IP Library Granted Patent US 12,596,094
Granted Patent B2
US 12,596,094 · App. 17/937,797 · Granted Apr 7, 2026

Methods, systems, and computer readable media for making base calls in nucleic acid sequencing

Inventors: Marcin Sikora (Burlingame, CA); Melville Davey (Westbrook, CT); Christian Koller (San Francisco, CA); Simon Cawley (Oakland, CA); Alan Williams (Albany, CA); David Kulp (Shelburne Falls, MA)
Assignee: Life Technologies Corporation
G01N27/4145C12Q1/6869G16B30/00G16B30/10C12Q2535/122C12Q2565/607G01N27/27G16B30/20
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 12,596,094
App. No.
17/937,797
Granted
Apr 7, 2026
Kind
B2
Abstract

A method for nucleic acid sequencing includes receiving a plurality of observed or measured signals indicative of a parameter observed or measured for a plurality of defined spaces; determining, for at least some of the defined spaces, whether the defined space comprises one or more sample nucleic acids; processing, for at least some of the defined spaces, the observed or measured signal to improve a quality of the observed or measured signal; generating, for at least some of the defined spaces, a set of candidate sequences of bases for the defined space using one or more metrics adapted to associate a score or penalty to the candidate sequences of bases; and selecting the candidate sequence leading to a highest score or a lowest penalty as corresponding to the correct sequence for the one or more sample nucleic acids in the defined space.

Claims (38)

1 . A system, comprising:

a machine-readable memory; and

a processor configured to execute machine-readable instructions, which, when executed by the processor, cause the system to perform steps including:

for each of a plurality of defined spaces of a chip or substrate, wherein each defined space is in communication with a respective sensor and wherein at least some of the defined spaces comprise one or more sample nucleic acids, receiving, from the respective sensor for each defined space, an observed or measured signal indicative of a parameter observed or measured for the defined space in response to a nucleotide flow to the defined space, to provide a measured signal value representative of a non-incorporation or an incorporation of a base corresponding to the nucleotide flow by the sample nucleic acid in the defined space, wherein each defined space is a space in which at least some of a molecule, fluid, and/or a solid can be confined, retained and/or localized, wherein the plurality of defined spaces comprises at least 100,000 defined spaces;

generating, for the defined spaces comprising one or more sample nucleic acids, a set of candidate sequences of bases for the one or more sample nucleic acids of the defined space, including generating a data structure comprising a set of partial paths corresponding to candidate sequences undergoing an expansion in a stepwise manner one base at a time:

generating a set of predicted signal values for the set of candidate sequences based on a simulation framework for modeling responses by an active polymerase associated with the sample nucleic acid to a series of nucleotide flows, wherein the simulation framework includes possible states, state transitions and state transition parameters, wherein a first state of the possible states represents a non-incorporation of a particular base at a particular flow of the series of nucleotide flows and a second state of the possible states represents an incorporation of the particular base at the particular flow by the active polymerase associated with the sample nucleic acid;

applying one or more metrics adapted to associate a score or a penalty to each of the candidate sequences of bases, wherein at least one of the metrics depends on a residual between the measured signal value and the predicted signal value generated by the simulation framework, wherein the residual comprises a difference between the predicted signal value and the measured signal value; and

selecting from the set of candidate sequences of bases the candidate sequence

leading to a highest score or a lowest penalty as corresponding to a correct sequence for the one or more sample nucleic acids in the defined space.

2 . The system of claim 1 , wherein the step of generating the data structure comprises determining a distance between the predicted signal value for each partial path and the measured signal value.

3 . The system of claim 2 , wherein the one or more metrics comprise a metric that is a function of the distance between the predicted signal value for each partial path and the measured signal value.

4 . The system of claim 2 , wherein the one or more metrics comprise a metric comprising a sum of squared distances between corresponding values of the predicted signal value for each partial path and the measured signal value.

5 . The system of claim 1 , wherein the one or more metrics comprise a path metric comprising a sum of (i) a sum of squared residuals before an active window and (ii) a sum of squared residuals for negative residuals within the active window.

6 . The system of claim 1 , wherein the one or more metrics comprise a greedy decision metric comprising a sum of (i) a product of an empirical constant and a sum of squared residuals for negative residuals within an active window and (ii) a sum of squared residuals for positive residuals within the active window but only before an in-phase flow.

7 . The system of claim 1 , wherein the one or more metrics comprise a path metric, a greedy decision metric, and a per-flow metric, and wherein the per-flow metric comprises a weighted sum of (i) the path metric and (ii) the greedy decision metric.

8 . The system of claim 1 , wherein the one or more metrics comprise a scaled residual comprising a ratio between (i) a difference between a measured signal value for a current path at a current in-phase flow and a predicted signal value from a parent path at the current in-phase flow and (ii) a difference between a predicted signal value of the current path at the current in-phase flow and the predicted signal value from the parent path at the current in-phase flow.

9 . The system of claim 1 , wherein the one or more metrics comprise a total residual comprising a sum of squared residuals over all nucleotide flows.

10 . The system of claim 1 , wherein the step of generating the data structure comprises pruning the data structure using one or more absolute pruning rules selected from the group comprising: (i) discarding paths having a path metric larger than a best total residual metric, (ii) discarding paths having reached a last nucleotide flow, (iii) discarding paths for which a greedy decision metric exceeds a greedy penalty maximal threshold, (iv) discarding paths for which a polymerase activity is below a polymerase activity minimal threshold, (v) discarding paths including more than a threshold number of homopolymers having at least a threshold length in a row, (vi) discarding paths having a scaled residual metric below a first scaled residual minimal threshold, (vii) discarding paths having a scaled residual below a second scaled residual minimal threshold that is larger than the first scaled residual minimal threshold, and (viii) discarding paths having a greedy decision metric that exceeds the greedy decision metric for a best greedy expansion by more than a maximal threshold.

11 . The system of claim 1 , wherein the step of generating the data structure comprises pruning the data structure using one or more relative pruning rules selected from the group comprising: (i) discarding paths being more than a certain number of base pairs shorter than a longest path in the data structure, and (ii) discarding paths having a highest per-flow metric whenever the number of paths exceeds a certain threshold.

12 . The system of claim 1 , wherein the state transition parameters of the simulation framework comprise state transition parameters for the possible states of the active polymerase corresponding to a K-th base during an N-th nucleotide flow of the series of nucleotide flows, where K and N denote indices associated with the bases and the nucleotide flows.

13 . The system of claim 12 , wherein the simulation framework comprises first and second state transition parameters for the first and second states, respectively, for situations where the K-th base matches the N-th nucleotide flow, wherein (i) the first state transition parameter represents a proportion of the active polymerase that will remain active and not incorporate base K in flow N and (ii) the second state transition parameter represents a proportion of the active polymerase that will remain active and incorporate base K in flow N.

14 . The system of claim 13 , wherein the simulation framework further comprises:

determining the first state transition parameter by calculating a product of (i) a measure of a quantity of the active polymerase prior to a transition to the first state and (ii) a first transition factor [IER x(1−DR)]; and

determining the second state transition parameter by calculating a product of (i) the measure of the quantity of the active polymerase prior to a transition to the second state and (ii) a second transition factor [(1−IER)×(1−DR)],

where IER represents an incomplete extension rate and DR represents a droop rate.

15 . The system of claim 12 , wherein the simulation framework comprises first and second state transition parameters for the first and second states, respectively, for situations where the K-th base does not match the N-th flow, wherein (i) the first state transition parameter represents a proportion of the active polymerase that will remain active and not incorporate base K in flow N and (ii) the second state transition parameter represents a proportion of the active polymerase that will remain active and incorporate base K in flow N.

16 . The system of claim 15 , wherein the simulation framework further comprises:

determining the first state transition parameter by calculating a product of (i) a measure of a quantity of the active polymerase prior to a transition to the first state and (ii) a first transition factor [(1−CFR1)+(CFR″×IER×(1−DR))]; and

determining the second state transition parameter by calculating a product of (i) the measure of the quantity of the active polymerase prior to a transition to the second state and (ii) a second transition factor [CFR M ×(1−IER)×(1−DR)],

where IER represents an incomplete extension rate, DR represents a droop rate, CFR represents a carry forward rate, and M is a smallest number such that an (N−M) flow matches the K-th base.

17 . A method for nucleic acid sequence identification, comprising:

obtaining information corresponding to a plurality of observed or measured nucleotide incorporation events for one or more sample nucleic acid sequences, wherein the observed or measured nucleotide incorporation events are obtained from a plurality of defined spaces of a chip or substrate in response to a nucleotide flow to the defined spaces, wherein each defined space is in communication with a respective sensor and wherein at least some of the defined spaces comprise the one or more sample nucleic acids, wherein each defined space is a space in which at least some of a molecule, fluid, and/or a solid can be confined, retained and/or localized, wherein the plurality of defined spaces comprises at least 100,000 defined spaces;

developing a plurality of predicted modelings of the observed or measured nucleotide incorporation events;

comparing the plurality of predicted modelings to at least one of the observed or measured nucleotide incorporation events; and

identifying at least a portion of the nucleic acid sequence on a basis of which predicted modeling is most similar to the observed or measured nucleotide incorporation events, the portion covering at least two consecutive bases called together as a whole.

18 . The method of claim 17 , wherein the comparing step applies a multi-element traversal to compare the predicted modelings to the observed or measured nucleotide incorporation events.

19 . The method of claim 18 , wherein the multi-element traversal comprises a tree-based search.

20 . The method of claim 18 , wherein the multi-element traversal includes one or more metrics to compare the predicted modelings to the observed or measured nucleotide incorporation events, the identifying step further comprising determining a path through the multi-element traversal having a best fit using the one or more metrics to determine which of the predicted modelings is most similar to the observed or measured nucleotide incorporation events.

Assignments (1)
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Dec 27, 2022
From: SIKORA, MARCIN; DAVEY, MELVILLE; KOLLER, CHRISTIAN; CAWLEY, SIMON; WILLIAMS, ALAN; KULP, DAVID
To: LIFE TECHNOLOGIES CORPORATION
Reel/Frame 062211/0309 →
Continuity (7)
Continuation 16196502 · Nov 20, 2018
Continuation 13588408 · Aug 17, 2012
Continuation In Part PCTUS2011067959 · Dec 29, 2011
Continuation In Part 13340490 · Dec 29, 2011
Provisional Application 61525073 · Aug 18, 2011
Provisional Application 61428733 · Dec 30, 2010
Related Publication 20230194464A1 · Jun 22, 2023
References Cited (190)
US 4683195A · Mullis et al. · 1987 [cited by applicant]
US 4683202A · Mullis · 1987 [cited by applicant]
US 4800159A · Mullis et al. · 1989 [cited by applicant]
US 4965188A · Mullis et al. · 1990 [cited by applicant]
US 5210015A · Gelfand et al. · 1993 [cited by applicant]
US 5399491A · Kacian et al. · 1995 [cited by applicant]
US 5587128A · Wilding et al. · 1996 [cited by applicant]
US 5750341A · Macevicz · 1998 [cited by applicant]
US 5854033A · Lizardi · 1998 [cited by applicant]
US 6033546A · Ramsey · 2000 [cited by applicant]
US 6054034A · Soane et al. · 2000 [cited by applicant]
US 6174670B1 · Wittwer et al. · 2001 [cited by applicant]
US 6210891B1 · Nyren et al. · 2001 [cited by applicant]
US 6258568B1 · Nyren · 2001 [cited by applicant]
US 6274320B1 · Rothberg et al. · 2001 [cited by applicant]
US 6399952B1 · Maher et al. · 2002 [cited by applicant]
US 6404907B1 · Gilchrist et al. · 2002 [cited by applicant]
US 6554987B1 · Gilchrist et al. · 2003 [cited by applicant]
US 6613525B2 · Nelson et al. · 2003 [cited by applicant]
US 6780591B2 · Williams et al. · 2004 [cited by applicant]
US 6828100B1 · Ronaghi · 2004 [cited by applicant]
US 6833246B2 · Balasubramanian · 2004 [cited by applicant]
US 6911327B2 · McMillan et al. · 2005 [cited by applicant]
US 6960437B2 · Enzelberger et al. · 2005 [cited by applicant]
US 7037687B2 · Williams et al. · 2006 [cited by applicant]
US 7049645B2 · Sawada et al. · 2006 [cited by applicant]
US 7133782B2 · Odedra · 2006 [cited by applicant]
US 7211390B2 · Rothberg et al. · 2007 [cited by applicant]
US 7244559B2 · Rothberg et al. · 2007 [cited by applicant]
US 7264929B2 · Rothberg et al. · 2007 [cited by applicant]
US 7323305B2 · Leamon et al. · 2008 [cited by applicant]
US 7335762B2 · Rothberg et al. · 2008 [cited by applicant]
US 7348181B2 · Walt et al. · 2008 [cited by applicant]
US 7424371B2 · Kamentsky · 2008 [cited by applicant]
US 7535232B2 · Barbaro et al. · 2009 [cited by applicant]
US 7575865B2 · Leamon et al. · 2009 [cited by applicant]
US 7645596B2 · Williams et al. · 2010 [cited by applicant]
US 7782237B2 · Ronaghi et al. · 2010 [cited by applicant]
US 7785862B2 · Kim et al. · 2010 [cited by applicant]
US 7835871B2 · Kain et al. · 2010 [cited by applicant]
US 7875440B2 · Williams et al. · 2011 [cited by applicant]
US 7948015B2 · Rothberg et al. · 2011 [cited by applicant]
US 8594951B2 · Homer · 2013 [cited by applicant]
US 9388462B1 · Eltoukhy · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 20030219797A1 · Zhao et al. · 2003 [cited by applicant]
US 20040018506A1 · Koehler et al. · 2004 [cited by applicant]
US 20040197793A1 · Hassibi et al. · 2004 [cited by applicant]
US 20040197845A1 · Hassibi et al. · 2004 [cited by applicant]
US 20050084851A1 · Ronaghi et al. · 2005 [cited by applicant]
US 20060040297A1 · Leamon et al. · 2006 [cited by applicant]
US 20060147935A1 · Linnarsson · 2006 [cited by applicant]
US 20060147983A1 · O'Uchi · 2006 [cited by applicant]
US 20070059733A1 · Sundararajan et al. · 2007 [cited by applicant]
US 20070059741A1 · Kamahori et al. · 2007 [cited by applicant]
US 20070092872A1 · Rothberg et al. · 2007 [cited by applicant]
US 20070207471A1 · Osaka et al. · 2007 [cited by applicant]
US 20070219367A1 · Shchepinov et al. · 2007 [cited by applicant]
US 20070281300A1 · Russell et al. · 2007 [cited by applicant]
US 20080166727A1 · Esfandyarpour et al. · 2008 [cited by applicant]
US 20080182757A1 · Heiner et al. · 2008 [cited by applicant]
US 20080286762A1 · Miyahara et al. · 2008 [cited by applicant]
US 20080286767A1 · Miyahara et al. · 2008 [cited by applicant]
US 20090024331A1 · Tomaney et al. · 2009 [cited by applicant]
US 20090026082A1 · Rothberg et al. · 2009 [cited by applicant]
US 20090053724A1 · Roth et al. · 2009 [cited by applicant]
US 20090105959A1 · Braverman et al. · 2009 [cited by applicant]
US 20090127589A1 · Rothberg et al. · 2009 [cited by applicant]
US 20090137404A1 · Drmanac et al. · 2009 [cited by applicant]
US 20090176200A1 · Wakita et al. · 2009 [cited by applicant]
US 20100035252A1 · Rothberg et al. · 2010 [cited by applicant]
US 20100075327A1 · Maxham et al. · 2010 [cited by applicant]
US 20100088255A1 · Mann · 2010 [cited by applicant]
US 20100105052A1 · Drmanac et al. · 2010 [cited by applicant]
US 20100137143A1 · Rothberg et al. · 2010 [cited by applicant]
US 20100159461A1 · Toumazou et al. · 2010 [cited by applicant]
US 20100160172A1 · Erlich et al. · 2010 [cited by applicant]
US 20100173303A1 · Ronaghi et al. · 2010 [cited by applicant]
US 20100188073A1 · Rothberg et al. · 2010 [cited by applicant]
US 20100192032A1 · Chen et al. · 2010 [cited by applicant]
US 20100197507A1 · Rothberg et al. · 2010 [cited by applicant]
US 20100199155A1 · Kermani et al. · 2010 [cited by applicant]
US 20100209922A1 · Williams et al. · 2010 [cited by applicant]
US 20100267043A1 · Braverman et al. · 2010 [cited by applicant]
US 20100282617A1 · Rothberg et al. · 2010 [cited by applicant]
US 20100300559A1 · Schultz et al. · 2010 [cited by applicant]
US 20100300895A1 · Nobile et al. · 2010 [cited by applicant]
US 20100301398A1 · Rothberg et al. · 2010 [cited by applicant]
US 20100304447A1 · Harris · 2010 [cited by applicant]
US 20100323348A1 · Hamady et al. · 2010 [cited by applicant]
US 20100323350A1 · Gordon et al. · 2010 [cited by applicant]
US 20110183320A1 · Flusberg et al. · 2011 [cited by applicant]
US 20110213563A1 · Chen et al. · 2011 [cited by applicant]
US 20110230358A1 · Rava · 2011 [cited by applicant]
US 20110246084A1 · Ronaghi et al. · 2011 [cited by applicant]
US 20110256631A1 · Tomaney et al. · 2011 [cited by applicant]
US 20110257889A1 · Klammer et al. · 2011 [cited by applicant]
US 20110263463A1 · Rothberg et al. · 2011 [cited by applicant]
US 20110275522A1 · Rothberg et al. · 2011 [cited by applicant]
US 20110281737A1 · Rothberg et al. · 2011 [cited by applicant]
US 20110281741A1 · Rothberg et al. · 2011 [cited by applicant]
US 20110287945A1 · Rothberg et al. · 2011 [cited by applicant]
US 20110294115A1 · Williams et al. · 2011 [cited by applicant]
US 20120035062A1 · Schultz et al. · 2012 [cited by applicant]
US 20120037961A1 · Rothberg et al. · 2012 [cited by applicant]
US 20120040844A1 · Rothberg et al. · 2012 [cited by applicant]
US 20120109598A1 · Davey et al. · 2012 [cited by applicant]
US 20120172241A1 · Rearick et al. · 2012 [cited by applicant]
US 20120173158A1 · Hubbell · 2012 [cited by applicant]
US 20120173159A1 · Davey et al. · 2012 [cited by applicant]
US 20120197623A1 · Homer · 2012 [cited by applicant]
US 20130060482A1 · Sikora et al. · 2013 [cited by applicant]
US 20130090860A1 · Sikora et al. · 2013 [cited by applicant]
US 20140220558A1 · Homer et al. · 2014 [cited by applicant]
GB 2461127A · 2009 [cited by applicant]
JP H04262799A · 1992 [cited by applicant]
WO WO1999019717A1 · 1999 [cited by applicant]
WO WO9957321A1 · 1999 [cited by applicant]
WO WO0220837A2 · 2002 [cited by applicant]
WO WO2002024322A2 · 2002 [cited by applicant]
WO WO03020895A2 · 2003 [cited by applicant]
WO WO2004001015A2 · 2003 [cited by applicant]
WO WO2005040425A2 · 2005 [cited by applicant]
WO WO2007098049A2 · 2007 [cited by applicant]
WO WO2008076406A2 · 2008 [cited by applicant]
WO WO2008092150A1 · 2008 [cited by applicant]
WO WO2008092155A2 · 2008 [cited by applicant]
WO WO2009117119A1 · 2009 [cited by applicant]
WO WO2009158006A2 · 2009 [cited by applicant]
WO WO2010047804A1 · 2010 [cited by applicant]
WO WO2010077859A2 · 2010 [cited by applicant]
WO WO2010117804A2 · 2010 [cited by applicant]
WO WO2010138182A2 · 2010 [cited by applicant]
WO WO2011120964A1 · 2011 [cited by applicant]
WO WO2011156707A2 · 2011 [cited by applicant]
WO WO2012058459A2 · 2012 [cited by applicant]
WO WO2012092515A2 · 2012 [cited by applicant]
U.S. Appl. No. 13/339,753, “Time-Warped Background Signal for Sequencing-by-Synthesis Operations”, US Application filed Dec. 29, 2011. [cited by applicant]
U.S. Appl. No. 13/339,846, “Models for Analyzing Data From Sequencing-by-Synthesis Operations”, US Application filed Dec. 29, 2011. [cited by applicant]
U.S. Appl. No. 13/588,408, “Methods, Systems, and Computer Readable Media for Making Base Calls in Nucleic Acid Sequencing” US Application filed Aug. 17, 2012. [cited by applicant]
“454 Sequencing System Software Manual Version 2.6,” Part B : GS Run Processor, GS Reporter, GS Run Browser, GS Support Tool, May 2011,112 pages, retrieved at http://genepool.bio.ed.ac.uk/Gene_Pool/454_software/Manuals/… [cited by applicant]
Ahmadian A., et al., “Pyrosequencing: History, Biochemistry And Future,” Clinica Chimica Acta, Jan. 2006, vol. 363, pp. 3-94. [cited by applicant]
Anderson E.P., et al., “A System For Multiplexed Direct Electrical Detection Of DNA Synthesis,” Sensors and actuators. B, Chemical, Jan. 2008, vol. 129, No. 1, pp. 79-86. [cited by applicant]
Appendix to the Specification of U.S. Appl. No. 61/198,222, filed Nov. 4, 2008, 50 pages. [cited by applicant]
Baldi P., et al., “Machine-Learning Foundations: The Probabilistic Framework,” Chapter 2, Bioinformatics: The Machine Learning Approach, Second Edition, The MIT Press, 2001, pp. 47-65. [cited by applicant]
Balzer S., et al., “Characteristics Of 454 Pyrosequencing Data-enabling Realistic Simulation With Flowsim,” Bioinformatics, Sep. 15, 2010, vol. 26, No. 18, pp. i420-I425. [cited by applicant]
Barbaro M., et al., “Fully Electronic DNA Hybridization Detection by a Standard CMOS Biochip,” Sensors and Actuators B: Chemical, 2006, vol. 118, pp. 41-46. [cited by applicant]
Brockman W., et al., “Quality Scores And Snp Detection In Sequencing-by-synthesis Systems,” Genome Research, May 2008, vol. 18, No. 5, pp. 763-770. [cited by applicant]
Eltoukhy H., et al., “Modeling and Base-Calling for DNA Sequencing-By-Synthesis,” IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing, May 2006, vol. 2, pp. II-1032-II-1035. [cited by applicant]
EP12823719.5, Extended European Search Report mailed Sep. 25, 2015, 12 pp. [cited by applicant]
EP12823719.5, Partial European Search Report mailed May 12, 2015, 3 pages. [cited by applicant]
EP19181402.9, Extended Search Report, Feb. 19, 2020, 8 pages. [cited by applicant]
Finotello F., et al., “Comparative Analysis Of Algorithms For Whole-Genome Assembly Of Pyrosequencing Data,” Briefings in Bioinformatics Advance Access, Oct. 21, 2011, pp. 1-12. [cited by applicant]
Hammond P.A., et al., “Design of a Single-Chip pH Sensor Using a Conventional 0.6-μm CMOS Process,” IEEE Sensors Journal, Dec. 2004, vol. 4, No. 6, pp. 706-712. [cited by applicant]
Heer F., et al., “Single-chip Microelectronic System To Interface With Living Cells,” Biosensors and Bioelectronics, May 15, 2007, vol. 22, No. 11, pp. 2546-2553. [cited by applicant]
Hert D.G., et aL, “Advantages And Limitations Of Next-generation Sequencing Technologies: A Comparison Of Electrophoresis And Non-electrophoresis Methods,” Electroghoresis, Dec. 2008, vol. 29, No. 23, pp. 4618-4626. [cited by applicant]
Hizawa T., et aL, “Fabrication Of a Two-dimensional pH Image Sensor Using A Charge Transfer Technique,” Sensors and Actuators B: Chemical, Oct. 2006, vol. 117, No. 2, pp. 509-515. [cited by applicant]
Hughes R.C., et al., “Chemical Microsensors,” Science, Oct. 4, 1991, vol. 254, pp. 74-80. [cited by applicant]
Huse S.M., et aL, “Accuracy and Quality of Massively Parallel DNA Pyrosequencing,” Genome Biology, 2007, vol. 8 (7), Article R143, pp. R143.1-R143.9. [cited by applicant]
Ji Y., et aL, “BM-BC: A Bayesian Method of base Calling for Solexa Sequence Data,” Department of Biostatistics, The University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, U.S.A, 2010, pp. 1-27, URL: http://od… [cited by applicant]
Kao W.-C., et al., “BayesCall: A Model-Based Base-Calling Algorithm for High-Throughput Short-Read Sequencing,” Genome Research, Oct. 2009, vol. 19, No. 10, pp. 1884-1895. [cited by applicant]
Langaee T., et al., “Genetic Variation Analyses By Pyrosequencing,” Mutation Research, Jun. 3, 2005, vol. 573, pp. 96-102. [cited by applicant]
Leamon J.H., et al., “Cramming More Sequencing Reactions onto Microreactor Chips,” Chemical Reviews, Aug. 2007, vol. 107, No. 8, pp. 3367-3376. [cited by applicant]
Ledergerber C., et al., “Base-calling For Next-generation Sequencing Platforms,” Briefings in Bioinformatics Advance Access, Jan. 18, 2011, vol. 12, No. 5, pp. 489-497. [cited by applicant]
Li, Heng et al., “Fast and accurate long-read alignment with Burrows-Wheeler transform”, Bioinformatics, vol. 26 No. 5, 2010, 589-595. [cited by applicant]
Li, Heng et al., “Fast and accurate short read alignment with Burrows-Wheeler transform”, Bioinformatics, vol. 25 No. 14, 2009, 1754-1760. [cited by applicant]
Li, Heng “Exploring single-sample SNP and INDEL calling with whole-genome de novo assembly”, Bioinformatics, 28, 14:May 7, 2012, pp. 1838-1844. [cited by applicant]
Lysholm F., et aL, “FAAST: Flow-Space Assisted Alignment Search Tool,” BMC Bioinformatics, Jul. 19, 2011, vol. 12, 7 Pages, Retrieved from the Internet: URL: http://www. biomedcentral.co m/1471-2105/12/293. [cited by applicant]
Margulies et al., “Supplemental Materials, Genome Sequencing in Microfabricated High-Density Picolitre Reactors”, Nature, vol. 437, No. 15, 2005, pp. 1-34. [cited by applicant]
Margulies M., et al., “Genome Sequencing in Microfabricated High-Density Picolitre Reactors,” Nature, 2005, vol. 437, No. 7057, pp. 376-380. [cited by applicant]
Martinoia S., et al., “Development of ISFET Array-Based Microsystems for Bioelectrochemical Measurements of Cell Populations,” Biosensors & Bioelectronics, Dec. 2001, vol. 16, Nos. 9-12, pp. 1043-1050. [cited by applicant]
Massingham T., et al., “All Your Base: A Fast And Accurate Probabilistic Approach to Base Calling,” Euroclean Bioinformatics Institute, Wellcome Trust Genome Cam12us, Hinxton, Cambridgeshire, UK, Oct. 26, 2011, pp. 1-26… [cited by applicant]
Metzker M.L., “Emerging Technologies In DNA Sequencing,” Genome Research, Dec. 2005, vol. 15, pp. 1767-1776. [cited by applicant]
Milgrew M. J., et aL, “The Development of Scalable Sensor Arrays Using Standard CMOS Technology,” Sensors and Actuators B: Chemical, Sep. 2004, vol. 103, Nos. 1-2, pp. 37-42. [cited by applicant]
MilgrewM.J., et al., “A Large Transistor-based Sensor Array Chip for Direct Extracellular Imaging,” Sensors and Actuators B: Chemical, 2005, vol. 111-112, pp. 347-353. [cited by applicant]
Mir M., et al., “Integrated Electrochemical DNA Biosensors For Lab-on-a-chip Devices,” Electrophoresis, Oct. 2009, vol. 30, No. 19, pp. 3386-3397. [cited by applicant]
Ning, Zemin et al., “SSAHA: A Fast Search Method for Large DNA Databases”, Genome Res., 11:, 2001, 1725-1729. [cited by applicant]
PCT/US2011/067959, International Search Report and Written Opinion mailed on Nov. 16, 2012. [cited by applicant]
PCT/US2012/051361, International Preliminary Report on Patentability mailed Feb. 27, 14, 10 pages. [cited by applicant]
PCT/US2012/051361, International Search Report and Written Opinion mailed on Oct. 23, 2012. [cited by applicant]
Pourmand N., et aL, “Direct Electrical Detection of DNA Synthesis,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Apr. 25, 2006, vol. 103, No. 17, pp. 6466-6470. [cited by applicant]
Ronaghi M., et aL, “A Sequencing Method Based on Real-Time Pyrophosphate,” Science, Jul. 17, 1998, vol. 281, pp. 363-365. [cited by applicant]
Ronaghi M., et al., “Pyrosequencing Sheds Light on DNA Sequencing,” Genome Research, Jan. 2001, vol. 11, pp. 3-11. [cited by applicant]
Smith, T. F. et al., “Identification of Common Molecular Subsequences”, Journal of Molecular Biology, 147, 10:, 1981, 195-197. [cited by applicant]
Specification & Drawings of U.S. Appl. No. 61/198,222, filed Nov. 4, 2008. [cited by applicant]
Svantesson A., et aL, “A Mathematical Model Of The Pyrosequencing Reaction System,” Biophysical Chemistry, Jul. 1, 2004, vol. 100, pp. 129-145. [cited by applicant]
Trojanowicz M., et al., “Recent Developments In Electrochemical Flow Detections—a Review: Part I. Flow Analysis And Capillary Electrophoresis,” Analytica Chimica Acta, Oct. 19, 2009, vol. 653, No. 1, pp. 36-58. [cited by applicant]
U.S. Appl. No. 13/588,408, Non-Final Office Action mailed May 7, 2015, 14 pages. [cited by applicant]
U.S. Appl. No. 13/645,058, Non-Final Office Action mailed Jun. 4, 2015, 7 pages. [cited by applicant]
Xu X., et al., “Integration Of Electrochemistry In Micro-total Analysis Systems For Biochemical Assays: Recent Developments,” Talanta, Nov. 15, 2009, vol. 80, No. 1, pp. 8-18. [cited by applicant]
Yeowt.C.W., et al., “A Very Large Integrated pH-ISFET Sensor Array Chip Compatible with Standard CMOS Processes,” Sensor and Actuators B: Chemical, Oct. 1997, vol. 44, Nos. 1-3, pp. 434-440. [cited by applicant]