IP Library Granted Patent US 12,495,727
Granted Patent B2
US 12,495,727 · App. 17/939,451 · Granted Dec 16, 2025

System and method for controlling the operation of an agricultural implement

Inventor: Brittany Schroeder (Bunker Hill, IN)
Assignee: CNH Industrial America LLC
A01B79/005A01B63/004G05D1/0214G05D1/0231G06V10/761G06V20/188A01B35/16
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 12,495,727
App. No.
17/939,451
Granted
Dec 16, 2025
Kind
B2
Abstract

An agricultural implement includes a computing system is configured to identify a plurality of residue pieces present within the portion of the field based on the image data generated by the imaging device. Furthermore, the computing system is configured to determine a number of residue pieces having a length within a first length range and a number of residue pieces of the identified plurality of residue pieces having a length within a second length range. Additionally, the computing system is configured to determine a characteristic length range for the portion of the field, with the characteristic length range corresponding to one of the first length range or the second length range having the greatest number of residue pieces associated therewith. Moreover, the computing system is configured to provide a notification associated with the determined characteristic length range to an operator of the agricultural implement.

Claims (43)

1 . An agricultural implement, comprising:

a frame;

a ground-engaging tool supported on the frame, the ground-engaging tool configured to perform an operation on a field as the agricultural implement travels across the field;

an imaging device configured to generate image data depicting a portion of the field; and

a computing system communicatively coupled to the imaging device, the computing system configured to:

identify a plurality of residue pieces present within the portion of the field based on the image data generated by the imaging device;

determine a number of residue pieces of the identified plurality of residue pieces having a length within a first length range;

determine a number of residue pieces of the identified plurality of residue pieces having a length within a second length range, the second length range being different from the first length range;

determine one of the first length range or the second length range having the greatest number of residue pieces associated therewith such that a characteristic length range for the portion of the field corresponds to the one of the first length range or the second length range having the greatest number of residue pieces associated therewith;

compare the determined characteristic length range to a previously determined characteristic length range;

when the determined characteristic length range differs from the previously determined characteristic length range, provide a notification to an operator of the agricultural implement that the characteristic length range has changed, the notification including a recommended operating parameter adjustment;

receive a first input from the operator indicative of acceptance of the recommended operating parameter adjustment or a second input from the operator indicative of rejection of the recommended operating parameter adjustment; and

automatically initiate the recommended operating parameter adjustment upon receipt of the first input.

2 . The agricultural implement of claim 1 , wherein, when providing the notification, the computing system is configured to initiate a visual display associated with the determined characteristic length range on a user interface.

3 . The agricultural implement of claim 2 , wherein the user interface is positioned within a cab of a work vehicle configured to tow the agricultural implement.

4 . The agricultural implement of claim 2 , wherein the user interface comprises a remote computing device.

5 . A system for controlling an operation of an agricultural implement, the system comprising:

an imaging device configured to generate image data depicting a portion of a field across which the agricultural implement is traveling; and

a computing system communicatively coupled to the imaging device, the computing system configured to:

identify a plurality of residue pieces present within the portion of the field based on the image data generated by the imaging device;

determine a number of residue pieces of the identified plurality of residue pieces having a length within a first length range;

determine a number of residue pieces of the identified plurality of residue pieces having a length within a second length range, the second length range being different from the first length range;

determine one of the first length range or the second length range having the greatest number of residue pieces associated therewith such that a characteristic length range for the portion of the field corresponds to the one of the first length range or the second length range having the greatest number of residue pieces associated therewith;

compare the determined characteristic length range to a previously determined characteristic length range;

when the determined characteristic length range differs from the previously determined characteristic length range, provide a notification to an operator of the agricultural implement that the characteristic length range has changed, the notification including a recommended operating parameter adjustment;

receive a first input from the operator indicative of acceptance of the recommended operating parameter adjustment or a second input from the operator indicative of rejection of the recommended operating parameter adjustment; and

automatically initiate the recommended operating parameter adjustment upon receipt of the first input.

6 . The system of claim 5 , wherein, when providing the notification to the operator that the characteristic length range has changed, the computing system is further configured to provide a recommended operating parameter adjustment to the operator.

7 . The system of claim 6 , wherein the recommended operating parameter adjustment comprises at least one of a recommended disk gang angle for the agricultural implement or a recommended direction of travel for the agricultural implement.

8 . The system of claim 5 , wherein, when providing the notification, the computing system is configured to initiate a visual display associated with the determined characteristic length range on a user interface.

9 . The system of claim 8 , wherein the user interface is positioned within a cab of a work vehicle configured to tow the agricultural implement.

10 . The system of claim 8 , wherein the user interface comprises a remote computing device.

11 . A method for controlling an operation of an agricultural implement, the method comprising:

receiving, with a computing system, image data depicting a portion of a field across which the agricultural implement is traveling;

identifying, with the computing system, a plurality of residue pieces present within the portion of the field based on the received image data;

determining, with the computing system, a number of residue pieces of the identified plurality of residue pieces having a length within a first length range;

determining, with the computing system, a number of residue pieces of the identified plurality of residue pieces having a length within a second length range, the second length range being different from the first length range;

determining, with the computing system, one of the first length range or the second length range having the greatest number of residue pieces associated therewith such that a characteristic length range for the portion of the field corresponds to the one of the first length range or the second length range having the greatest number of residue pieces associated therewith;

comparing, with the computing system, the determined characteristic length range to a previously determined characteristic length range;

when the determined characteristic length range differs from the previously determined characteristic length range, providing, with the computing system, a notification to an operator of the agricultural implement that the characteristic length range has changed, the notification including a recommended operating parameter adjustment;

receiving, with the computing system, a first input from the operator indicative of acceptance of the recommended operating parameter adjustment or a second input from the operator indicative of rejection of the recommended operating parameter adjustment; and

automatically initiating, with the computing system, the recommended operating parameter adjustment upon receipt of the first input.

12 . The method of claim 11 , wherein the recommended operating parameter adjustment comprises at least one of a recommended disk gang angle for the agricultural implement or a recommended direction of travel for the agricultural implement.

Assignments (2)
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Apr 7, 2026
From: CNH INDUSTRIAL AMERICA LLC
To: BLUE LEAF I.P., INC.
Reel/Frame 075345/0217 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Sep 7, 2022
From: SCHROEDER, BRITTANY
To: CNH INDUSTRIAL AMERICA LLC
Reel/Frame 061015/0582 →
Continuity (1)
Related Publication 20240074342A1 · Mar 7, 2024
References Cited (62)
US 6253136B1 · Stratton · 2001 [cited by examiner]
US 8576056B2 · Clair et al. · 2013 [cited by applicant]
US 9554098B2 · Casper et al. · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 9600872B2 · Dima · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 10524409B2 · Posselius et al. · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 10687476B2 · Gowa · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 10721859B2 · Wu et al. · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 10813265B2 · Stanhope · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 10820472B2 · Stahope et al. · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 10820476B2 · Stoller et al. · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 11058045B2 · Harmon · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 11259455B2 · Johnson et al. · 2022 [cited by applicant]
US 11266056B2 · Nair et al. · 2022 [cited by applicant]
US 11277956B2 · Bertucci et al. · 2022 [cited by applicant]
US 11360984B1 · Zicari · 2022 [cited by examiner]
US 20190090432A1 · Duquette · 2019 [cited by examiner]
US 20190104947A1 · Shigemori · 2019 [cited by examiner]
US 20190124819A1 · Madsen et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 20200344939A1 · Sporrer · 2020 [cited by examiner]
US 20200352081A1 · Arnett et al. · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 20200352088A1 · Arnett · 2020 [cited by examiner]
US 20210007266A1 · Stoller et al. · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 20210080586A1 · Dasika et al. · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 20210084803A1 · Harmon et al. · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 20210084820A1 · Vandike et al. · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 20210153420A1 · Smith · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 20210176912A1 · Harmon · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 20210212249A1 · Disberger et al. · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 20210259148A1 · Schmidt · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 20210267115A1 · Fjelstad et al. · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 20220101554A1 · Fu · 2022 [cited by examiner]
US 20220117153A1 · Nielsen · 2022 [cited by applicant]
US 20220117215A1 · Sibley · 2022 [cited by examiner]
US 20220262027A1 · Henry · 2022 [cited by examiner]
US 20220264783A1 · Johnson · 2022 [cited by examiner]
US 20230050483A1 · Bout · 2023 [cited by examiner]
CN 109937685A · 2019 [cited by applicant]
CN 112237087A · 2021 [cited by applicant]
DE 10351861A1 · 2005 [cited by applicant]
DE 102017130694A1 · 2019 [cited by applicant]
DE 102018200411A1 · 2019 [cited by applicant]
DE 102018213212A1 · 2020 [cited by applicant]
EP 2936957A1 · 2015 [cited by applicant]
EP 2545761B1 · 2016 [cited by applicant]
EP 3189719A1 · 2017 [cited by applicant]
EP 3167698B1 · 2020 [cited by applicant]
EP 3732941A1 · 2020 [cited by applicant]
EP 3981232 · 2022 [cited by applicant]
WO WO2020217106A1 · 2020 [cited by applicant]
WO WO2020231934 · 2020 [cited by applicant]
Walker, Jeffrey, “Statistics in Criminal Justice: Analysis and Interpretation”, 1999, Aspen Publishing, 1st Edition, pp. 74-75. (Year : 1999). [cited by examiner]
Modal Class Interval—Corbettmaths—https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Cwk6_6RpJ3o (corbettmaths) (2:45-4:52) (Year: 2021). [cited by examiner]
The modal and median class from grouped data—https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UzSdTd4eTll (Mark Willis) (0:00-0:30) (Year : 2015). [cited by examiner]
Screen Captures from YouTube Video Clip “Lavori conto terzi vigna in Sardegna. Impresa Agricola Piga Franco Villaputzu” Uploaded on Mar. 10, 2014, by user “Cavalliecavalli macchine agricole in Sardegna” (7 pages). Retri… [cited by applicant]
Screen Captures from YouTube Video Clip “3D sensor on a tractor—on the way to agriculture 4.0” Uploaded on Oct. 27, 2015, by user “ifm group of companies” (6 pages) Retrieved from Internet: https://www.youtube.com/watch… [cited by applicant]
Screen Captures from YouTube Video Clip “Vertical Tillage—Viking” Uploaded on Aug. 9, 2016, by user “Versatile” (6 pages) Retrieved from Internet: https://www.youtube.com/watch?y=hSyQEdvzwtU. [cited by applicant]
“Grain Harvesting” Combines and Front End Equipment John Deere (44 pages) https://www.deere.com/assets/pdfs/region-1/products/combines/2018 S700-Series Combine.pdf. [cited by applicant]
Dan Crummett “Variable Intensity Tillage Offers Solutions for Varying Soil Conditions” Niche Equipment Markets Manufacturer News Mar. 18, 2019 (11 pages) https://www.farm-equipment.com/articles/16770-variable-intensity-… [cited by applicant]
Jessie Scott “Dynamically Adjustable Tillage System From Gates Manufacturing” Jun. 16. 2015 (3 pages) https://www.agriculture.com/machinery/precision-agriculture/dynamically-adjustable-tillage-system_234-ar49223. [cited by applicant]
“VT Flex™ 435 Vertical Tillage Tool” Specifications Case IH (4 pages) https://assets.cnhindustrial.com/caseih/NAFTA/NAFTAASSETS/Products/Tillage/Vertical-Tillage/Brochures/VT-FLEX_435_Spec_Sheet_10-21_CIH21100801_pages.… [cited by applicant]
J.M. Guerrero, et al. “Automatic expert system based on images for accuracy crop row detection in maize fields” Expert Systems with Applications 40 (2013) 656-665 Elsevier Ltd. (9 pages) https://oa.upm.es/32345/1/INVE_M… [cited by applicant]
Björn Åstrand, et al. “An Agricultural Mobile Robot with Vision-Based Perception for Mechanical Weed Control” Autonomous Robots 13, 21-35, 2002 2002 Kluwer Academic Publishers (15 pages) https://sci-hub.hkvisa.net/10.10… [cited by applicant]