Addressable measurement framework
Example methods, apparatus, systems and articles of manufacture to implement an addressable measurement framework are disclosed. Example apparatus disclosed herein perform a common homes analysis of provider data and panel data to determine a coverage footprint associated with the provider data, the provider data including at least one of return path data reported by a plurality of set-top boxes or automatic content recognition data reported by a plurality of smart media devices, and the panel data reported by media device meters. Disclosed example apparatus also weight a portion of the provider data based on the common homes analysis, weight a portion of the panel data based on the common homes analysis, and calculate an addressable advertisement rating based on the weighted portion of the provider data and the weighted portion of the panel data.
1. An apparatus comprising:
interface circuitry;
machine readable instructions; and
programmable circuitry to execute the machine readable instructions to at least:
perform a comparison of provider data and panel data to identify a bias between a first segment of a coverage footprint associated with the provider data and a second segment of the coverage footprint associated with the provider data, the provider data including at least one of return path data or automatic content recognition data reported by media devices, the panel data reported by media device meters, the first segment of the coverage footprint associated with a first media device type, the second segment of the coverage footprint associated with a second media device type;
weight a portion of the provider data to determine a weighted portion of the provider data to represent the first segment of the coverage footprint;
weight a portion of the panel data to determine a weighted portion of the panel data to represent the second segment of the coverage footprint; and
output an addressable advertisement rating based on the weighted portion of the provider data and the weighted portion of the panel data.
2. The apparatus of claim 1 , wherein the first media device type includes first ones of the media devices that are able to report return path data, and the second media device type includes second ones of the media devices that are unable to report return path data.
3. The apparatus of claim 1 , wherein the first media device type includes first ones of the media devices that are able to perform automatic content recognition, and the second media device type includes second ones of the media devices that are unable to perform automatic content recognition.
4. The apparatus of claim 1 , wherein the programmable circuitry is to:
identify addressable advertisement impressions represented in the provider data; and
calculate, based on the weighted portion of the provider data and the weighted portion of the panel data, the addressable advertisement rating to represent audience exposure to the addressable advertisement impressions.
5. The apparatus of claim 4 , wherein the programmable circuitry is to remove the addressable advertisement impressions from calculation of a linear advertisement rating different from the addressable advertisement rating.
6. The apparatus of claim 1 , wherein the bias is associated with a difference in device tuning data characteristics between the first segment of the coverage footprint associated with a first media device type and the second segment of the coverage footprint associated with a second media device type.
7. The apparatus of claim 1 , wherein the programmable circuitry is to control at least one of selection or delivery of addressable advertisements to one or more target devices based on the addressable advertisement rating.
8. At least one non-transitory computer readable medium comprising computer readable instructions to cause one or more processors to at least:
perform a comparison of provider data and panel data to identify a bias between a first segment of a coverage footprint associated with the provider data and a second segment of the coverage footprint associated with the provider data, the provider data including at least one of return path data or automatic content recognition data reported by media devices, the panel data reported by media device meters, the first segment of the coverage footprint associated with a first media device type, the second segment of the coverage footprint associated with a second media device type;
weight a portion of the provider data to determine a weighted portion of the provider data to represent the first segment of the coverage footprint;
weight a portion of the panel data to determine a weighted portion of the panel data to represent the second segment of the coverage footprint; and
output an addressable advertisement rating based on the weighted portion of the provider data and the weighted portion of the panel data.
9. The at least one non-transitory computer readable medium of claim 8 , wherein the first media device type includes first ones of the media devices that are able to report return path data, and the second media device type includes second ones of the media devices that are unable to report return path data.
10. The at least one non-transitory computer readable medium of claim 8 , wherein the first media device type includes first ones of the media devices that are able to perform automatic content recognition, and the second media device type includes second ones of the media devices that are unable to perform automatic content recognition.
11. The at least one non-transitory computer readable medium of claim 8 , wherein the instructions are to cause the one or more processors to:
identify addressable advertisement impressions represented in the provider data; and
calculate, based on the weighted portion of the provider data and the weighted portion of the panel data, the addressable advertisement rating to represent audience exposure to the addressable advertisement impressions.
12. The at least one non-transitory computer readable medium of claim 11 , wherein the instructions are to cause the one or more processors to remove the addressable advertisement impressions from calculation of a linear advertisement rating different from the addressable advertisement rating.
13. The at least one non-transitory computer readable medium of claim 8 , wherein the bias is associated with a difference in device tuning data characteristics between the first segment of the coverage footprint associated with a first media device type and the second segment of the coverage footprint associated with a second media device type.
14. The at least one non-transitory computer readable medium of claim 8 , wherein the instructions are to cause the one or more processors to control at least one of selection or delivery of addressable advertisements to one or more target devices based on the addressable advertisement rating.
15. A method comprising:
performing, by executing an instruction with one or more processors, a comparison of provider data and panel data to identify a bias between a first segment of a coverage footprint associated with the provider data and a second segment of the coverage footprint associated with the provider data, the provider data including at least one of return path data or automatic content recognition data reported by media devices, the panel data reported by media device meters, the first segment of the coverage footprint associated with a first media device type, the second segment of the coverage footprint associated with a second media device type;
weighting, by executing an instruction with the one or more processors, a portion of the provider data to determine a weighted portion of the provider data to represent the first segment of the coverage footprint;
weighting, by executing an instruction with the one or more processors, a portion of the panel data to determine a weighted portion of the panel data to represent the second segment of the coverage footprint; and
outputting an addressable advertisement rating based on the weighted portion of the provider data and the weighted portion of the panel data.
16. The method of claim 15 , wherein the first media device type includes first ones of the media devices that are able to report return path data, and the second media device type includes second ones of the media devices that are unable to report return path data.
17. The method of claim 15 , wherein the first media device type includes first ones of the media devices that are able to perform automatic content recognition, and the second media device type includes second ones of the media devices that are unable to perform automatic content recognition.
18. The method of claim 15 , further including:
identifying addressable advertisement impressions represented in the provider data; and
calculating, based on the weighted portion of the provider data and the weighted portion of the panel data, the addressable advertisement rating to represent audience exposure to the addressable advertisement impressions.
19. The method of claim 18 , further including removing the addressable advertisement impressions from calculation of a linear advertisement rating different from the addressable advertisement rating.
20. The method of claim 15 , wherein the bias is associated with a difference in device tuning data characteristics between the first segment of the coverage footprint associated with a first media device type and the second segment of the coverage footprint associated with a second media device type.