the splitter configured to direct the third stream toward a second system for blending off high sulfur hydrocarbons.

6. The system of claim 4 , further comprising:

a) an IPU on which is stored one or more limits on a physical property of the second hydrocarbon stream selected from octane, distillation temperature, Reid vapor pressure, molecular weight distributions, flash point, and API gravity, programmed to receive or access a measurement of the physical property of the second hydrocarbon stream, and generate a diversion signal when the measurement exceeds the limit on the physical property for the second hydrocarbon stream;

b) a sampler and analyzer in fluid communication with the second hydrocarbon stream and in electronic communication with IPU, electronically configured to withdraw samples periodically from the second hydrocarbon stream, measure the physical property, and transmit or make accessible the measurement to the IPU; and

c) a diversion valve on the piping, electronically configured to receive or access the diversion signal, and configured to return the second hydrocarbon stream to the hydrocarbon splitter in response to the diversion signal.

7. The system of claim 1 , wherein the second hydrocarbon stream has a sulfur concentration more than 150% greater than the sulfur concentration of the defined hydrocarbon stream.

8. The system of claim 1 , wherein the defined hydrocarbon and second hydrocarbon streams have substantially the same boiling point.

9. The system of claim 1 , wherein the defined hydrocarbon stream comprises low sulfur diesel and the second hydrocarbon stream comprises distillate transmix comprising aviation fuel.

10. A system for blending sulfur into a hydrocarbon stream without violating a pre-determined sulfur limit comprising:

a) a first hydrocarbon stream comprising a first sulfur concentration and a first flow rate;

b) a second hydrocarbon stream in fluid communication with the first stream, comprising a second sulfur concentration higher than the first sulfur concentration and a second flow rate;

c) a blended stream comprising all or a portion of the first and second hydrocarbon streams;

d) an IPU on which is stored a maximum sulfur concentration for the first stream, programmed to calculate a rate or ratio at which the second stream can be added to the first stream based on the maximum sulfur concentration and a measured sulfur concentration of the first hydrocarbon stream, the second hydrocarbon stream, or the blended stream;

e) a sulfur analyzer on the first stream, the second stream, or the blended stream, in electronic communication with the IPU, configured to measure a sulfur concentration, and transmit or make accessible the sulfur concentration to the IPU; and

f) a flow regulator interposed between the first and second hydrocarbon streams, in electronic communication with the IPU, electronically configured to receive or access the rate or ratio from the IPU and adjust the second flow rate without exceeding the rate or ratio.

11. The system of claim 10 , wherein the first hydrocarbon stream comprises gasoline and the second hydrocarbon stream comprises gasoline transmix.

12. The system of claim 10 , wherein the first stream comprises CBOB gasoline and the second hydrocarbon stream comprises gasoline transmix comprising RBOB.

13. The system of claim 10 , wherein the first and second hydrocarbon streams consist essentially of butane.

14. The system of claim 1 , wherein the sampler is located on the blended stream downstream of the flow regulator.

15. The system of claim 1 , wherein the sampler is located on the second hydrocarbon stream upstream of the flow regulator.

16. The system of claim 1 , wherein the sampler is located on the second hydrocarbon stream upstream of the flow regulator, further comprising a second sampler located on the blended stream downstream of the flow regulator, electronically configured to withdraw downstream samples from the defined hydrocarbon stream and transmit the downstream samples to a sulfur analyzer.

17. The system of claim 1 , wherein the sampler is located on the second hydrocarbon stream upstream of the flow regulator, further comprising a second sampler located on the blended stream downstream of the flow regulator, electronically configured to withdraw downstream samples from the blended stream and transmit the downstream samples to an analyzer for a physical property selected from octane, distillation temperature, Reid vapor pressure, molecular weight distributions, flash point, and API gravity.

Assignments (5)
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded May 13, 2024
From: ROBBINS, JOHN COLIN; WAWAK, GARY S
To: TEXON LP
Reel/Frame 067396/0589 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded May 13, 2024
From: TEXON DISTRIBUTING L.P. D/B/A TEXON L.P.
To: TEXON MIDSTREAM, LLC (F/K/A TEXON BLENDTECH, LLC)
Reel/Frame 067396/0603 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded May 7, 2024
From: TEXON DISTRIBUTING L.P. (D/B/A TEXON L.P.)
To: TEXON MIDSTREAM, LLC (F/K/A TEXON BLENDTECH, LLC)
Reel/Frame 067333/0110 →
SECURITY INTEREST Recorded May 2, 2024
From: TEXON MIDSTREAM, LLC
To: WELLS FARGO BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION
Reel/Frame 067299/0934 →
SECURITY INTEREST Recorded May 2, 2024
From: TEXON MIDSTREAM, LLC
To: MORGAN STANLEY SENIOR FUNDING, INC.
Reel/Frame 067300/0040 →
Continuity (4)
Continuation 16815496 · Mar 11, 2020
Provisional Application 62817081 · Mar 12, 2019
Provisional Application 62911285 · Oct 6, 2019
Related Publication 20230279304A1 · Sep 7, 2023
References Cited (131)
US 2246875A · Carney · 1941 [cited by applicant]
US 2297185A · Hollander et al. · 1942 [cited by applicant]
US 2722826A · Milligan et al. · 1955 [cited by applicant]
US 2937140A · Stinson · 1960 [cited by applicant]
US 3009789A · Jordan et al. · 1961 [cited by applicant]
US 3179291A · Umbach et al. · 1965 [cited by applicant]
US 3192473A · Marsh · 1965 [cited by applicant]
US 3342199A · McEvoy · 1967 [cited by applicant]
US 3385680A · Feld et al. · 1968 [cited by applicant]
US 3410293A · Ernyei · 1968 [cited by applicant]
US 3484590A · Stanton · 1969 [cited by applicant]
US 3751644A · Mayer · 1973 [cited by applicant]
US 3813925A · Fenske et al. · 1974 [cited by applicant]
US 3900391A · Merrill, Jr. · 1975 [cited by applicant]
US 3904508A · Whyte, Jr. et al. · 1975 [cited by applicant]
US 3999959A · Balek · 1976 [cited by applicant]
US 4268701A · Vu et al. · 1981 [cited by applicant]
US 4523928A · Hillman et al. · 1985 [cited by applicant]
US 4543819A · Chin et al. · 1985 [cited by applicant]
US 4867198A · Faust · 1989 [cited by applicant]
US 4876653A · McSpadden et al. · 1989 [cited by applicant]
US 4882041A · Scott · 1989 [cited by applicant]
US 4901559A · Grabner · 1990 [cited by applicant]
US 5004850A · Wilson · 1991 [cited by applicant]
US 5093533A · Wilson · 1992 [cited by applicant]
US 5133391A · Johansson et al. · 1992 [cited by applicant]
US 5163586A · Zinsmeyer · 1992 [cited by applicant]
US 5193594A · Johansson et al. · 1993 [cited by applicant]
US 5198597A · O'Young et al. · 1993 [cited by applicant]
US 5208402A · Wilson · 1993 [cited by applicant]
US 5271526A · Williams · 1993 [cited by applicant]
US 5344044A · Hayden · 1994 [cited by applicant]
US 5423607A · Jones et al. · 1995 [cited by applicant]
US 5430295A · Le Febre et al. · 1995 [cited by applicant]
US 5462650A · Takito et al. · 1995 [cited by applicant]
US 5484614A · Clem · 1996 [cited by examiner]
US 5542450A · King et al. · 1996 [cited by applicant]
US 5823669A · Jones · 1998 [cited by applicant]
US 5860457A · Andersson · 1999 [cited by applicant]
US 5975353A · Finlayson · 1999 [cited by applicant]
US 5979705A · Kaehler et al. · 1999 [cited by applicant]
US 6026991A · Matthews · 2000 [cited by applicant]
US 6109286A · Johnston · 2000 [cited by applicant]
US 6161060A · Collins · 2000 [cited by applicant]
US 6163738A · Miller · 2000 [cited by applicant]
US 6258987B1 · Schmidt et al. · 2001 [cited by applicant]
US 6328772B1 · Scott et al. · 2001 [cited by applicant]
US 6540797B1 · Scott et al. · 2003 [cited by applicant]
US 6679302B1 · Mattingly et al. · 2004 [cited by applicant]
US 7032629B1 · Mattingly et al. · 2006 [cited by applicant]
US 7631671B2 · Mattingly et al. · 2009 [cited by applicant]
US 8176951B2 · Mattingly et al. · 2012 [cited by applicant]
US 8192510B2 · Mattingly et al. · 2012 [cited by applicant]
US 8506656B1 · Turocy · 2013 [cited by applicant]
US 8597380B2 · Buchanan · 2013 [cited by applicant]
US 8748677B2 · Buchanan · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 9080111B1 · Huff et al. · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 11441088B2 · Robbins · 2022 [cited by examiner]
US 20050022446A1 · Brundage et al. · 2005 [cited by applicant]
US 20050058016A1 · Smith et al. · 2005 [cited by applicant]
US 20060074256A1 · Alasti · 2006 [cited by applicant]
US 20060213554A1 · Welch · 2006 [cited by applicant]
US 20060278304A1 · Mattingly et al. · 2006 [cited by applicant]
US 20070034550A1 · Hedrick · 2007 [cited by applicant]
US 20080000836A1 · Wang et al. · 2008 [cited by applicant]
US 20090000396A1 · Kawanishi · 2009 [cited by applicant]
US 20090316139A1 · Shrestha · 2009 [cited by applicant]
US 20100039884A1 · Weathers · 2010 [cited by applicant]
US 20100175313A1 · Mattingly et al. · 2010 [cited by applicant]
US 20100211329A1 · Farquharson · 2010 [cited by applicant]
US 20100313467A1 · Lake · 2010 [cited by applicant]
US 20120216453A1 · Mattingly et al. · 2012 [cited by applicant]
US 20130225883A1 · Mattingly · 2013 [cited by applicant]
US 20140229010A1 · Farquharson · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 20150053304A1 · Huwyler · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 20160068775A1 · Mattingly · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 20190359905A1 · Lanni · 2019 [cited by applicant]
WO 2010083077A1 · 2014 [cited by applicant]
WO 2017214058A1 · 2017 [cited by applicant]
WO WO2018017528A1 · 2018 [cited by examiner]
WO 2018148087A1 · 2018 [cited by applicant]
Kram J, No need to splashm Biodiesel Magazine (Jan. 17, 2006). [cited by applicant]
Multi-Stream Blender Description and Technical Specifications; Honeywell Enraf Americas Inc.; Mar. 2009 Honeywell International Inc. [cited by applicant]
International Search Report and Written Opinion issued in corresponding International Application No. PCT/US17/42509 on Oct. 12, 2017. [cited by applicant]
Office Action issued in corresponding Canadian Patent Application No. 2,936,755 on Sep. 8, 2017. [cited by applicant]
EPA Q & A Date Oct. 3, 1994, Abstract. [cited by applicant]
Vanderbur; Butane Supply and Blending Agreement MCE Blending LLC, Feb. 7, 2000. [cited by applicant]
Greenfield 00165, various letters, reports and receipts dated Dec. 6, 1993 through Mar. 8, 1994. [cited by applicant]
Greenfield 00101, various internal correspondence work orders, supply agreements, Aug. 19, 1993 through Apr. 18, 1995. [cited by applicant]
Greenfield 00001, various correspondence, reports and receipts; Notice of Hearing of Appeal, Zoning Appeal Board Order, Operating and Procedures Manual Apr. 27, 1993 through Dec. 14, 1993. [cited by applicant]
Correspondence from Director of Compliance Programs, US Department of Labor to President, Mid-Continent Company Inc.; Confirmation that mixing of liquefied butane, transferred by a CTMV, with gasoline stored in atmosphe… [cited by applicant]
Correspondence from MCE Blending to U.S. Department of Labor OSHA regarding Process Safety Management Program required by OSHA; Feb. 6, 1995. [cited by applicant]
Grabner Instruments, “About Vapor Pressure Testing,” from Grabner Instruments website, 2013. [cited by applicant]
Haskell, N.B. et al., Front-End Volatility of Gasoline Blend Industrial and Engineering Chemistry, vol. 34, No. 2, Feb. 1942, pp. 167-170. [cited by applicant]
Stewart, W.E., “Predict RVP of Blends Accurately,” Petroleum Refiner, vol. 38, No. 6, Jun. 1959, pp. 231-234. [cited by applicant]
Standard Test Method for Vapor Pressure of Petroleum Products (Reid Method); from Organic website (http://organic.ulsan.ac.kr/reid.html), 2013. [cited by applicant]
Vazquez-Esparragoza, J. et el., “How to Estimate Reid Vapor Pressure (RVP) of Blends,” Bryan Research & Engineering, Inc., website, Encyclopedia of Chemical Processing and Design, vol. 47, pp. 415-424; Hydrocarbon Proce… [cited by applicant]
Compliance Monitoring for Vapor Pressure or Vapor-Liquid Ratio Temperature, MiniVap On-line Petrolab Company website, 2013. [cited by applicant]
Spectro, “Sulfur Monitors and Analyzers for Fuels and Oils,” from Spectro website, 2013. [cited by applicant]
Sindie, “Sindie On-line Analyzer,” from Sindie website, 2013. [cited by applicant]
Reynolds, Robert E., “The Current Fuel Ethanol Industry Transportation, Marketing, Distribution, and Technical Considerations,” Downstream Alternatives Inc., May 15, 2000. [cited by applicant]
Monder, Dayadeep S., Real-Time Optimization of Gasoline Blending with Uncertain Parameters, University of Alberta, Spring 2001. [cited by applicant]
International Search Report and Written Opinion issued Mar. 5, 2010 in International Patent Application No. PCT/EP10/20207. [cited by applicant]
International Search Report and Written Opinion, dated May 2, 2014, which issued during the prosecution of International Patent Application No. PCT/US2013/038761, which corresponds to the present application. [cited by applicant]
International Search Report and Written Opinion, dated Jun. 10, 2014, which issued during the prosecution of International Patent Application No. PCT/US2013/069447, which corresponds to the present application. [cited by applicant]
Timothy R. Harbert; Automation Improvements in Batch Cutting Process: The Last Profit Center for Pipelines; American Society of Mechanical Engineers; 2008 7th International Pipeline Conference; Paper No. IPC2008-64392, … [cited by applicant]
Third Party Submission Under 37 CFR 1.290 Concise Description of Relevance for U.S. Appl. No. 15/430,274, filed Jun. 20, 2017. [cited by applicant]
Jones J.D et al., Hydrocarbon Processing (May 2000 Issue) pp. 85-89. [cited by applicant]
EPA Regulatory Announcement 420-F-06-039 (May 2006). [cited by applicant]
Thermo Scientific, SOLA® II Sulfur Online Analyzer (accessed at https://assets.thermofisher.com/TFS-Assets/LSG/Specification-Sheets/D10617˜.pdf on Jan. 17, 2018). [cited by applicant]
X-Ray Optical Systems, Sindie® On-Line Sulfur Analyzer (accessed at https://www.bartec.de/ProdCatalogue/Assets/Datasheets/Ing_0/Sindie_E.pdf on Jan. 17, 2018). [cited by applicant]
Jiskoot Quality Systems, In Line Blending Systems (accessed at http://www.jiskoot.com/files/1114/1691/7164/BB001_In_Line_Blending.pdf on Jan. 17, 2018. [cited by applicant]
Jiskoot Quality Systems, Ratio Blending Calculator (accessed at http://www.jiskoot.com/services/calculations/ratio-blending-index/ on Jan. 17, 2018). [cited by applicant]
International Search Report and Written Opinion issued in corresponding International Application No. PCT/ JS20/22000 on Jun. 9, 2020. [cited by applicant]
Applications,Gas Liquid Identification Analysis and Sampling, JP3 Measurement, LLC, 2020, Austin, TX, 6 pp. [cited by applicant]
Kumar, Devika Krishna and Hampton, Liz, Colonial Pipeline Plan to Cut off Dirty Jet Fuel Could Hit Airlines, Reuters, 2017, 33 pp. [cited by applicant]
United States Environmental Protection Agency, Regulatory Announcement, Refiner and Importer Quality Assurance Requirements for Downstream Oxygenate Blending and Requirements for Pipeline Interface, Office of Transporta… [cited by applicant]
Jiskoot Quality Systems, In-Line Blending Systems, Cameron International Corp, BB-001-1101-4, 2011, 8 pp. [cited by applicant]
Jiskoot Quality Systems, Ration Blending Calculator, Cameron International Corp, 2014, 2 pp. [cited by applicant]
Jones, et al., Use an Integrated Two-Tower Process to Separate Transmix, Increasing complexities and variations of fuels challenge distilling pipeline byproducts imto gasoline and diesel-fuel products, Reprinted from: H… [cited by applicant]
VeraSIGHT Optical Flow Cell, In-Line Multi-Stream Measurement of Hydrocarbon Composition, API Gravity, Vapor Pressure, BTU, and Other Properties in Natural Gas, NGL, Condensate, Crude Oil and Refined Products, JP3 Measu… [cited by applicant]
Verax SSG Analyzer, Single-Stream Measurement of Hydrocarbon Composition, BTU, Relative Density and Other Properties for Natural Gas, JP3 Measurement, LLC, Verax SSG Technical Specs, Mar. 2016, Austin, TX, 2 pp. [cited by applicant]
Verax SSL Analyzer, Single-Stream Analysis for Crude, Condensate, Natural Gas Liquids and Refined Products, JP3 Measurement, LLC, Verax SSL Technical Specs, Mar. 2018, Austin, TX, 2 pp. [cited by applicant]
Verax VPA, Vapor Pressure Analyzer (RVP, VPCRx, & TVP) for Crude Oil, Condensate, NGL, and Refined Fuels, JP3 Measurement, LLC, Nov. 2017, Austin, TX, 2 pp. [cited by applicant]
Pantoja et al, Application of Near-Infrared Spectroscopy to the Characterization of Petroleum, Analytical Characterization Methods for Crude Oil and Related Products, First Edition, John Wiley & Sons Ltd. Published 2018… [cited by applicant]
Sindie On Line, XOS, Sulfur Process Analyzer for Petroleum Fuels, X-Ray Optical Systems, Inc., 2007, New York, 4 op. [cited by applicant]
Thermo Schientific: Sola II Sulfur Online Analyzer, Thermo Fisher Scientific, 2015, 4 pp. [cited by applicant]
Auers, John R. et al., Economic and Supply Impacts of a Reduced Cap on Gasoline Sulfur Content, Prepared for the American Petroleum Institute by Turner, Mason & Company, Dallas, Feb. 2013, 52 pp. [cited by applicant]
Ultraclean Fuel considers that there are a number of specific market opportunities available to it that will suit the Ultrex® Process, Ultraclean Fuel Ltd., 2017 4 pp. [cited by applicant]
Verax SSG/SSL, Verax SSG and SSL are cost e ective single stream optical analyzers for the oil and gas industry, Verax SSG Spec Sheet, JP3 Measurement, LLC, Austin, TX,2020, 3 pp. [cited by applicant]
Verax VPA, Verax VPA™ is the first optical, online, real-time, vapor pressure analyzer for crude, condensate and NGL streams available to the Oil & Gas industry, JP3 Verax VPA Spec Sheet, JP3 Measurement, LLC, Austin, T… [cited by applicant]