Powering a surgical robot arm
A control system for a surgical robotic system, the surgical robotic system comprising a remote surgeon console having a surgeon input device, and a surgical robot arm comprising a series of joints extending from a base to a terminal end for attaching to a surgical instrument, the surgical robot arm operable in a full power mode in which the joints of the surgical robot arm are powered by a first power source and a reduced power mode in which the joints of the surgical robot arm are powered by a second power source, the control system configured to: whilst the surgical robot arm is operating in the full power mode, control the surgical robot arm in a surgical mode by converting movements of the surgeon input device to control signals for moving joints of the surgical robot arm; detect a power failure of the first power source; in response to detecting the power failure, enable the reduced power mode, and transition control of the surgical robot arm from the surgical mode to a standby mode; whilst in the reduced power mode, receive a command from a user input located on or adjacent to the surgical robot arm or on the surgeon console; and in response to receiving the command, transition control of the surgical robot arm from the standby mode to a calibration mode.
1. A control system for a surgical robotic system, the surgical robotic system comprising a remote surgeon console having a surgeon input device, and a surgical robot arm comprising a series of joints extending from a base to a terminal end for attaching to a surgical instrument, the surgical robot arm operable in a full power mode in which the joints of the surgical robot arm are powered by a first power source and a reduced power mode in which the joints of the surgical robot arm are powered by a second power source, the control system configured to:
whilst the surgical robot arm is operating in the full power mode, control the surgical robot arm in a surgical mode by converting movements of the surgeon input device to control signals for moving joints of the surgical robot arm;
detect a power failure of the first power source;
in response to detecting the power failure, enable the reduced power mode, and transition control of the surgical robot arm from the surgical mode to a standby mode;
whilst in the reduced power mode, receive a command from a user input located on or adjacent to the surgical robot arm or on the surgeon console; and
in response to receiving the command, transition control of the surgical robot arm from the standby mode to a calibration mode.
2. A control system as claimed in claim 1 , configured to, in the calibration mode, not convert movements of the surgeon input device to control signals for moving joints of the surgical robot arm.
3. A control system as claimed in claim 1 , configured to, in the calibration mode:
detect an external force applied to the surgical robot arm; and
send control signals to the surgical robot arm for moving one or more joints of the surgical robot arm to conform with the detected external force.
4. A control system as claimed in claim 1 , configured to, in response to receiving the command from the user input:
determine whether there is greater than a threshold battery capacity available from the second power source; and
only transition control of the surgical robot arm from the standby mode to the calibration mode on determining that there is greater than the threshold battery capacity available from the second power source.
5. A control system as claimed in claim 4 , configured to maintain the surgical robot arm in the standby mode on determining that there is less than the threshold battery capacity available from the second power source.
6. A control system as claimed in claim 1 , configured to, in response to receiving the command from the user input:
determine whether the surgical instrument is attached to the surgical robot arm and is located in a patient's body; and
transition control of the surgical robot arm from the standby mode to the calibration mode on determining that there is no surgical instrument attached to the surgical robot arm that is located in the patient's body.
7. A control system as claimed in claim 6 , configured to maintain the surgical robot arm in the standby mode on determining that the surgical instrument is located in the patient's body.
8. A control system as claimed in claim 1 , wherein the surgical robot arm is mounted on a support structure, and the user input located on or adjacent to the surgical robot arm is located on the support structure.
9. A control system as claimed in claim 1 , configured to:
whilst the surgical robot arm is operating in the full power mode, control the surgical robot arm in a further mode in which the control system constrains motion of the surgical robot arm so as to maintain an intersection between the surgical instrument and a stored fulcrum;
detect a power failure of the first power source;
in response to detecting the power failure, enable the reduced power mode, and transition control of the surgical robot arm from the further mode to the standby mode;
whilst in the reduced power mode, receive a command from the user input located on or adjacent to the surgical robot arm; and
in response to receiving the command, transition control of the surgical robot arm from the standby mode to the calibration mode.
10. A control system as claimed in claim 9 , wherein the further mode is an instrument adjust mode in which the control system is configured to control the surgical robot arm to conform with a detected external force applied to the surgical robot arm.
11. A control system as claimed in claim 9 , wherein the further mode is an instrument change mode in which the control system is configured to control the surgical robot arm to conform with the component of a detected external force lying along the longitudinal axis of the surgical instrument.
12. A control system as claimed in claim 9 , wherein the further mode is a locked mode in which the control system is configured to hold the joints of the surgical robot arm in position against gravity.
13. A control system as claimed in claim 9 , wherein the stored fulcrum is a point about which the surgical instrument pivots when the configuration of the surgical robot arm is altered whilst the surgical instrument is inside a port in a patient's body.
14. A control system as claimed in claim 1 , wherein the first power source is a mains power supply.
15. A control system as claimed in claim 14 , wherein the mains power supply is provided to the surgical robot arm via the remote surgeon console.
16. A control system as claimed in claim 1 , wherein the second power source comprises a battery.
17. A control system as claimed in claim 16 , wherein the battery is rechargeable.
18. A control system as claimed in claim 16 , wherein the second power source comprises a further battery, wherein the further battery is non-rechargeable.
19. A control system as claimed in claim 1 , wherein the control system comprises a robot arm controller configured to detect power failures, detect restoration of power following a power failure, and enable and disable the full power mode and the reduced power mode.
20. A control system as claimed in claim 1 , wherein the standby mode is a locked mode in which control signals are sent to the joints of the surgical robot arm to hold the joints of the surgical robot arm locked in place.