IP Library Granted Patent US 12,364,551
Granted Patent B2
US 12,364,551 · App. 17/923,041 · Granted Jul 22, 2025

Measurement guided resurfacing during robotic resection

Inventor: Steve Henderson (Fremont, CA)
Assignee: CUREXO, INC.
A61B34/30A61B17/14A61B34/10A61B2034/104A61B2034/107
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 12,364,551
App. No.
17/923,041
Granted
Jul 22, 2025
Kind
B2
Abstract

A surgical system is provided for robotically resecting tissue. The system includes a surgical robot with an end-effector configured to remove tissue along a path up to a planned boundary. A computing system interfaces with the surgical robot and includes one or more processors, non-transient storage memory, and software executable instructions. The computing system records deviations between the end-effector and the planned boundary while the end-effector removes tissue along the path during a first pass. The system then determines if the end-effector should perform a subsequent pass along at least a portion of the path based on the recorded deviations. A method for robotically resecting tissue along a path up to a planned boundary is also provided that determined on the recorded deviations, if the end-effector should perform a subsequent pass along at least a portion of the path.

Claims (31)

1. A surgical system for resecting tissue, the system comprising:

a surgical robot comprising an end-effector configured to remove a tissue at planned end-effector position; and

a computing system comprising one or more processors configured to:

record an end-effector position to generate a recorded end-effector position while the end-effector removes a tissue at the recorded end-effector position;

determine a deviation between the recorded end-effector position and the planned end-effector position; and

compare the deviation against pre-defined criteria,

wherein, when the deviation meets or exceeds the pre-defined criteria, the computing system is further configured to:

instruct the surgical robot to revisit a passed region previously passed by the end-effector; and

remove a tissue with the end-effector at a location adjacent to the recorded end-effector position so that the end-effector resurfaces the tissue of the passed region,

wherein the end-effector is operated with first operating conditions while removing the tissue at the recorded end-effector position and second operating conditions while removing the tissue at the location adjacent to the recorded end-effector position to resurface the tissue of the passed region, and

wherein the first operating conditions are different from the second operating conditions in a speed of the end-effector, a direction of motion by the end-effector or an offset in the recorded end-effector position.

2. The system of claim 1 , wherein the pre-defined criteria comprise (i) a maximum deviation; (ii) a mean deviation; or (iii) a threshold deviation.

3. The system of claim 1 , wherein the computing system is further configured to receive user input before the surgical robot is instructed to the passed region previously passed by the end-effector.

4. The system of claim 1 , wherein the computing system is further configured to determine a cumulative deviation between at least a portion of the recorded end-effector position and at least a portion of the planned end-effector position and compare the cumulative deviation to the pre-defined criteria.

5. The system of claim 1 , wherein the pre-defined criteria comprise (i) a maximum cumulative error; (ii) a mean cumulative error; (iii) a threshold error; or (iv) a standard deviation threshold.

6. The system of claim 1 , wherein the computing system is further configured to determine a first cumulative deviation for a recorded end-effector position in a first region and a second cumulative deviation for a recorded end-effector position in a second region and compare the first cumulative deviation and the second cumulative deviation to the pre-defined criteria.

7. The system of claim 6 , wherein the computing system is further configured to instruct the surgical robot to remove a tissue with the end-effector at a location adjacent to the recorded end-effector position in the first region or the second region if the first cumulative deviation or the second cumulative deviation meets or exceeds the pre-defined criteria.

8. The system of claim 7 , wherein the computing system is further configured to receive user input before the surgical robot is instructed to remove the tissue with the end-effector at the location adjacent to the recorded end-effector position in the first region or the second region.

9. A method for resecting tissue with a surgical robot comprising an end-effector, the method comprising:

recording an end-effector position to generate a recorded end-effector position while the end-effector removes a tissue at the recorded end-effector position;

determining a deviation between the recorded end-effector position and a planned end-effector position; and

comparing the deviation against pre-defined criteria,

wherein, when the deviation meets or exceeds the pre-defined criteria, the surgical robot is instructed to revisit a passed region previously passed by the end-effector and to remove a tissue with the end-effector at a location adjacent to the recorded end-effector position so that the end-effector resurfaces the tissue of the passed region,

wherein the end-effector is operated with first operating conditions while removing the tissue at the recorded end-effector position and second operating conditions while removing the tissue at the location adjacent to the recorded end-effector position to resurface the tissue of the passed region, and

wherein the first operating conditions are different from the second operating conditions in a speed of the end-effector, a direction of motion by the end-effector or an offset in the recorded end-effector position.

10. The method of claim 9 , wherein the pre-defined criteria comprises (i) a maximum deviation; (ii) a mean deviation; or (iii) a threshold deviation.

11. The method of claim 9 , further comprising determining a cumulative deviation between at least a portion of the recorded end-effector position and at least a portion of the planned end-effector position and comparing the cumulative deviation to the pre-defined criteria.

12. The method of claim 11 , wherein the pre-defined criteria comprises (i) a maximum cumulative error; (ii) a mean cumulative error; (iii) a threshold error; or (iv) a standard deviation threshold.

13. The method of claim 11 , further comprising:

determining a first cumulative deviation for a recorded end-effector position in a first region and a second cumulative deviation for a recorded end-effector position in a second region and comparing the first cumulative deviation and the second cumulative deviation to the pre-defined criteria.

14. The method of claim 13 , further comprising instructing the surgical robot to remove a tissue with the end-effector at a location adjacent to the recorded end-effector position in the first region or the second region if the first cumulative deviation or the second cumulative deviation meets or exceeds the pre-defined criteria.

Assignments (2)
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Feb 24, 2025
From: HENDERSON, STEVE
To: THINK SURGICAL INC.
Reel/Frame 070301/0293 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Jan 20, 2025
From: THINK SURGICAL, INC.
To: CUREXO, INC.
Reel/Frame 069956/0850 →
Continuity (2)
Provisional Application 63022731 · May 11, 2020
Related Publication 20230157773A1 · May 25, 2023
References Cited (12)
US 9770300B2 · Kwon · 2017 [cited by examiner]
US 20110060345A1 · Lee · 2011 [cited by examiner]
US 20120143084A1 · Shoham · 2012 [cited by applicant]
US 20150297177A1 · Boctor · 2015 [cited by examiner]
US 20170239006A1 · Crawford · 2017 [cited by examiner]
US 20180064499A1 · Itkowitz · 2018 [cited by examiner]
US 20190365481A1 · Otto · 2019 [cited by examiner]
US 20210059777A1 · Overmyer · 2021 [cited by examiner]
EP 3510927A1 · 2019 [cited by applicant]
WO 2012136223A1 · 2012 [cited by applicant]
WO 2019032828A2 · 2019 [cited by applicant]
Int'l Search Report for PCT/US2021/031703, dated Aug. 26, 2021. [cited by applicant]