IP Library Granted Patent US 12,431,129
Granted Patent B2
US 12,431,129 · App. 17/951,715 · Granted Sep 30, 2025

Voice assistant error detection system

Inventors: Markus Funk (Merelbeke, BE); Holger Quast (Ghent, BE)
Assignee: Cerence
G10L15/1815G10L15/22G10L15/30G10L25/63G10L2015/223
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 12,431,129
App. No.
17/951,715
Granted
Sep 30, 2025
Kind
B2
Abstract

A vehicle system for classifying spoken utterance within a vehicle cabin as one of system-directed and non-system directed, the system may include at least one microphone configured to detect at least one acoustic utterance from at least one occupant of a vehicle, at least one sensor to detect user behavior data indicative of user behavior, and a processor programmed to: receive the acoustic utterance, classify the acoustic utterance as one of a system-directed utterance and a non-system directed utterance, determine whether the acoustic utterance was properly classified based on user behavior observed via data received from the sensor after the classification, and apply a mitigating adjustment to classifications of subsequent acoustic utterances based on an improper classification.

Claims (29)

1. A vehicle system for classifying spoken utterance within a vehicle cabin as one of system-directed and non-system directed, the system comprising:

at least one microphone configured to detect at least one acoustic utterance from at least one occupant of a vehicle;

at least one sensor to detect user behavior data indicative of user behavior; and

a processor programmed to:

receive the acoustic utterance,

classify the acoustic utterance as one of a system-directed utterance and a non-system directed utterance,

determine whether the acoustic utterance was properly classified based on user behavior observed via data received from the sensor after the classification, and

apply a mitigating adjustment to classifications of subsequent acoustic utterances based on an improper classification, wherein the mitigating adjustment includes adjusting a confidence threshold for determining whether the acoustic utterance is one of a system-directed utterance and a non-system directed utterance.

2. The system of claim 1 , wherein the processor is further programmed to transmit and receive the mitigating adjustment from an off-board server.

3. The system of claim 1 , wherein the user behavior includes repeating of the acoustic utterance.

4. The system of claim 1 , wherein the user behavior includes a corrective command.

5. The system of claim 1 , wherein the user behavior includes a subsequent acoustic utterance with differing pronunciation or tone than that of the prior acoustic utterance.

6. The system of claim 1 , wherein the user behavior includes an action indicative of canceling of the acoustic utterance.

7. The system of claim 1 , wherein the user behavior includes a subsequent acoustic utterance including a profanity.

8. A method for classifying spoken utterances within a vehicle cabin as one of system-directed and non-system directed, the method comprising:

receiving an acoustic utterance;

classifying the acoustic utterance as one of a system-directed utterance and a non-system directed utterance;

determining whether the acoustic utterance was properly classified based on user behavior observed via data received from a sensor after the classification; and

applying a mitigating adjustment to classifications of subsequent acoustic utterances based on an improper classification, wherein the mitigating adjustment includes identifying an error specific to a semantic domain and ignoring classification of that domain.

9. The method of claim 8 , further comprising transmitting and receiving the mitigating adjustment from an off-board server.

10. The method of claim 8 , wherein the user behavior includes repeating of the acoustic utterance.

11. The method of claim 8 , wherein the user behavior includes a corrective command.

12. The method of claim 8 , wherein the user behavior includes a subsequent acoustic utterance with differing pronunciation or tone than that of the prior acoustic utterance.

13. The method of claim 8 , wherein the user behavior includes an action indicative of canceling of the acoustic utterance.

14. A non-transitory computer-readable medium storing computer-executable instructions, that when executed by at least one processor, cause the at least one processor to:

receive an acoustic utterance,

classify the acoustic utterance as one of a system-directed utterance and a non-system directed utterance,

determine whether the acoustic utterance was properly classified based on user behavior observed via data received from a sensor after the classification, and

apply a mitigating adjustment to classifications of subsequent acoustic utterances based on an improper classification, wherein the mitigating adjustment includes identifying an error specific to a dialog and situation and ignoring classification during the situation.

Assignments (3)
RELEASE (REEL 067417 / FRAME 0303) Recorded Jan 2, 2025
From: WELLS FARGO BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION
To: CERENCE OPERATING COMPANY
Reel/Frame 069797/0422 →
SECURITY AGREEMENT Recorded Apr 15, 2024
From: CERENCE OPERATING COMPANY
To: WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A., AS COLLATERAL AGENT
Reel/Frame 067417/0303 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Sep 26, 2022
From: FUNK, MARKUS; QUAST, HOLGER
To: CERENCE OPERATING COMPANY
Reel/Frame 061214/0883 →
Continuity (2)
Provisional Application 63249250 · Sep 28, 2021
Related Publication 20230103202A1 · Mar 30, 2023
References Cited (16)
US 11776534B1 · Kulakarni · 2023 [cited by examiner]
US 11809480B1 · Cheng · 2023 [cited by examiner]
US 11899714B1 · Bueche · 2024 [cited by examiner]
US 20030023432A1 · Kyomitsu · 2003 [cited by examiner]
US 20030061029A1 · Shaket · 2003 [cited by examiner]
US 20140278391A1 · Braho · 2014 [cited by examiner]
US 20160014273A1 · Joh · 2016 [cited by examiner]
US 20170076734A1 · Subasingha · 2017 [cited by examiner]
US 20200220935A1 · Bao · 2020 [cited by examiner]
US 20200380212A1 · Butler · 2020 [cited by examiner]
US 20210074285A1 · Golikov · 2021 [cited by examiner]
US 20210383796A1 · Coucke · 2021 [cited by examiner]
US 20210407520A1 · Neckermann · 2021 [cited by examiner]
US 20220293125A1 · Maddika · 2022 [cited by examiner]
US 20220358914A1 · Eda · 2022 [cited by examiner]
US 20230325146A1 · Mistry · 2023 [cited by examiner]