IP Library Granted Patent US 12,641,030
Granted Patent B2
US 12,641,030 · App. 17/928,504 · Granted May 26, 2026

Systems and methods for data transmission across unreliable connections

Inventors: George Richard Jones (Waterloo, CA); Imad Azzam (Waterloo, CA); David Pui Keung Sze (Waterloo, CA); Jonathon Oberholzer (Waterloo, CA)
Assignee: DEJERO LABS INC.
H04L47/2483H04L1/189H04L43/0805H04L41/0893
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 12,641,030
App. No.
17/928,504
Granted
May 26, 2026
Kind
B2
Abstract

An improved data packet communications approach is described that is adapted for communications across unreliable connections. In particular, the approach can be implemented as systems and methods for a networked router device configured to monitor communication characteristics and to group the connections into various tiers based on their communication reliability data. When a new packet is to be communicated, the grouped connections are utilized in aggregate to meet a target transmission reliability probability (e.g., target value or a band of values).

Claims (37)

1 . A network router computing device, the device comprising:

a processor coupled to computer memory and data storage, the processor configured to:

receive one or more data sets indicative of monitored network communications characteristics;

maintain, in a data structure stored on the data storage, a tiered representation of a plurality of connections segregated into a plurality of groups, each group established based at least on a minimum probability associated with a successful communication of a data packet across one or more connections of the plurality of connections residing within the group; and

control a plurality of communications of a data packet such that the data packet is sent at least once across one or more connections of the plurality of connections such that, in aggregate, the plurality of communications cause the transmission of the data packet to satisfy a target probability threshold;

wherein the plurality of groups are organized into a plurality of corresponding tiers, each tier representing a number of times the data packet would have to be transmitted across any corresponding connections of the tier to achieve the target probability threshold; and

wherein the plurality of communications include re-transmissions across connections of a tier of the plurality of tiers, wherein a number of re-transmissions are based on the number of times the data packet would have to be transmitted across corresponding connections of the tier to achieve the target probability threshold for the corresponding tier.

2 . The network router computing device of claim 1 , wherein the re-transmissions are conducted across different connections of the tier.

3 . The network router computing device of claim 1 , wherein the plurality of communications includes re-transmissions across connections of different tiers of the plurality of tiers.

4 . The network router computing device of claim 1 , wherein an additional group is an indeterminate group established for connections that do not have sufficient data for assessing reliability, or an additional group is an unreliable group established for connections that are indicated as below a threshold reliability for data communication.

5 . The network router computing device of claim 4 , wherein membership of the indeterminate group or the unreliable group is periodically modified to classify connections into the plurality of groups.

6 . The network router computing device of claim 4 , wherein connections of the plurality of groups is periodically monitored to shift membership into the indeterminate group or the unreliable group where connection data is stale or indicative of increased unreliability.

7 . The network router computing device of claim 4 , wherein the indeterminate group is utilized for the communications of a data packet using assigned reliability probabilities.

8 . The network router computing device of claim 7 , wherein the assigned reliability probabilities are periodically adjusted based on the monitored network communications characteristics.

9 . The network router computing device of claim 4 , wherein the connections for which a number of transmits or retransmits were required were greater than a threshold are transferred into the indeterminate group or the unreliable group.

10 . The network router computing device of claim 1 , wherein the processor is configured to maintain one or more state machines for classifying each connection of the plurality of connections.

11 . A method for network communications, the method comprising:

receiving one or more data sets indicative of monitored network communications characteristics;

maintaining, in a data structure stored on the data storage, a tiered representation of a plurality of connections segregated into a plurality of groups, each group established based at least on a minimum probability associated with a successful communication of a data packet across one or more connections of the plurality of connections residing within the group; and

controlling a plurality of communications of a data packet such that the data packet is sent at least once across one or more connections of the plurality of connections such that, in aggregate, the plurality of communications cause the transmission of the data packet to satisfy a target probability threshold;

wherein the plurality of groups are organized into a plurality of corresponding tiers, each tier representing a number of times the data packet would have to be transmitted across any corresponding connections of the tier to achieve the target probability threshold; and

wherein the plurality of communications include re-transmissions across connections of a tier of the plurality of tiers, wherein a number of re-transmissions are based on the number of times the data packet would have to be transmitted across corresponding connections of the tier to achieve the target probability threshold for the corresponding tier.

12 . The method of claim 11 , wherein the re-transmissions are conducted across different connections of the tier.

13 . The method of claim 11 , wherein the plurality of communications includes re-transmissions across connections of different tiers of the plurality of tiers.

14 . The method of claim 11 , wherein an additional group is an indeterminate group established for connections that do not have sufficient data for assessing reliability, or an additional group is an unreliable group established for connections that are indicated as below a threshold reliability for data communication.

15 . The method of claim 14 , wherein the method further comprises periodically transmitting data packets across connections in the indeterminate group or the unreliable group, and wherein the periodic transmission of the data packets incorporates a backoff timer to reduce an overall system inefficiency.

16 . The method of claim 14 , wherein membership of the indeterminate group or the unreliable group is periodically modified to classify connections into the plurality of groups.

17 . The method of claim 14 , wherein connections of the plurality of groups is periodically monitored to shift membership into the indeterminate group or the unreliable group where connection data is stale or indicative of increased unreliability.

18 . The method of claim 14 , wherein the indeterminate group is utilized for the communications of a data packet using assigned reliability probabilities.

19 . The method of claim 18 , wherein the assigned reliability probabilities are periodically adjusted based on the monitored network communications characteristics.

20 . The method of claim 14 , wherein the connections for which a number of transmits or retransmits were required were greater than a threshold are transferred into the indeterminate group or the unreliable group.

21 . A non-transitory computer readable medium storing non-transitory instructions, which when executed by a processor, cause the processor to perform a method comprising:

receiving one or more data sets indicative of monitored network communications characteristics;

maintaining, in a data structure stored on the data storage, a tiered representation of a plurality of connections segregated into a plurality of groups, each group established based at least on a minimum probability associated with a successful communication of a data packet across one or more connections of the plurality of connections residing within the group; and

controlling a plurality of communications of a data packet such that the data packet is sent at least once across one or more connections of the plurality of connections such that, in aggregate, the plurality of communications cause the transmission of the data packet to satisfy a target probability threshold;

wherein the plurality of groups are organized into a plurality of corresponding tiers, each tier representing a number of times the data packet would have to be transmitted across any corresponding connections of the tier to achieve the target probability threshold; and

wherein the plurality of communications include re-transmissions across connections of a tier of the plurality of tiers, wherein a number of re-transmissions are based on the number of times the data packet would have to be transmitted across corresponding connections of the tier to achieve the target probability threshold for the corresponding tier.

Assignments (2)
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Jan 26, 2026
From: JONES, GEORGE RICHARD; AZZAM, IMAD; SZE, DAVID PUI KEUNG; OBERHOLZER, JONATHON
To: DEJERO LABS INC.
Reel/Frame 073577/0589 →
SECURITY INTEREST Recorded Dec 16, 2025
From: DEJERO LABS INC.
To: COMERICA BANK
Reel/Frame 073235/0146 →
Continuity (2)
Provisional Application 63032180 · May 29, 2020
Related Publication 20230208571A1 · Jun 29, 2023
References Cited (18)
US 11902018B2 · Del Carpio Vega · 2024 [cited by examiner]
US 20090147678A1 · Xhafa · 2009 [cited by examiner]
US 20120224484A1 · Babiarz et al. · 2012 [cited by applicant]
US 20140160939A1 · Arad · 2014 [cited by examiner]
US 20150223098A1 · Sze et al. · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 20150281288A1 · Levinson · 2015 [cited by examiner]
US 20190268219A1 · Haapanen · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 20200098251A1 · Laselva · 2020 [cited by examiner]
US 20250385872A1 · Chung · 2025 [cited by examiner]
JP 2020502948A · 2020 [cited by applicant]
WO 2018112657A1 · 2018 [cited by applicant]
WO 2018112657A · 2018 [cited by applicant]
WO 2020024046A1 · 2020 [cited by applicant]
Canadian Intellectual Property Office (CIPO), International Search Report and Written Opinion to PCT/CA2021/050732, Aug. 6, 2021. [cited by applicant]
European Patent Office, European Search Report issued to EP 21813832.9, May 13, 2024. [cited by applicant]
Canadian Intellectual Property Office, Examiner's Requisition issued to CA 3,178,286, May 6, 2024. [cited by applicant]
Japanese Patent Office, Office Action issued to JP 2022-572327, dated Feb. 27, 2025. [cited by applicant]
IP Australia, Examination Report No. 1, issued in AU2021279111, dated Jun. 12, 2025. [cited by applicant]