IP Library Patent Application 17934678
Patent Application
App. No. 17/934,678

SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR OPTIMIZING TRANSACTION CONVERSION RATE USING MACHINE LEARNING

Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US None
App. No.
17/934,678
Abstract

A method for optimizing transaction authorization conversion rates using machine learning includes retrieving payment transaction parameters and authorization results for a plurality of past payment transactions from a database, generating a transaction success model comprising authorization success factors for each of a plurality of payment transaction parameters using a machine learning training phase based on the retrieved payment transaction parameters and authorization results, receiving, at an acquirer processor, a payment transaction from a merchant, modifying one or more parameters of the payment transaction according to the generated transaction success model, and submitting the modified payment transaction to a financial institution for processing.

Claims (64)

1 - 20 . (canceled)

21 . A computer-implemented method for optimizing authorization transaction conversion rates, comprising:

receiving a request for authorization of a transaction from a user device;

determining patterns of acceptance or denial of the request based, at least in part, on processing of transaction parameters and authorization results for a plurality of past transactions from a dataset;

inputting the determined patterns into a machine learning model to generate a transaction success model, wherein the transaction success model includes authorization success factors for a plurality of transactions;

applying, by the machine learning model, the transaction success model to the request and re-format one or more parameters associated with the request; and

transmitting the re-formatted request to a service provider for authorization of the transaction.

22 . The computer-implemented method of claim 21 , wherein generating the transaction success model, further comprises:

processing, by the machine learning model, the plurality of past transactions in the dataset to tune the transaction success model;

determining, by the machine learning model, the transaction success model provides an improvement in the transaction conversion rates; and

applying, by the machine learning model, the transaction success model to the parameters of the request based, at least in part, on the determination.

23 . The computer-implemented method of claim 21 , further comprising:

determining an inclusion, an exclusion, or an alteration of the one or more parameters associated with the request results in an improvement or a decrease in rate of transaction authorization.

24 . The computer-implemented method of claim 21 , further comprising:

automatically calibrating optimization factors of the transaction success model through analysis of the authorization success factors, one or more transaction scenarios, and issuer negative results.

25 . The computer-implemented method of claim 21 , further comprising:

determining, by the machine learning model, transaction request with tokens, encrypted information, or a combination thereof improves probability of transaction authorization; and

re-formatting, by the machine learning model, the one or more parameters associated with the request to include a token, an encrypted authorization credentials, or a combination thereof.

26 . The computer-implemented method of claim 21 , further comprising:

determining, by the machine learning model, at least one network with a higher probability of transaction authorization; and

selecting, by the machine learning model, the at least one network for transmitting the re-formatted request to the service provider for transaction authorization.

27 . The computer-implemented method of claim 21 , further comprising:

receiving a transaction authorization result for the re-formatted request from the service provider; and

adding the transaction authorization result and the parameters of the re-formatted request to the dataset, wherein the transaction authorization result and the parameters are utilized for subsequent transactions.

28 . The computer-implemented method of claim 21 , wherein the one or more parameters associated with the request are re-formatted in batches, in a queue of the requests, in real-time, or asynchronously.

29 . The computer-implemented method of claim 21 , wherein the dataset includes an authorization result that indicates a specific combination of the transaction parameters that resulted in authorization of the request and a reason response code.

30 . The computer-implemented method of claim 21 , wherein the transaction parameters include one or more of a billing address, a card verification value (CVV), a payment processing network, a payment vehicle expiration date, a payment vehicle issuer token, and a merchant classification code (MCC).

31 . A system for optimizing authorization transaction conversion rates, comprising:

one or more processors; and

at least one non-transitory computer readable medium storing instructions which, when executed by the one or more processors, cause the one or more processors to perform operations comprising:

receiving a request for authorization of a transaction from a user device;

determining patterns of acceptance or denial of the request based, at least in part, on processing of transaction parameters and authorization results for a plurality of past transactions from a dataset;

inputting the determined patterns into a machine learning model to generate a transaction success model, wherein the transaction success model includes authorization success factors for a plurality of transactions;

applying, by the machine learning model, the transaction success model to the request and re-format one or more parameters associated with the request; and

transmitting the re-formatted request to a service provider for authorization of the transaction.

32 . The system of claim 31 , wherein generating the transaction success model, further comprises:

processing, by the machine learning model, the plurality of past transactions in the dataset to tune the transaction success model;

determining, by the machine learning model, the transaction success model provides an improvement in the transaction conversion rates; and

applying, by the machine learning model, the transaction success model to the parameters of the request based, at least in part, on the determination.

33 . The system of claim 31 , further comprising:

determining an inclusion, an exclusion, or an alteration of the one or more parameters associated with the request results in an improvement or a decrease in rate of transaction authorization.

34 . The system of claim 31 , further comprising:

automatically calibrating optimization factors of the transaction success model through analysis of the authorization success factors, one or more transaction scenarios, and issuer negative results.

35 . The system of claim 31 , further comprising:

determining, by the machine learning model, transaction request with tokens, encrypted information, or a combination thereof improves probability of transaction authorization; and

re-formatting, by the machine learning model, the one or more parameters associated with the request to include a token, an encrypted authorization credentials, or a combination thereof.

36 . The system of claim 31 , further comprising:

determining, by the machine learning model, at least one network with a higher probability of transaction authorization; and

selecting, by the machine learning model, the at least one network for transmitting the re-formatted request to the service provider for transaction authorization.

37 . The system of claim 31 , further comprising:

receiving a transaction authorization result for the re-formatted request from the service provider; and

adding the transaction authorization result and the parameters of the re-formatted request to the dataset, wherein the transaction authorization result and the parameters are utilized for subsequent transactions.

38 . A non-transitory computer readable medium for optimizing authorization transaction conversion rates, the non-transitory computer readable medium storing instructions which, when executed by one or more processors, cause the one or more processors to perform operations comprising:

receiving a request for authorization of a transaction from a user device;

determining patterns of acceptance or denial of the request based, at least in part, on processing of transaction parameters and authorization results for a plurality of past transactions from a dataset;

inputting the determined patterns into a machine learning model to generate a transaction success model, wherein the transaction success model includes authorization success factors for a plurality of transactions;

applying, by the machine learning model, the transaction success model to the request and re-format one or more parameters associated with the request; and

transmitting the re-formatted request to a service provider for authorization of the transaction.

39 . The non-transitory computer readable medium of claim 38 , wherein generating the transaction success model, further comprises:

processing, by the machine learning model, the plurality of past transactions in the dataset to tune the transaction success model;

determining, by the machine learning model, the transaction success model provides an improvement in the transaction conversion rates; and

applying, by the machine learning model, the transaction success model to the parameters of the request based, at least in part, on the determination.

40 . The non-transitory computer readable medium of claim 38 , further comprising:

determining an inclusion, an exclusion, or an alteration of the one or more parameters associated with the request results in an improvement or a decrease in rate of transaction authorization.

Assignments (6)
RELEASE OF SECURITY INTERESTS RECORDED AT REEL/FRAMES 066626/0655, 066625/0426, 066625/0347, AND 066625/0276 Recorded Jan 12, 2026
From: WILMINGTON TRUST, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, AS NOTES COLLATERAL AGENT
To: WORLDPAY, LLC; WORLDPAY ISO AND ECOMMERCE, LLC; PAYMETRIC, LLC; WORLDPAY US, LLC
Reel/Frame 074314/0622 →
RELEASE OF SECURITY INTEREST IN INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RECORDED AT R/F 066624/0719 Recorded Jan 12, 2026
From: JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A., AS COLLATERAL AGENT
To: WORLDPAY, LLC
Reel/Frame 074315/0412 →
SECURITY INTEREST Recorded Feb 19, 2024
From: WORLDPAY, LLC
To: JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A., AS COLLATERAL AGENT
Reel/Frame 066624/0719 →
SECURITY INTEREST Recorded Feb 19, 2024
From: WORLDPAY, LLC
To: WILMINGTON TRUST, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, AS NOTES COLLATERAL AGENT
Reel/Frame 066626/0655 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Sep 23, 2022
From: COHN, WILLIAM H.; SHABEER, SAYID; CANNING, NED
To: VANTIV, LLC
Reel/Frame 061194/0542 →
CHANGE OF NAME Recorded Sep 23, 2022
From: VANTIV, LLC
To: WORLDPAY, LLC
Reel/Frame 061535/0335 →