IP Library Granted Patent US 12,538,915
Granted Patent B2
US 12,538,915 · App. 17/919,228 · Granted Feb 3, 2026

Image monitoring for control of invasive grasses

Inventors: Kevin Adam (Cary, NC); Brent Slone (Cary, NC)
Assignee: Discovery Purchaser Corporation
A01M7/0089A01B79/005A01M21/043A01N25/00
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 12,538,915
App. No.
17/919,228
Granted
Feb 3, 2026
Kind
B2
Abstract

The invention relates to weed mapping, monitoring and control, in particular to the mapping, monitoring and control of invasive annual grasses. A computer system comprises a receiving unit providing a processing unit with images of a geographical area, the images displaying the geographical area at points in time during a phenological cycle of a weed. At least two images depicting a weed at two different phenological stages may be used because two sequentially collected images are required in order to identify a characteristic temporal change. The processing unit analyzes the images to identify image areas showing a spectral signature characteristic of the weed. The processing unit identifies geographical sub-areas corresponding to the identified image areas and to create a weed distribution map with the identified geographical sub-areas marked as areas affected by the weed. The output unit is configured to output the map.

Claims (35)

1 . A computer system, the computer system comprising:

a receiving unit;

a processing unit; and

an output unit;

wherein the receiving unit is configured to provide the processing unit with at least two images of a geographical area, wherein the images display the geographical area at two or more points in time during a phenological cycle of a weed, including a first point in time and a second point in time, the first point in time being a time point at which the weed is at a first phenological stage and the second point in time being a time point at which the weed is at a second phenological stage;

wherein the processing unit is configured to analyze the images to identify one or more image area(s) in the images the image area(s) showing a spectral signature, wherein the spectral signature is characteristic of the weed at the two or more points in time during the phenological cycle of the weed, and wherein the spectral signature is caused by a transition of the weed from the first phenological stage into the second phenological stage;

wherein the processing unit is configured to identify one or more geographical subarea(s) corresponding to the identified image area(s);

wherein the processing unit is configured to create a weed distribution map of the geographical area on which the identified geographical subarea(s) is/are marked as (an) area(s) affected by the weed; and

wherein the output unit is configured to output the map.

2 . The computer system according to claim 1 , wherein the weed is a grass weed.

3 . The computer system according to claim 1 , wherein the weed is downy brome being in the phenological stage in which the color of the weed is purple, or the weed is ventenata being in the phenological stage in which the color of the weed is white with a silvery sheen, or the weed is medusahead being in the phenological stage in which the weed is strawcolored.

4 . The computer system according to claim 1 , wherein the weed is downy brome changing its color from green to purple or from purple to straw-color, or the weed is ventenata changing its color from green to white with a silvery sheen, or the weed is medusahead changing its color from green to straw-color.

5 . The computer system according to claim 1 , wherein the processing unit is configured to feed the at least two images into a classifier, and to receive, as an output from the classifier, information about one or more subareas showing the one or more graphical subareas infested by the weed.

6 . The computer system according to claim 1 , wherein the processing unit is configured to feed the at least two images into an-artificial neural network, and to receive, as an output from the artificial neural network, information about one or more subareas showing the one or more graphical subareas infested by the weed.

7 . The computer system according to claim 6 , wherein the artificial neural network comprises convolutional layers and feedback cycles.

8 . The computer system according to claim 1 , wherein the processing unit is configured to determine a degree of infestation of the identified geographical subarea.

9 . The computer system according to claim 1 wherein the processing unit is configured to determine a criticality score for the identified geographical subarea, the criticality score being representative of a risk of a fire outbreak caused by the identified geographical subarea.

10 . The computer system according to claim 1 , wherein the processing unit is configured to determine a criticality score for the identified geographical subarea, the criticality score being representative of a potential amount of damages caused by the identified geographical subarea.

11 . The computer system according to claim 1 , wherein the processing unit is configured to calculate a cost for treating the identified geographical subarea with a herbicide.

12 . The computer system according to claim 1 , wherein the processing unit is configured to generate a prescription map on the basis of the weed distribution map, wherein the prescription map displays areas to be treated with a herbicide.

13 . The computer system according to claim 12 , wherein the areas to be treated are selected on the basis of a criticality score and/or a cost for treating.

14 . A system for controlling weed, the system comprising;

an image acquisition unit, wherein the image acquisition unit is configured to collect at least two while the image acquisition unit is moved relative to a geographical area, wherein the images display the geographical area at two or more points in time during a phenological cycle of a weed, including a first point in time and a second point in time, the first point in time being a time point at which the weed is at a first phenological stage and the second point in time being a time point at which the weed is at a second phenological stage;

a spraying unit, comprising a receptable containing a herbicide for controlling a weed;

locomotion means for moving the image acquisition unit and the spraying unit relative to the geographical area; and

a processing unit configured to:

receive the at least two images from the image acquisition unit;

analyze the received and identify one or more areas in the images based on a spectral signature, the area(s) in the images showing geographical subareas, the geographical subareas being infested by the weed, wherein the spectral signature is characteristic of the weed at the two or more points in time during the phenological cycle of the weed, and wherein the spectral signature is caused by a transition of the weed from the first phenological stage into the second phenological stage; and

cause the spraying unit to apply the herbicide to the geographical subareas.

15 . A method for mapping a weed, the method comprising:

receiving at least two images of a geographical area, wherein the images display the geographical area at two or more points in time during a phenological cycle of a weed, including a first point in time and a second point in time, the first point in time being a time point at which the weed is at a first phenological stage and the second point in time being a time point at which the weed is at a second phenological stage;

analyzing the at least two and identifying one or more image area(s) in the at least two images, the image area(s) showing a spectral signature, wherein the spectral signature is characteristic of the weed at the two or more points in time during the phenological cycle of the weed, and wherein the spectral signature is caused by a transition of the weed from the first phenological stage into the second phenological stage;

identifying one or more geographical subareas, the geographical subarea(s) corresponding to the identified image area(s);

creating a weed distribution map of the geographical area on which the identified geographical subarea(s) is/are marked as (an) area(s) affected by the weed;

displaying the weed distribution map on a monitor and/or storing the map in a data storage and/or transmitting the map to a separate computer system.

Assignments (5)
FIRST LIEN PATENT SECURITY AGREEMENT SUPPLEMENT Recorded Sep 25, 2023
From: DISCOVERY PURCHASER CORPORATION
To: BANK OF MONTREAL
Reel/Frame 065021/0922 →
SECOND LIEN PATENT SECURITY AGREEMENT SUPPLEMENT Recorded Sep 25, 2023
From: DISCOVERY PURCHASER CORPORATION
To: BANK OF MONTREAL
Reel/Frame 065021/0929 →
ABL PATENT SHORT FORM SECURITY AGREEMENT SUPPLEMENT Recorded Sep 25, 2023
From: DISCOVERY PURCHASER CORPORATION
To: BARCLAYS BANK PLC
Reel/Frame 065021/0936 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Sep 20, 2023
From: BAYER CROPSCIENCE LP
To: DISCOVERY PURCHASER CORPORATION
Reel/Frame 064972/0981 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Jan 11, 2023
From: ADAM, KEVIN; SLONE, BRENT
To: BAYER CROPSCIENCE LP
Reel/Frame 062356/0021 →
Continuity (2)
Provisional Application 63011955 · Apr 17, 2020
Related Publication 20230165235A1 · Jun 1, 2023
References Cited (29)
US 8855937B2 · Lindores · 2014 [cited by examiner]
US 9058633B2 · Lindores · 2015 [cited by examiner]
US 11304355B2 · Noivirt-Brik · 2022 [cited by examiner]
US 11373288B2 · Peters · 2022 [cited by examiner]
US 20180336460A1 · Tschemezki · 2018 [cited by examiner]
US 20190174740A1 · Lambert · 2019 [cited by examiner]
WO WO2018142371 · 2018 [cited by applicant]
WO WO2019081375 · 2019 [cited by applicant]
WO WO2019226869 · 2019 [cited by applicant]
Peña JM, Torres-Sánchez J, de Castro Al, Kelly M, López-Granados F (2013) Weed Mapping in Early-Season Maize Fields Using Object-Based Analysis of Unmanned Aerial Vehicle (UAV) Images. PLOS ONE 8(10): e77151. https://do… [cited by examiner]
I. Sa et al., “weedNet: Dense Semantic Weed Classification Using Multispectral Images and MAV for Smart Farming,” in IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters, vol. 3, No. 1, pp. 588-595, Jan. 2018, doi: 10.1109/LRA.2017.277… [cited by examiner]
Malmstrom CM, Butterfield HS, Planck L, Long CW, Eviner VT (2017) Novel fine-scale aerial mapping approach quantifies grassland weed cover dynamics and response to management. PLOS ONE 12(10): e0181665. https://doi.org/… [cited by examiner]
Sa, Inkyu et al., “weedNet: Dense Semantic Weed Classification Using Multispectral Images and MAV for Smart Farming” IEE Robotics and Automation Letters, vol. 3, No. 1, Jan. 1, 2018. (8 pages). [cited by applicant]
Ghedass, F. et al., “An improved classification of hyperspectral imaging based on spectral signature and Gray Level Co-occurrence Matrix” Proceedings of the Spatial Analysis and GEOmatrics conference, 2015. (14 pages). [cited by applicant]
Aghdam, Hamed Habibi & Heravi, Elnaz Jahani, “Guide to Convolutional Neural Networks: A Practical Application to Traffic-Sign Detection and Classification” (303 pages). [cited by applicant]
Chen, Y. et al., “A Spectral Signature Shape-Based Algorithm for Landsat Image Classification” International Journal of Geo-Information, 2016. (16 pages). [cited by applicant]
Ji, S. et al., “3D Convolutional Neural Networks for Human Action Recognition” IEEE Transactions On Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, vol. 35 No. 1, Jan. 2013. (11 pages). [cited by applicant]
Liu, Yu Han, “Feature Extraction and Image Recognition with Convolutional Neural Networks” First International Conference on Advanced Algorithms and Control Engineering, 2018. (8 pages). [cited by applicant]
Gerhards, Dr. R., “Evaluation of weed populations under the influence of site-specific weed control to derive decision rules for a sustainable weed management” 2008. (86 pages). [cited by applicant]
Pakhira, Malay K., “Digital Image Processing and Pattern Recognition” PHI Learning Private Limited, Delhi, 2014. (11 pages). [cited by applicant]
Khan, S. et al., “A Guide to Convolutional Neural Networks for Computer Vision” Synthesis Lectures On Computer Vision, Lecture #15, Jan. 2018. (15 pages). [cited by applicant]
Klemmedson, James O. & Smith, Justin G., “Cheatgrass ( [cited by applicant]
Leondes, Cornelius T., “Image Processing and Pattern Recognition” Neural Network Systems Techniques and Applications, vol. 5, 1998. (407 pages). [cited by applicant]
Shih, Frank Y., “Image Processing and Pattern Recognition: Fundamentals and techniques” IEEE Press, 2010. (30 pages). [cited by applicant]
Meier, Uwe, “Growth stages of mono- and dicotyledonous plants: BBCH Monograph” Julius Kuhn Institut, 2018. (204 pages). [cited by applicant]
Duong et al., “Spectral signatures in landsat 8 oli image and their interpretation for land cover study” Institute of Geography, Vietnam Academy o Science and Technology, Jan. 2014. (10 pages). [cited by applicant]
Simonyan, K. & Zisserman, A., “Two-Stream Convolutional Networks for Action Recognition in Videos” NeurIPS Proceedings, NIPS, 2014. (9 pages). [cited by applicant]
Karpathy, A. et al., “Large-scale Video Classification with Convolutional Neural Networks” IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, 2014. (8 pages). [cited by applicant]
Baccouche, M. et al., “Sequential Deep Learning for Human Action Recognition” Lecutre Notices in Computer Science, LNIP vol. 7065, pp. 29-39, 2011. (11 pages). [cited by applicant]