IP Library Granted Patent US 12,439,106
Granted Patent B2
US 12,439,106 · App. 17/966,556 · Granted Oct 7, 2025

Bandwidth-adaptive light field video transmission on mobile and portable devices

Inventors: Dhananjay Lal (Englewood, CO); Reda Harb (Issaquah, WA)
Assignee: Adeia Guides Inc.
H04N21/2385H04N21/2402
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 12,439,106
App. No.
17/966,556
Granted
Oct 7, 2025
Kind
B2
Abstract

Systems and methods for bandwidth-adaptive light field video transmission on mobile and portable devices is disclosed. An upstream bandwidth is estimated. A request for a service tier for capture and transmission of light field content is received, wherein the light field content comprises an image array of a plurality of sub-aperture images. When the requested service tier is greater than the estimated upstream bandwidth, a reduced service tier is determined based on the estimated upstream bandwidth. A number of sub-aperture images comprising a reduced image array is determined based on the reduced service tier. The image array is reduced to the reduced image array based on feature saliency and adjacency of sub-aperture images. Resources corresponding to the reduced service tier are provided for capture and transmission of the reduced image array.

Claims (56)

1. A method of live broadcasting of light field media content from a capture device, comprising:

estimating an upstream bandwidth available to the capture device for uploading content in a network;

receiving, from the capture device, a request for a first service tier from a plurality of service tiers, wherein each service tier is based on a different network condition and is associated with a different respective quality level of network resources for transmission and processing of the light field media content captured by the capture device, the light field media content comprising an image array;

determining that a bandwidth associated with the first service tier is greater than the estimated upstream bandwidth;

determining a second service tier based on the estimated upstream bandwidth, wherein the second service tier is associated with a lower quality level of network resources than the first service tier;

determining parameters for reducing the image array to a reduced image array based on the second service tier, wherein determining the parameters comprises selecting a number of sub-aperture images from the image array based on maximizing feature saliency of the image array;

allocating, to the capture device, resources corresponding to the second service tier for transmission of the reduced image array; and

allocating, in a cloud system, resources corresponding to the second service tier for processing the transmitted reduced image array.

2. The method of claim 1 , further comprising:

determining the bandwidth associated with the first service tier is not greater than the estimated upstream bandwidth;

allocating, to the capture device, resources corresponding to the first service tier for transmission of the image array; and

allocating, in the cloud system, resources corresponding to the first service tier for processing the transmitted image array.

3. The method of claim 1 , further comprising:

estimating the upstream bandwidth periodically;

in response to determining a drop in the upstream bandwidth, determining the bandwidth associated with the second service tier exceeds the dropped upstream bandwidth;

determining a third service tier based on the dropped upstream bandwidth, wherein the third service tier is associated with a lower quality level of network resources than the second service tier;

determining parameters for reducing the image array to a second reduced image array;

allocating, to the capture device, resources corresponding to the third service tier for transmission of the second reduced image array; and

allocating, in the cloud system, resources corresponding to the third service tier for processing the transmitted second reduced image array.

4. The method of claim 1 ,

wherein the reduced image array comprises the selected sub-aperture images.

5. The method of claim 1 , further comprising:

selecting each of the number of sub-aperture images from the image array such that each selected sub-aperture image is adjacent to at least one other selected sub-aperture image.

6. The method of claim 1 , wherein the transmission of the reduced image array at the second service tier corresponds to a reduced cone of view of the light field media content when rendered at a display device.

7. The method of claim 6 , wherein the transmission of the reduced image array at the second service tier minimizes a loss of quality of the rendered light field media content resulting from the reduced cone of view.

8. The method of claim 6 , wherein a type of the reduced cone of view comprises at least one of a parallax in all cardinal directions, asymmetrical parallax, horizontal parallax, vertical parallax, or diagonal parallax.

9. The method of claim 8 , further comprising:

determining, for rendering at the display device, the type of the reduced cone of view based on at least one of the second service tier, maximizing feature saliency, maximizing perspective-accurate viewing, or supporting a particular parallax.

10. The method of claim 1 , wherein the resources comprise at least one of a network resource, compute resource, or storage resource.

11. The method of claim 1 , wherein the capture device is coupled to at least one of a camera or a microlens array.

12. A system for live broadcasting of light field media content from a capture device, the system comprising:

input/output circuitry configured to:

receive, from the capture device, a request for a first service tier from a plurality of service tiers, wherein each service tier is based on a different network condition and is associated with a different respective quality level of network resources for transmission and processing of the light field media content captured by the capture device, the light field media content comprising an image array; and

a control circuitry configured to:

estimate an upstream bandwidth available to the capture device for uploading content in a network;

determine that a bandwidth associated with the first service tier is greater than the estimated upstream bandwidth;

determine a second service tier based on the estimated upstream bandwidth, wherein the second service tier is associated with a lower quality level of network resources than the first service tier;

determine parameters for reducing the image array to a reduced image array based on the second service tier, wherein determining the parameters comprises selecting a number of sub-aperture images from the image array based on maximizing feature saliency of the image array;

allocate, to the capture device, resources corresponding to the second service tier for transmission of the reduced image array; and

allocate, in a cloud system, resources corresponding to the second service tier for processing the transmitted reduced image array.

13. The system of claim 12 , wherein the control circuitry is further configured to:

determine the bandwidth associated with the first service tier is not greater than the estimated upstream bandwidth;

allocate, to the capture device, resources corresponding to the first service tier for transmission of the image array; and

allocate, in the cloud system, resources corresponding to the first service tier for processing the transmitted image array.

14. The system of claim 12 , wherein the control circuitry is further configured to:

estimate the upstream bandwidth periodically;

in response to determining a drop in the upstream bandwidth, determine the bandwidth associated with the second service tier exceeds the dropped upstream bandwidth;

determine a third service tier based on the dropped upstream bandwidth, wherein the third service tier is associated with a lower quality level of network resources than the second service tier;

determine parameters for reducing the image array to a second reduced image array;

allocate, to the capture device, resources corresponding to the third service tier for transmission of the second reduced image array; and

allocate, in the cloud system, resources corresponding to the third service tier for processing the transmitted second reduced image array.

15. The system of claim 12 , wherein the reduced image array comprises the selected sub-aperture images.

16. The system of claim 12 , wherein the control circuitry is further configured to:

select each of the number of sub-aperture images from the image array such that each selected sub-aperture image is adjacent to at least one other selected sub-aperture image.

17. The system of claim 12 , wherein the transmission of the reduced image array at the second service tier corresponds to a reduced cone of view of the light field media content when rendered at a display device.

18. The system of claim 17 , wherein a type of the reduced cone of view comprises at least one of a parallax in all cardinal directions, asymmetrical parallax, horizontal parallax, vertical parallax, or diagonal parallax.

Assignments (3)
CHANGE OF NAME Recorded Oct 4, 2024
From: ROVI GUIDES, INC.
To: ADEIA GUIDES INC.
Reel/Frame 069113/0420 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Jul 17, 2023
From: LAL, DHANANJAY; HARB, REDA
To: ROVI GUIDES, INC.
Reel/Frame 064285/0062 →
SECURITY INTEREST Recorded May 3, 2023
From: ADEIA GUIDES INC.; ADEIA IMAGING LLC; ADEIA MEDIA HOLDINGS LLC; ADEIA MEDIA SOLUTIONS INC.; ADEIA SEMICONDUCTOR ADVANCED TECHNOLOGIES INC.; ADEIA SEMICONDUCTOR BONDING TECHNOLOGIES INC.; ADEIA SEMICONDUCTOR INC.; ADEIA SEMICONDUCTOR SOLUTIONS LLC; ADEIA SEMICONDUCTOR TECHNOLOGIES LLC; ADEIA SOLUTIONS LLC
To: BANK OF AMERICA, N.A., AS COLLATERAL AGENT
Reel/Frame 063529/0272 →
Continuity (1)
Related Publication 20240129564A1 · Apr 18, 2024
References Cited (29)
US 20140169192A1 · Zhang · 2014 [cited by examiner]
US 20180322691A1 · Mitchell et al. · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 20200106959A1 · Molina · 2020 [cited by examiner]
US 20220264080A1 · Harviainen · 2022 [cited by examiner]
“Kush Gauge,” Captain Bodgit, http://captainbodgit.blogspot.com/p/blog-page_22.html. [cited by applicant]
“Cisco Visual Networking Index: Global Mobile Data Traffic Forecast Update, 2017-2022,” White Paper, Cisco Public (Feb. 2019). [cited by applicant]
“Light Field Imaging Technology,” Tech Briefs, Mar. 1, 2021. https://www.techbriefs.com/component/content/article/tb/supplements/pit/features/technology-leaders/38622. [cited by applicant]
“Light Field Selfie Camera,” WOOPTIX, https://wooptix.com/solutions/selfie-camera/. [cited by applicant]
“Lytro Lightfield Camera—General Info,” LightField Forum. http:/lightfield-forum.com/lytro/lytro-lightfield-camera/. [cited by applicant]
“SIMD in the GPU World,” RasterGrid Kft., https://www.rastergrid.com/blog/gpu-tech/2022/02/simd-in-the-gpu-world/. [cited by applicant]
“What Percentage of Internet Traffic is Mobile?,” Oberlo, https://www.oberlo.com/statistics/mobile-internet-traffic. [cited by applicant]
“World's First Holographic Smartphone Is Already There : The Future Is Now!,” YouTube, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nmzEe8j1TSM (Jun. 2018). [cited by applicant]
Gonzalez, Barb, “Internet Speed Requirements for Video Streaming,” LifeWire, https://www.lifewire.com/internet-speed-requirements-for-movie-viewing-1847401 (Nov. 2020). [cited by applicant]
Hollister, Sean, “Looking Glass might have just invented the GIF's 3D successor,” The Verge, Jun. 1, 2022. https://www.theverge.com/23132875/looking-glass-blocks-3d-vr-sharable-image. [cited by applicant]
Ip, Andrew et al., “The Cable Network, Immersive Experiences and Lightfields,” Broadband Library. https://broadbandlibrary.com/the-cable-network-immersive-experiences-and-lightfields/. [cited by applicant]
Kim, Meejin, et al., “Fusion Poser: 3D Human Pose Estimation Using Sparse IMUs and Head Trackers in Real Time,” Sensors 2022, 22, 4846. Https://doi.org/10.3390/s22134846. [cited by applicant]
Koniaris, Babis, et al., “Real-time Rendering with Compressed Animated Light Fields,” Graphics Interface 2017, May 16, 2017. [cited by applicant]
Levoy, Marc, et al., “Light Field Rendering,” Computer Science Department, Stanford University, Jul. 1996. [cited by applicant]
Marin-Jimenez, Manuel J. et al., “3D human pose estimation from depth maps using a deep combination of poses,” arXiv:1807.05389v1, Jul. 17, 2018. [cited by applicant]
Maguey, Thomas, et al., “Interactive Multiview Video System With Low Complexity 2D Look Around at Decoder,” IEEE Transactions on Multimedia, vol. 15, No. 5 (Aug. 2013). [cited by applicant]
Moss, Brent, “Want to See How Much Mobile Data Traffic is Video? (Hint: So Much!),” NabAmplify, https://amplify.nabshow.com/articles/video-represents-69-of-mobile-data-traffic-growing-to-79-by-2027-source-rapidtvnews/ (… [cited by applicant]
Pascual-Hernandez, David et al., “Efficient 3D human pose estimation from RGBD sensors,” Displays, vol. 74, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.displa.2022.102225 (Sep. 2022). [cited by applicant]
Pichler, Benjamin, “HDR Light Field,” Department of Computer Science (Institute of Computer Graphics), Johannes Kepler University Linz, Oct. 9, 2012. [cited by applicant]
Purcher, Jack, “Apple wins a major Light Field Camera patent that will allow iPhone owners to use Gestures to capture scenes from different positions & more,” Patently Apple, https://www.patentlyapple.com/2021/06/apple-… [cited by applicant]
Segan, Sascha, “RED Hydrogen One Review,” PCMag, https://www.pcmag.com/reviews/red-hydrogen-one (Dec. 2018). [cited by applicant]
Wu, Gaochang, et al., “Light Field Image Processing: An Overview,” Journal of Latex Class Files, vol. XX, No. X, Oct. 2017. [cited by applicant]
Haixu Han et al., “Plenoptic Image Compression via Simplified Subaperture Projection,” Sep. 19, 2018, Sat. 2015 18th International Conference, Austin TX, USA, Sep. 24-27, 2015, pp. 274-284 Lecture Notes. [cited by applicant]
PCT International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT/US2023/034953, dated Jan. 25, 2024. [cited by applicant]
Tu Wang et al., “Efficient Content Adaptive Plenoptic Video Coding,” IEEE Access, IEEE, USA, vol. 8, Jan. 6, 2020, pp. 5797-5804. [cited by applicant]