IP Library Granted Patent US 12,417,827
Granted Patent B2
US 12,417,827 · App. 17/961,900 · Granted Sep 16, 2025

Telecommunication apparatus and method

Inventor: Sanjay Prasad (Rockville, MD)
Assignee: SurgiPrice, Inc.
G16H10/60
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 12,417,827
App. No.
17/961,900
Granted
Sep 16, 2025
Kind
B2
Abstract

Telecommunication systems and telecommunication devices can be configured for collecting and corroborating medical data obtained from at least one electronic medical record database via at least one network connection (e.g. the internet, an intranet, a local area network, a wide area network, etc.). Embodiments can be configured to corroborate data obtained to confirm user input that has been entered by a user is corroborated by other medical record documentation. Embodiments can help evaluate self-reported data provided by a care provider user to provide an objective evaluation of that data to minimize misrepresentative data or inaccurate data being utilized in conjunction with one or more telecommunication services that can be hosted by the system or device.

Claims (32)

1. A telecommunication apparatus comprising:

a host device having a processor connectable to a non-transitory computer readable medium, the host device configured to communicate with at least one electronic health record (EHR) device, at least one practice management element, at least one care provider device, and at least one patient device via at least one network;

the host device configured to query electronic medical records stored at least one of the EHR device and the at least one practice management element and compare self-reported data associated with a care provider received via the at least one care provider device with medical records associated with the care provider accessible via the at least one of the EHR device and the at least one practice management element;

wherein the host device is configured to evaluate at least one success measure based on a pre-selected success criteria and at least one complication measure based on pre-selected complication criteria from comparing the self-reported data with data from the queried medical records to corroborate the self-reported data via evaluation of pre-operative diagnostic records and post-operative diagnostic records of the medical records to identify events in which a side or site of a patient identified in the pre-operative diagnostic records does not match a side or site of the patient identified in the post-operative diagnostic records to determine a rate of complication measure for the care provider.

2. The telecommunication apparatus of claim 1 , wherein the host device is also configured to evaluate the at least one success measure based on the pre-selected success criteria and the at least one complication measure based on the pre-selected complication criteria from comparing the self-reported data with data from the queried medical records to corroborate the self-reported data via identifying keywords associated with complications in operative notes of at least one of the medical records and office visit records of the medical records to determine the rate of complication measure for the care provider.

3. The telecommunication apparatus of claim 2 , wherein the host device is configured to filter the corroborated self-reported data based on filtering input received via the at least one patient device to display care provider data responsive to the filtering input.

4. The telecommunication apparatus of claim 3 , wherein the filtered corroborated self-reported data is prioritizable based on a pre-selected prioritization weighing function so that care provider data is displayable via a graphical use interface (GUI) displayed at the at least one patient device in accordance with a ranking defined by the weighing function that is determined by the host device.

5. The telecommunication apparatus of claim 2 , wherein the pre-selected success criteria includes a generated quality metric for a critical view of safety (CVS) criteria, the quality metric for CVS being determinable by the host device via a recognition of anatomical structure outlines from at least one of image data and video data received from the at least one patient device associated with a care provider.

6. The telecommunication apparatus of claim 1 , including at least one of: the at least one patient device, the at least one care provider device, the at least one practice management element, the at least one EHR device, and the at least one network.

7. A method of telecommunication, comprising:

a host device communicating with at least one of: at least one electronic health record (EHR) device and at least one practice management element to query electronic medical records stored at the at least one of the EHR device and the at least one practice management element, the host device having a processor connected to a non-transitory computer readable medium;

the host device comparing self-reported data associated with a care provider received via at least one care provider device with medical records associated with the care provider accessible via the communicating with the EHR device and the at least one practice management element, wherein the comparing of the self-reported data associated with the care provider received via the at least one care provider device with medical records associated with the care provider includes evaluating pre-operative diagnostic records and post-operative diagnostic records of the medical records to identify events in which a side or site of a patient identified in the pre-operative diagnostic records does not match a side or site of the patient identified in the post-operative diagnostic records to determine a complication rate for at least one complication measure for the care provider.

8. The method of claim 7 , comprising:

the host device evaluating at least one success measure based on at least one of a pre-selected success criteria and the at least one complication measure based on pre-selected complication criteria from comparing the self-reported data with data from the queried medical records to corroborate the self-reported data via identifying keywords associated with complications in at least one of operative notes of the medical records and office visit records of the medical records to determine the rate for the at least one complication measure for the care provider.

9. The method of claim 8 , comprising:

the host device filtering the corroborated self-reported data based on filtering input received from at least one patient device to display care provider data responsive to the filtering input.

10. The method of claim 9 , comprising:

the host device prioritizing the filtered corroborated self-reported data based on a pre-selected prioritization weighing function so that care provider data is displayable via a graphical user interface (GUI) displayed at the at least one patient device in accordance with a ranking defined by the weighing function that is determined by the host device.

11. The method of claim 8 , wherein the pre-selected success criteria includes a generated quality metric for a critical view of safety (CVS) criteria, the quality metric for CVS being determinable by the host device via a recognition of anatomical structure outlines from at least one of image data and video data received from the at least one patient device associated with a care provider.

12. The method of claim 8 , wherein the at least one success measure includes a success rate and the at least one complication measure includes the complication rate.

13. A non-transitory computer readable medium having an application stored thereon, the application defining a method that is performed by a telecommunication device that runs the application, the method comprising:

the telecommunication device communicating with at least one of at least one electronic health record (EHR) device and at least one practice management element to query electronic medical records stored at the at least one of the EHR device and the at least one practice management element;

the telecommunication device comparing self-reported data associated with a care provider received via at least one care provider device with medical records associated with the care provider accessible via the communicating with the EHR device and the at least one practice management element, wherein the comparing of the self-reported data associated with the care provider received via the at least one care provider device with medical records associated with the care provider includes evaluating pre-operative diagnostic records and post-operative diagnostic records of the medical records to identify events in which a side or site of a patient identified in the pre-operative diagnostic records does not match a side or site of the patient identified in the post-operative diagnostic records to determine a complication rate for at least one complication measure for the care provider.

14. The non-transitory computer readable medium of claim 13 , wherein the method comprises:

the telecommunication device evaluating at least one success measure based on a pre-selected success criteria and the at least one complication measure based on pre-selected complication criteria from comparing the self-reported data with data from the queried medical records to corroborate the self-reported data via identifying keywords associated with complications in at least one of operative notes of the medical records and office visit records of the medical records to determine the rate for the at least one complication measure for the care provider.

15. The non-transitory computer readable medium of claim 14 , wherein the method comprises:

the telecommunication device filtering the corroborated self-reported data based on filtering input received from at least one patient device to display care provider data responsive to the filtering input.

16. The non-transitory computer readable medium of claim 15 , wherein the method comprises:

the telecommunication device prioritizing the filtered corroborated self-reported data based on a pre-selected prioritization weighing function so that care provider data is displayable via a graphical user interface (GUI) displayed at the at least one patient device in accordance with a ranking defined by the weighing function that is determined by the host device.

17. The non-transitory computer readable medium of claim 14 , wherein the pre-selected success criteria includes a generated quality metric for a critical view of safety (CVS) criteria, the method also comprising:

the telecommunication device determining a quality metric for CVS via a recognition of anatomical structure outlines from at least one of image data and video data received from the at least one patient device associated with a care provider.

18. The non-transitory computer readable medium of claim 14 , wherein the at least one success measure includes a success rate and the at least one complication measure includes the complication rate.

Assignments (1)
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Oct 31, 2022
From: PRSAD, SANJAY
To: SURGIPRICE, INC.
Reel/Frame 061589/0555 →
Continuity (2)
Provisional Application 63278695 · Nov 12, 2021
Related Publication 20230154579A1 · May 18, 2023
References Cited (50)
US 7260480B1 · Brown · 2007 [cited by examiner]
US 9129054B2 · Nawana · 2015 [cited by examiner]
US 9171285B2 · Greene · 2015 [cited by examiner]
US 9928342B1 · LaBorde · 2018 [cited by examiner]
US 10014076B1 · LaBorde · 2018 [cited by examiner]
US 10043591B1 · LaBorde · 2018 [cited by examiner]
US 10186329B1 · LaBorde · 2019 [cited by examiner]
US 10192636B1 · LaBorde · 2019 [cited by examiner]
US 10319476B1 · LaBorde · 2019 [cited by examiner]
US 10388410B1 · LaBorde · 2019 [cited by examiner]
US 10460837B1 · LaBorde · 2019 [cited by examiner]
US 10482377B1 · LaBorde · 2019 [cited by examiner]
US 10628739B1 · LaBorde · 2020 [cited by examiner]
US 10777306B1 · LaBorde · 2020 [cited by examiner]
US 10783991B1 · LaBorde · 2020 [cited by examiner]
US 11238962B1 · LaBorde · 2022 [cited by examiner]
US 11355223B1 · LaBorde · 2022 [cited by examiner]
US 11593606B1 · LaBorde · 2023 [cited by examiner]
US 11705242B2 · Pfeiffer · 2023 [cited by examiner]
US 11735299B1 · LaBorde · 2023 [cited by examiner]
US 20030191668A1 · Oka et al. · 2003 [cited by applicant]
US 20050187794A1 · Kimak · 2005 [cited by applicant]
US 20060149593A1 · Wager · 2006 [cited by applicant]
US 20060161456A1 · Baker et al. · 2006 [cited by applicant]
US 20070027720A1 · Hasan et al. · 2007 [cited by applicant]
US 20070156455A1 · Tarino et al. · 2007 [cited by applicant]
US 20080177576A1 · Jennings et al. · 2008 [cited by applicant]
US 20120310661A1 · Greene · 2012 [cited by examiner]
US 20130246084A1 · Parmanto et al. · 2013 [cited by applicant]
US 20140240444A1 · Szymczyk et al. · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 20150261917A1 · Smith · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 20150287082A1 · Agarwal · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 20150294079A1 · Bergougnan · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 20170011192A1 · Arshad et al. · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 20170249435A1 · Lancelot · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 20170323485A1 · Samec et al. · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 20180226158A1 · Fish et al. · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 20180360295A1 · Boucher et al. · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 20190392931A1 · Abousy et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 20200311781A1 · Kalmat · 2020 [cited by examiner]
US 20210240852A1 · Shelton et al. · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 20210304860A1 · Hart et al. · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 20210350915A1 · Letinic · 2021 [cited by examiner]
US 20240233895A1 · LaBorde · 2024 [cited by examiner]
EP 2000934A1 · 2008 [cited by examiner]
WO WO2006125145A2 · 2006 [cited by examiner]
WO WO2008149300A1 · 2008 [cited by examiner]
Demiris, Elsevier, 2019, pp. 311-330. [cited by examiner]
International Search Report for Application No. PCT/US2022/048514 dated Mar. 9, 2023. [cited by applicant]
Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority for Application No. PCT/US2022/048514 dated Mar. 9, 2023. [cited by applicant]